Total ERP costs may exceed $90.7 million over a five-year period. Stakeholders consist of governmental and non-governmental agencies at national, provincial, district and local levels as defined in Chapter 1 of the ERP document. In the ERP preparation phase, Infokom can remain neutral, but after integration, these agencies can play a key role in synchronizing the various systems within the framework of the FGRM program and in knowledge management.
DDPI, which is a key partner in the implementation of the ERP and represents the interests of the regional and local governments, universities and civil society organizations, was closely involved in the development of the East Kalimantan Environmentally Sustainable Development Strategy, the strategy and action . Plan (SRAP) and the East Kalimantan Climate Change Master Plan. These stakeholders are involved in the development of the ERPD and thus play a crucial role in providing technical support for the implementation and oversight of the ERP. These stakeholders were involved in the development of the ERPD and provided scientific data to support the development of the ERP design.
The participation of local communities must be preceded by free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). The relevant customary council (Adat): While this council is currently regarded as a neutral party, the status of the stakeholders may shift towards being a positive or negative influencer, depending on the engagement and implementation of the ERP. In addition to reducing deforestation and degradation from encroachment, activities in this component are expected to have significant non-carbon benefits, contribute to fairer outcomes and be an important part of the strategy to reduce the risk of returns.
Lack of accessibility for all social layers of the community to be involved in the plantation process.
REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS RELEVANT TO THE ERP
Regulation/policy issue Importance for REDD+ Adequate E&S Risks for large land claims within the forest area. Preventing the issuance of HGUs that were not based on a proper Provincial environmental and social assessment. A multi-sectoral approach to address the economic, social, legal, social, cultural and environmental aspects of conflict.
GAP/COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS
COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS BETWEEN EXISTING SECURITY GUARANTEES (INCLUDING GOI RELEVANT REGULATIONS) AND THE WORLD BANK SECURITY POLICY. Environmental and social assessments are carried out by the Strategic Environmental Assessment in accordance with the MoEF Regulation No. EK Bappeda and EK Environment Agency have drawn up an SOA for the Regional Spatial Planning for and the Medium-Term Development Plan for 2018-2023.
Environmental assessment refers to the Indonesian regulations and ESMF that require the development of environmental documents according to the results of the screening. P1.5 P3.6 P5 More detailed assessment is needed at site level to ensure that all those identified in the SEA are addressed at field level. Preliminary screening process against negative list for ER activities in ESMF, which includes identification of potential impact against involuntary.
This regulation requires the identification of risks and the corresponding mitigating measures, which is similar to the protective principles. Environmental and social assessments are carried out through the VSM and AMDAL process in accordance with MFP Regulation No. are not covered by the Ministry of Environment Regulations.
Capacity for managing environmental and social impacts is needed for FMU and private companies. P.22/2017 regarding Management of Grievances related to indications of pollution and/or environmental damage and/or damage to forests. P2, 3 P1, 3, 4 P1, 2, 4 There is no specific and integrated mechanism for the management and resolution of grievances related to ER activities.
By empowering the executive agency of government (national and regional level), this law mandates that provinces and districts develop a strategic environmental assessment that will guide the region. SES REDD Kaltim Ministry of Environment.. Regulation No. 29 of 2009 on Guidelines for the Conservation of Regional Biodiversity. designations, karst and physical cultural resources). There are currently no specific mechanisms to address the displacement of forest-dependent communities and the restriction of access to nature reserves and/or other protected areas.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Forest degradation and biodiversity and deforestation increase due to management uncertainty during the period of preparation of the status quo mechanism. Equality of bargaining positions between actors in the management of SDH and Kehati (+) Increase the understanding of the parties for their rights and responsibilities as well as the risks that may occur as a result of SDH management. Accelerating the recognition of customary rights and control of land within forest areas, in accordance with the.
Providing technical assistance (and training) to government agencies to implement the above commitments. Mapping for the identification and inventory of HCV areas on existing crops and other concessions that do not yet have a plantation permit. Technical assistance to companies and government agencies to implement HCV commitments.
The concessionaire and the community agree on the existence of the HCV, the steps for managing and monitoring the assets of the HCV. Capacity building provisions for groups (community based fire management and monitoring system (CBFMMS); Supporting and encouraging the development of non-palm oil commodities, including the development of
Increasing the income of the community or the community's economy obtained from the sale of inter-harvested timber in the fields. components Activities Expected results E&. Raising awareness of the ecological and social consequences of mangrove conversion and palm oil plantations of small farmers; A number of small-scale commercial producers and other parts of the value chain provided capital as a result of mechanisms for sharing carbon and non-carbon benefits.
Director General of PSKL as the person in charge, Regional BPSKL Kalimantan and East Kalimantan Provincial Forest Service as monitors of the implementation of activities in the field.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS
Effective planning and scheduling required to minimize the risk of delays in capacity building activities. Proper identification of credible trainers and/or educational institutions to deliver the required capacity building sessions. Encourage the participation of local farmer groups in the forest and rural fire management programme/community-based forest and fire management.
Key policy issues include insufficient cross-sectoral cooperation, overlapping boundaries, dual land administration systems between forest and non-forest management, HCV management within concessions (both forestry and non-forestry concessions), operationalization of FMUs, addressing tenure conflicts and disputes , including grievances and access restriction. Moratorium on issuing forestry concession permits on Primary forest and Peatland (Presidential Instruction No. 6/2017) is part of forestry management policy, and is relevant for application to avoid overlapping boundaries between forest concessions. At the provincial level, existing policies on sustainable palm oil plantation (Local Regulation/PERDA No. 7/2018) and moratorium on mining (Governor Regulation No. 1/2018) address the needs to clarify boundaries of existing palm oil and mining concessions; so avoid overlapping borders.
Due to significant prospects for reducing emissions from potential deforestation and degradation, these aforementioned policies must be consistently supported. The regulation must allow sufficient time to restore the environment, as well as to process raw materials other than coal (e.g. limestone). Sustainable forest management policies such as HCV and RIL must be immediately adhered to by forestry and plantation companies.
This policy should address gaps in human resource capacity to manage forest and non-forest areas and support the operationalization of FMU. A proper implementation of ERP clearly requires capacity building of local communities, district and provincial governments. Such a capacity building program will ensure the readiness of all related parties to carry out the key activities described in the ERP.
Community training/capacity development for smallholders and private sectors and government institutions related to sustainable crop production and ESMF;. Community training/capacity development on access to finance and sustainable agriculture programs (especially on post-harvest technology for value addition); Capacity building for government and the private sector in relation to dispute/conflict resolution and grievance redressal and environmental and social management and monitoring programs (ESMF and ESMP).
CONSULTATIONS ON THE ERP
Maintain and strengthen existing safeguards, including ESMF, for relevant stakeholders (especially private sectors and government agencies).
