• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 - http;//links.lww.com

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 - http;//links.lww.com"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Supplemental Digital Appendix 1

Description of LICs at All 4 sites; Classification Using Worley and Colleagues’

Typology

36

; and Analysis of Levels of Integration, Continuity, and Longitudinality, From a Multi-Institution Study of Student Identity Construction in Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships, 2019–2020

HYMS Comprehensive LIC

UoD Comprehensive LIC

ULSoM Amalgamative Clerkship

CUSOM

Comprehensive LIC Description of

programme

- 6 students - Voluntary

recruitment - Primary care

base with secondary care follow- up - Year-long,

penultimate clinical year - Rural setting

- 6 students - Voluntary

recruitment - Primary

care base with secondary care follow- up - Year-long,

penultimate clinical year - Both rural

and urban settings

- 73 students - Mandatory

placement - Primary

care - 18-weeks

long, penultimate clinical year - Both rural

and urban settings

- 10 students - Voluntary

application, competitive selection process - Academic

safety net hospital - Year-long,

penultimate clinical year - Urban

setting

Classification as per Worley et al’s typology

Comprehensive LIC (LIC-C)

Comprehensive LIC (LIC-C)

Amalgamative Clerkship (LIC-A)

Comprehensive LIC (LIC-C)

Integration of clinical disciplines

Complete integration of clinical disciplines across the duration of the LIC.

Complete integration of clinical disciplines across the duration of the LIC.

Some, as disciplines walk in through the door within primary care.

Outcomes primary care focused, although there is no set exposure to secondary care, outcomes are not unique to primary care setting e.g., how to diagnose medical, surgical, and psychiatric conditions that span primary and secondary care settings.

Complete integration of clinical disciplines across the duration of the LIC.

Programme-level integration

Relatively lacking- no central organisation of programme-level integration, no explicit external LIC thematic framework, as outcomes and assessment remain aligned with the

There are programme- long themes that span the duration of the LIC.

There are programme-long themes that span the duration of the LIC.

There are programme-long themes that span the duration of the LIC.

(2)

patient panel. patient panel. presenting to student primary care clinics or students scheduling follow up

appointments for patients. Patients may also be assigned to students under GP supervision and encouraged to attend student clinics for their ongoing healthcare needs.

patient panel.

Continuity of teaching

Primary care preceptors remained the same throughout the LIC.

Continuity of programme faculty.

Primary care preceptors remained the same throughout the LIC.

Continuity of programme faculty.

Primary care preceptors remained the same throughout the LIC.

Continuity of programme faculty.

Preceptor continuity throughout the LIC - one preceptor for each core specialty parallel stream.

Continuity of programme faculty.

Continuity of location

Placed in same general practice for duration of the one-year

programme.

Access to same secondary care settings for the duration of the one-year programme.

Placed in same general practice for duration of the one- year programme.

Access to same secondary care settings for the duration of the one- year programme.

Placed in same general practice for duration of the 18- week programme.

Placed in same hospital and

outpatient system for the duration of the one-year programme.

Peer continuities Small peer cohort of 6 students, taught together to foster cohesion.

Small peer cohort of 6 students, taught together to foster cohesion.

Larger peer cohort, taught together to foster cohesion.

Small peer cohort of 10 students, taught together to foster cohesion.

Longitudinality There are brief in- patient immersions that disrupt the longitudinality of the clinical experience, and teaching, although this is longitudinal in nature.

There are brief in- patient immersions that disrupt the longitudinality of the clinical experience, and teaching, although this is longitudinal in nature.

Only interruptions to experience for weekly seminars, but these were also longitudinal in nature.

There are brief in- patient immersions that disrupt the longitudinality of the clinical experience, and teaching, although this is longitudinal in nature.

Program mission, as per online information

Mission involves increasing the recruitment and retention of general practitioners to rural North Yorkshire. Also aims to facilitate interprofessional attitudes to practice.

Mission involves both creating academically excellent doctors, but also to help address recruitment issues in general practice and rural areas.

Mission involves increasing the recruitment and retention of general practitioners to rural Ireland.

Mission involves supporting students’

personal and professional development, community engagement and developing a pipeline of physician leaders committed to care for underserved

populations.

(3)

Supplemental Digital Appendix 2

Semi-Structured Interview Question Stems, From a Multi-Institution Study of Student Identity Construction in Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships, 2019–2020

FIRST SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW

Demographic information - Age

-Gender

-Race and ethnicity -Sexual orientation -Prior degree?

-Prior healthcare experience?

(Demographic info is voluntary, please inform students they can decline to answer if they wish).

Understanding general professional identity - Can you tell me more about your experience in becoming a medical student this far?

-When was the first time you felt like a medical student?

-If I were to ask you the question ‘Who are you?’ how would you respond?

- Have there been any moments throughout your training when you felt you particularly belonged?

-Have there been any times you felt you didn’t belong or have felt excluded?

-Have you ever had a crisis in your professional identity?

-Have you ever felt any conflict between who you are at home and who you are professionally? Examples?

-What do you like about who you are within a clinical environment? What don’t you like? Why?

Influences upon professional identity - What do you think has shaped you into the medical student you are today?

-What has been helpful in shaping you as a medical student? (Examples?)

-What hasn’t been as helpful in shaping you as a medical student? (Examples?)

- Can you tell me about any role models that you’ve had throughout the course? How did they help you?

-Do you think being resilient is part of being a medical student? Why? Is ‘resilient’ the best word to use? Have you had any experiences where you have had to be particularly ‘resilient’?

Questions concerning the longitudinal integrated clerkship

- What are your thoughts in general on longitudinal integrated clerkships?

-How is your longitudinal integrated clerkship going at the moment?

-Some people say there’s quite a transition to learning within an LIC- how have you found this change?

-What do you think the benefits of an LIC are for a medical student might be? What are you looking forward to?

-Do you think an LIC could cause any issues for medical students? What aren’t you looking forward to?

-How do you think an LIC may change you as a medical student?

-Has the LIC changed how you view yourself? If so, how?

(4)

-Has the LIC changed how you behave at all? If so, how?

-What has been your favorite part of the LIC so far?

-What has been your least favorite part of the LIC so far?

SECOND SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW

Questions concerning the longitudinal integrated clerkship experience and identity formation

- Have your thoughts on LICs changed throughout your experience? If so, how?

-How is your longitudinal integrated clerkship going?

-What do you think the benefits of an LIC are for a medical student? Have you experienced any of these benefits? If not, what benefits have you experienced (if any)?

-Do you think an LIC could cause any issues for medical students? Have you experienced any of these issues? If not, what issues have you experienced (if any)?

-Can you tell me about any role models you’ve had throughout the LIC?

- Have there been any moments throughout your LIC when you felt you particularly belonged?

-Have there been any times you felt you didn’t belong or have felt excluded?

-Have you had any crises in your professional identity as a medical student throughout the LIC?

-I asked you this question last time, but if I asked you

‘who are you’, how would you respond?

- How do you think the LIC has changed you as a medical student (if at all)?

-Has the LIC changed how you view yourself? If so, how?

-Do you think the LIC has changed how you think other people view you? If so, how?

-Has the LIC changed how you behave? If so, how?

-How do you think the LIC has impacted upon you?

- Do you feel like more of a doctor after taking part in an LIC? Why/ why not? Any examples?

-What has been your favorite part of the LIC?

-What has been your least favorite part of the LIC?

[Space for follow-up questions building on previous collected data].

(5)

Supplemental Digital Appendix 3

Coding Process for Qualitative Analysis in This Study, From a Multi-Institution Study of Student Identity Construction in Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships, 2019–2020

Step Procedures

1: Familiarizing oneself with data MB and CA conducted all interviews, after which they manually transcribed interview and diary audio data to foster familiarity.

MB engaged in repeat cycles of reading and re-reading interview and diary data.

2: Generating initial codes As data collection occurred, two researchers independently coded each transcript (MB and GF/PW). Researchers from each site (AO’R, CA) acted as inductive coders for at least two of their participants’ transcripts to deepen discussion of cultural nuances. MB reviewed all codes, recorded them in NVivo 12, and collated them to form a codebook.

Using the codebook, MB recoded all transcripts.

3: Searching for themes All transcripts were re-read, and reflective memos made to facilitate analytical thought concerning connections between coded data.

Data display tables were created for each early theme to locate patterns within

clusters of codes. MB created an early list of themes.

4: Reviewing the themes Researchers met frequently to discuss analysis, challenge their interpretations, and examine themes alongside original data.

MB reviewed early proposed themes and made edits based on team discussions.

5: Defining and naming themes Once themes were agreed upon, MB defined and named each theme. MB produced a narrative report of the themes with illustrative quotes that was reviewed and commented on by all members of the research team (MB, CA, JA, AO’R, GF).

Abbreviations: MB = Megan Brown; CA = Catherine Ard; GF = Gabrielle Finn; PW = Paul

Whybrow; AO’R = Andrew O’Regan; JA = Jennifer Adams.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

15-17 Supplemental Digital Appendix 3F: Milestones Ratings and Predictive Analytics for the Fourth Milestones Review Occasion for Internal Medicine 18-20 Supplemental

1 Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 Interview Guide for Companies that Do Not Hire Smokers, Used With Executives Identified as Being Responsible for or Most Knowledgeable About the

Supplemental Digital Appendix 2 Multiple Linear Regression Coefficients of Predictor Variables With IM-CE Scores for PGY1 and PGY2 Residents PGY1 N = 9,676; R2 = 0... predicted to

1 Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 Faculty and Resident Survey Detail, From a Study of the Association of ACGME Resident and Faculty Surveys with Internal Medicine Residency Program

Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 Results of Analysis of Variance ANOVA of Gender and Country Effects We used multivariate analysis of variance MANOVA to examine the gender and

1 Supplemental Digital Appendix 1 Protocol: Building the Next Generation of Academic Physicians Initiative BNGAP, Medical Students’ Perceptions of and Interest in Academic

2 Supplemental Digital Appendix 2 Tips and Data-Mining Tool for Talking About Race in the Preclinical Curriculum The following section has been adapted from The Warren Alpert

2 Supplemental Digital Appendix 2 Questionnaire for Recipients of a Prefecture Scholarship, From a Study of Rural Physician Placement Programs in Japan, 2014–2016 Please answer