STUDENTS READING PROFICIENCY PROFILE WHILE ONLINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION
( A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY IN EIGHTH GRADERS OF MTS N 3 JEMBRANA)
BY:
MUHAMMAD NUR HUDA 1612021206
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS GANESHA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION
2022
STUDENTS READING PROFICIENCY PROFILE WHILE ONLINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION
( A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY IN EIGHTH GRADERS OF MTS N 3 JEMBRANA)
THESIS
Proposed to Ganesha University of Education to fulfill a requirement in finishing Stratum Program in English Education Department
BY:
MUHAMMAD NUR HUDA 1612021206
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS GANESHA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION
2022
iv
vi MOTTO
“This Thesis Proves That I Have Been To Collage”
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First, the writer would like to express my deepest gratitude to Almighty God for all the blessing so that the writer could finish this thesis entitled
“Students Reading Proficiency Profile while Online Learning
Implementation (A Descriptive Study in Eighth Graders of MTS N 3 Jembrana)”. The writer realizes this thesis cannot be completed without the help of others. Many people have helped in accomplishing this thesis. Therefore, the writer would like to thank to other parties that have given guidance and support during completing this thesis.
1. Prof. Dr. I Nyoman Adi Jaya Putra, M.A. as the first supervisor who had given great guidance, suggestions, corrections, encouragement and support on accomplishing this thesis.
2. Dewa Ayu Eka Agustini, S.Pd., M.S. as the second supervisor who had given guidance, suggestion, support, and feedback during the process of making this thesis.
3. All the lectures of English Language Education who had supported and given knowledge through these four years.
4. All of the students VIII 2, VIII 3 and VIII 4 in MTs N 3 Jembrana and Mr. Iskandar, S.Pd,. as the English teacher that helped much ini collecting the data.
5. The writer’s family for the unconditional love and endless support.
The last but not least, thank you so much for all of the writer’s friends from ELE 2016, Flamingo a.k.a Flams class, Thesis Team ( Wisnu Mahayasa and Yudis Astika) Teammate (Trisna, Dema, and Radit) for the amazing experiences and support. The writer really gratefull of it. Finally, the writer realizes this thesis is still not perfect. Therefore, any constructive suggestion and criticism for the perfection of this thesis will be highly appreciated
Singaraja, 21 Februari 2022
The author
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUPERVISORS APPROVAL SHEET ... ii
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN ... v
MOTTO ... vi
ABSTRACT ... vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... viii
TABLE OF CONTENT ... ix
LIST OF TABLES ... x
LIST OF PICTURES ... xi
LIST OF APPENDICES ... xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ... 1
1.1 Background of the Research ... 1
1.2 Research Problems ... 6
1.3 Research Objectives ... 6
1.4 Research Significances ... 7
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE ... 9
2.1 The Nature of Reading ... 9
2.2 Teaching Reading ... 11
2.3 The Nature of Online Learning ... 13
2.4 Teaching Reading through Online Learning ... 15
2.5 Review of Reading Proficiency and Classical Mastery ... 16
2.6 Emperical Review ... 17
2.7 Framework of the Thought ... 21
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODS ... 23
3.1 Types of the Research ... 23
3.2 Setting of the Research ... 23
3.3 Subject of the Research ... 24
3.4 Object of the Research ... 24
x
3.5 Research Instruments ... 24
3.6 Instrument Validation ... 25
3.6.1 Content Validity ... 26
3.6.2 Reliability Test ... 27
3.6.3 Level of Difficulty Test ... 27
3.6.4 Discrimination Index ... 28
3.7 Research Procedure ... 29
3.8 Method of Data Analysis ... 30
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ... 32
4.1 Data Description ... 32
4.2 Findings... 33
4.2.1 Content Validity ... 33
4.2.2 Profile of Students Reading Classical Mastery ... 34
4.3 Discussion of the Findings ... 34
4.3 Implication of the Research ... 37
CHAPTER V CLOSING ... 39
5.1 Summary ... 39
5.2 Conclusions ... 42
5.3 Suggestions ... 43
REFERENCES ... 44
APPENDICES ... 47
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Table 3.1 Blueprint of the Test (After Validation) ... 25
Table 3.2 The Summary of Emperical Validity ... 26
Table 3.3 The Summary of Level of Difficulty Items ... 27
Table 3.4 Discrimination Index ... 28
Table 3.5 Criterion Referenced Formula with 5 Classification... 30
Table 4.1 Summary of Descriptive Analysis... 32
Table 4.2 Profile of Reading proficiency per Each Dimension ... 33
Table 4.3 Profile of Reading proficiency Classical Mastery (CM) per Each Dimension ... 34
xii
LIST OF PICTURES
Picture Page
Picture 2.1 Framework of the Thought ... 22
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendices Page
Appendix 1 Reading proficiency Test (After and Before Validation) ... 47 Appendix 2 Validation Process ... 60 Appendix 3 Data Analysis ... 84
