• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Abstract

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Abstract"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

xli

Abstract

The stability of geotechnical earth structures is often affected if the randomness of geotechnical variables is not incorporated in design. The Factor of Safety (FS) approach holds good only when the input parameters, namely, engineering properties of soil, location of ground water table and loading conditions etc., can be accurately assessed.

The concept of reliability analysis is a well-established mathematical approach to account for these uncertainties of field variables. A few investigations highlighted the sensitivity (S) of random variables on different modes of failure. Also different approaches are available to determine the probability of failure (Pf) for variation of random variables.

Contrarily, design approach incorporating both these effects has not yet been adequately addressed and more rigorous investigation is needed to examine the combined effects of sensitivity of random variables and failure of various earth structures. Also very little is known from the literature regarding any approach to generalize the “partial factor of safety” based upon variations of different geotechnical random variables. In the present study, a correction factor, named as the probabilistic risk factor (Rf) is formulated for different geotechnical random variables based on their variations. These risk factors reflect both reliability and sensitivity of random variables on failure probability, and at the same time may produce an economic design. Pf is calculated by Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis of each random variable is carried out by F-test analysis. The structure, redesigned by modifying the original random variables with the risk factors, is expected to perform satisfactorily with all the variations of random variables included into it. The proposed approach is applied to five different earth retaining structures viz. cantilever retaining wall, gravity retaining wall, reinforced retaining wall, sheet pile walls and finite slopes. The gravity retaining wall is analysed for static, pseudo-static and pseudo-dynamic conditions in a probabilistic framework. It is observed that if the variation in some properties, like internal angle of friction and cohesion of soil be properly identified, significant reduction in cost can be achieved. The study also proposes various design charts for different geotechnical earth structures, under both static and dynamic loading conditions, for different variations of random variables, based upon the proposed design approach.This may help to simplify the use of the proposed method for the practicing engineers.

Keywords: Geotechnical Random Variables, Reliability Analysis, Probability of Failure, Sensitivity Analysis, Earth Structures, Risk Factors

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Newmark [8] developed a method that used implicit integration and global stiffness, mass and damping matrices for both the static and dynamic solutions of structures with both

Summary Maximum von Mises stresses in the hip prosthesis are determined under dynamic loading for nine different activities using a 3D finite element analysis for 3 patients, two

Figure 4 4.3 Lateral Load Analysis NZS 4203:1976 1 allows the base shear coefficient for the seismic static lateral loading to be factored by 0.9 if a dynamic modal analysis is

Calculation of the dynamic response of irregular building structures to earthquake loading, can use the analysis method of response spectrum variance or the dynamic response analysis

Experimentally, three mechanisms namely ping-pong mechanism, ordered mechanism and random mechanism have been reported for the OPRT action in different organisms.. All these mechanisms

In this Thesis, we design different schemes for delivering Sensor-Cloud-based IoT platform to enable energy-efficient dynamic provisioning of the deployed sensors, while maintaining

Conclusion This paper focuses on the geotechnical study and the calculation of the static and dynamic forces which act on a quay wall, the modeling of this quay on the TALREN software

Nonlinear static Nonlinear static –– NSP NSP considered accurate enough considered accurate enough for most structures for most structures  Structural model with Structural model