How To
Publish in
Reputable
Journal
REPUTAB
LE JOURNAL
26%
Others
Share of Journal Articles Published
Over one million English language research
articles published globally each year
Our Scientific Disciplines
About 1000 English language research articles published with Elsevier today
Elsevier
Springer
Wiley-Blackwell
ACSTaylor & Francis Wolters KluwerAIP
IEEE APS
IOP Others
Life sciences
Materials Science &
Engineering Chemistry &
Chemical Engineering Physics
Maths & computer science
Social Sciences
Earth Sciences Environmental
Sciences
Health sciences
26%
Article Share
“Reputable Article follow Ethical Manuscript”
●
Copyright Laws Infringement
●
Plagiarism in any form
●
Duplicate Publication
●
“Ghost” Authorship
●
Bias and Conflicts
●
Ethical Research
Why did My Article Fail to Pass the Technical Screening?
• Suspicion of plagiarism
• Your manuscript is incomplete
• The English is not coherent enough for the peer-review process
• References are incomplete or very old
• Your article doesn’t fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal
Why My Article Faced Rejection?
• Your research is incomplete
• Methodological problems
• The research does not support your conclusion
• Insufficient novelty
• Your article is boring Final Words!
If you receive a rejection, don’t give up!
But HOW?
Kualitas Artikel
• Good Writing
• Good data presentation: acceptable equipment and tools
• High Impact Factor
• Diversity author
• Good Author
• Publish with international authors
• Team-authored articles get cited more
• Use more references
• Papers published after having first been rejected elsewhere receive significantly more citations
• GOOD DATA-Acceptable Method/Equipment
• New Information
• Intensive study:
1. hasil road map penelitian yang sustain
2. Collaboration intensity: Centrality of author/group
How to get published in an academic journal: top tips from editors
• The writing stage
• Focus on a story that progresses logically, rather than chronologically
• Don’t try to write and edit at the same time
• Don’t bury your argument like a needle in a haystack
• Ask a colleague to check your work
• Get published by writing a review or a response
• Don’t forget about international readers
• Don’t try to cram your PhD into a 6,000 word
paper
Submitting your work
1. Pick the right journal: it’s a bad sign if you don’t recognise any of the editorial board
2. Always follow the correct submissions procedures 3. Don’t repeat your abstract in the cover letter
4. A common reason for rejections is lack of context
make sure that it is clear where your research sits within the wider scholarly landscape, and which gaps in knowledge it’s addressing. A common reason for articles being rejected after peer review is this lack of context or lack of clarity about why the research is important.
5. Don’t over-state your methodology
Dealing with feedback
1. Respond directly (and calmly) to reviewer comments
Don’t respond to reviewer feedback as soon as you get it. Read it, think about it for several days, discuss it with others, and then draft a response.
2. Revise and resubmit: don’t give up after getting through all the major hurdles
3. It is acceptable to challenge reviewers, with good justification 4. Think about how quickly you want to see your paper published 5. Remember: when you read published papers you only see the
finished article
10 tips for writing a truly terrible journal article 1. Refuse to read the previous literature published in your field
2. Take the lazy route and plagiarize 3. Omit key article components
4. Disrespect previous publications 5. Overestimate your contribution
6. Excel in ambiguity and inconsistency
7. Apply incorrect referencing of statements 8. Prefer subjective over objective statements
9. Give little care to grammar, spelling, figures and tables
10.Ignore editor and reviewer comments
Give your paper a clear vision
• Good journal articles usually get straight to the point and remain there the whole way through. Establish what exactly your paper
explores/investigates/accomplishes right from the start
• Narrow your focus: Clear visions can also be grand
visions, but journal articles don’t lend themselves to
thorough examinations of large-scale topics
DRAFTING MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTABLE ARTICLE
●
Good IDEA: Novelty, not out of date
●
Good Presenting
●
Good writing makes significant difference
●
Better to say little clearly, than saying too much unclearly
●
No Plagiarsm
●
Follow Author Guideline
Important publishing advice:
Important publishing advice:
1. Choose the target journal
o Choose one right journal. DO NOT gamble
o Read recent publication. Find out the hot topics on the journal
2. Read the GUIDE for AUTHORs and READ Again and READ Again
3. Submit to the right journal 4. Submit to one journal only 5. Check the english
1. Choose the target journal
o Choose one right journal. DO NOT gamble
o Read recent publication. Find out the hot topics on the journal
2. Read the GUIDE for AUTHORs and READ Again and READ Again
3. Submit to the right journal 4. Submit to one journal only 5. Check the english
Reasons: article was rejected
1. It fails the technical screening:
A. suspected to be plagiarized, or Republishing articles B. lacking tables and figures
C. The English is not sufficient for the peer review process, D. References are incomplete or very old.
E. It does not fall within the Aims and Scope.
2. The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective.
3. The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.
o The arguments are illogical, unstructured or invalid.
o The data does not support the conclusions.
4. It's is simply a small extension of a different paper, 5. language, structure, or figures are so poor
6. The work is not of interest to the readers of the specific journals.
How to Prepare a Manuscript for
International Journals
GENERAL STRUCTURE fo FULL ARTICLE
GENERAL STRUCTURE fo FULL ARTICLE
o Introduction: what did you/others do? Why did you do it?
o Methods: how did you do it?
o Results: what did you find?
o Discussion: what does it all mean?
o Introduction: what did you/others do? Why did you do it?
o Methods: how did you do it?
o Results: what did you find?
o Discussion: what does it all mean?
• Title
• Authors
• Abstract
• Keywords
• Main text
introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
• Acknowledgements
• References
• Supplementary materials
• Title
• Authors
• Abstract
• Keywords
• Main text
introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
• Acknowledgements
• References
• Supplementary materials
Make them easy to indexing and searching (informative, attractive and effective)
Make them easy to indexing and searching (informative, attractive and effective)
Make your article as brief as possible
Steps to organizing your manuscript
1. Prepare the figures and tables.
2. Write the Methods.
3. Write up the Results.
4. Write the Discussion
5. Write a clear Conclusion.
6. Write a compelling introduction.
7. Write the Abstract.
8. Compose a concise and descriptive Title.
9. Select Keywords for indexing.
10.Write the Acknowledgements.
11.Write up the References.
FIGURES & FIGURE LEGENDS
1. Judul figure perlu diikuti penjelasan mengenai makna figure, sehingga pembaca mengerti hasil penelitian tanpa harus membaca teks
2. Metode untuk memperoleh data bias ditammpilkan dalam penjelasan asal tidak pengulangan dari metode
3. Simbol dalam gambar perlu di jelaskann di legend
4. Sebaiknya di sebutkan jumlah sammpel, repilasi, analisis statistiknya.
Figure 1. Increased granulopoiesis and reduced erythropoiesis in RAG-2
-/-mice that received CD8
+CD122
-T cells.
(a) Bone marrow cells obtained from RAG-2-/- mice that had received either total CD8+cells or CD8+CD122- T cells were stained with anti-Gr-1 and anti-TER-119 antibodies (top panels). Percentages of cells in myeloid lineage (Gr-1+TER- 119-) and cells in erythroid lineage (Gr-1-TER-119+) are shown. The same cells were stained with anti-VLA-4 and anti-TER-119 antibodies (bottom panels). (b) Numbers of leukocytes in peripheral blood of wild-type (WT) mice and RAG- 2-/- mice that had received 5x105 total CD8+ T cells, 5x105 CD8+CD122- T cells, 5x105 CD8+CD122- T cells mixed with 5x104 CD8+CD122+ T cells, or 5x105 CD8+CD122- T cells mixed with 5x103 CD8+CD122+ T cells were counted using cell-counting chamber. Data are mean SD of 3-6 mice in each group. (c) Hematocrit values of wild-type (WT) mice and RAG-2-/- mice that had received the indicated cell population. Data are mean SD of three to six mice in each group.
Duplikasi informasi
Presenting to much data
the misuse of lines and histograms.
Lines joining data only can be used when presenting time series or consecutive samples data
fonts are too small for the journal
pay attention to the use of decimals, lines, etc.
HIGH
Impact
factor
Journal
HIGH Impact factor Journal
HIGH Impact
factor Journal
Low Impact factor Journal
Low Impact factor Journal
Write the Methods
1. Description of the site
2. Description of the surveys or experiments done, giving information on dates, etc.
3. Description of the laboratory methods,
4. Description of the statistical methods used (including confidence levels, etc.)
5. Provide sufficient guidance to repeat the experiments.
6. Citation from reference
Results
This section responds to the question "What have you found?" Hence, only representative results from your research should be presented. The results should be essential for discussion.
The text should be presented with concise, accurate, and all
data must be original and clearly explained.
Discussion
1. The discussion should not repeat the material covered in the results section.
2. Different style: Results and discussion sections must be combined or separated.
3. Avoid statements that go beyond what the results can support.
4. Avoid unspecific expressions such as "higher temperature", "at a lower rate", "highly significant". Quantitative descriptions are always preferred (35ºC, 0.5%, p<0.001, respectively).
5. Avoid sudden introduction of new terms or ideas; you must present everything in the introduction, to be confronted with your results here.
6. Speculations on possible interpretations are allowed, but these should be rooted in fact, rather than imagination.
Conclusion
1. In some journals, it's a separate section; in others, it's the last paragraph of the Discussion section.
2. A common error in this section is repeating the abstract, 3. or just listing experimental results.
4. Trivial statements of your results are unacceptable in this section.
5. provide a clear scientific justification 6. suggest future experiments
Introduction
1. convince readers that you clearly know why your work is useful.
2. A good introduction should answer the following questions:
A. What is the problem to be solved?
B. Are there any existing solutions?
C. Which is the best?
D. What is its main limitation?
E. What do you hope to achieve?
Abstract
1. Abstracts must not exceed 250 words.
2. The abstract should provide a clear synopsis of the reported findings that is accessible to a non specialist reader.
3. What has been done?
4. What are the main findings?
5. Together with the title, it's the advertisement of your article.
6. Make it interesting and easily understood without reading the whole article.
7. Avoid using jargon, uncommon abbreviations and references.
TITLE
1. The title should be concise and accessible to a general audience.
2. The title must explain what the paper is broadly about.
3. Attract the reader, reviewer dan editor
The title page includes:
The title and complete author list.
The complete names of the institutions where the work was performed.
The name, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, and email address of the author to whom correspondence and proofs are to be sent.
Keywords
1. Keywords are used for indexing your paper.
2. They are the label of your manuscript.
3. avoid words with a broad meaning and words already included in the title.
4. Only abbreviations firmly established in the field are eligible, avoiding those which are not broadly used
Acknowledgements
1. you can thank people who have contributed to the manuscript but not to the extent where that would justify authorship. For example, here you can include technical help and assistance with writing and proofreading.
2. Probably, the most important thing is to thank your
funding agency or the agency giving you a grant or
fellowship.
References
1. Different style in each journal
2. If automatic referencing software is used, the references
must be finalized and reduced to text before submission.
Check the proofs
●
Once the manuscript is accepted and
prepared for print, the publisher will send the corresponding author page proofs of the article.
CAPA
●
www.plagiarism.com (test free or USD 65)
●
www.plagiarism.org (bayar)
● www.turnitin.com (bayar)
● http://dupeoff.com/ (free dan bayar)
● www.google.com (Free)
● http://www.plagium.com/plagiarismchecker.cfm (Free )
● http://www.dustball.com/cs/plagiarism.checker/ (USD 8/month)
● http://www.grammarly.com/ (free)
● www.plagiarsm-checker.com (45usd)
Mencegah Plagiat Dengan Software
CONTOH HASIL DETEKSI
PLAGIAT
Check the proofs
●
