• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

between visual function testing and quality of life parameters at

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "between visual function testing and quality of life parameters at"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Table e3. Correlationsa between visual function testing and quality of life parameters at each time.

Baseline 52 weeks 104 weeks

HCVA (100%)

LCVA (2.5%)

HCVA (100%)

LCVA (2.5%)

HCVA (100%)

LCVA (2.5%)

PCS 0.08

(p=0.02)

0.14 (p<0.0001)

0.09 (p<0.01)

0.14 (p<0.0001)

0.13 (p<0.001)

0.13 (p<0.001)

MCS 0.06

(p=0.07)

0.09 (p<0.01)

0.10 (p<0.01)

0.09 (p=0.01)

0.02 (p=0.59)

0.08 (p=0.02)

IVISb -0.45

(p<0.0001)

-0.29 (p<0.0001)

-0.39 (p<0.0001)

-0.25 (p<0.0001)

-0.37 (p<0.0001)

-0.29 (p<0.0001)

VAS 0.05

(p=0.14)

0.13 (p<0.0001)

0.00 (p=0.9)

0.09 (p<0.01)

0.08 (p=0.02)

0.12 (p<0.001) Lower VFT scores were associated with worse QOL scores, with the strongest (negative) association between HCVA and IVIS at baseline.

aAnalyzed using Pearson linear correlation coefficients.

bHigher IVIS scores indicate worse QOL.

HCVA: high-contrast visual acuity; IVIS: Impact of Visual Impairment Scale; LCVA: low- contrast visual acuity; MCS: Mental Component Summary; PCS: Physical Component VAS:

visual analogue scale.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

reported that second eye surgery for bilateral cataracts resulted in improved visual function and quality of life compared to surgery on one eye.. Gondhowiardjo et

RESEARCH METHOD In one semester-long collaborative writing course, Alwasilah 2004a ex- perimented three modes of engaging 179 undergraduate students with literary and non-literary