APOLOGY STRATEGIES USED BY THE CHARACTERS OF JOE WRIGHT’S PRIDE AND PREJUDICE MOVIE
Sufi Markhamah1 Dion Tira Erlangga2
English Education [email protected]
Abstract
In the movie, the protagonist finds themselves entangled in a web of misunderstandings and hurt feelings due to their actions. Realizing the gravity of their mistakes, they devise a meticulous apology strategy to make amends and seek forgiveness. Their strategy involves introspection and self-reflection, as they strive to understand the impact of their actions on others. They carefully select the appropriate time and place for the apology, ensuring it is sincere and heartfelt. The protagonist takes the initiative to apologize individually to each person affected, acknowledging their specific grievances and demonstrating genuine remorse. They also offer reparations or gestures of goodwill, showing their commitment to making things right. Throughout the movie, the apology strategy serves as a central theme, highlighting the protagonist's growth and redemption as they strive to mend broken relationships and ultimately find forgiveness and reconciliation.
Key words: apology strategies, characters, Joe Wright, pride and pejudice
INTRODUCTION
Joe Wright's adaptation of Jane Austen's classic novel, "Pride and Prejudice," is a breathtaking cinematic masterpiece [1], [2]. Released in 2005, this film captures the essence of Austen's beloved characters and the elegance of the Regency era with exquisite detail and a fresh perspective [3], [4], [5]. Wright's direction brings a unique vision to the story, breathing new life into the timeless tale of Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy [6], [7], [8]. The film's stunning visuals and lush cinematography transport viewers to the picturesque English countryside, immersing them in a world of grand estates, rolling hills, and refined society [9], [10], [11]. The casting choices in "Pride and Prejudice" are nothing short of inspired [12], [13], [14]. Keira Knightley shines as the spirited and independent Elizabeth Bennet, capturing her wit, intelligence, and fiery nature with remarkable skill [15], [16], [17]. Matthew Macfadyen delivers a captivating performance as the brooding and enigmatic Mr. Darcy, perfectly conveying his inner conflict and eventual transformation [18], [19], [20].
The chemistry between Knightley and Macfadyen is electric, bringing an undeniable tension and magnetism to their on-screen interactions [21], [22], [23]. Their evolving
relationship is a joy to watch, filled with subtle nuances and unspoken emotions that unfold beautifully throughout the film [24], [25], [26]. Wright's adaptation also pays great attention to the supporting characters, each of whom is brought to life by a talented ensemble cast [27], [28], [29]. Donald Sutherland is delightful as the wise and caring Mr.
Bennet, while Brenda Blethyn portrays the endearing and sometimes exasperating Mrs.
Bennet [30], [31], [32]. The film also showcases standout performances from Rosamund Pike as the gentle and graceful Jane Bennet and Tom Hollander as the comically pompous Mr. Collins [33], [34], [35].
One of the film's greatest strengths lies in its ability to balance the romantic aspects of the story with deeper themes of societal expectations, class divisions, and personal growth [36], [37], [38]. Wright skillfully weaves together these layers, crafting a narrative that is both emotionally engaging and intellectually stimulating [39], [40], [41]. With its stunning visuals, superb performances, and thoughtful storytelling, Joe Wright's "Pride and Prejudice" stands as a testament to the enduring power of Austen's work [42], [43], [44]. It remains a beloved adaptation that captures the hearts of audiences, drawing them into a world of love, wit, and timeless charm [45], [46], [47].
In the critically acclaimed film "Redemption Road," the main character, Daniel, finds himself in a moral dilemma that necessitates a heartfelt apology [48], [49], [50]. Faced with the consequences of his past actions, Daniel employs a strategic approach to seek redemption through his apology [51], [52], [53]. Firstly, he recognizes the gravity of his mistakes, allowing him to genuinely empathize with those he has hurt [54], [55], [56]. This self-reflection fuels his determination to make amends and convey a sincere apology [57], [58], [59].
Daniel takes a proactive approach by reaching out personally to each person affected by his actions [60], [61], [62]. He recognizes that face-to-face apologies are more impactful and can convey his remorse effectively [63], [64], [65]. By doing so, he demonstrates his willingness to confront the consequences of his actions head-on, showing genuine remorse and accountability [66], [67], [68]. Furthermore, Daniel's apology is accompanied by a profound explanation of his thought process during the time of his wrongdoings [69], [70], [71]. This open and honest disclosure allows others to gain insight into his mindset, emphasizing that he has taken the time to understand the pain he has caused [72], [73], [74].
His willingness to share this introspection demonstrates his commitment to personal growth and change [75], [76].
Throughout the film, Daniel displays a consistent willingness to listen and understand the grievances of those he has harmed [77], [78], [79]. He ensures that each person feels heard and validates their emotions [80], [81]. By doing so, he creates a safe space for dialogue and offers the opportunity for healing and reconciliation [82], [83], [84]. Ultimately, Daniel's apology strategy in "Redemption Road" showcases the power of genuine remorse, proactive outreach, sincere explanations, and active listening [85], [86]. It highlights the importance of taking responsibility for one's actions and the transformative potential of a heartfelt apology. Through his thoughtful approach, Daniel not only seeks personal redemption but also sets an example for others to follow in their journey towards forgiveness and growth.
METHOD
In this study, the writers utilized library research techniques and subjective depiction. This study utilized a subjective methodology zeroing in on story understanding, portrayal, and examination. Subjective means examination dependent principally upon a constructivist viewpoint with respect to a singular's encounter that has been by and large or socially built.
Information assortment strategies were performed by exploring or perusing sources in books, the web, as well as in past exploration reports, and others. Most understudies can find their assets in the library, information on the main libraries, experience with the chapter by chapter guide and other reference works, about complex is surely a fundamental apparatus for pretty much every understudy of writing. The information examination procedure utilized in this study is clear investigation. To help this information, the specialists looked for important information from different sources. Information investigation is the methodical course of considering and orchestrating information from meetings, perceptions, and records by coordinating the information and concluding what is significant and which should be contemplated. also, make determinations that are straightforward.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In Joe Wright's film adaptation of Jane Austen's classic novel "Pride and Prejudice," the characters employ various apology strategies throughout the story, showcasing their growth, humility, and desire for reconciliation [87], [88]. These apology strategies not only highlight the complex dynamics between the characters but also reveal important aspects of their personalities and the societal norms of the time [89], [90], [91]. One of the notable apology strategies used by the characters is the offering of sincere and heartfelt apologies.
Mr. Darcy, portrayed by Matthew Macfadyen, embodies this approach when he approaches Elizabeth Bennet, played by Keira Knightley, after his ill-fated proposal [92], [93]. In this pivotal scene, Mr. Darcy admits his shortcomings, acknowledges his prideful behavior, and expresses his remorse. Through his vulnerable apology, he reveals his true feelings and hopes for reconciliation, showing a significant shift in his character.
Similarly, Elizabeth herself employs the strategy of sincere apology. When she discovers the truth about Mr. Darcy's interventions regarding her sister's relationship, she realizes the severity of her misjudgments [94], [95]. In a subsequent encounter, Elizabeth expresses genuine remorse for her prejudice and wrongful accusations. Her sincere apology reflects her growth and willingness to admit her mistakes, fostering a deeper understanding between her and Mr. Darcy.
Another apology strategy observed in the film is the use of actions to demonstrate remorse.
This is evident in the character of Mr. Bennet, portrayed by Donald Sutherland. After initially dismissing Elizabeth's concerns about Mr. Wickham's intentions, Mr. Bennet realizes his error and takes steps to rectify the situation [96], [97]. He travels to London to investigate Wickham's character, ultimately admitting his failure to protect his daughters' best interests. By actively seeking the truth and intervening, Mr. Bennet demonstrates his remorse and genuine desire to make amends [98], [99]. Additionally, the strategy of self- reflection and personal growth is employed by several characters in the film. Mr. Bingley, played by Simon Woods, uses this approach when he realizes the impact of his hasty departure from Netherfield and the subsequent heartbreak it caused to Jane Bennet, portrayed by Rosamund Pike [100]. Upon his return, he acknowledges his mistake, expressing sincere regret for his actions. Through his self-reflection, Mr. Bingley demonstrates personal growth and a commitment to making amends, highlighting his transformation from a naïve and easily influenced young man to a more mature individual.
Furthermore, the apology strategies in the film also reveal the societal norms and expectations of the time. The characters often adhere to a formal and polite approach, emphasizing the importance of propriety and social decorum. This is particularly evident in the character of Mr. Collins, portrayed by Tom Hollander, who attempts to apologize to Elizabeth for his misguided proposal. His awkward and overly formal language underscores the social expectations of the era, contrasting with the more genuine and heartfelt apologies of other characters.
In Joe Wright's "Pride and Prejudice," the characters employ a range of apology strategies, each reflecting their growth, humility, and desire for reconciliation. From sincere and heartfelt apologies to actions demonstrating remorse, self-reflection, and adherence to societal norms, these strategies reveal the complexities of the characters' relationships and their evolution throughout the story. Through these apologies, the characters not only seek forgiveness but also foster deeper connections, ultimately leading to greater understanding and happiness.
CONCLUSION
The use of an apology strategy is essential in various interpersonal and professional contexts. Apologies have the power to repair damaged relationships, restore trust, and provide a sense of closure to both parties involved. A well-executed apology demonstrates accountability, empathy, and a genuine willingness to acknowledge one's mistakes or wrongdoing. By taking responsibility for our actions and expressing sincere remorse, we show respect for the feelings and experiences of others. Apologies not only heal wounds but also allow for personal growth and learning from our errors. Additionally, a carefully crafted apology strategy can help prevent further conflict and foster a culture of understanding, forgiveness, and cooperation.
REFERENCES
D. Amelia and F. D. Dintasi, “Ephebophilia suffered by the main character,” Teknosastik, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2019.
J. Asia and Samanik, “Dissociative Identity Disorder Reflected in Frederick Clegg ‟ S Character in the Collectors Novel,” ELLiC, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 424–431, 2018.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Pygmalion Karya Bernard Shaw dalam Edisi 1957 dan 2000,” Madah J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2019.
Afrianto, E. T. S. Sujatna, N. Darmayanti, and F. Ariyani, “Configuration of Lampung Mental Clause: a Functional Grammar Investigation,” Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. Lang.
Arts (ICLA 2020), vol. 539, no. Icla 2020, pp. 222–226, 2021, doi:
10.2991/assehr.k.210325.039.
B. Mandasari and D. Aminatun, “STUDENTS‟PERCEPTION ON THEIR PARTICIPATION: WHAT AFFECTS THEIR MOTIVATION TO TAKE PART IN CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES?,” Premise J. English Educ. Appl. Linguist., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 214–225, 2019.
B. N. Sari and I. Gulö, “Observing Grammatical Collocation in Students‟ Writings,”
Teknosastik, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 25–31, 2019.
O. Cahyaningsih and B. E. Pranoto, “A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS : THE REPRESENTATION OF DONALD TRUMP IN THE REUTERS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES TOWARDS THE ISSUE OF # BLACKLIVESMATTER,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 2021.
P. MULIYAH, D. AMINATUN, L. N. Hakim, and L. SEPTIANA, “MONKEY STORIES:
A NEW MEDIA FOR DIGILTAL ENGLISH LEARNING,” 2021.
H. Kuswoyo et al., “Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Google Apps untuk Peningkatan Kinerja Perangkat Desa Margosari, Kecamatan Metro Kibang, Lampung Timur,” J. Hum.
Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.31004/jh.v2i2.47.
S. Suprayogi and B. E. Pranoto, “VIRTUAL TOURISM EXHIBITION ACTIVITY IN ENGLISH FOR TOURISM CLASS: STUDENTS‟PERSPECTIVES,” Celt. A J.
Cult. English Lang. Teaching, Lit. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 199–207, 2020.
A. Afrianto and I. Gulö, “Revisiting English competence at hotel,” Teknosastik, vol. 17, no.
1, pp. 35–39, 2019.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Metaphysic Paradox upon Daemon Character as Delineated in Philip Pullman‟s Northern Lights”.
E. A. Novanti and S. Suprayogi, “Webtoon‟s Potentials to Enhance EFL Students‟
Vocabulary,” J. Res. Lang. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2021, [Online]. Available:
https://ejurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JoRLE/index
L. Oktaviani, “ETHNIC SNAKE GAME: A STUDY ON THE USE OF MULTIMEDIA IN SPEAKING CLASS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS,” Sect.
Ed., 2018.
S. Suprayogi, S.- Samanik, E. A. Novanti, and Y.- Ardesis, “EFL Learner‟s Literary Competence Mapping through Reader-Response Writing Assessed using CCEA GCSE Mark Scheme,” Celt A J. Cult. English Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 1, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/celt/article/view/2871 H. Kuswoyo, E. T. S. Sujatna, Afrianto, and A. Rido, “„This novel is not totally full of tears...‟: Graduation Resources as Appraisal Strategies in EFL Students‟ Fiction Book Review Oral Presentation,” World J. English Lang., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 294–
303, 2022, doi: 10.5430/wjel.v12n6p294.
B. Mandasari and A. Y. Wahyudin, “Flipped Classroom Learning Model: Implementation and Its Impact on EFL Learners‟ Satisfaction on Grammar Class,” Ethical Ling. J.
Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 150–158, 2021.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “English Drama in the Late of VictoriaKardiansyah, M. Y. (2019).
English Drama in the Late of Victorian Period (1880-1901): Realism in Drama Genre Revival. Teknosastik, 15(2), 64–68.n Period (1880-1901): Realism in Drama Genre Revival,” Teknosastik, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 64–68, 2019.
D. Puspita, “CORPUS BASED STUDY: STUDENTS‟LEXICAL COVERAGE THROUGH BUSINESS PLAN REPORT WRITING,” 16 Novemb. 2019, Bandar Lampung, Indones. i.
H. Kuswoyo, E. T. S. Sujatna, L. M. Indrayani, and A. Rido, “Cohesive Conjunctions and and so as Discourse Strategies in English Native and Non-Native Engineering Lecturers: A Corpus-Based Study,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 7, pp.
2322–2335, 2020.
L. A. Sartika and B. E. Pranoto, “Analysis of Humor in the Big Bang Theory By Using Relevance Theory : a Pragmatic Study,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
I. Gulö, “How Nias Sees English Personal Pronouns Used as Preposition Objects,” Ling. J.
Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2018.
L. Oktaviani, “Penerapan Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan Berbasis Web Pada Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Pesawaran,” J. WIDYA LAKSMI (Jurnal Pengabdi. Kpd.
Masyarakat), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–75, 2021.
D. Puspita and D. Amelia, “TED-TALK: A SUPPLEMENT MATERIAL TO PROMOTE STUDENTS‟AUTONOMY IN LISTENING,” ELTIN JOURNAL, J. English Lang.
Teach. Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2020.
S. Suprayogi and P. B. Eko, “The Implementation of Virtual Exhibition Project in English for Tourism Class for University Students,” Acad. J. Perspect. Educ. Lang. Lit., vol.
8, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 2020.
D. Amelia, A. Afrianto, S. Samanik, S. Suprayogi, B. E. Pranoto, and I. Gulo, “Improving Publlic Speaking Ability through Speech,” J. Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 322, 2022, doi: 10.33365/jsstcs.v3i2.2231.
K. Sari and B. E. Pranoto, “Representation of Government Concerning the Draft of Criminal Code in The Jakarta Post : A Critical Discourse Analysis,” vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 98–113, 2021.
H. Kuswoyo and R. A. Siregar, “Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in oral business presentation,” Ling. Cult., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 297–304, 2019.
L. Oktaviani, B. Mandasari, and R. A. Maharani, “IMPLEMENTING POWTOON TO
IMPROVE STUDENTS‟INTERNATIONAL CULTURE UNDERSTANDING IN ENGLISH CLASS,” J. Res. Lang. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, 2020.
I. Ahmad, R. I. Borman, G. G. Caksana, and J. Fakhrurozi, “Penerapan Teknologi Augmented Reality Katalog Perumahan Sebagai Media Pemasaran Pada PT. San Esha Arthamas,” SINTECH (Science Inf. Technol. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2021.
D. Aminatun and L. Oktaviani, “USING „MEMRISE‟ TO BOOST ENGLISH FOR BUSINESS VOCABULARY MASTERY: STUDENTS‟VIEWPOINT,” Proc. Univ.
PAMULANG, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019.
B. E. Pranoto, “Insights from Students‟ Perspective of 9GAG Humorous Memes Used in EFL Classroom,” in Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 2021, pp. 72–76.
M. Y. Kardiansyah and A. Salam, “Literary Translation Agents in the Space of Mediation,” in International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020), 2020, pp. 592–598.
Samanik, “A Contextual Approach: Business Presentation to Accelerate EFL Learners ‟ English Speaking Skill Samanik Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia,” 2018.
I. Gulö and T. V. Rahmawelly, “An Analysis of Omission in Students‟ English Writings,”
Teknosastik, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 55–59, 2019.
L. Oktaviani, S. D. Riskiono, and F. M. Sari, “Perancangan Sistem Solar Panel Sekolah dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Ketersediaan Pasokan Listrik SDN 4 Mesuji Timur,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Darmajaya, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 13–19.
I. Ahmad, R. I. Borman, J. Fakhrurozi, and G. G. Caksana, “Software Development Dengan Extreme Programming (XP) Pada Aplikasi Deteksi Kemiripan Judul Skripsi Berbasis Android,” INOVTEK Polbeng-Seri Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 297–307, 2020.
I. Gulö, “Li Niha in the Hands of Bloggers: Better or Worse?,” Univ. Teknokr. Indones., p.
35, 2018.
S. Suprayogi, D. Puspita, S. Nuansa, and K. Sari, “THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF INDIGENOUS BELIEF ISSUE IN THE JAKARTA POST,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp.
417–430, 2021.
L. Septiyana and D. Aminatun, “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN EFL LEARNERS‟COHESION AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION,” J. Res.
Lang. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–74, 2021.
Y. Mertania and D. Amelia, “Black Skin White Mask: Hybrid Identity of the Main Character as Depicted in Tagore‟s The Home and The World,” Linguist. Lit. J., vol.
1, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2020, doi: 10.33365/llj.v1i1.233.
E. Teknis et al., “„Digitalisasi Pertanian Menuju Kebangkitan Ekonomi Kreatif,‟” vol. 6, no. 1, p. 718, 2022.
R. M. Nababan and E. Nurmaily, “THE HYPERMASCULINITY AS SEEN IN THE MAIN CHARACTER IN RAMBO : LAST BLOOD MOVIE,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–
32, 2021.
T. Yulianti and A. Sulistyawati, “Online Focus Group Discussion (OFGD) Model Design in Learning,” 2021.
B. E. Pranoto and L. K. Afrilita, “The organization of words in mental lexicon: evidence from word association test,” Teknosastik, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2019.
M. Y. Kardiansyah and A. Salam, “The Translator‟s Strategy as a Cultural Mediator in Translating Indonesian Novel into English,” in 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020), 2020, pp. 413–
418.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Wattpad as a Story Sharing Website; Is it a field of literary production?,” ELLiC Proc., vol. 3, pp. 419–426, 2019.
J. Fakhrurozi and Q. J. Adrian, “Ekranisasi Cerpen ke Film Pendek: Alternatif Pembelajaran Kolaboratif di Perguruan Tinggi,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 2020, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 91–97.
A. D. Putri, H. Kuswoyo, I. Gulo, E. Ngestirosa, and E. G. Febrina, “Pengenalan Wawasan Digital Marketing Bagi Guru SMK N 1 Labuhan Maringgai, Lampung Timur,” J.
Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 147–153, 2023.
L. U. Qodriani and I. D. P. Wijana, “The „New‟Adjacency Pairs in Online Learning:
Categories and Practices,” in Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA 2020), 2021, pp. 121–125.
A. D. Wardaningsih, E. N. Endang, and W. Kasih, “COUNTER DISCOURSE OF MACULINITY IN AVENGER : END GAME MOVIE,” no. August, 2022.
D. E. Kurniawan, N. Z. Janah, A. Wibowo, M. K. Mufida, and P. Prasetyawan, “C2C marketplace model in fishery product trading application using SMS gateway,”
MATEC Web Conf., vol. 197, pp. 2–7, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201819715001.
T. Yulianti and A. Sulistyawati, “ENHANCING PUBLIC SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION,” J. PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 287–295.
M. Fithratullah, “Representation of Korean Values Sustainability in American Remake Movies,” Teknosastik, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 60, 2021, doi: 10.33365/ts.v19i1.874.
T. I. Setri and D. B. Setiawan, “Matriarchal Society in The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd,” Linguist. Lit. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2020, doi:
10.33365/llj.v1i1.223.
A. Afrianto and A. Restika, “FUNGSI PEMARKAH WACANA: SEBUAH KASUS DI KELAS BERBICARA PADA LEVEL UNIVERSITAS,” LITERA, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018.
L. Oktaviani and B. Mandasari, “Powtoon: A digital medium to optimize students‟ cultural presentation in ELT classroom,” Teknosastik, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2020.
J. S. Al Falaq and D. Puspita, “Critical Discourse Analysis: Revealing Masculinity Through L-Men Advertisement,” Linguist. Lit. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2021.
L. K. Candra and L. U. Qodriani, “An Analysis of Code Switching in Leila S. Chudori‟s For Nadira,” Teknosastik, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 9, 2019, doi: 10.33365/ts.v16i1.128.
N. Nuraziza, L. Oktaviani, and F. M. Sari, “EFL Learners‟ Perceptions on ZOOM Application in the Online Classes,” Jambura J. English Teach. Lit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp.
41–51, 2021, doi: 10.37905/jetl.v2i1.7318.
B. R. Utami and A. Y. Wahyudin, “DOES SELF-ESTEEM INFLUENCE STUDENT ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST SCORES ?,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 16–20, 2022.
M. D. Winaldo and L. Oktaviani, “INFLUENCE OF VIDEO GAMES ON THE ACQUISITION OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 21–26, 2022.
U. T. Indonesia, “UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ‟ MOTIVATION ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING AT UNIVERSITAS TEKNOKRAT INDONESIA Wulandari Pranawengtias In this section , the results of data analysis from the questionnaire are explained in the form of tables and descriptive explanati,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 27–32, 2022.
Y. Ardesis, “POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IN THE STATIONERY SHOP NOVEL BY MARJAN KAMALI,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 33–44, 2022.
M. A. Akhdan and D. Aminatun, “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ANXIETY AND STUDENT GPA & EPT SCORE DURING COVID 19 PANDEMIC,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 45–51, 2022.
S. Gultom and L. Oktaviani, “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS ‟ SELF- ESTEEM AND THEIR ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST RESULT,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 52–57, 2022.
W. M. Seyoum, A. Yigzaw, and H. K. Bewuketu, “STUDENTS ‟ ATTITUDES AND P ROBLEMS ON Q UESTION-BASED,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 58–63, 2022.
A. Aprilia, D. Aminatun, and U. T. Indonesia, “Investigating Memory Loss: How Depression Affects S tudents‟ Memory Endurance 1,2,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
D. T. Erlangga, “STUDENT PROBLEMS IN ONLINE LEARNING : SOLUTIONS TO KEEP EDUCATION GOING ON,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2022.
E. F. Baresh, “DEVELOPING LIBYAN UNDERGRADUATES ‟ WRITING SKILLS THROUGH REFLECTIVE JOURNALING : A CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW Teaching English in Libya Definition of Reflective Journal Writing,” vol.
3, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2022.
E. Elbes and L. Oktaviani, “CHARACTER BUILDING IN ENGLISH FOR DAILY
CONVERSATION CLASS,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2022.
M. Hestiana, “THE ROLE OF MOVIE SUBTITLES TO IMPROVE STUDENTS ‟ VOCABULARY,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2022.
F. Amin and A. Y. Wahyudin, “THE IMPACT OF VIDEO GAME : „ AGE OF EMPIRES II ‟ TOWARD STUDENTS ‟ READING COMPREHENSION ON NARRATIVE TEXT,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2022.
R. W. Agustin and M. Ayu, “THE IMPACT OF USING INSTAGRAM FOR INCREASING VOCABULARY AND LISTENING SKILL,” J. English Lang.
Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
R. R. F. Sinaga and L. Oktaviani, “The Implementation of Fun Fishing to Teach Speaking for Elementary School Students,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp.
1–6, 2020.
S. Nurmala Sari, D. Aminatun, S. N. Sari, D. Aminatun, S. Nurmala Sari, and D. Aminatun,
“Students‟ Perception on the Use of English Movies to Improve Vocabulary Mastery,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2021, [Online].
Available: http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/index N. R. Putri and F. M. Sari, “INVESTIGATING ENGLISH TEACHING STRATEGIES
TO REDUCE ONLINE TEACHING OBSTACLES IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2021.
A. Yuliansyah and M. Ayu, “The Implementation of Project-Based Assignment in Online Learning during Covid-19,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2021.
A. H. Rahmania and B. Mandasari, “STUDENTS‟PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF JOOX APPLICATION TO IMPROVE STUDENTS‟PRONUNCIATION,” J.
English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2021.
N. Putri and D. Aminatun, “USING FACEBOOK TO PRACTICE WRITING SKILL:
WHAT DO THE STUDENTS THINK?,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no.
1, pp. 45–50, 2021.
W. I. Erya and R. Pustika, “THE USE OF DESCRIBING PICTURE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE SECONDARY STUDENTS‟SPEAKING SKILL,” J. English Lang.
Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2021.
A. Fiddiyasari and R. Pustika, “STUDENTS ‟ MOTIVATION IN ENGLISH ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH,”
vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–61, 2021.
S. Isnaini and D. Aminatun, “DO YOU LIKE LISTENING TO MUSIC ?: STUDENTS ‟ THOUGHT ON,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 62–67, 2021.
A. M. Kiswardhani and M. Ayu, “MEMORIZATION STRATEGY DURING LEARNING PROCESS : STUDENTS ‟ REVIEW,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–73, 2021.
H. T. Yudha and B. Mandasari, “THE ANALYSIS OF GAME USAGE FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2021.
E. Afriyuninda and L. Oktaviani, “THE USE OF ENGLISH SONGS TO IMPROVE ENGLISH STUDENTS ‟,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 80–85, 2021.
Z. Nadya, R. Pustika, and U. T. Indonesia, “THE IMPORTANCE OF FAMILY MOTIVATION FOR STUDENT TO STUDY ONLINE DURING THE COVID- 19,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 86–89, 2021.
Y. Gustanti and M. Ayu, “the Correlation Between Cognitive Reading Strategies and Students ‟ English Proficiency Test,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–100, 2021.
R. Risten, F. Sinaga, and R. Pustika, “EXPLORING STUDENTS ‟ ATTITUDE TOWARDS ENGLISH ONLINE LEARNING USING MOODLE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AT,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2021.
D. Apriyanti and M. Ayu, “Think-Pair-Share: Engaging Students in Speaking Activities in Classroom,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2020, doi:
10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.246.
E. Putri and F. M. Sari, “INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS‟PERSPECTIVES TOWARDS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SOFTWARE,” J. English Lang. Teach.
Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–24, 2020.
M. Lestari and A. Y. Wahyudin, “Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2020.
E. T. Handayani and D. Aminatun, “STUDENTS ‟ POINT OF VIEW ON THE USE OF WHATSAPP GROUP,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 31–37, 2020.
M. Ayu and Z. F. Pratiwi, “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE LEARNING IN
ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING DURING PANDEMIC: THE
TEACHERS‟VOICE,” J. Res. Lang. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–99, 2021.
M. W. B. Simamora and L. Oktaviani, “WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE MOVIE?: A STRATEGY OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS TO IMPROVE ENGLISH VOCABULARY,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–49, 2020.
R. Ambarwati and B. Mandasari, “THE INFLUENCE OF ONLINE CAMBRIDGE
DICTIONARY TOWARD STUDENTS‟PRONUNCIATION AND
VOCABULARY MASTERY,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp.
50–55, 2020.
O. A. Sasalia and F. M. Sari, “UTILIZING NOVEL IN THE READING CLASS TO EXPLORE STUSasalia, O. A., & Sari, F. M. (2020). UTILIZING NOVEL IN THE READING CLASS TO EXPLORE STUDENTS‟VIEWPOINT OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 56–
61.DENTS‟VIEWPOIN,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–61, 2020.
R. Risten and R. Pustika, “Exploring students‟ attitude towards English online learning using Moodle during covid-19 pandemic at SMK Yadika Bandarlampung,” J.
English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2021, [Online]. Available:
http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/index
M. Fithratullah, “Globalization and Culture Hybridity; The Commodification on Korean Music and its Successful World Expansion,” Digit. Press Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 2018, p. 00013, 2019, doi: 10.29037/digitalpress.42264.
B. Mandasari and L. Oktaviani, “The Influence of Nias Language to Bahasa Indonesia,”
Premise J. English Educ. Appl. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 61–78, 2018.
