Head volume correlates with both the area of the PSD and the number of vesicles in the presynaptic compartment ( Harris and Stevens, 1989 ). ERANGE (Mortazavi et al., 2008) was used to derive measurements of the abundance of each transcript.
Results
Processing sequence data
Measuring gene expression
The fraction of all transcripts within 5 percent of their final value is plotted against the number of reads used to calculate abundance in Figure 2.3. The high correlation and small error indicate that RPKM is a consistent measure of the number of samples in a transcript. Transcript measurements are binned, and the log of the number of genes in each bin is indicated on the ordinate.
The transcript measurements are binned, and the number of genes in each bin is indicated on the ordinate.
Differential gene expression
Transcript levels represented in this plot were measured in the forebrain of wild-type mice. Transcript abundance in the forebrain of densin knockout mice is plotted against the equivalent value in wild-type mice. Changes in expression in the forebrain of densin knockout mice are compared to expressing wild-type mice in Figure 2.9.
The distribution is similar to that seen in the forebrain. The increased expression of MT3 in the hippocampus is particularly notable in light of increased MT1 and MT2 expression in the forebrain.
Patterns of differential expression
MT3 expression is increased in the hippocampus of densin mice relative to wild-type mice. We used data from ABA to identify structures enriched for genes identified as DE in the forebrain of densin knockout versus wild-type mice. The trend of light green in the hippocampus indicates that many of the genes are more expressed there than in other structures.
Networks between genes DE in the forebrain of the densin knockout versus wild-type mice were identified by querying a composite interaction network (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis).
Differential expression in densin-related genes
Of the 271 PSD fraction genes, 13 were DE in the densin knockout; 9 in the hippocampus and 4 in the forebrain (Table 2.4 on the next page). Thus, PSD fraction genes are no more likely to be DE in the densin knockout than other genes. Compared to wild-type mice, densin knockout mice differentially express (z>2) 13 transcripts: nine in the hippocampus and four in the forebrain.
Several immediate early genes are DE in the opposite direction in the forebrain and hippocampus.
Discussion
Implementation of RNA-Seq
We normalized raw reads by transcript length and by the number of reads produced by a sequencer run. However, cross-transcriptome comparisons are an advantage of the RNA-Seq technique, and locally weighted transformations lose that advantage. We therefore used only the log2 transformation and chose a method for identifying DE genes that accounts for abundance-dependent changes in distribution.
Measuring the proportion of values that approached the final value allowed us to reliably use 97 percent.
Effects of the loss of densin on brain transcription
A number of IEGs are upregulated in the hippocampus of knockout mice: Arc, Egr1 (Zif268), Fos, Junb and Nptx2 (Narp). Like Arc, Egr1 and Fos, Cryab is upregulated in the hippocampus and downregulated in the forebrain. In the hippocampus of wild-type mice, Igh-1b is not expressed (0 RPKM), while in the knockout it is expressed at 4 RPKM.
Thus, Mt2 upregulation in densin knockout may be the result of hyperexcitability indicated by increased CaMKII transcripts and seizure tendency (Sumori et al., 2006).
Implications for densin
By crossing the PAK strain with the Fmr1 knockout, researchers partially rescued the spine density, hyperactivity, stereotypy, and hypoanxiety phenotypes, and completely rescued the impaired cortical long-term potentiation (LTP) (Hayashi et al., 2007). Treatment of primary hippocampal cultures with the drug N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), which stimulates NMDA receptors, activates upstream actin regulators Rac (a small GTPase) and PAH (Carlisle et al., 2008). In other systems, an increase in phospho-PAH leads to an inactivation of cofilin through phosphorylation (Aleksic et al., 2009).
Kiroonoofiin saayitoosoolii sammuu loonii, seelii Heelaa fi haala seelii irraa bilisa ta’e keessatti koofiliin difosfooraayileetii godha (Gohla et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2008).
Materials and Methods
- Cell culture and treatment
- Fluorescence immunocytochemistry
- Immunoblot
- Mouse PSD preparation with sucrose gradient
Samples were heated to 95◦C for three minutes in 3 percent SDS and 40 mM β-glycerophosphate and fractionated via SDS-PAGE. Antibodies were diluted in Odyssey Blocking Buffer; and membranes were scanned with an Odyssey scanner (Li-Cor). We prepared the crude mouse brain postsynaptic density fraction from 10 mice as described in Carlin et al. 1980), with modifications described in Cho et al.
Synaptosome samples were taken from the band between 1.0 and 1.2 M sucrose; the remainder of the band was incubated with 0.5 percent Triton X-100 (Pierce), agitated for 15 minutes at 4◦ Celsius, and centrifuged at 36,800 X g for 45 minutes.
Results
Analysis of synaptic localization
Kronofin and sling are present in the synaptosome and are therefore potential mediators of NMDA-induced cofilin dephosphorylation. A large band of PSD95 in the PSD fraction indicates successful enrichment of the postsynaptic density. PAK1 and PAK2 show little change between the homogenate and the synaptosomal fraction, whereas cofilin is enriched in the synaptosomal fraction.
Slingshot staining is punctate in dendrites and close to the cell membrane in the cell body (Figure 3.3).
Small molecule phosphatase inhibitors
The proportion of dephosphorylation is similar in the presence and absence of calcineurin inhibition. Phospho-cofilin levels are shown on the ordinate as a percentage of phospho-cofilin levels in the control sample (indicated by the gray box; control cultures were not treated with either phosphatase inhibitor or NMDA). Further addition of NMDA in the presence of okadaic acid does not further increase phospho-PAK1-3 (Figure 3.7).
Calcineurin inhibitor FK506 does not alter steady-state phospho-PAK1-3 levels (time point 0), and phospho-PAK1-3 levels increase in response to NMDA treatments in the presence and absence of the calcineurin inhibitor.
Knockdown of slingshot
Phospho-cofilin, as a percentage of control (indicated by the gray box), is plotted against the duration of NMDA treatment. Okadaic acid increases steady-state phospho-cofilin levels (time 0), but phospho-cofilin is still dephosphorylated in response to a bath application of NMDA. In the left group, vehicle or siRNA was applied to cultures for 48 h; to the right for 72 hours.
The overall reduction in GAPDH was 61 percent after 72 hours of treatment, normalized to the untargeted siRNA treatment.
Discussion
To confirm the activation of actin regulatory pathways by NMDA, we measured phosphorylation of PAK isoforms 1–3 and phospho-cofilin. Although we have not identified the phosphatase involved in the NMDA-dependent dephosphorylation of cofilin, this evidence indicates that the most promiscuous phos-. As discussed in the introduction, a dominant negative form of PAH can rescue cytoskeletal and behavioral deficits in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome.
Understanding neuron-specific regulation of PAH and cofilin is critical for implementing treatments that will target the regulation of PAH and cofilin.
Introduction to Arc
Several known binding partners of Arc are described in the literature, including endophilin, dynamin, MAP2, and CaMKII (which phosphorylates Arc) (Chowdhury et al., 2006; Donai et al., 2003; Fujimoto et al., 2004). Interaction with actin-binding protein is indicated by co-sedimentation observed with crude, but not purified, filamentous actin (Lyford et al., 1995). Interaction with 14-3-3ζ is also indicated by the results of the yeast two-hybrid assay (Lyford, 1998).
14-3-3 proteins often regulate signal transduction pathways by binding serine/threonine phosphorylated proteins and thus preventing dephosphorylation.
Materials and Methods
- Protein expression
- Protein purification
- Pull-down experiments
- Yeast two-hybrid Arc mini-library
GST and GST-Arc beads were washed 4 times in 10 ml PBST (PBS and 1% Triton) by rotating for 5 min end to end. To increase the proportion of full-length GST-Arc in the GST-Arc fragment, some purified protein samples were subjected to size-exclusion chromatography instead of dialysis. In an alternative method used to increase the proportion of full-length GST-Arc in the GST-Arc fragment, GSH-agarose beads were used to deplete the GST-Arc fragment.
After dialysis, the GST-Arc solution was incubated twice with GSH-agarose beads for five minutes.
Results
Protein purification
The GST-Arc fragment has a much higher affinity for GSH-agarose than the full-length protein, and longer incubations increase the amount of full-length protein on the bead. To take advantage of this, we depleted the GST-Arc fragment by incubating the protein solution with GSH-agarose beads for five minutes and then retaining the supernatant. Because GSH-agarose has a higher affinity for the GST-Arc fragment than for full-length GST-Arc, the maximum enrichment of full-length GST-Arc was not retained.
Nevertheless, the proportion of full-length GST-Arc in the pull-down experiments was improved by depleting the GST-Arc fragment.
Interactions in brain lysate
The two most prominent species in the solution are full-length GST-Arc and a GST-Arc fragment of approximately 30 kiloDaltons (lane one). Full-length GST-Arc (solid black arrowhead) is approximately 80 kDa; a prominent GST-Arc fragment (empty arrowhead) is approximately 30 kDa. Because PSD-95 bands were not observed, the GST-Arc beads did not pull down large portions of the postsynaptic density (PSD).
Glutathione-agarose beads were incubated with GST or GST-Arc as described and subsequently incubated with deoxycholate (DOC)-solubilized brain membrane fraction.
Creation of Arc mini library
Discussion
Typically, the main barrier is destruction of the remaining sample in the process of making the measurement. Of all genes measured, seventy percent are expressed at lower levels in the hippocampus than in the forebrain. Nine genes identified as PSD proteins in a proteomic study by (Cheng et al., 2006) were differentially expressed in the densin knockout mouse: cofilin 1, CHCHD3 (coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 3 ), lemon (rho-interacting, serine/threonine kinase 21), FXYD5 (FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 5), PPP1CC (protein phosphatase 1, catalytic subunit, gamma isoform), PTPRZ1.
Differences in hippocampal gene expression were plotted against control condition: forebrain expression.