View of EFFECT OF SELECTED EXERCISES ON ACCURACY OF LONG RANGE SHOOT, PENALTY SHOOT AND RUNNING SHOOT ABILITY IN KORFBALL

(1)

ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING

Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL) UGC APPROVED NO. 48767

Vol.03, Issue 04, April 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

1

EFFECT OF SELECTED EXERCISES ON ACCURACY OF LONG RANGE SHOOT, PENALTY SHOOT AND RUNNING SHOOT ABILITY IN KORFBALL

ZAHEER ABAS KHAN¹

1Research Scholar

Sant Baba Bhag Singh University Khiala Jalandhar

zaheerpe17002041@gmail.com DR. R.S. PATHANIA²

2Professor And Head Physical Education Department Sant Baba Bhag Singh University

Khiala Jalandhar singhpritamsnc@gmail.com

Abstract:- The purpose of the study check the Effect Of Selected Exercises On Accuracy Of Long Range Shoot, Penalty Shoot And Running Shoot Ability In Korfball 40 players were selected from P.G.T.D.physical education Sant gadge baba Amravati university. To check the longer range shoot, penalty shoot and running shoot the self-made test for knowing the long range shoot, penalty shoot and running shoot.the involve tested was conductedon the base of in ANCOVA test its was found that there is sentience difference betweenTable-6 reveals that there is significant difference between means of post test of control and experimental group, to collect the date and the significance was set 0.05 levelthe significance collection was set at 0.05 level

Keywords:- Long Range shoot, Penalty shoot and Running shoot.

INTRODUCTION

A brief history of physical education in the United States would kick off 0in the nineteenth century. There was growing popularity of formal physical education programs all across Europe where calisthenics and gymnastics were all the rage. American schools looked to follow the European model by incorporating physical education into the curriculum for primary and secondary schools. And a brief history of physical education would not be complete with a consideration of institutes of higher education that gradually built up extremely successful sports programs.

The brief history of physical education would start in just about 1820 when schools focused on gymnastics, hygiene training and care and development of the human body. By the year 1950, over 400 institutes had introduced majors in physical education.

The Young Men's Christian Association launched its very first chapter in 1851 and focused on physical activities.

Colleges were encouraged to focus on intramural sports particularly track, field and football.

But physical education became a formal requirement following the civil war when many states opted to pass laws

that required schools to incorporate a substantial physical education component into their curriculums. But it was not till 1970 that an amendment was made to the Federal Education Act that allowed women from high school and college to compete in athletic competitions. Sex- based discrimination was completely outlawed from government funded programs at this point.

THE PURPOSE OF EXERCISE

Last time I wrote about “When Walking Hurts” and explained how you move, how your body functions, is impacted by the accumulation of physical experiences and emotional input acquired over the years.

If you continue to exercise while in pain, it‟s likely that the injury will become a more severe chronic pain, which steals the fun and joy of walking from you. It doesn‟t have to be so. Now I‟d like to discuss the purpose of exercise: It‟s to create a platform of better health and fitness that leads to a better quality of life.

These benefits are derived from the consistency of movement, the everyday actions that do good things for you physically, mentally, and emotionally.

There are those who may want to walk a marathon or achieve some other fitness

(2)

2 goal. However, for many of us it about wants to walk daily and feeling good.

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

The following three physical variables were be selected for the study:

a. Long Range Shoot b. Penalty Shoot c. Running shoot

Criterion Measures The researcher was conducting self-made test for knowing the long range shoot, penalty shoot and running shoot.

ADMINISTRATION OF TEST:

1. LONG RANGE SHOOT:

It is one of the fundamental skills of Korfball game.

Purpose:

To measure the shooting ability of korfball players.

Procedure:

For the collection of data in a precise manner, the subjects will give full demonstration about the conductance of test. The tester will draw a line on the ground 6 mts. apart from the pole of three different positions. i.e. straight from the pole. From left side at an angle of 45 ⁰ and from right side at an angle of 45⁰ then the subject will be asked to shooting for 15 times at different positions.

Score:

No. of successful shoots will be considered as score of the subject.

2. PENALTY SHOOT:

It is also the fundamental skill of korfball.

Purpose:

This test will be used to know the accuracy in shooting ability of korfball players

Procedure:

For the collection of data in a precise manner, the subjects will give full demonstration about the conductance of test. The tester will draw a line on the ground 2.5 mts. apart from the pole at three different positions i.e. straight from the pole. From left side at an angle of 45o and from right side at an angle of 45o then the subject will be asked to do

shooting for 15 times at different positions.

Score:

No. of successful shoots will be considered as score of the subject.

Running Shoot:

It is also one of the fundamental skills of korfball.

Procedure:

The subject will be asked by the tester to perform running shoot at a distance of 10 mts. from the pole and the subject will be also asked to perform running shoot at an angle of 45o from both sides. The subject will be given 15 attempts from all three positions to perform the skills.

Score:

No of successful running shoot will be considered as score of the subject.

Measures:

The data Was collected on 40 male subjects before and after six week training program on long range shoot, penalty shoot and running shoot was analyzed by comparing the means of pre and post test of control and experimental groups and was again statistically analyzed by applying„t‟-test to check the significant difference among selected variables.

Therefore separate presented tables and graphs have been presented for each variable as follows.

Table No. 1 Comparison of Running Shoot Between Post Test of Control

And Experimental Group Group Me

an S.

D. M.

D. D.

F. O.

T. T.

T.

Control 23.

5 4.

34 6.

35 38 5.

29 2.

02 Experim

ental 29.

85 3.

21

Level of significance = 0.05 Tabulated‘t’0.05 (38) =2.02

Table-1 reveals that there is significant difference between means of post test of control and experimental group, because mean of posttest of control group is 23.5 is less than mean of post test of

(3)

3 experimental group is 29.85, and there mean difference is 6.35, To check the significant difference between post test of control and experimental group the data was again analysed by applying„t‟ test.

Before applying„t‟ test, standard deviation was calculated between post test where S.D. (control group) =4.34 and S.D. of (experimental group) =3.21 There was significant difference between post test of control and experimental group because value of calculated „t‟ =5.29 which is more than tabulated „t‟ =2.02 at 0.05 level of significance, which shows improvement was found in experimental group due to six week training and no improvement in running shoot was found in control group.

Graph No. 1 Graphical Representation Of Mean Difference Between Pre And Post Test Of Control And Experimental

Group For Running Shoot

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study and from statistical analysis the following conclusion was drawn. There is significant difference on subjects of long range shoot, penalty shoot and running shoot ability in korfball through the statistical analysis after six weeks training programme.

REFRENCES

1. AAPHER special fitness test manual, AAPHER N.E.A.fitness development, Washington D.C., 1967.

2. Bucher C.A, Foundation Of Physical Education, Saint Louis: The C. V.

Mosby Company, 1987.

3. Blair Steven N. And Will Josephine, Guidelines For Exercises Testing And Prescription, Philadelphia: American College Of Sports Medicine, 1986.

4. 4. Bourke G. Harrison A J and “The effect of resisted sprint training on speed and strength performance in male rugby players.”Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol.23.No.1, Jan,

2009.

5. Colson Johan HcAnd Collision Frank W, Progressive Exercise Therapy, London: John Wright & Sons Ltd, 1983.

6. 6. Comyns T.M, et. al., “Effect of Squatting On Sprinting Performance and Repeated Exposure to Complex Training In Male Rugby Players”. Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research, Vol.24, No.3, Mar, 2010.

7. 7. CastagnaC,et.al., “Relationship between Endurance Field Tests and Match Performance in Young Soccer Players.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 24, No.12, 2010.

8. 8. Christos Kotzamanidisand ,(2006), conducted the study on, “effect of polymeric training on running performance and vertical jumping in prepubertal boys”. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research vol. 20.

No.2. May, 2006.

9. Draganidis D, “The time-frame of acute resistance exercise effects on football skill performance: The impact of exercise intensity.” journal of sports sci, vol.9.no.3, jan.2013.

1 2

3

0 0

23.5

29.85