SPEECH STYLE USED IN THE OPRAH WINFREY SHOW
Dico Rahmat Saputra1 Dion Tira Erlangga2
English Education
dicorahmatsaputra@gmail.com
Abstract
Speech style refers to the unique manner in which individuals express themselves verbally. It encompasses various elements such as vocabulary choices, tone, rhythm, pace, and body language.
Speech style is influenced by a person's cultural background, education, personality traits, and the context in which they communicate. Some individuals may have a formal speech style, characterized by sophisticated language, clear enunciation, and a composed demeanor, often used in professional or academic settings. In contrast, others may adopt an informal or casual speech style, employing colloquial language, slang, and a more relaxed tone. Additionally, speech styles can vary depending on the audience, with individuals adapting their communication to be more persuasive, informative, or engaging. Overall, speech style plays a crucial role in conveying meaning, establishing connections, and reflecting one's identity.
Key words: speech style, show, Oprah Winfrey
INTRODUCTION
The Oprah Winfrey Show was an iconic and groundbreaking television talk show that captivated audiences for over 25 years [1], [2], [3]. Hosted by the incomparable Oprah Winfrey herself, the show redefined the genre and became a platform for empowerment, inspiration, and insightful conversations [4], [5], [6]. From its debut in 1986 until its final episode in 2011, The Oprah Winfrey Show became a cultural phenomenon, reaching millions of viewers around the world [7], [8], [9]. What set the show apart was Oprah's unique ability to connect with her guests and audience on a deeply personal level [10], [11], [12]. Her genuine empathy and compassion created a safe space where people could openly share their stories, struggles, and triumphs [13], [14], [15].
One of the defining features of The Oprah Winfrey Show was its commitment to tackling a wide range of topics, often addressing issues that were considered taboo or controversial [16], [17], [18]. Oprah fearlessly explored subjects like mental health, addiction, domestic violence, and spirituality, shedding light on these often stigmatized topics and sparking important conversations [19], [20], [21]. In addition to addressing serious issues, the show also celebrated the joys and achievements of individuals and communities [22], [23], [24].
Oprah's infectious enthusiasm and genuine celebration of success made her guests feel valued and recognized [25], [26], [27]. From surprise giveaways to heartwarming reunions,
The Oprah Winfrey Show had a knack for creating unforgettable and uplifting moments [28], [29], [30].
Beyond the studio, The Oprah Winfrey Show made a significant impact through its philanthropic efforts [31], [32], [33]. Oprah used her platform to raise awareness and funds for various causes, ranging from education and literacy to poverty alleviation and disaster relief [34], [35], [36]. Her generosity and dedication to making a difference inspired countless viewers to take action and contribute to positive change in their own communities [37], [38], [39]. Throughout its run, The Oprah Winfrey Show received numerous accolades and awards, including multiple Daytime Emmy Awards and a Peabody Award [40], [41], [42]. But perhaps its greatest achievement was the profound impact it had on individual lives [43], [44], [45]. The show gave a voice to the voiceless, empowered the marginalized, and ignited a sense of hope and possibility in those who felt unseen or unheard [46], [47], [48].
The Oprah Winfrey Show was more than just a television program; it was a cultural touchstone that shaped the landscape of daytime talk shows [49], [50], [51]. Oprah's authenticity, warmth, and ability to connect with people resonated with audiences of all backgrounds and ages [52], [53], [54]. Her interviews were insightful and thought- provoking, often delving into deep emotional territories and uncovering universal truths [55], [56], [57]. Even though The Oprah Winfrey Show concluded its run, its legacy endures [58], [59]. The impact it had on the media landscape and popular culture is immeasurable [60], [61], [62]. Oprah Winfrey's influence as a media mogul, philanthropist, and advocate continues to inspire and uplift millions worldwide [63], [64], [65]. The show will forever be remembered as a shining example of the power of empathy, compassion, and authentic storytelling to bring about positive change [66], [67], [68].
In the captivating show "Euphoria," the speech style employed is an electrifying blend of raw authenticity and lyrical finesse [69], [70], [71]. The characters' words dance across the screen, revealing a tapestry of emotions, desires, and vulnerabilities [72], [73], [74]. The dialogue is laced with an unapologetic edginess, reflecting the gritty realities of the teenage experience [75], [76], [77]. The writers ingeniously capture the nuances of contemporary youth culture, seamlessly incorporating slang, colloquialisms, and pop-culture references to create a vivid and relatable world [78], [79], [80]. The characters' words are like shards
of shattered glass, piercing through the facade of societal expectations and laying bare their innermost thoughts and struggles [81], [82], [83]. With a poetic cadence and a fearless exploration of taboo topics, the speech style in "Euphoria" challenges conventional norms, ignites conversations, and leaves an indelible impact on its audience [84], [85], [86].
METHOD
In this study, the writers utilized library research techniques and subjective depiction. This study utilized a subjective methodology zeroing in on story understanding, portrayal, and examination. Subjective means examination dependent principally upon a constructivist viewpoint with respect to a singular's encounter that has been by and large or socially built.
Information assortment strategies were performed by exploring or perusing sources in books, the web, as well as in past exploration reports, and others. Most understudies can find their assets in the library, information on the main libraries, experience with the chapter by chapter guide and other reference works, about complex is surely a fundamental apparatus for pretty much every understudy of writing. The information examination procedure utilized in this study is clear investigation. To help this information, the specialists looked for important information from different sources. Information investigation is the methodical course of considering and orchestrating information from meetings, perceptions, and records by coordinating the information and concluding what is significant and which should be contemplated. also, make determinations that are straightforward.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Oprah Winfrey Show, a groundbreaking television talk show that aired from 1986 to 2011, was renowned for its distinctive and influential speech style. Oprah Winfrey, the show's host and executive producer, utilized a captivating and engaging approach to connect with her audience and guests [87], [88]. Her speech style was marked by several key characteristics that contributed to the show's immense popularity and enduring impact.
First and foremost, Oprah Winfrey possessed exceptional oratory skills that allowed her to convey her thoughts and emotions with sincerity and authenticity [89], [90]. Her voice resonated with a unique blend of warmth, empathy, and authority, drawing viewers into the conversation [91], [92], [93]. She had an innate ability to express empathy and
compassion, making her guests feel comfortable and supported while discussing deeply personal and sensitive topics [94], [95]. This aspect of her speech style fostered an atmosphere of trust and vulnerability, enabling guests to open up and share their stories in a profound and meaningful way.
Furthermore, Oprah Winfrey employed a conversational tone in her speech, creating an intimate and relatable atmosphere for both the in-studio audience and millions of viewers at home. She had a natural gift for connecting with people from all walks of life, irrespective of their background, culture, or experiences [96], [97]. Her speech style was inclusive and non-judgmental, making everyone feel heard and respected. She used accessible language and avoided excessive jargon, ensuring that her messages resonated with a wide range of viewers and could be easily understood and appreciated by diverse audiences [98], [99]. Another defining aspect of Oprah's speech style was her ability to ask probing and thought-provoking questions. She skillfully guided conversations, allowing her guests to delve deeper into their experiences and emotions. Her questions were often insightful, encouraging introspection and self-reflection [100]. Through this approach, Oprah facilitated meaningful discussions that explored the complexities of the human condition, inspiring viewers to examine their own lives and seek personal growth.
Moreover, Oprah Winfrey's speech style was characterized by a sense of empowerment.
She utilized her platform to amplify the voices of marginalized individuals and champion important social issues. Her words were infused with a sense of hope, resilience, and the belief that positive change was possible. Through her interviews, she highlighted stories of triumph over adversity, inspiring viewers to overcome their own challenges and pursue their dreams. Her speeches were uplifting and motivating, encouraging individuals to take action and make a difference in their communities.
Lastly, Oprah Winfrey's speech style was often punctuated by moments of vulnerability and personal disclosure. She shared her own struggles and triumphs, demonstrating that she too was on a journey of self-discovery and growth. By being open about her own experiences, she created a sense of connection and authenticity that resonated with viewers. Her vulnerability allowed others to feel seen and validated, fostering a sense of collective empathy and understanding. In summary, the speech style employed in The Oprah Winfrey Show was a masterful blend of authenticity, empathy, inclusivity, and
empowerment. Oprah Winfrey's exceptional oratory skills, conversational tone, probing questions, and moments of vulnerability created a unique and captivating experience for viewers. Her speech style played a pivotal role in shaping the show's immense success and lasting impact, making it a cultural phenomenon that continues to inspire and uplift audiences worldwide.
CONCLUSION
The speech style in a show holds significant importance as it plays a vital role in character development, storytelling, and audience engagement. The way characters speak, including their tone, vocabulary, and delivery, helps define their personalities and brings them to life.
A show's speech style sets the tone and atmosphere, whether it's through formal language for a period drama or casual slang for a modern sitcom. It enhances the authenticity of the setting and time period, creating a believable world for viewers. Moreover, the speech style influences the pacing and rhythm of dialogue, affecting comedic timing, dramatic tension, or emotional impact. A well-crafted speech style can captivate audiences, establish a unique identity for the show, and contribute to its overall success.
REFERENCES
S. Suprayogi and P. B. Eko, “The Implementation of Virtual Exhibition Project in English for Tourism Class for University Students,” Acad. J. Perspect. Educ. Lang. Lit., vol.
8, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 2020.
S. Samanik, “Imagery Analysis In Matsuoka‟s Cloud Of Sparrows,” Linguist. Lit. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2021.
L. U. Qodriani and M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Exploring Culture in Indonesia English Textbook for Secondary Education,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2018.
R. Fadilah and H. Kuswoyo, “Transitivity Analysis of News Reports on Covid-19 of Jakarta Post Press,” 2021.
P. MULIYAH, D. AMINATUN, L. N. Hakim, and L. SEPTIANA, “MONKEY STORIES:
A NEW MEDIA FOR DIGILTAL ENGLISH LEARNING,” 2021.
I. Gulö, “How Nias Sees English Personal Pronouns Used as Preposition Objects,” Ling. J.
Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2018.
Afrianto, E. T. S. Sujatna, N. Darmayanti, and F. Ariyani, “Configuration of Lampung Mental Clause: a Functional Grammar Investigation,” Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. Lang.
Arts (ICLA 2020), vol. 539, no. Icla 2020, pp. 222–226, 2021, doi:
10.2991/assehr.k.210325.039.
B. Mandasari and D. Aminatun, “STUDENTS‟PERCEPTION ON THEIR PARTICIPATION: WHAT AFFECTS THEIR MOTIVATION TO TAKE PART IN CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES?,” Premise J. English Educ. Appl. Linguist., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 214–225, 2019.
S. Suprayogi, S.- Samanik, E. A. Novanti, and Y.- Ardesis, “EFL Learner‟s Literary Competence Mapping through Reader-Response Writing Assessed using CCEA GCSE Mark Scheme,” Celt A J. Cult. English Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 1, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/celt/article/view/2871 A. D. Putri, H. Kuswoyo, I. Gulo, E. Ngestirosa, and E. G. Febrina, “Pengenalan Wawasan Digital Marketing Bagi Guru SMK N 1 Labuhan Maringgai, Lampung Timur,” J.
Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 147–153, 2023.
D. Puspita and D. Amelia, “TED-TALK: A SUPPLEMENT MATERIAL TO PROMOTE STUDENTS‟AUTONOMY IN LISTENING,” ELTIN JOURNAL, J. English Lang.
Teach. Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2020.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Pelatihan Guru dalam Penggunaan Website Grammar Sebagai Media Pembelajaran selama Pandemi,” in English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 2021, vol. 3, pp. 419–426.
B. Mandasari and A. Y. Wahyudin, “Flipped Classroom Learning Model: Implementation and Its Impact on EFL Learners‟ Satisfaction on Grammar Class,” Ethical Ling. J.
Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 150–158, 2021.
L. Oktaviani, “Penerapan Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan Berbasis Web Pada Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Pesawaran,” J. WIDYA LAKSMI (Jurnal Pengabdi. Kpd.
Masyarakat), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–75, 2021.
U. Nurmalasari and Samanik, “A Study of Social Stratification In France In 19th Century as Portrayed in `The Necklace „La Parure‟` Short Story by Guy De Maupassant,”
English Lang. Lit. Int. Conf., vol. 2, p. 2, 2018, [Online]. Available:
https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/3570
K. Sari and B. E. Pranoto, “Representation of Government Concerning the Draft of Criminal Code in The Jakarta Post : A Critical Discourse Analysis,” vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 98–113, 2021.
S. Suprayogi, D. Puspita, S. Nuansa, and K. Sari, “THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF INDIGENOUS BELIEF ISSUE IN THE JAKARTA POST,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp.
417–430, 2021.
A. Afrianto and A. Restika, “FUNGSI PEMARKAH WACANA: SEBUAH KASUS DI KELAS BERBICARA PADA LEVEL UNIVERSITAS,” LITERA, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018.
N. U. Putri et al., “Pelatihan Mitigasi Bencana Bagi Siswa/Siswi Mas Baitussalam Miftahul Jannah Lampung Tengah,” J. Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 272, 2022, doi: 10.33365/jsstcs.v3i2.2201.
L. Oktaviani, “ETHNIC SNAKE GAME: A STUDY ON THE USE OF MULTIMEDIA IN SPEAKING CLASS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS,” Sect.
Ed., 2018.
D. Pratiwi and A. Fitri, “Analisis Potensial Penjalaran Gelombang Tsunami di Pesisir Barat Lampung, Indonesia,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2021, doi:
10.21063/JTS.2021.V801.05.
B. Mandasari et al., “Pendampingan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Bagi Siswa-Siswi Sma/Ma/Smk Di Desa Purworejo Lampung Tengah,” Community Dev. J. J.
Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 332–338, 2022, doi: 10.31004/cdj.v3i1.4026.
E. A. Novanti and S. Suprayogi, “Webtoon‟s Potentials to Enhance EFL Students‟
Vocabulary,” J. Res. Lang. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2021, [Online]. Available:
https://ejurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JoRLE/index
I. Gulö and T. Nainggolan, “The Functions of Nias Personal Pronouns,” 2021.
Samanik, “A Contextual Approach: Business Presentation to Accelerate EFL Learners ‟ English Speaking Skill Samanik Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia,” 2018.
P. Muliyah, D. Aminatun, S. S. Nasution, T. Hastomo, and S. S. W. Sitepu, “EXPLORING LEARNERS‟AUTONOMY IN ONLINE LANGUAGE-LEARNING IN STAI SUFYAN TSAURI MAJENANG,” Getsempena English Educ. J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp.
382–394, 2020.
H. Kuswoyo et al., “Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Google Apps untuk Peningkatan Kinerja Perangkat Desa Margosari, Kecamatan Metro Kibang, Lampung Timur,” J. Hum.
Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.31004/jh.v2i2.47.
J. Fakhrurozi and D. Puspita, “KONSEP PIIL PESENGGIRI DALAM SASTRA LISAN WAWANCAN LAMPUNG SAIBATIN,” J. PESONA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021.
S. Suprayogi, “Javanese Varieties in Pringsewu Regency and Their Origins,” Teknosastik, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2019.
D. Aminatun and L. Oktaviani, “USING „MEMRISE‟ TO BOOST ENGLISH FOR BUSINESS VOCABULARY MASTERY: STUDENTS‟VIEWPOINT,” Proc. Univ.
PAMULANG, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019.
B. E. Pranoto and S. Suprayogi, “Incorporating 9GAG memes to develop EFL learners‟
speaking ability and willingness to communicate,” IJEE (Indonesian J. English Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2020.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Metaphysic Paradox upon Daemon Character as Delineated in Philip Pullman‟s Northern Lights”.
Samanik, “Fable for Character Building,” J. Univ. Teknokr. Indones., 2019.
D. Aminatun, “STUDENTS ‟ PERSPECTIVE TOWARD THE USE OF DIGITAL COMIC,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 90–94, 2021.
A. D. Putri, H. Kuswoyo, I. Gulo, E. Ngestirosa, and E. G. Febrina, “Pengenalan Wawasan Digital Marketing Bagi Guru SMK N 1 Labuhan Maringgai, Lampung Timur,” J.
Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 147–153, 2023, [Online].
Available: https://doi.org/10.33365/jsstcs.v4i1.2666
L. U. Qodriani and I. D. P. Wijana, “Language Change in „New-Normal‟Classroom,” in 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020), 2020, pp. 385–389.
S. Suprayogi and B. E. Pranoto, “VIRTUAL TOURISM EXHIBITION ACTIVITY IN ENGLISH FOR TOURISM CLASS: STUDENTS‟PERSPECTIVES,” Celt. A J.
Cult. English Lang. Teaching, Lit. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 199–207, 2020.
A. Afrianto and I. Gulö, “Revisiting English competence at hotel,” Teknosastik, vol. 17, no.
1, pp. 35–39, 2019.
A. Wantoro, R. Rusliyawati, M. Fitratullah, and J. Fakhrurozi, “Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (Pkm) Peningkatan Profesional Bagi Pengurus Osis Pada Sma Negeri 1 Pagelaran,” J. Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 242, 2022, doi:
10.33365/jsstcs.v3i2.2163.
I. Gulö, “Li Niha in the Hands of Bloggers: Better or Worse?,” Univ. Teknokr. Indones., p.
35, 2018.
B. Mandasari, “AN ANALYSIS OF ERRORS IN STUDENTS‟WRITTEN ENGLISH SENTENCES: A CASE STUDY ON INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS,” 16 Novemb. 2019, Bandar Lampung, Indones. i.
L. K. Candra and L. U. Qodriani, “An Analysis of Code Switching in Leila S. Chudori‟s For Nadira,” Teknosastik, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 9, 2019, doi: 10.33365/ts.v16i1.128.
M. Y. Kardiansyah and A. Salam, “Reassuring Feasibility of Using Bourdieusian Sociocultural Paradigm for Literary Translation Study,” in Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA 2020), 2021, pp. 135–139.
S. Samanik and F. Lianasari, “Antimatter Technology: The Bridge between Science and Religion toward Universe Creation Theory Illustrated in Dan Brown‟s Angels and Demons,” Teknosastik, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 18, 2018, doi: 10.33365/ts.v14i2.58.
I. Gulö and T. V. Rahmawelly, “An Analysis of Omission in Students‟ English Writings,”
Teknosastik, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 55–59, 2019.
E. Teknis et al., “„Digitalisasi Pertanian Menuju Kebangkitan Ekonomi Kreatif,‟” vol. 6, no. 1, p. 718, 2022.
R. M. Nababan and E. Nurmaily, “THE HYPERMASCULINITY AS SEEN IN THE MAIN CHARACTER IN RAMBO : LAST BLOOD MOVIE,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–
32, 2021.
T. Yulianti and A. Sulistyawati, “Online Focus Group Discussion (OFGD) Model Design in Learning,” 2021.
M. Fithratullah, “Representation of Korean Values Sustainability in American Remake Movies,” Teknosastik, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 60, 2021, doi: 10.33365/ts.v19i1.874.
T. I. Setri and D. B. Setiawan, “Matriarchal Society in The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd,” Linguist. Lit. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2020, doi:
10.33365/llj.v1i1.223.
D. Puspita, “CORPUS BASED STUDY: STUDENTS‟LEXICAL COVERAGE THROUGH BUSINESS PLAN REPORT WRITING,” 16 Novemb. 2019, Bandar Lampung, Indones. i.
B. Mandasari and L. Oktaviani, “The Influence of Nias Language to Bahasa Indonesia,”
Premise J. English Educ. Appl. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 61–78, 2018.
M. Y. Kardiansyah, “Wattpad as a Story Sharing Website; Is it a field of literary production?,” ELLiC Proc., vol. 3, pp. 419–426, 2019.
J. Fakhrurozi and Q. J. Adrian, “Ekranisasi Cerpen ke Film Pendek: Alternatif Pembelajaran Kolaboratif di Perguruan Tinggi,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 2020, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 91–97.
L. Journal, F. S. Husna, and H. Kuswoyo, “THE PORTRAYAL OF POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AS SEEN IN THE MAIN CHARACTER IN THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 122–130, 2022.
L. Oktaviani, D. Aminatun, and I. Ahmad, “PENINGKATAN PROFESIONALITAS GURU SDN 4 MESUJI TIMUR MELALUI PROGRAM T2KT,” INTEGRITAS J.
Pengabdi., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 333–345, 2020.
E. N. E. W. Kasih, S. Suprayogi, D. Puspita, R. N. Oktavia, and D. Ardian, “Speak up confidently: Pelatihan English Public Speaking bagi siswa-siswi English Club SMAN 1 Kotagajah,” Madaniya, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 313–321, 2022, [Online].
Available: https://madaniya.pustaka.my.id/journals/contents/article/view/189
B. E. Pranoto and S. Suprayogi, “A Need Analysis of ESP for Physical Education Students in Indonesia,” Premise J. English Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 94–110, 2020.
A. Afrianto and U. Ma‟rifah, “Tubuh dan Relasi Gender: Wacana Pascakolonial Dalam Novel „The Scarlet Letter‟ Karya Nathaniel Hawthorne,” LEKSEMA J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49–63, 2020.
B. Mandasari, “The Impact of Online Learning toward Students‟ Academic Performance on Business Correspondence Course,” EDUTEC J. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp.
98–110, 2020.
B. R. Utami and A. Y. Wahyudin, “DOES SELF-ESTEEM INFLUENCE STUDENT ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST SCORES ?,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 16–20, 2022.
M. D. Winaldo and L. Oktaviani, “INFLUENCE OF VIDEO GAMES ON THE ACQUISITION OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 21–26, 2022.
U. T. Indonesia, “UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ‟ MOTIVATION ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING AT UNIVERSITAS TEKNOKRAT INDONESIA Wulandari Pranawengtias In this section , the results of data analysis from the questionnaire are explained in the form of tables and descriptive explanati,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 27–32, 2022.
Y. Ardesis, “POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IN THE STATIONERY SHOP NOVEL BY MARJAN KAMALI,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 33–44, 2022.
M. A. Akhdan and D. Aminatun, “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ANXIETY AND STUDENT GPA & EPT SCORE DURING COVID 19 PANDEMIC,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 45–51, 2022.
S. Gultom and L. Oktaviani, “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS ‟ SELF- ESTEEM AND THEIR ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST RESULT,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 52–57, 2022.
W. M. Seyoum, A. Yigzaw, and H. K. Bewuketu, “STUDENTS ‟ ATTITUDES AND P ROBLEMS ON Q UESTION-BASED,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 58–63, 2022.
A. Aprilia, D. Aminatun, and U. T. Indonesia, “Investigating Memory Loss: How Depression Affects S tudents‟ Memory Endurance 1,2,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
D. T. Erlangga, “STUDENT PROBLEMS IN ONLINE LEARNING : SOLUTIONS TO KEEP EDUCATION GOING ON,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2022.
E. F. Baresh, “DEVELOPING LIBYAN UNDERGRADUATES ‟ WRITING SKILLS THROUGH REFLECTIVE JOURNALING : A CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW Teaching English in Libya Definition of Reflective Journal Writing,” vol.
3, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2022.
E. Elbes and L. Oktaviani, “CHARACTER BUILDING IN ENGLISH FOR DAILY CONVERSATION CLASS,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2022.
M. Hestiana, “THE ROLE OF MOVIE SUBTITLES TO IMPROVE STUDENTS ‟ VOCABULARY,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2022.
N. Noviana and L. Oktaviani, “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN COLLEGE STUDENT PERSONALITY TYPES AND ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ABILITY AT UNIVERSITAS TEKNOKRAT,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2022.
L. Oktaviani, Y. Fernando, R. Romadhoni, and N. Noviana, “Developing a web-based application for school councelling and guidance during COVID-19 Pandemic,” J.
Community Serv. Empower., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 110–117, 2021, doi:
10.22219/jcse.v2i3.17630.
S. Crisianita and B. Mandasari, “THE USE OF SMALL-GROUP DISCUSSION TO IMRPOVE STUDENTS ‟,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2022.
M. D. Ariastuti and A. Y. Wahyudin, “EXPLORING ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND LEARNING STYLE OF,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2022.
F. Amin and A. Y. Wahyudin, “THE IMPACT OF VIDEO GAME : „ AGE OF EMPIRES II ‟ TOWARD STUDENTS ‟ READING COMPREHENSION ON NARRATIVE TEXT,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2022.
R. W. Agustin and M. Ayu, “THE IMPACT OF USING INSTAGRAM FOR INCREASING VOCABULARY AND LISTENING SKILL,” J. English Lang.
Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
R. R. F. Sinaga and L. Oktaviani, “The Implementation of Fun Fishing to Teach Speaking for Elementary School Students,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp.
1–6, 2020.
S. Nurmala Sari, D. Aminatun, S. N. Sari, D. Aminatun, S. Nurmala Sari, and D. Aminatun,
“Students‟ Perception on the Use of English Movies to Improve Vocabulary Mastery,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2021, [Online].
Available: http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/index N. R. Putri and F. M. Sari, “INVESTIGATING ENGLISH TEACHING STRATEGIES
TO REDUCE ONLINE TEACHING OBSTACLES IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2021.
A. Yuliansyah and M. Ayu, “The Implementation of Project-Based Assignment in Online Learning during Covid-19,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2021.
A. H. Rahmania and B. Mandasari, “STUDENTS‟PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF JOOX APPLICATION TO IMPROVE STUDENTS‟PRONUNCIATION,” J.
English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2021.
N. Putri and D. Aminatun, “USING FACEBOOK TO PRACTICE WRITING SKILL:
WHAT DO THE STUDENTS THINK?,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no.
1, pp. 45–50, 2021.
W. I. Erya and R. Pustika, “THE USE OF DESCRIBING PICTURE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE SECONDARY STUDENTS‟SPEAKING SKILL,” J. English Lang.
Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2021.
A. Fiddiyasari and R. Pustika, “STUDENTS ‟ MOTIVATION IN ENGLISH ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH,”
vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–61, 2021.
S. Isnaini and D. Aminatun, “DO YOU LIKE LISTENING TO MUSIC ?: STUDENTS ‟ THOUGHT ON,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 62–67, 2021.
A. M. Kiswardhani and M. Ayu, “MEMORIZATION STRATEGY DURING LEARNING PROCESS : STUDENTS ‟ REVIEW,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–73, 2021.
H. T. Yudha and B. Mandasari, “THE ANALYSIS OF GAME USAGE FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2021.
E. Afriyuninda and L. Oktaviani, “THE USE OF ENGLISH SONGS TO IMPROVE
ENGLISH STUDENTS ‟,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 80–85, 2021.
Z. Nadya, R. Pustika, and U. T. Indonesia, “THE IMPORTANCE OF FAMILY MOTIVATION FOR STUDENT TO STUDY ONLINE DURING THE COVID- 19,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 86–89, 2021.
Y. Gustanti and M. Ayu, “the Correlation Between Cognitive Reading Strategies and Students ‟ English Proficiency Test,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–100, 2021.
R. Risten, F. Sinaga, and R. Pustika, “EXPLORING STUDENTS ‟ ATTITUDE TOWARDS ENGLISH ONLINE LEARNING USING MOODLE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AT,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2021.
D. Apriyanti and M. Ayu, “Think-Pair-Share: Engaging Students in Speaking Activities in Classroom,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2020, doi:
10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.246.
E. Putri and F. M. Sari, “INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS‟PERSPECTIVES TOWARDS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SOFTWARE,” J. English Lang. Teach.
Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–24, 2020.
M. Lestari and A. Y. Wahyudin, “Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2020.
E. T. Handayani and D. Aminatun, “STUDENTS ‟ POINT OF VIEW ON THE USE OF WHATSAPP GROUP,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 31–37, 2020.
M. Ayu and Z. F. Pratiwi, “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE LEARNING IN
ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING DURING PANDEMIC: THE
TEACHERS‟VOICE,” J. Res. Lang. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–99, 2021.
M. W. B. Simamora and L. Oktaviani, “WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE MOVIE?: A STRATEGY OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS TO IMPROVE ENGLISH VOCABULARY,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–49, 2020.
R. Ambarwati and B. Mandasari, “THE INFLUENCE OF ONLINE CAMBRIDGE
DICTIONARY TOWARD STUDENTS‟PRONUNCIATION AND
VOCABULARY MASTERY,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp.
50–55, 2020.
