5IO rohwer: notes on sawflies
Tenthredo
(Schyzocera) calceola Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
582,nomen nudum.
1835.This
name was
never published in connection withany
description,but
in themanuscript
Hst of Harrisunder
no. 173 thename
is hsted ashaving been suppHed by
Say.To
this Harris hasadded
a note thatit is not a Schizocera but belongs to Lophyrus. Later Harris described part of the material
under
hisnumber
173 asLophyrus
ahietis, q. v.Tenthredo
(Lophyrus) flavida Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
582,nomen nudum.
1835.A nomen nudum and
notnow
representedby
specimens in the Harriscollection. %
Tenthredo (Hylotoma)
scutellata Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
582,nomen nudum.
1835.Hylotoma
scutellata Say,Boston
Journ. Nat. Hist, i: 211. 1836.Not
Lepeletier, 1823.A
rathercommon
speciesnow known
asAgre
sanguinea (Klug.).Tenthredo
(Allantus)sambuci
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
586,nomen nudum.
1833; ed. 2, 582,nomen nudum.
1835.Allantus epinotus Say, var. a (.4. sambuci Harris) Norton,
Boston
Journ. Nat. Hist. 7: 258. i860.Macrophya
epinotus Say, Norton, Trans.Amer.
Ent. Soc. i: 268.1867,
where sambuci
isquoted
insynonymy. Not Macrophya
sambuci (Latrielle. 1805).Norton
in i860gave
standing to themanuscript name sambuci
of the Harris catalogueby
associating it with variety a ofMacrophya
epinota (Say).The
type specimen, no. 269 Harris collection, is apparentlywhat
I considerMacrophya
mixta IVIacGillivray,but inasmuch
as thename
sambuci is preoccupied there isno change
necessary.Tenthredo
(Allantus)media
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in i860 as a variety ofMacrophya
bifasciata (Say)and now
considered as asynonym
of it.Tenthredo
(Allantus) tacita Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in i860and now
considered agood
species in Strongylogaster.Tenthredo
(Allantus)melisoma
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen
nudum.
1835.rohwer: notes on sawflies
511A name
given standingby Norton
in i860when
he considers it asynonym
of Strongylogastroidea terminalis (Say).Tenthredo
(Allantus) trosula Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in i860and now
considered agood
species of
Macrophya.
Tenthredo
(Allantus) trisyllabus Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in i860and now
considered agood
species of
Macrophya.
Tenthredo
(Allantus) atroviolacea Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in i860and now
considered agood
species in the genus
Lagium.
Tenthredo
(Allantus)obesa
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in i860and now^
considered as the correctname
forEriocampa
rotunda (Norton)Tenthredo
(Allantus) marginicollis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861and now known
as Periclista margini-collis (Norton).
The
type, in Harris collectionunder
no. 268, lacks antennae but is otherwise ingood
condition.Tenthredo
(Allantus) coronatus Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A name
given standingby Norton
in i860when
hequoted
it insynonymy
with {Allantus) Tenthredo hasilaris Say.Type
in Harris collectionunder
no. 310.Tenthredo
(Allantus) tarda Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in i860and now
placed in thegenus Lagium.
Tenthredo
(Selandria) vitis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
586. 1833;ed. 2, 583. 1835; Ins. Injur. Veget. 378. 1841. Norton, Proc.
Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 8: 219. 1861.Selandria vitis Harris, 1832.
A
discourse delivered before theMass.
Soc.
on
fourth anniversary, published inNew England
Farmer.Page and
referenceunknown.
See account in 1841.*
MacGiluvray,
Can. Ent. 40: 368. 1908.512
rohwer: notes on sawflies
This species has usually,
and
correctly,been
accredited to Harrisand
is, as pointed outby
Norton, asynonym
of Erythraspidespygmaea
(Say).
Type,
allotype,and
a paratypemale under
no. 172 in Harris Collection.Tenthredo
(Selandria)barda
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Say
in 1836and now
referred to the genus Tomostethuswhere
it is agood
species.Tenthredo
(Selandria)pygmaea
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583. 1835.This refers to Erythaspides
pygmaea
(Say), described in 1824.Tenthredo
(vSelandria)halcyon
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in 1861and now
considered agood
species in
Hoplocampa. Type
in Harris collectionunder
no. 266, nothingbut
wingsand enough
of thoraxand
legs tokeep them on
pin.Tenthredo
(Dosytheus) aprica Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.A
species describedby Norton
in 1861and now known
as Dolerus apricus (Norton).Type
in Harris collectionunder
no. 311.Tenthredo (Emphytus)
tarsata Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Say
in 1836and now known
asMacremphytus
tarsatus (Say).Tenthredo (Emphytus)
mellipes Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861and now known
asEmphytus
mellipes Norton.Type
in Harris collectionunder
no. 122.The Maine specimen
is so badly
damaged
that thespecimen from New Hampshire
is chosen as lectotype.Tenthredo (Emphytus)
aperta Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861and now known
asEmphytina
aperta (Norton).Type
femaleand
allotypemale
in Harris collectionunder
no. 178.
Tenthredo (Nematus)
Integra Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Say
in 1836and now known
asPteronidea Integra (Say).
Tenthredo (Nematus) melanocephala
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Never
described,name
usedby
Hartig in 1837.Tenthredo (Nematus)
ventralis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Refers to a species described in 1824
by Say and now known
as Pteronidea ventralis (Say).Tenthredo (Nematus)
palUcornis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861and
treatedby
Marlatt as Pontania.Marlatt
is in error, the type is in Harris collectionand
bears no. 183.It is
synonymous
withDiphadmis
appendiculatus (Hartig).Tenthredo (Nematus)
fulvipes Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Species described
by Norton
in 1861 butname
preoccupiedby
Fallen.The
type of Norton's species isunder
no. 357 in Harris' collectionand
is a single
male
in poor condition.What
Marlatt considered as thisis
now known
asAmauronematus
semirufus Kirby. Norton's type is notAmauronematus, but
thename
fulvipes is preoccupied,Tenthredo (Nematus)
labrata Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861.The
type isunder
no. 182, Harris collection,but
noteshave been
lostand
standing of species willhave
to be investigated.Tenthredo (Nematus)
stigmatus Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861.The
type is a single female with thehead and
thorax badly eatenand
isunder
no. 435 in Harris collection.It is
what
isnow known
asPachynematus
extensicomis (Norton)and
is asynonym
of that species.Tenthredo (Nematus) monochroma
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861.The
type isunder
no. 436 in Harriscollection. It has only thorax, right wings (except apex)
and
right hind leg to tarsus remaining.These
remainsdo
not indicate that Marlattwas
correct in placing this species in Pteronidea. Itseems
thatit is
Amauronematus and Dyar^ was
probably correct in 1894when
he considered the species
which
Marlatt later described asAmaurone-
* Can. Ent. 26: 187. 1894.
514
rohwer: notes on sawflies
matus
dyari as this species.The
thorax, however, also suggests thatit
may
bePachynematus but
in that genus there is nothingwhich monochroma
can be; P. apiceaeRohwer comes
nearest. Untilwhat remains
of the type hasbeen
carefullycompared
with anumber
of different species the standing ofmonochroma Norton must remain
uncertain.Tenthredo
(Cladius)isomera
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861.The
type is a rather dirty femaleunder
no. 185 in the Harris collection. In 1892 Rileysynonymized
Norton's species with thecommon European
species, Cladius pectin- icornis (Foucroy), but a recentstudy
ofAmerican and European ma-
terial demonstrates that the
two
are not thesame and makes
it neces-sary to reinstate Norton's
name. The
differencesbetween
thetwo forms
are discussed in detail in apaper on
the Cladiinaenow
in press.Tenthredo (Lyda)
maculiventris Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1869.There
isno specimen
of this species in the Harris collectionand
thereseems
to beno doubt
that the typeis lost although it is possible that the paratype is in the
Cambridge Museum.
MacGillivray® recognizes this speciesand
places it in Itycorsia.Tenthredo (Lyda) ochracea
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1869and now
placed in thegroup
Itycorsia.Not
in Harris collectionbut
aspecimen from "Mass."
inAcademy
ofNatural
Sciences of Philadelphia isundoubtedly
the type.Tenthredo (Lyda)
rufofasciata Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1869and now
correctly treatedby Mac-
Gillivray^ as Anoplolyda.
The
type issomewhat
imperfectand
isno. 382, Harris collection. Paratypes are in Philadelphia.
The
type locality is, according to Harris'manuscript
list, Dublin,New Hamp-
shire.
Tenthredo (Lyda)
calceata Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.This has never
been
described.6 Conn. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 22: 2,2>. igi?-
^ Conn. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 22: 41. 1917-
Xyela
infuscata Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861and
correctly treatedby
MacGillivray^as Macroxyela.
The
type is no. 186 in Harris collection. It is ingood
conditionand
according to Harris' manuscript listwas
collected April 25, 1827.Cephus
abbreviatus Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583. 1835.This
was
describedby Say
in 1824.Cephus
integer Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
583,nomen nudum.
1835.Described
by Norton
in 1861and now
correctly treated as Janus.Type
a single female ingood
conditionunder
no. 354 in Harris collec-tion.
Cephus
heteropterus Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835-
Described
by Norton
in 1861.The
type is lost,but
a paratypewhich
lacks thehead and
has part of the thorax eatenaway
is in Harris col-lection
under
no. 314,and
according to Harris'manuscript
listcame from
Dublin,New Hampshire.
This species isundoubtedly
synon-ymous
withJ amis
abbreviatus (Say).The
differencesmentioned by Norton
are not specific as they exist in a reared seriesnow
in theNa-
tional
Museum. The
venation of the paratype is abnormal.Cephus
filicornis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835.This
was
given standingby Norton
in 1861 in connection with the description ofCephus
integer.The specimen
heexamined
isdamaged and
is in the Harris collectionunder
no. 283. It is, as statedby
Norton, themale
of integer.Xiphydria albicornis Harris, Cat. Ins.
Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835; Ins. Injur. Veget. 392. 1841.
This species is correctly
synonymized
withXiphydria
maculata Say.The
type is theNew Hampshire specimen under
no. 302 in Harris collection.The
type locality is Dublin,New Hampshire,
according to Harris' manuscript list.Type
locality determinedby
listand
published statement that he is indebted to L.
W. Leonard
for the speci- mens.Xiphydria mellipes Harris, Cat. Ins.
Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835; Ins. Injur. Veget. 392. 1841.
Type
a single femaleunder name Xiphydria
tibialisSay and
bearing8 Conn. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 22: 32. 1917.
5i6
rohwEr: notes on sawfliEs
Harris' no. 303 in Harris collection. This specimen, according to Harris'
manuscript
list,was
collectedby
L.W. Leonard
at Dublin,New Hampshire
(the type locality test, the published statement thatHarris
was
indebted toLeonard
for specimens),and was
sentunder
no. 1457. This
specimen
is in fair conditionbut
lacks the antennae, except the right scapeand
pedicel.This species has
been synonymized
incorrectly withXiphydria
maculata Say. It is thesame
asand
will replace thename
ofthe specieswhich
the author^ treatedunder
thename
provancheri Cresson.Oryssus
haemorrhoidalis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835; Ins. Injur. Veget. 394. 1841.
The
type is ingood
conditionbut mounted on
a pinwhich
is badly verdigrised. It is in Harris collectionunder
no.304 and
according to the Harrismanuscript
listwas
collected at Dublin,New Hampshire,
by
L.W.
Leonard.The
type agrees with the treatment givenby
the author^" in 1912,but
in apaper now
in press the necessity of uniting terminalisand
haemorrhoidalis is pointed out."Oryssus
maturus Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835;Ins. Injur. Veget. 394. 1841.
The
type is ingood
conditionand
in the Harris collectionunder
his no. 305. It
and
aparatypeunder
no. 1033were
collected at Dublin,New Hampshire, by
L.W.
Leonard, according to themanuscript
listof Harris.
No
specimens agreeing with the type or paratypeshave been
seenand
although this is very likely sayiiWestwood,
itseems
best to delay a definite statement.Oryssus
aflinis Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835;Ins. Injur. Veget. 394. 1841.
Type
ingood
condition, except that the apices of theantennae have been
eaten, in Harris collectionunder
no. 306.According
to themanuscript
list the typewas
collected at Dublin,New Hampshire, by
L.
W.
Leonard. This isundoubtedly
thesame
as sayiiWestwood,
as treated
by
the writer.^^Sirex
abdominalis
Harris, Cat. Ins.Mass.
584,nomen nudum.
1835;Ins. Injur. Veget. 392. 1841.
Three
malesunder
no. 355 in the Harris collection.According
to themanuscript
list thesewere
collected at Boston,Cambridge and
^ Ent.
News
29: 109. 1918.1" Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 43: 151. 1912.
"
Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 43: 152. 1912.rohwer: notes on
sawfliejs 517Milton
(1832)and
are all thesame
species, although one ofthem
issmaller
and
lacks the head.These
agree with Bradley's interpretation of the species,'^and
are thesame
as flavicornis (Fabricius).OTHER
SPECIESDESCRIBED BY HARRIS
Besides
the species listed inthe 1835 Catalogue, many
ofwhich were not described by
Harris, certainother
specieswere described by Harris
insome
of hiseconomic
papers.A
list ofthese
with notes on the types
follows:Urocerus
nitidus Harris, Ins. Injur. Veget. 391. 1841.Type
a badly eaten specimen in the Harris collectionunder
no. 448and
withname
label cyaneus.That
this is the type isproven by
the manuscript list,
which
alsoadds
that itwas
collected at Dublin,New Hampshire, by
L.W.
Leonard.What
is left of this specimenproves that it is correctly
synonymized
with Sirex cyaneus Fabriciusby
Bradley.^^Lophyrus
abietis Harris, Ins. Injur. Veget. 376. 1841.Under
thisname
in the Harris collection there aretwo
malesand two
females.One
of the females ison
a long pinand
bearsno number
label
and
has notbeen
considered as part of the type material.The
other three specimens bear the no. 173
which
in the Harris manuscriptlist refers to "Schyzcera calceola S. n. sp." with the
added
note thatSay
is
wrong and
that it "belongs to Lophyrus."There
is alsoan
account ofone specimen collectedon
pitch pineand
specimens rearedfrom
larvaeon
fir.One
of the males is a Monoctenus, the other is Diprion but badly eaten.The
remaining female,which
is without appendages,must
be the type. It is thesame
as that treatedby Norton and
is the onenow
treatedunder
thatname. The
species will be treated inmore
detail in a later paper.
Selandria rosae Harris, Ins. Injur. Veget. 380. 1841.
The
type of this speciesseems
to be lost, but, inview
of the de- scriptionand
biological notes, there can beno doubt
that it is Caliroa aethiops (Fabricius)Selandria rubi Harris,
Address
N. Darling,New Haven,
13. 1845;Norton, Proc.
Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 8: 221. 1861. (Treated.in
subgenus
Hoplocampa.)'2 Joum. Ent. Zool. 5: 18. 1913.
13 Journ. Ent. Zool. 5: 14. 1913.
5i8
rohwer: notes on sawelies
The
type is a single femalespecimen
in the Harris collectionwithout
anumber but
with aname
labelwhich
is folded to hold a detached wing. Thisspecimen
is badlybroken but enough
remains tomake
itcertain that our present understanding of it as
Monophadnoides
rubi (Harris) is correct.OTHER TYPES
INHARRIS COLLECTION
Besides the types and
species listedabove the Harris
collection alsocontains
certainother
types.These
are listedbelow.
Trichiosoma
bicolor Norton, Proc.Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 8: 150.1861.
The specimen mentioned
in the original description as in the Harris collection is aparatype and
isnow
in the Harris collectionunder
no.511.
According
to themanuscript
list thiscame from Maine
(Randall 1836). Thisspecimen
is thesame
species asdescribedby
MacGillivray^'*under
thename
conjusum.Allantus
dubius
Norton, Proc.Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 7: 241. 1861.Two
specimens,both which
lackhead and most
of theabdomen,
are in the Harris collection
under
no. 393and
are types.Nematus
bivittatus Norton, Proc.Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 8: 158.1861.
Type
a single female in Harris collectionunder
no. 184, ingood
con- dition, except that it is dirtyand on
a disk so itcannot
be seen well.There
is another different female,under
no. 184,which
is not a type.This species is correctly treated
by
Marlatt.Allantus tricolor Norton, Journ.
Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 7: 247. i860.Type
in Harris collectionunder
no. 515.Allantus angulifer Norton, Journ. Bos. Soc. Nat. Hist. 7: 252. i860.
Paratype
in Harris collectionunder
no. 430.Allantus mellinus Norton, Journ.
Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 7: 248.i860.
Type and
allotype in Harris collectionunder
no. 516.Allantus signatus
Norton,
Journ.Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist. 7: 247.i860.
Type and
one paratype (broken) in Harris collectionunder
no. 431.According
to Harris' notes the type locality is Hallowell,Maine.
1* Conn. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 22: 103. 1917.