“
ǤǣȀȀ Ǥ ȀȀ
ǡǤǡǡǤǡƬǡǤǤȋʹͲͳͺȌǤ
ǤGEMA Online® Journal of Language Studiesǡ18ȋ͵ȌǤ
ǡ ǤǡǡǤǡƬǡǤȋʹͲʹͳȌǤ
ǣ ǤMEXTESOLǡ 45ȋʹȌǡͳǦͳͶǤ
ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ƭ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ȋʹͲͳͺȌǤ Ǧ
ȋȌǤMATEC Web of Conferences ȋǤͳͷͲǡǤͲͷͲͺȌǤ Ǥ
ǡǤǡƬǡǤȋʹͲͳȌǤ
ǤDiscourse Processesǡ54ȋʹȌǡͳ͵ǦͳͷǤ
BEYOND BINARY: A GENDER AND LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PRONOUN 'THEY'
Ananda Putri Noviana [1], Rohmani Nur Indah [2]
ȏʹȐǡͳͻͲ̷Ǥ
ȏͳȐǡȏʹȐǡǤ
ǡ
Abstractǣ
Ǧ ǡ ̵̵ ̵ǡ’
Ǥ
̵Ǧ ̵ Ǥ
ǡ ̵
approach to addressing and using ‘nonǦgular they’ to
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
̵Ǧ
Ǥ’ǡ
Ǧ
̵Ǧ Ǥ̵
ǡ
Ǧ ǡ ̵Ǧ
Ǥ’ǡ Ǧ
Ǧ
: ‘theyǤ’
KeywordsǣǡǦǡ
INTRODUCTION
ǡ
Ǧ ǦǤ ǡ
ȋ
ǡ ʹͲʹʹȌǤ
Ǥǡǡ
ǡǡǡǡ
Ǧ Ǥ
̵Ȁ.’
ǡ
Ǧ ‘’ ‘ǡ’
ȋǤʹͲʹʹȌǡȋǡʹͲʹʹȌǤ
ǦǦǦ ǡ
ǡ ǣ ̵̵
“
ȏͳȐǡȏʹȐ
ǡ
ǡǡȋ ǡʹͲʹ͵ȌǤ ǡ
̵ǫǡ
ǡ ǡǡ
ǡ̵ǡ
ȋǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ ǡ
̵ ȋ ǡ ʹͲʹ͵ȌǤ ǡ Ǧ
ǫǫ
ȋ
ǤǡʹͲʹͳȌǡ to two binaries: ‘he’ for men and ‘she’ for women. In addition, The presence of the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ as a reference that is not limited by gender bias that ǡ ǡ Ǧȋ
ǤǡʹͲʹʹȌ ǤǦ
ǡ ̵ Ǥ
Ǧ ǡ Ǥ
ǡǡ
ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ
ǦǦ
ǡǡ ȋ ǡʹͲʹ͵ȌǤ
̵̵ Ǧ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ ̵ Ǥ
ǣ ̵ Ǣǡ
Ǥǡ
ǦȋǡʹͲͳͶȌ ȋ Ǥǡ ʹͲʹͳǢ ǡ ʹͲʹͲȌǤ ǡ ǡ
ȋǡ ʹͲͳͻȌǤ ǡ
the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ by
Ǥ
̵̵Ǧ
Ǧ Ǥ
̵̵ Ǥ
ǡ
ȋƬǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ ǡ ̵̵
ǡ Ǥǡ
ǡ Ǥ ǡ
̵̵ǦǦǤ
̵̵
Ǥ
ǡ
pronouns such as ‘he’ and ‘sheǤ ǡ
ǡ Ǥ ǡ
on of the pronoun ‘they’ can be analyzed through the point of view of sociolinguistic theory
Ǥ
In this context, the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ can be considered an attempt to expand
Ǥ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ ǡ
reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ through the perspective of gender theory and sociolinguistics
Ǥ
“
ǡ
ǡǡȋ ǡʹͲʹ͵ȌǤ ǡ
̵ǫǡ
ǡ ǡǡ
ǡ̵ǡ
ȋǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ ǡ
̵ ȋ ǡ ʹͲʹ͵ȌǤ ǡ Ǧ
ǫǫ
ȋ
ǤǡʹͲʹͳȌǡ to two binaries: ‘he’ for men and ‘she’ for women. In addition, The presence of the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ as a reference that is not limited by gender bias that ǡ ǡ Ǧȋ
ǤǡʹͲʹʹȌ ǤǦ
ǡ ̵ Ǥ
Ǧ ǡ Ǥ
ǡǡ
ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ
ǦǦ
ǡǡ ȋ ǡʹͲʹ͵ȌǤ
̵̵ Ǧ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ ̵ Ǥ
ǣ ̵ Ǣǡ
Ǥǡ
ǦȋǡʹͲͳͶȌ ȋ Ǥǡ ʹͲʹͳǢ ǡ ʹͲʹͲȌǤ ǡ ǡ
ȋǡ ʹͲͳͻȌǤ ǡ
the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ by
Ǥ
̵̵Ǧ
Ǧ Ǥ
̵̵ Ǥ
ǡ
ȋƬǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ ǡ ̵̵
ǡ Ǥǡ
ǡ Ǥ ǡ
̵̵ǦǦǤ
̵̵
Ǥ
ǡ
pronouns such as ‘he’ and ‘sheǤ ǡ
ǡ Ǥ ǡ
on of the pronoun ‘they’ can be analyzed through the point of view of sociolinguistic theory
Ǥ
In this context, the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ can be considered an attempt to expand
Ǥ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ ǡ
reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ through the perspective of gender theory and sociolinguistics
Ǥ
̵̵
Ǥ ǡ ȋʹͲʹͲȌ ̵̵ ̵̵
ǦǦǤ ̵̵
ǦǦǡ̵̵
Ǥ
Ǥ ǡƬȋʹͲʹͳȌ Ǧ
Ǥ
ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ȋʹͲʹʹȌ
ȋ ȌǤ ǡ
Ǥ ǡ ȋʹͲͳȌ
Ǥ
Ǧ ǡ
ǦǤ ǡȋʹͲʹʹȌ‘’
Ǧ Ǥǣ
ǡǦǡ Ǥ
ǡ
ȋʹͲʹͲȌǡƬȋʹͲʹͳȌǡǡǡƬȋʹͲʹʹȌ
people still perceive the reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’ a
Ǥ ǡ̵ ȋʹͲʹͲȌ
Ǥǡ ȋʹͲͳȌ
Ǥ ǡȋʹͲʹʹȌ
Ǧ
Ǥǡ
ǡ ̵̵Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧ
̵̵Ǧ Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥǡ
Ǥ
ǡǦfair reconstruction of the pronoun ‘they’
ǤǦ
Ǥǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
ǡ
̵̵
Ǥ ǡǣͳȌ
̵Ǧ̵
ǫʹȌ ̵ ̵Ǧ̵ǫ
Ǥ ǡǡ
Ǥ ǡ
̵̵ȋǡʹͲͳͲȌǤ
ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ
̵̵ Ǥ
̵̵ Ǥ
ǡ
ǡǡǡ
“
ȏͳȐǡȏʹȐ
Ǥ
ǡ
ȋǡʹͲͲȌǡȋǡ ʹͲʹͳȌǤǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ ǡ ̵
Ȁǡ̵̵ǡ̵̵ǦǤ̵
Ǥ ͳͻͷǦ ʹͲʹʹǡ Ǧ
pronoun ‘they.’ The third stage was reviewing the
̵ǡ̵ ǡ Ǥ
Ǥǡ
̵ ǡ ǡ ǡ
ȋǡͳͻͳͲȌǡ Ǥ FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Gender in English
Ǥ
Ǥ ̵̵ǡ
ȋǡ ʹͲͳͷȌǤ
Ǥ ȋʹͲͳͷȌ
ȋͳͻͻȌǡ ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡǤǡ
ǡ ǡ ǡ
Ǥ Ǥ
ǡ ȋǡʹͲͳͷȌǤ
̵
ǤǡǦ
ȋǡ ʹͲʹʹȌǤ Ǧ ʹͲͲͲǡ ǡ
ȋʹͲͲͳȌ ǣ ǡ
ͳͻͻͲȋǡʹͲͳͻȌǤ
ǡ
ȋƬǡʹͲͳͻȌǤ
Ǧ Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ ȋǡʹͲͳͶȌǤǡǦ
ǡ
ȋǡʹͲʹʹȌǤ
ǡ
ǡ ǡȋǡʹͲͳͷȌǤȋʹͲͳͷȌ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ ǡ Ǧ
ǡ
ǡ ǦǤ
ǡ ǡǡ ǡǡ
Ǥǡ ǡ
Ǥ ǡͳͻͲǡ
“
Ǥ
ǡ
ȋǡʹͲͲȌǡȋǡ ʹͲʹͳȌǤǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ ǡ ̵
Ȁǡ̵̵ǡ̵̵ǦǤ̵
Ǥ ͳͻͷǦ ʹͲʹʹǡ Ǧ
pronoun ‘they.’ The third stage was reviewing the
̵ǡ̵ ǡ Ǥ
Ǥǡ
̵ ǡ ǡ ǡ
ȋǡͳͻͳͲȌǡ Ǥ FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Gender in English
Ǥ
Ǥ ̵̵ǡ
ȋǡ ʹͲͳͷȌǤ
Ǥ ȋʹͲͳͷȌ
ȋͳͻͻȌǡ ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡǤǡ
ǡ ǡ ǡ
Ǥ Ǥ
ǡ ȋǡʹͲͳͷȌǤ
̵
ǤǡǦ
ȋǡ ʹͲʹʹȌǤ Ǧ ʹͲͲͲǡ ǡ
ȋʹͲͲͳȌ ǣ ǡ
ͳͻͻͲȋǡʹͲͳͻȌǤ
ǡ
ȋƬǡʹͲͳͻȌǤ
Ǧ Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ ȋǡʹͲͳͶȌǤǡǦ
ǡ
ȋǡʹͲʹʹȌǤ
ǡ
ǡ ǡȋǡʹͲͳͷȌǤȋʹͲͳͷȌ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ ǡ Ǧ
ǡ
ǡ ǦǤ
ǡ ǡǡ ǡǡ
Ǥǡ ǡ
Ǥ ǡͳͻͲǡ
Ǧǡ
the renewal of the generic ‘he’ with alternatives such as the singular pronominal ‘they’ (Breccia, 2021).
ǦǤ ȋͳͻͷǣͳ͵ͲȌǡ
ǤǦ ǡ
ǡ Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥǡ
ȋǡͳͻͷȌǤ Reconstruction of the pronoun 'they'
ǡ Ǥ
ǡ Ǥ
ǡ ǡ ̵
ȋǡʹͲͳͻȌǤ ǡ ̵ǡ̵
ǦǤ̵̵
Ǥ ȋʹͲʹͲȌǡ
ǡ
Ǥǡ
ǡ ̵Ǥ̵
ǡ
ǡ ȋ ̵̵Ȍǡ
ȋ ̵̵Ȍǡȋ ̵̵̵̵ȌǤǡ
ǡ ̵ǡ̵̵ǡ̵̵ǡ̵ǡ
̵̵ ȋǤǡʹͲʹͳȌǤǡ ǡ
̵̵ ̵̵̵̵
ȋǤǡʹͲʹͳȌ Ǧǡǡ ̵Ǥ̵̵̵
ȋƬǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ
ȋʹͲʹͲȌ
̵̵
ȋ ȋǡʹͲͲʹȌȌ ͳͶ
ȋǡǤͻͳǡʹͲʹͲȌ Ǥ Ǥ No colleaguethey Ǥ
Ǥ The competent managerthey theirǤ
Ǥ Every musician they their
Ǥ
ǡ̵̵
ǡ ǦǤ
ǦǤsexist substitute for pronouns like ‘he’ and
ǡ ̵̵
ǦǤ
ȋǡǤʹǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ
Ǥ
“
ȏͳȐǡȏʹȐ Ǥ The manager they Ǥ
Ǥ Our youngest sibling their Ǥ Ǥ My cousinthemselfǤ
̵ ȋʹͲͳȌǡ̵̵
Ǥǡ ̵̵
Ǧ Ǥ
ǡ ʹͳ ȋʹͲͳͺȌ ȋʹͲʹͲȌ
ȋʹͲʹͲȌ Ǥ
Ǧ̵̵ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ Sarah they Ǥ
Ǥ Michael their Ǥ
Ǥ ̵my close friend themselvesǤ
̵ Ǧ Ǧ
singular pronoun ‘they’ as seen in the example sentence (a) above, ̵̵
ǤǡȋʹͲʹͲȌ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋȌ̵ǡ̵
̵̵Ǥ ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ a. Your sister her Ǥ
ȋ̶̶ȀǤȌ b. Your sistertheirǤ
ȋ̶ ̶ ǡ ǡ
ȀǤȌ c. Your sister his umbrella here.
ȋ ̶ ǡ ǡ
ȀȀǤ ǤȌ
ǡ ǤȋʹͲʹͳȌ̶Ȁǣ
̶̵Ǥ̵
̵̵
Ǥ ǡ
̵Ǥ̵
ͳ ʹǤ ̵̵
̵̵
Ǥ ǡ ǣ
“This is AlexǡtheyȀǤAlexǤTheyǤ AlexǤThey̶ȋǤǡʹͲʹͳǡǤͳͻͳȌǤ
“
Ǥ The manager they Ǥ
Ǥ Our youngest sibling their Ǥ Ǥ My cousinthemselfǤ
̵ ȋʹͲͳȌǡ̵̵
Ǥǡ ̵̵
Ǧ Ǥ
ǡ ʹͳ ȋʹͲͳͺȌ ȋʹͲʹͲȌ
ȋʹͲʹͲȌ Ǥ
Ǧ̵̵ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ Sarah they Ǥ
Ǥ Michael their Ǥ
Ǥ ̵my close friend themselvesǤ
̵ Ǧ Ǧ
singular pronoun ‘they’ as seen in the example sentence (a) above, ̵̵
ǤǡȋʹͲʹͲȌ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋȌ̵ǡ̵
̵̵Ǥ ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ a. Your sister her Ǥ
ȋ̶̶ȀǤȌ b. Your sistertheirǤ
ȋ̶ ̶ ǡ ǡ
ȀǤȌ c. Your sister his umbrella here.
ȋ ̶ ǡ ǡ
ȀȀǤ ǤȌ
ǡ ǤȋʹͲʹͳȌ̶Ȁǣ
̶̵Ǥ̵
̵̵
Ǥ ǡ
̵Ǥ̵
ͳ ʹǤ ̵̵
̵̵
Ǥ ǡ ǣ
“This is AlexǡtheyȀǤAlexǤTheyǤ AlexǤThey̶ȋǤǡʹͲʹͳǡǤͳͻͳȌǤ
ǡ
̵̵ ǡ
ȋʹͲͳȌǤ ǡ ʹͲͳͻǡ
̵̵ ̵̵ǡ
̵̵Ǧ
ȋǡʹͲʹͲȌǤ̵̵
Ǧ Ǥǡ
̵Ǧ̵ ǡ Ǧ
ȋʹͲͳͻȌǡ ǡ
ȋǡʹͲͳͻȌǤ
ͳǤDefinition of Singular ‘they’ (Source:ǤǦǤ Ȍ
ǡ̵̵
ȋƬǡʹͲͳȌǡȋ ǤǡͳͻͻȌǤ ̵ ǡ̵
ǡ
Ǥ
̵̵Ǥ ǡǤ ȋʹͲʹͲȌ
̵ǡ̵ Ǥ
ǤȋʹͲʹͲȌǡ
ǡǤ
̵̵Ǥ
ǤȋʹͲʹʹȌǤ
ǦǤ
ǡ
ȋ Ȍ ǡ ȋ Ȍ Ǧ
ȋ Ȍǡ̵̵
Ǥǡ
ȋ Ȍǡǡ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋʹȌǤ ǤȋʹͲʹʹȌǡ
ȋ Ȍ
̵ ̵
̵̵ ǡ
Ǥ ǡ