• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

SAW device modelling

Chapter 2 Modelling and simulation of one-port SAW resonator

of transmission line, and the port 3 is the electrical port where the voltages are applied and sensed.

By applying a voltage to the IDT electric field is generated in SAW device as shown in figure 2.3(b). The distribution of the electric field can be approximated by cross-field model and in- line field model. In cross-filed model the electric fields are perpendicular to the substrate surface and in-line models the electric fields are parallel to the substrate surface.

Using mason cross-field model, Smith et al. have formulated an equivalent circuit model for surface wave transducers [81]. In this model, the acoustic forces are represented as electric potentials and the SAW velocities as equivalent electric current. The IDT is represented as an equivalent three-port admittance network and is shown in figure 2.4.

Figure 2.3 (a) IDT represented as a three-port network. Port 1 and 2 are electrical equivalents of acoustic port while port 3 is a true electrical port. (b) Directions of electric field lines in an electrically excited IDT with cross-field and inline-field approximations.

(a) (b)

Chapter 2 Modelling and simulation of one-port SAW resonator

The admittance of SAW transmission lines 𝐺0 is given as

𝐺0 = 𝐾2𝐢𝑠𝑓0

(2.10)

where 𝑓0 is the synchronous frequency and 𝐢𝑠 is the capacitance per finger pair and is expressed as 𝐢𝑠= 𝐢0π‘Š where 𝐢0 is the capacitance of one periodic section of IDT per unit length and 𝐾2 is a measure of the surface wave coupling efficiency. The Y parameters of the 3-port network using the equivalent circuit of a period of an IDT can be expressed as

[ 𝐼1 𝐼2 𝐼3

] = [

βˆ’π‘—πΊ0cot π‘π‘πœƒ βˆ’π‘—πΊ0csc π‘π‘πœƒ βˆ’π‘—πΊ0tan(πœƒ 4⁄ ) 𝑗𝐺0csc π‘π‘πœƒ βˆ’π‘—πΊ0cot π‘π‘πœƒ 𝑗𝐺0tan(πœƒ 4⁄ )

βˆ’π‘—πΊ0tan(πœƒ 4⁄ ) 𝑗𝐺0tan(πœƒ 4⁄ ) π‘—πœ”πΆπ‘‡+ 4𝑗𝑁𝑝𝐺0tan(πœƒ 4⁄ ) ] [

𝐸1 𝐸2 𝐸3

]

(2.11)

where 𝐢𝑇 is the total capacitance of the IDT and is expressed as 𝐢𝑇 = 𝑁𝑝𝐢𝑠 , 𝑁𝑝 is the number of IDT pairs and πœƒ = 2πœ‹π‘“ 𝑓⁄ 0 is the electrical transit angle in radian through one finger pair. The equivalent circuit representation of IDT is shown in figure 2.4 (b) The input admittance π‘Œ(𝑓) is written as

π‘Œ(𝑓) = πΊπ‘Ž(𝑓) + π΅π‘Ž(𝑓) + π‘—πœ”πΆπ‘‡

(2.12)

πΊπ‘Ž(𝑓) is the radiation conductance and is given by the relation

πΊπ‘Ž(𝑓) = πΊπ‘Ž(𝑓0) |sin 𝑋

𝑋 |2

(2.13)

π΅π‘Ž(𝑓) is the susceptance and is given by

(a) (b)

Figure 2.4 (a) Three-port equivalent admittance network representation for an IDT in the crossed-field model. (b) Equivalent circuit representation of SAW IDT [81].

π΅π‘Ž(𝑓) = πΊπ‘Ž(𝑓0) (sin(2𝑋)βˆ’2𝑋)

2𝑋2

(2.14)

where, the radiation conductance at 𝑓0 is

πΊπ‘Ž(𝑓0) = 8𝐾2𝑓0𝐢𝑠𝑁𝑝2

(2.15)

and

𝑋 = π‘π‘πœ‹(𝑓 βˆ’ 𝑓0) 𝑓⁄ 0

(2.16)

At center frequency, the radiation conductance is maximum and the susceptance passes through the zero. The equivalent circuit model is generally used in the design of IDT but the second order effects such as propagation losses, electrode resistance and electrode discontinuities are neglected. The IDT is designed such that its impedance should match the source impedance of 50 . For a given piezoelectric material, the IDT with 50  impedance at the operating frequency can be designed by choosing proper values of aperture of IDT (π‘Š) and number of pairs of IDT (𝑁𝑝).

2.2.4 Coupling of modes (COM) model

COM model is widely used in designing of SAW devices. The model considers acoustic properties, wave amplitude and interaction between the waves but the depth of penetration of waves into the substrate is not considered. The coupling interaction between the two counter propagating waves from the IDT is represented in the form of differential equations [82]. As the wave propagates through the piezoelectric medium, charges are induced on the electrode due to inverse piezoelectric effect and it leads to a current flow through the electrodes. The COM model consists of three governing differential equations and are written as

𝑑𝑅(π‘₯)

𝑑(π‘₯) = βˆ’π‘—π›Ώπ‘…(π‘₯) + π‘—π‘˜π‘†(π‘₯) + 𝑗𝛼𝑉

(2.17) 𝑑𝑆(π‘₯)

𝑑(π‘₯) = βˆ’π‘—π‘˜βˆ—π‘…(π‘₯) + 𝑗𝛿𝑆(π‘₯) βˆ’ π‘—π›Όβˆ—π‘‰ 𝑑𝐼(π‘₯)

𝑑(π‘₯) = βˆ’2π‘—π›Όβˆ—π‘…(π‘₯) βˆ’ 2𝑗𝛼𝑆(π‘₯) + π‘—πœ”πΆπ‘‰

where 𝛿 is the detuning parameter given as 𝛿 = 2πœ‹(𝑓 βˆ’ 𝑓0) 𝑣 βˆ’ 𝑗𝛾⁄ , π‘˜ is the reflectivity due to perturbations, 𝛼 is the transduction coefficient, 𝐢 is capacitance per unit length, 𝛾 is

Chapter 2 Modelling and simulation of one-port SAW resonator attenuation and 𝑣 is the SAW velocity. The evaluation of the COM parameters are done either through numerical simulations or by performing experiments.

The COM analysis along with P-matrix formulation is often used for modeling the response of SAW devices. The P-matrix is a type of scattering matrix commonly used to describe the behavior of SAW gratings and transducers [83]. The figure 2.5 shows the P-matrix representation of an uniform IDT transducer and 𝐴𝑖1 and 𝐴𝑖2 represent the amplitudes of waves incident at ports 1 and 2 respectively. The amplitudes of waves leaving the transducer at these ports are represented by 𝐴𝑑1 and 𝐴𝑑2. π‘Š is the IDT aperture, 𝑁 is the number of fingers in the IDT and 𝐿𝑇 = (2𝑛 βˆ’ 1) πœ† 4⁄ is the length of the transducer. Current and voltage are denoted by 𝐼 and 𝑉 respectively.

The P-matrix is defined as,

[ 𝐴𝑑1 𝐴𝑑2 𝐼

] = [

𝑃11 𝑃12 𝑃13 𝑃21 𝑃22 𝑃23 𝑃31 𝑃32 𝑃33

] [ 𝐴𝑖1 𝐴𝑖2 𝑉

]

(2.18)

For a lossless non reflective transducer, with conditions of reciprocity, the elements of the P- matrix are

0

p a

Ξ»

Ai1 At1

At2 Ai2 w

x

-L/2 L/2

Port 1 Port 2

Figure 2.5 Schematic of IDT for P-matrix representation. The pitch p of the IDT is given as, p = a/4 = Ξ»/2. Ai and At denote the amplitudes of incident and transmitted waves.

𝑃11= 𝑃22 = 0

(2.19)

𝑃12= 𝑃21 = π‘’βˆ’π‘—π‘˜πΏ

(2.20)

𝑃13= βˆ’π‘ƒ31⁄ = π‘—πœŒ2 Μ…Μ…Μ…(π‘˜) βˆšπœ”π‘Šπ›€π‘’ 𝑠⁄ 𝑒2 βˆ’π‘—π‘˜πΏ 2⁄

(2.21)

𝑃23 = βˆ’π‘ƒ32⁄ = π‘—πœŒ2 Μ…Μ…Μ…(βˆ’π‘˜)βˆšπœ”π‘Šπ›€π‘’ 𝑠⁄ 𝑒2 βˆ’π‘—π‘˜πΏ 2⁄

(2.22)

𝑃33 = π‘Œ(πœ”) = πΊπ‘Ž(πœ”) + π‘—π΅π‘Ž(πœ”) + π‘—πœ”πΆπ‘‡

(2.23)

𝑃11 and 𝑃22 are the reflection coefficients of the IDT and are zero for the non-reflective transducers. 𝑃12 and 𝑃21 are the transmission coefficients, 𝑃33 represents the admittance of the IDT, 𝑃13 and 𝑃23 are the currents generated by the waves and are computed using πœŒπ‘’

Μ…Μ…Μ…(π‘˜), which is the Fourier transform of electrostatic charge density in the IDT [84]. For a reflective transducer the 𝑃11 and 𝑃22 are written as

𝑃11= βˆ’π‘12βˆ— sin(𝑆𝐿)

𝐷 (2.24)

𝑃22 = 𝑐12sin(𝑆𝐿)π‘’βˆ’π‘—π‘˜0𝐿𝐷 (2.25) where 𝑐12= г𝑠⁄ , г𝑝 𝑠 is the reflection coefficient of one finger, 𝑠2= 𝛿2βˆ’ |𝑐122 |, 𝛿 is the detuning factor, 𝐷 = 𝑠 cos(𝑆𝐿) + 𝑗𝛿 sin(𝑆𝐿). These equations are important for designing the SAW devices.