• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

OPTIMAL ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (EMPs)

6.4. MODEL FORMULATION

6.4.2. MODEL FORMULATION FOR LARGE WATERSHED WITH DIFFERENT OWNERSHIP

Ci = cover factor for the ith EMP in the plot (dimensionless) Aj = Area of the jth land cover in the plot (m2)

Cj= Cover factor for the jth land cover in the plot (dimensionless) Qmax = Maximum allowable peak rate of runoff from the plot (cumec)

Qmin = Minimum allowable peak rate of runoff at downstream from theplot, (cumec) RCi = Runoff coefficient for the ith EMP in the plot (dimensionless)

RCj= Runoff coefficient for the jth landcover in the plot (dimensionless) Rc = Runoff coefficient of the coverage area (dimensionless)

Ac= Coverage area of the plot (m2)

I = Maximum intensity of rainfall for the time of concentration of the selected design storm for the plot (mm/hr)

(as)i= Suitable area available for ith EMP in the plot (m2) (amin)i = Minimum area required for ith EMP (m2) AL= Total available EMP area in the plot (m2) Cmax = Maximum coverage allowed in the plot (m2)

(amin)i is the minimum area kept for ith EMP in the plot according to owner’s choice (m2) (amax)i is the maximum area kept for ith EMP in the plot according to owner’s choice (m2)

6.4.2. MODEL FORMULATION FOR LARGE WATERSHED WITH

(a) OPTEMP-LM Model Mathematical formulation

Objective function: Minimization of construction and maintenance cost for the EMPs in p number of plots

(6.8)

Where,

i= 1,2,……n, where, n is number of possible EMPs that can be applied k=1,2,3….p, p is the number of plots in the watershed

Ccik = Capital cost of the ith EMP in the kth plot (`) Cmik = Maintenance cost of the ith EMP in the kth plot (`) Constraints:

Sediment yield constraints:

Stmax k

n

1

= i

m

1

= j

k k k

j ik

ik k K K p

1

= k

min ∑ ∑ ∑n +Cc Ac }P ]≤

1

= i

)cik a ik A -

+ ( a { c

) LS ( K

∑[R

St

(6.9) Peak discharge constraints:

( )

}÷A ]IA≤Qk

∑RkC a +(∑ A -∑a )Rc + RckAc

≤ [{

Qk

k max n

1

= i

m

1

=

j jk k

k n

1

= i k i k j

k i i

min

(6.10) Available EMP area constraints:

∑a ≤ALk =Ak -AkCkmax

n

1

= i

ik (6.11)

Suitable EMP area constraints:

ak ≤ask

i

i (6.12)

( )

a

∑ Cc +Cm

=

MinimizeZ ik

n

1

= i

ik ik p

1

= k

Owner’s Choice constraints:

( ) ( )

a min k

≥ ak

≥ a maxk

i i

i (6.13) Non negativity constraints:

ak ≥0

i (6.14)

where,

j= 1,2,……m, where m is the number of different landcover in the plot except the EMPs and coverage area

(Cc)ki = Capital cost of the ith EMP in the kth plot (`) (Cm )ki = Maintenance cost of the ith EMP in the kth plot (`) aki = Area of the ith EMP in the kth plot (m2)

Stmin = Minimum sediment yield required from the watershed (tonnes/yr) Stmax = Maximum sediment yield allowed from the watershed (tonnes/yr) Ak=Area of the kth plot in the watershed (m2)

Rk = Rainfall and runoff erosivity index of the kth plot (100 ft·tonf·in/acre/hr/yr) K k = Soil erodibility factor of the kth plot (tonnes/acre per unit of R),

(LS) k = LS factor of the kth plot (dimensionless)

Ci k = cover factor for the ith EMP in the kth plot (dimensionless) Aj k = Area of the jth land cover in the kth plot (m2)

Cj k = Cover factor for the jth land cover in the kth plot (dimensionless) Qkmax = Maximum allowable peak rate of runoff from the kth plot (cumec)

Qkmin = Minimum allowable peak rate of runoff at downstream from thekth plot, (cumec) RCki = Runoff coefficient for the ith EMP in the kth plot (dimensionless)

RCkj= Runoff coefficient for the jth landcover in the kth plot (dimensionless) Rck = Runoff coefficient of the coverage area in the kth plot (dimensionless)

Ack= Coverage area of the plot (m2) in the kth plot

Ik = Maximum intensity of rainfall for the time of concentration of the selected design storm for the kth plot (mm/hr)

(as) ki= Suitable area available for ith EMP in the kth plot (m2) (amin) ki = Minimum area required for ith EMP in the kth plot (m2) ALk= Available EMP area in the kth plot (m2)

Ckmax = Maximum coverage allowed in the kth plot (%)

(amin) ki is the minimum area kept for ith EMP in the plot according to owner’s choice in the kth plot (m2)

(amax) ki is the maximum area kept for ith EMP in the plot according to owner’s choice in the kth plot (m2)

(b) OPTEMP-LDM Model

In the OPTEMP-LM model, numbers of variable representing EMPs increase with the increase in number of plot. Therefore, with large number of EMPs and with large number of plots, the numbers of variables in the model becomes considerably high, which may sometimes become problem from computational point of view. Therefore, a model with DP approach is developed (OPTEMP-LDM), where number of variable remains same as number of EMPs considered for the study. Here number of stages increases with increase in number of plots, which is computationally advantageous.

In the OPTEMP-LDM model, the watershed is considered as combination of various plots belongs to different land owners. Plots from upstream to downstream in sequence were considered as stages for the DP model. The OPTEMP-LS model provides optimal combination of EMPs for the different plots of the watershed for various desired sediment yield and peak discharge from the plots. The optimal values obtained for each of these plots for different sediment and peak discharge values are then used in the DP model

to obtain optimal combination of EMPs for the entire watershed for desired sediment yield and peak discharge at the outlet of the watershed.

The sequence of plots considered in the DP model is as shown in the Figure 6.1.

Figure 6.1: Arrangement of the plots

Objective function:To determine the best combination of EMPs for the entire watershed so that the otherwise allowable coverage area of the watershed can be developed completely at minimum cost maintaining sediment yield and peak discharge from the watershed within permissible limits.

Recursive equation:

f= cost of EMP combination

fp (Sp) = Min [Z(Xp,Qp)+ fp-1 (Sp-Xp)] (6.15) where, Spis the state variable representing amount of sediment yield from the pth stage, and Xp is the trial discrete sediment yield from the current plot in pth stage and fp-1(Sp-Xp) is the optimal cost of EMPs combination up to the previous stage for allowing (Sp-Xp) sediment yield from (p-1) stage. Z(Xp,Qp) is the cost of the EMPs for sediment yield Xp and is it peak discharge of Qp