Supplement
Table of Contents
Table S1. ARIC study visit 2 participant characteristics by sex-specific tertiles of the CMI. ... 2 Table S2. Comparison of sex-specific tertiles of CMI with other muscle mass indices based on serum creatinine and serum cystatin C at ARIC visit 5 (A) and visit 2 (B). ... 4 Table S3. AUCs for frailty models and C-statistics for mortality models with related measures in men and women. . 5 Figure S1. Adjusted odds ratios of frail (vs robust) with continuous CMI in men and women at visits 5 in ARIC. ... 7 References ... 8
Table S1. ARIC study visit 2 participant characteristics by sex-specific tertiles of the CMI.
Overall Men, N=5616 Women, N=7170
CMI tertile CMI tertile
1 2 3
p for trend
1 2 3 p for
trend
N=1872 N=1872 N=1872 N=2390 N=2390 N=2390
CMI,
mg/day/1.73m2
996.6 (258.2)
330.9 - 1041.1
1041.2 - 1257.9
1258.3 - 2313.3
234.3 - 786.5
786.5 - 944.2
944.3 - 1910.3
Age, years 57.4
(5.7)
59.9 (5.6)
57.8 (5.6)
55.6
(5.3) <0.001 59 (5.5) 57.3 (5.6)
55.0
(5.2) <0.001
Black race 24.4%
(3125)
9.6%
(180)
16.5%
(308)
34.6%
(648) <0.001
21.4%
(512)
24.9%
(594)
36.9%
(883) <0.001
Study Site <0.001 <0.001
Forsyth County, NC
25.7%
(3291)
31.7%
(594)
26.3%
(492)
21.5%
(402)
29.6%
(707)
25.8%
(617)
20%
(479) Jackson, MS 21.8%
(2783)
8.4%
(157)
14.4%
(270)
30.7%
(575)
18.7%
(447)
22.4%
(536)
33.4%
(798) Minneapolis,
MN
27.1%
(3464)
25.8%
(483)
32.4%
(606)
29.1%
(545)
21.3%
(508)
26.7%
(637)
28.7%
(685) Washington
County, MD
25.4%
(3248)
34.1%
(638)
26.9%
(504)
18.7%
(350)
30.5%
(728)
25.1%
(600)
17.9%
(428)
Education <0.001 <0.001
Less than high school
21.2%
(2701)
24.9%
(464)
20.7%
(387)
17.8%
(333)
27.2%
(649)
19.5%
(466)
16.8%
(402) High school
or vocational school
41.8%
(5334)
38.4%
(716)
35.9%
(670)
35.7%
(668)
46.6%
(1113)
47.5%
(1135)
43.2%
(1032) More than
high school
37.1%
(4731)
36.8%
(686)
43.4%
(811)
46.5%
(869)
26.2%
(624)
33%
(787)
39.9%
(954)
Weight, kg 79.4
(16.9)
86.9 (16.4)
85.6 (13.9)
85.6
(13.2) 0.005 76.9 (19)
73.7 (16.4)
71.9
(14.3) <0.001
Height, cm 168.4
(9.3)
175.8 (6.6)
176.2 (6.4)
176.6
(6.5) <0.001
161.6 (6.1)
162.2 (5.9)
163.3
(5.8) <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 28.0
(5.4)
28.2
(4.9) 27.6 (4) 27.5
(3.7) <0.001 29.5 (7) 28.1 (6) 27.0 (5)
<0.001 BSA, m2 1.9 (0.2) 2.1 (0.2) 2.0 (0.2) 2.0 (0.2) 0.186 1.8 (0.2) 1.8 (0.2) 1.8 (0.2) <0.001 Waist-to-hip ratio 0.9 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) <0.001 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) <0.001
Smoking status <0.001 <0.001
current 22.02%
(2816)
33.2%
(622)
22.8%
(426)
15.2%
(285)
28.9%
(690)
19%
(453)
14.2%
(340)
former 37.81%
(4835)
47.3%
(885)
51%
(955)
51.7%
(968)
25.7%
(614)
28.6%
(683)
30.5%
(730)
never 40.16%
(5135)
19.5%
(365)
26.2%
(491)
33.1%
(619)
45.4%
(1086)
52.5%
(1254)
55.2%
(1320)
Serum creatinine 0.8 (0.4) 0.9 (0.5) 0.9 (0.2) 1.0 (0.3) <0.001 0.6 (0.5) 0.7 (0.2) 0.8 (0.2) <0.001 Serum cystatin C 0.9 (0.3) 1.1 (0.4) 0.9 (0.1) 0.8 (0.2) <0.001 1.0 (0.5) 0.8 (0.2) 0.8 (0.1) <0.001
eGFRcys 91.4
(18.5)
78.2 (18.4)
93.2 (14.9)
103.4
(13.2) <0.001
80.3 (20.1)
92.5 (15.1)
101
(12.5) <0.001
eGFRB2M 84.9
(16.2)
76.0 (15.5)
85.3 (13.4)
91.6
(13.4) <0.001
77.5 (17.6)
86.1 (14.7)
92.3
(14.5) <0.001
ACR, mg/g Cr n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
hs CRP, mg/L n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total cholesterol,
mmol/L 5.4 (1.0) 5.2 (1.0) 5.3 (1.0) 5.3 (1.0) <0.001
5.6 (1.1) 5.6 (1.0) 5.5 (1.0) 0.015 HDL cholesterol,
mmol/L 1.3 (0.4) 1.0 (0.3) 1.1 (0.3) 1.2 (0.4) <0.001
1.3 (0.4) 1.4 (0.4) 1.5 (0.4) <0.001
Hypertension 35.5%
(4539)
39.8%
(745)
32.6%
(610)
34.3%
(643)
<0.001 44%
(1052)
32.2%
(770)
30.1%
(719)
<0.001
Diabetes 11.4%
(1461)
13.4%
(250)
10.6%
(199)
10.4%
(194)
0.004 15.6%
(372)
10%
(239)
8.7%
(207)
<0.001
CHD 5.7%
(735)
14.5%
(272)
9.2%
(173)
5.9%
(110)
<0.001 4.2%
(100)
1.5%
(37)
1.8%
(43)
<0.001
Number of
medications 2.8 (2.9) 2.5 (2.7) 1.9 (2.3) 1.8 (2.4) <0.001
3.6 (3.2) 3.2 (2.9) 3.1 (2.9) <0.001 Polypharmacy
(10 or more medications
2.2%
(279)
1.5%
(29)
0.7%
(13)
1.2%
(22)
0.281
3.7%
(89)
2.6%
(62)
2.7%
(64)
0.034
Mean (SD) or % (N) shown in the table. ACR and hs-CRP show median [IQR]. ACR and high sensitivity CRP were not available at visit 2.
P-value for trend:
Continuous variables: derived from regression of variable on ordinal variable of CMI tertile.
Categorical variables: Cochran-Armitage trend test, except site and smoking status which report p-value for chi square test of independence.
Table S2. Comparison of sex-specific tertiles of CMI with other muscle mass indices based on serum creatinine and serum cystatin C at ARIC visit 5 (A) and visit 2 (B).
A. Visit 5 Mean (sd)
Men, N=2056 Women, N=2583
CMI tertile CMI tertile
1 2 3 p for
trend
1 2 3 p for
trend
N=686 N=685 N=685 N=861 N=861 N=861
CMI, mg/day/1.73m2 714.6 (94.8)
927.5 (50.9)
1185.5
(142.5) <0.001 555.4 (67.4)
720.4 (43.2)
915
(104.9) <0.001 Estimated creatinine
excretion rate,(1) mg/day/1.73m2
1259.2 (63.8)
1265.5 (56.8)
1277.3
(52.5) <0.001 918.3 (113.4)
914.2 (104.7)
917.5
(94.6) 0.867 eGFRcys-eGFRcr(2),
ml/min/1.73 m2 -22.1 (9.2) -10.9 (5.6) 4.8 (8.9) <0.001 -23.4 (9.3) -11.3 (6.3) 3.3 (8.1) <0.001 eGFRcys/eGFRcr(3) 0.7 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 1.1 (0.1) <0.001 0.7 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1) 1.1 (0.1) <0.001 Scr/Scys(4), mg/dl per
mg/l 0.8 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 1.1 (0.1) <0.001 0.6 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) <0.001 Serum creatinine
alone, mg/dl 1.2 (0.5) 1.1 (0.3) 1.1 (0.3) <0.001 0.9 (0.4) 0.9 (0.3) 0.9 (0.2) <0.001 Serum cystatin C
alone, mg/l 1.5 (0.6) 1.2 (0.2) 1.0 (0.2) <0.001 1.5 (0.5) 1.2 (0.3) 1.0 (0.2) <0.001 P-value for trend derived from a linear regression of the variable of interest on an ordinal variable of tertiles of CMI. All ratios (i.e., eGFRcys/eGFRcr and Scr/ Scys) were log-transformed.
B. Visit 2 Mean (sd)
Men, N=5616 Women, N=7170
Creatinine muscle index tertile Creatinine muscle index tertile
1 2 3 p for
trend
1 2 3 p for
trend
N=1872 N=1872 N=1872 N=2390 N=2390 N=2390
CMI, mg/day/1.73m2 897.4 (111.9)
1146.1 (61.8)
1428.6
(151.4) <0.001 669.5 (91.2)
864.9 (46.3)
1077.7
(114.1) <0.001 Estimated creatinine
excretion rate,(1) mg/day/1.73m2
1345.2 (54.9)
1352.4 (47.8)
1367.7
(46) <0.001 1024.2 (101.1)
1018.3 (90.3)
1024.8
(78.3) 0.819 eGFRcys-eGFRcr(2),
ml/min/1.73 m2 -19.6 (11) -3.7 (7.1) 11.9 (9.2) <0.001 -20.4
(12.2) -6.2 (7) 7.9 (8.9) <0.001 eGFRcys/eGFRcr(3) 0.8 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) 1.1 (0.1) <0.001 0.8 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 1.1 (0.1) <0.001 Scr/Scys(4), mg/dl per
mg/l 0.8 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) 1.2 (0.1) <0.001 0.6 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) <0.001 Serum creatinine
alone, mg/dl 0.9 (0.5) 0.9 (0.2) 1.0 (0.3) <0.001 0.6 (0.5) 0.7 (0.2) 0.8 (0.2) <0.001 Serum cystatin C
alone, mg/l 1.1 (0.4) 0.9 (0.1) 0.8 (0.2) <0.001 1.0 (0.5) 0.8 (0.2) 0.8 (0.1) <0.001 P-value for trend derived from a linear regression of the variable of interest on an ordinal variable of tertiles of CMI. All ratios (i.e., eGFRcys/eGFRcr and Scr/ Scys) were log-transformed.
Table S3. AUCs for frailty models and C-statistics for mortality models with related measures in men and women.
AUC for frail and prefrail vs. robust models
Men Women
Visit 5: AUC for frailty AUC 95%CI,
lower
95%CI, upper
p-value AUC 95%CI, lower
95%CI, upper
p-value
Base model 0.760 0.709 0.811 0.753 0.718 0.788
Creatinine Muscle Index 0.827 0.783 0.871 0.002 0.791 0.759 0.822 0.004
eGFRcys-eGFRcr 0.785 0.737 0.832 0.039 0.776 0.744 0.808 0.029
eGFRcys/eGFRcr 0.811 0.766 0.856 0.007 0.777 0.745 0.809 0.037
Scr/Scys 0.793 0.746 0.840 0.032 0.769 0.736 0.802 0.112
Estimated creatinine excretion rate 0.770 0.720 0.821 0.129 0.752 0.717 0.787 0.917
Serum creatinine alone 0.806 0.761 0.851 0.002 0.765 0.729 0.800 0.088
Serum cystatin C alone 0.845 0.805 0.886 <0.001 0.793 0.761 0.824 <0.001
Visit 5: AUC for prefrail AUC 95%CI,
lower
95%CI, upper
AUC 95%CI,
lower
95%CI, upper
Base model 0.655 0.630 0.679 0.647 0.625 0.669
Creatinine Muscle Index 0.669 0.646 0.693 0.015 0.656 0.634 0.678 0.027
eGFRcys-eGFRcr 0.664 0.640 0.688 0.066 0.653 0.631 0.675 0.073
eGFRcys/eGFRcr 0.666 0.642 0.690 0.035 0.654 0.632 0.676 0.065
Scr/Scys 0.666 0.642 0.690 0.029 0.653 0.631 0.675 0.066
Estimated creatinine excretion rate 0.659 0.635 0.683 0.179 0.647 0.625 0.669 0.984
Serum creatinine alone 0.656 0.632 0.680 0.608 0.648 0.626 0.670 0.574
Serum cystatin C alone 0.665 0.641 0.689 0.056 0.654 0.632 0.676 0.101
C-statistics for mortality models
Visit 5: c-statistics for mortality C-statistic 95%CI, lower
95%CI, upper
p-value C-statistic 95%CI, lower
95%CI, upper
p-value
Base model 0.670 0.646 0.693 0.663 0.638 0.689
Creatinine Muscle Index 0.696 0.673 0.720 <0.001 0.698 0.674 0.723 <0.001
eGFRcys-eGFRcr 0.679 0.655 0.703 0.015 0.676 0.651 0.701 0.011
eGFRcys/eGFRcr 0.688 0.664 0.711 0.002 0.687 0.662 0.711 0.001
Scr/Scys 0.682 0.658 0.705 0.011 0.678 0.653 0.703 0.013
Estimated creatinine excretion rate 0.670 0.646 0.694 0.193 0.663 0.638 0.689 0.547
Serum creatinine alone 0.685 0.661 0.708 0.002 0.680 0.655 0.706 <0.001
Serum cystatin C alone 0.700 0.677 0.723 <0.001 0.703 0.679 0.728 <0.001
Visit 2: c-statistics for mortality C-statistic 95%CI, lower
95%CI, upper
C-statistic 95%CI, lower
95%CI, upper
Base model 0.671 0.662 0.680 0.681 0.672 0.690
Creatinine Muscle index 0.687 0.678 0.696 <0.001 0.692 0.683 0.701 <0.001
eGFRcys-eGFRcr 0.683 0.674 0.692 <0.001 0.691 0.682 0.700 <0.001
eGFRcys/eGFRcr 0.683 0.673 0.692 <0.001 0.691 0.682 0.700 <0.001
Scr/Scys 0.682 0.673 0.691 <0.001 0.688 0.679 0.697 <0.001
Estimated creatinine excretion rate 0.676 0.666 0.685 <0.001 0.682 0.673 0.691 0.004
Serum creatinine alone 0.671 0.662 0.680 0.387 0.683 0.674 0.692 0.001
Serum cystatin C alone 0.680 0.671 0.689 <0.001 0.691 0.682 0.700 <0.001
Base model includes age, height, weight, and education. P-value for difference from the base model. Other rows indicate models in which the variable is added to the base model.
Figure S1. Adjusted odds ratios of frail (vs robust) with continuous CMI in men and
women at visits 5 in ARIC. Reference point is cut off for upper tertile. Vertical lines are cutoffs
between tertiles. Adjusted for age, logACR, logCRP, total chol, HDL-C, current smoking,
education, center/race, prevalent CHD, hypertension, diabetes, BMI, eGFRB2M
References
1. Ix JH, Wassel CL, Stevens LA, Beck GJ, Froissart M, Navis G, et al. Equations to estimate creatinine excretion rate: the CKD epidemiology collaboration. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(1):184-91.
2. Potok OA, Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Katz R, Hawfield AT, Rocco MV, et al. The Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated GFR and Associations With Frailty and Adverse Outcomes: A Cohort Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76(6):765- 74.
3. Akesson A, Lindstrom V, Nyman U, Jonsson M, Abrahamson M, Christensson A, et al. Shrunken pore syndrome and mortality: a cohort study of patients with measured GFR and known comorbidities. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020;80(5):412-22.
4. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Kashani K. Serum creatinine level, a surrogate of muscle mass, predicts mortality in critically ill patients. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(5):E305-11.