PREVENTING CARBONATION FROM FORMING IN TUNNEL CONCRETE WITH THE HELP OF SILICIOUS AND POZOLONA MATERIALS IN FRESH CONCRETE FOR
IMPROVING DURABILITY AND PERMEABILTY OF LINING CONCRETE Sudeep Sharma
Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Prof. Rajesh Joshi
Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.)
Abstract - Pozzolans are a class of strengthening cementitious materials that can be utilized as a halfway substitution of portland concrete in concrete. Beside their natural advantages, some pozzolans have been found to build the strength, decrease the penetrability, and consequently increment the sturdiness of cement. In this review, a characteristic pozzolanic material from stores in Southern Saskatchewan was assessed for its viability as a fractional substitution of portland concrete in the development of cement.
Examples with substitution measures of 10%, 20%, and 30% by weight of concrete were ready and tried to gauge compressive strength and penetrability, alongside a reference blend without pozzolan for examination. The impact of sieving out molecule sizes more prominent than 74 μm was examined. The outcomes showed that the 10% and 20%
substitution sums dialed back the strength improvement, yet delivered long haul compressive qualities at more prominent than a half year that didn't vary essentially from that of the reference blend, with the exception of when pozzolan molecule sizes were not restricted to under 74 μm at the 20% substitution sum. The 30% substitution sum created substantial that was more fragile than the control blend by 16% and 8% at 56 days and one year, individually, when the molecule size was controlled. The penetrability of tests ready with 10% pozzolan was measurably lower than that of the reference blend and was additionally genuinely lower when pozzolan molecule sizes were restricted to under 74 μm.
The normal pozzolan is in this manner viewed as a powerful concrete substitution material.
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background
These mixed material practices were lost with the fall of the Roman realm yet were rediscovered through "De architectura"
(Ten Books on Architecture), an aide for building projects composed by the renowned Roman engineer Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, which was committed to his support, the sovereign Caesar Augustus. It is the main book on the hypothesis of engineering that depicts the traditional engineering, foundational layout, and imaginative structure materials exhaustively (Morgan 1914;
Kruft 1994). During the sixteenth - eighteenth hundreds of years, these materials turned out to be more normal for development projects because of their solidarity and sturdiness, particularly their solidifying ability submerged (Idorn 1997; Valek et al. 2012).
Over the time of the twentieth 100 years, the expansion of pozzolanic materials into portland concrete cement has become more predominant and standard practice. One of the inspirations for their utilization has been the interest in maintainability. Businesses have been
leaned towards progressively maintainable practices, and the concrete business is no special case. The outflow of carbon dioxide high up is a difficult issue that should be tended to, as the arrival of ozone depleting substances influences the entire environmental framework and is accepted to prompt an unnatural weather change. Scientists accept that piece of the justification for expanded an Earth-wide temperature boost is because of expanded energy creation, industrialization, agribusiness, and transportation (Mehta 2002). An essential focal point of numerous nations currently is to control the emanation of carbon dioxide into the environment (Altwair and Kabir 2010).
The utilization of regular pozzolan in
cement can help in lessening the creation
and utilization of concrete, and can in
this way lower how much fossil fuel
byproducts into the climate (Tafheem et
al. 2011). Thus, the utilization of mixed
concrete has been progressively
expanding. Otherwise called
strengthening cementitious materials,
they are progressively being utilized to
decrease how much portland concrete required and to work on the nature of cement.
1.2 Scope and Methodology
1.2.1 Research Significance and Scope The utilization of valuable cementitious materials otherwise called Scm's, for making mixed concrete is turning out to be more normal. Different examinations on the utilization of beneficial cementitious materials have been finished in numerous nations, alongside some on the utilization of mixed concretes that incorporate normal pozzolans. Their effect on the sturdiness of a construction has gotten a lot of consideration. This examination assessed the impact of one specific normal pozzolan from southern Saskatchewan on the toughness of cement by estimating the compressive strength and porousness.
1.2.2 Research Methodology
A research center testing program was embraced to quantify the compressive strength and penetrability of cement containing various measures of the regular pozzolan.
Tests with four different concrete substitution sums (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) and two distinct types of pozzolan (as-squashed and passing No. 200 strainer) were tried to gauge compressive strength at six ages (7, 28, 56, 112, 182 and 364 days). Five examples were tried at each age, then again, actually 15 examples were tried at 56 and 364 days to give all the more genuinely dependable outcomes. Compressive strength was estimated on 100 x 200 mm chambers as indicated by ASTM standard C39.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Mohammad et al. introduced the idea of using modern and horticultural waste materials in concrete adds to rewarding lacking regular assets, tackling the garbage removal issue, and tracking down elective methods to safeguard nature.
Natural mindfulness with respect to potential hurtful impacts has altogether expanded, and, in this manner, reusing or utilizing rural and modern waste results has turned into an undeniably alluring option for garbage removal. A few related examinations researched the usage of waste materials and results like coal base
debris, rice husk debris, coconut shells, plastic, glass, and wood. In this paper, a careful evaluation has been led about the modern and farming waste substances that can be successfully used in concrete as a choice to concrete or total in the substantial blend. This paper additionally plans to advance using squanders by improving pozzolanic execution and material properties as a component of substantial constituents.
Girts et al uncovered in this paper the substantial business is anxiously chasing after the monetary benefits of concrete and the improvement of its drawn out properties. One of the best ways to deal with further develop substantial properties is related with supplanting a piece of the Portland concrete with pozzolanic added substances. Albeit business pozzolans like silica seethe have shown to be compelling, they come for an extreme price.
Jamshid et al proposed scientists have demonstrated the way that reused materials can be utilized to substitute a portion of the blend parts in Ultra-High- Performance Concrete (UHPC) to bring about more feasible structure material.
One normal material that can be reused to be utilized in substantial applications is squander glass (WG). This paper presents a writing survey on the consequences for the new and hard mechanical properties of UHPC by reused squander glass (WG). With the expansion of reused glass, the new material ''Ultra- High-Performance Glass Concrete"
(UHPGC) turns out to be incredibly
serviceable and has rheological attributes
working on new substantial way of
behaving because of the low water
ingestion, smooth surface, and improved
bundle thickness of the material. The
utilization of GP (Glass Powder) as a
halfway concrete substitute in UHPGC
gives great mechanical qualities as
compressive strength, elasticity, and
twisting strength. Also, the glass powder
diminishes the vulnerability of chloride-
particle in concrete and lessens the
chance of chloride-prompted steel
consumption. The glass powder's give
pozzolanic movement. Likewise, UHPGC
can be planned with a diminished
measure of concrete as the concrete
business is one of the sources emanating
CO2.
3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 3.1 Overview
This exploration zeroed in on the viability of a characteristic pozzolan from Southern Saskatchewan as a halfway trade for portland concrete. To assess the viability of the material, two principal tests were finished, i.e., compressive strength tests and porousness tests. The material supplanted the concrete in a substantial blend at four rates (0%, 10%, 20% and 30% by weight) and in two distinct structures (as squashed and passing #200 sifter). The two tests kept guideline strategies. The compressive strength was estimated on examples at different relieving ages, going from seven days to north of a year, while the penetrability tests were led at a solitary period of over a year.
This section portrays the trial methods followed to direct all of the testing related with this examination.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Introduction
This section centers around the aftereffects of the analyses performed for assessing the normal pozzolan. The consequences of the pressure strength tests are introduced first, trailed by
correlations of the different materials and a conversation of the impact of the pozzolan in as-squashed and sieved structures. The consequences of porousness tests are then introduced, alongside a correlation of the permeabilities of the two unique materials (as-squashed and passing No. 200 strainer) with various pozzolan substitution rates. Finally, a conversation of the impact of the pozzolans on penetrability is introduced.
4.2 Compressive Strength
The compressive qualities of the multitude of various bunches are recorded in Table 4.1. Likewise recorded in the table are the coefficients of variety, which demonstrate the fluctuation of estimated compressive strength. A graphical show of the outcomes is given in Figure 4.1.
The deliberate compressive qualities for individual examples are tracked down in Appendix C. A factual examination of mean compressive qualities at the 90% certainty limit was performed utilizing a 2-sided Student's t- test; the point by point examination is displayed in Appendix D of this proposition.
Table 4.1 Mean compressive strength of each group of specimens at all test ages (MPa)
1. Percentage of total cementitious materials by weight
2. ac = as crushed; -200 = passing
#200 sieve
3. The italicized values shown in parentheses are the coefficients of variation in percent
4. Indicates that a physical outlier was removed, the tests failed.
5. Indicates that a statistical outlier was removed, the test failed.
6. The bracketed values indicates the number of samples tested at the
given age. Figure 4.1 Variation in compressive
strength with age (ac= as crushed, #200
= passing #200 sieve). The error bars here indicate the standard deviation of
measurements.
In spite of a few obvious irregularities in the deliberate information (e.g., the high strength of the control blend at 28 days and some lower values at 182 days), a few patterns are noticed.
In the first place, at prior ages (as long as 56 days), with two special cases, the compressive qualities of all blends contrasted essentially from that of the control blend. The two exemptions were the 10% pozzolan - 200 examples at 7 and 56 days, which didn't vary from the benchmark group at a 90% degree of certainty. At later ages (112 days and later), the 20% as-squashed cluster and the two 30% clumps at 182 days and 364 days contrasted essentially from the benchmark group, however different bunches didn't. Hence, supplanting 10 or 20% of the concrete with the regular pozzolan seems to slow the strength improvement, however doesn't altogether affect the compressive qualities created in the long haul (i.e., higher than a half year), with the exception of in the event that the most extreme molecule size isn't controlled at the 20% substitution rate.
The 30% as-squashed and passing No. 200 strainer clusters contrasted essentially from the benchmark group at all ages besides at 112 days. Nonetheless, the blends in with the pozzolan kept on acquiring strength over the whole testing period, with the strength gains for the pozzolan blends between 182 days and 364 days all being genuinely huge. This
contrasts from the control blend, which didn't show measurably huge strength advancement at later ages. This affirms that the pozzolanic response happens over a more broadened period, permitting the solidified concrete glue to densify and create expanded strength.
A correlation of the compressive qualities of the examples arranged with the pozzolan in as-squashed structure and with molecule sizes under 74 μm (see Appendix D) shows that at the 10%
substitution rate, there was by and large no massive contrast between the two, while at the 20% substitution rate, the examples arranged with the pozzolan in as-squashed structure were fundamentally more fragile than those arranged with molecule sizes under 74 μm. A comparable pattern was noticed for the 30% examples, for which the as- squashed blend had a lower compressive strength than the mix that consolidated pozzolan passing the No. 200 sifter.
4.3 Permeability
The mean qualities for the coefficient of penetrability of all examples tried are recorded in Table 4.2 and introduced graphically in Figure 4.2. Coefficients of fluctuation are likewise recorded in the table, and mistake bars in the chart relate to one standard deviation from the mean.
Additionally, the table contains the accuracy of the deliberate qualities, which relates to the 90% certainty limits.
Table 4.2 Mean coefficients of permeability at curing age of 442 days
Figure 4.2 Coefficient of permeability as measured at 442 days. The error
bars here indicate the standard deviation of measurements.
The substantial utilized for this study was a moderately great blend, with low penetrability. Subsequently, very little water went through any of the examples north of a 24-hour time frame, delivering estimated values for porousness lying near the wiggle room for the tests, as displayed in Table 4.2. Regardless of this, a few distinctions are evident among the
examples. Both of the blends ready at the 10% pozzolan substitution rate had permeabilities that were fundamentally lower than that of the control blend at the 90% degree of certainty. At this substitution rate, the decreases in porousness were 35% and 54% for the as- squashed and - 200 blends, separately.
The two 10% blends didn't contrast essentially from one another at the 90%
degree of certainty, albeit the 10% - 200 blend created the least mean coefficient of porousness of the relative multitude of blends examined, 29% lower than that of the 10% as-squashed blend. The porousness of tests ready at the 20%
substitution rate didn't vary altogether from that of the control blend or from one another, albeit the mean incentive for the 20% - 200 blend was 5% higher than that of the control blend and 10% lower than the 20% as-squashed blend, while that of the 20% as-squashed blend was 17%
higher than the control blend.
Table 4.3 Mean coefficient of permeability of 30% pozzolan batch at ages of 364 and 442 days
Figure 4.3 Variation in coefficient of permeability for 30% pozzolan batch at
ages of 364 and 442 days. The error bars here indicate the standard
deviation of measurements.
4.4 Discussion
At the 10% substitution rate, the pozzolan is very powerful. The compressive strength was viewed as like that of the
control blend, and a critical decrease in porousness was seen when contrasted with the control blend.
Then again, the exhibition at the 30% substitution rate was altogether more regrettable. The compressive strength at the 30% substitution rate in both pozzolan structures was lower than that of the control blend and the other two substitutions rate (10% and 20%).
The strength of the 30% as-squashed blend was likewise lower than that arranged with pozzolan passing No. 200 sifter. The porousness of the two blends ready at the 30% substitution rate was higher than that of the control blend, as well as the other two blends (10% and 20%).
Albeit not the distinctions were all
genuinely critical, the pozzolan was by
and large observed to be more viable
when the most extreme molecule size was restricted. More modest particles have more surface region for the pozzolan to respond with calcium hydroxide in the concrete glue, prompting a more complete response and denser material. This is reflected in both the higher compressive qualities and lower permeabilities of the substantial containing normal pozzolans at the more modest molecule size.
4.5 Carbonation and Tunnel Concrete Durability
4.5.1 Understanding Corrosion
Erosion is an electrochemical interaction including the progression of charges (electrons and particles). At dynamic destinations on the bar, called anodes, iron molecules lose electrons and move into the encompassing passage concrete as ferrous particles. This interaction is known as a half-cell oxidation response, or the anodic response, and is addressed as: (Figure 4.4)
Figure 4.4 Schematic Diagram of Corrosion
2Fe’ -> 2Fe2++ 4e- (4.1) 2H2O + O2 + 4e-’ -> 4OH- (4.2) 2Fe2++ 4OH-’ -> 2Fe(OH)2 (4.3)
This underlying hastened hydroxide will in general respond further with oxygen to shape higher oxides. The expansions in volume as the response items respond further with disintegrated oxygen prompts inside pressure inside the substantial that might be adequate to cause breaking and expanding of the substantial cover.
4.6 Experiments
4.6.1 Carbonation Depth Results Analysis of Carbonation Results
Relationshp between carbonated profundity versus Strength are plotted here.
The upsides of carbonation profundity have been plotted against plan strength. It has been isolated into 6 sections. Each part is the line addressing for a proper substitution level of fly debris and silica rage. It is a complete diagram and it tends to be seen plainly that as strength expands the carbonation profundity values are diminishing.
4.7 Carbonation of Tunnel Concrete The passage substantial comes into contact with carbonic corrosive coming about because of carbon dioxide in the air, the following carbonation of the calcium hydroxide in the hydrated concrete glue prompts decrease of the alkalinity, to pH as low as 8.5, consequently allowing erosion of the implanted steel. At the point when all Ca(OH)2 in burrow concrete has become carbonated the pH worth of passage substantial will be essentially as low as 8.3 and at that stage the defensive layer gets annihilated and steel is presented to erosion. The pace of carbonation in burrow concrete straightforwardly relies upon the water concrete proportion of the substantial, i.e., the higher the proportion the more noteworthy is the profundity of carbonation in the substantial. In solidify burrow concrete with sensible quality with next to no breaks pace of carbonation is supposed to be extremely low. Concrete glue contains 25-50 rates by weight calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2), with pH of the new concrete glue is something like 12.5. The pH of a completely carbonated glue is around 7.
The passage substantial will carbonate if CO2 from air or from water enters the substantial as indicated by
CO2+ H2O '! H2CO3 (4.4) Ca (OH)2+H2CO3'! CaCO3+ 2H2O (4.5) Alkali + Acid '! Salt + water (4.6) 4.8 Repair Methodology Adopted
Burrow concrete infiltrating erosion inhibitors depend on bipolar inhabitation instrument. These can enter even in thick passage concrete by righteousness of its low fume tension and normal proclivity to metallic surfaces and occupy erosion at both anode and cathode surfaces.
Traditional inhibitors depend on Calcium
nitrate that works just on anodic
inhibitors component. In light of the non- horrendous tests results it was chosen to take on the realkalisation of passage concrete for proceeded with use. The current surface covering of oil bound sickness was taken out by scouring totally and washed with water and cleaned with compacted air. Openings were bored at a time period focus to focus along the length of the segment on every one of the uncovered sides so that the stunning will be viable to cover most extreme area of sections and pillars. PVC spouts are grouted with epoxy grout and air restored. Reclamation and expanding the alkalinity burrow concrete, a basic inhibitor arrangement of Calcium hydroxide 2gm/liter and sodium nitrite of 10 gm/liter arrangement were grouted in all openings.
4.9 Qualification of Repair Methodology
The corroborative tests were directed on the fixed underlying individuals. PH test for old cementing when infusion re- alkalization compound, and so on, were led. Powder tests were gathered for assessment of pH of the realkalisation burrow concrete. There is momentous improvement of pH as given in Table 4.8 and displayed in Chart 4.1
Chart 4.1 Values of pH of concrete before an after realkalization Table 4.4 Values of pH before and after
re-alkalization
Locationof sample Before
realkalization After realkalization
L1 10.00 12.20
L2 9.70 12.2
L3 10.90 12.12
L4 9.00 12.20
L5 9.10 11.80
L6 8.20 11.90
L7 9.80 12.16
L8 9.20 12.10
L9 9.10 12.07
L10 10.10 12.10
4.10 Discussion of Results
Pace of carbonation relies upon the degree of pore water, burrow substantial grade, porousness of passage cement and cover profundity. The carbon dioxide dispersion will be extremely sluggish when the passage substantial pores are loaded up with water. The all around diffused carbon dioxide will bring about arrangement of carbonic corrosive, which eventually brings about alkalinity decrease. Periodical upkeep like reestablishment is expected for all passage substantial individuals from structures presented to forceful climate.
The plan of designs presented to such forceful modern contaminated air condition, fitting defensive covering for building up steel, all the passage cement and workmanship surfaces will be determined for execution right in development stage.
5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Taking into account the impact of the molecule size of the regular pozzolan, very little contrast was seen between the compressive qualities of tests ready with as-squashed and sieved pozzolan at the 10% substitution rate. At the 20% and 30% substitution rates, the examples arranged with the as-squashed pozzolan had compressive qualities that were genuinely lower than those arranged with the pozzolan that had been sieved to a most extreme molecule size of 74 μm. In this way, not restricting the greatest molecule size harmed the compressive strength at the 20% and 30% pozzolan substitution rates. Tests ready with molecule sizes less than 74 μm had mean coefficients of porousness that were 24%, 23%, and 10% lower for the 10%, 20%
and 30% substitution rates, separately, contrasted with their buddy examples arranged with the as-squashed pozzolan.
Alkalinity of passage cement can be expanded and erosion of support because of carbonation can be deferred by utilizing specific consumption repressing synthetics like nitrites, phosphates, benzonites and so forth on solidified burrow concrete.
Forceful general climate impact
carbonation and erosion in burrow
substantial designs. On the off
chance that the general climate is
appropriately researched, it is feasible to take on different medicinal and careful steps to postpone or limit carbonation and consumption commencement in burrow concrete.
Erosion inhibitor chose ought to be equipped for entering upto steel support.
The Corrosion inhibitors utilized for realkalisation are going about as defensive coats for the uncovered surfaces of passage concrete because of property of hydrophobic impregnation
Without appropriate examination on the forceful impact of the encompassing, the passage substantial designs must be worked with legitimate plan, development quality control in order to accomplish profoundly impermeable passage substantial utilizing mineral admixtures.
6 FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. More tests ought to be finished to assess the regular pozzolan secured from Southern Saskatchewan for examining the intensity of hydration in the blend and its impacts on different water/concrete proportions.
2. The blend plan for this study was expected to compare to a great cement for an extension deck application, yet unique blend plans could be taken on for a lower-quality cement for applications like walkways or private storm cellars.
3. The utilization of some regular pozzolans has been displayed to forestall unreasonable extension because of soluble base silica response. The pozzolans from southern Saskatchewan ought to be tried for this application.
4. Apart from a sifter examination, individual molecule size dispersions could likewise be estimated utilizing laser diffraction based molecule size analyzer.
5. Tests to distinguish the physical and compound sythesis of the regular pozzolan could be performed and contrasted with comparable substitution materials like fly debris, metakaolin, and so forth.
REFERENCES
1. Ababneh, A., and Matalkah, F. 2018.
Potential use of Jordanian volcanic tuffs as supplementary cementitious materials. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 8: 193–
202.
2. Abdollahi, S. 2016. The Role of Pozzolans to Reduce Air Pollution, Production Cost and Increasing of Quality in Lamerd Cement Factory. In 2nd International Conference on Science & Engineering. Istanbul - Turkey.
pp. 1–12. Available from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
301695090.
3. ACI Committee 226.3R-87. 1987. Use of Fly Ash in Concrete. American Concrete Institute Materials Journal, 84(5): 381–409.
4. ACI Committee 211.2-98. 1998. Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Structural Lightweight Concrete (ACI 211.2- 98). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, NJ.
5. ACI Committee 225R-99. 1999. ACI 225R-99 Guide to the Selection and Use of Hydraulic Cements. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, NJ.
6. ACI Committee 229R-99. 1999. Controlled Low-Strength Materials (ACI 229R-99).
American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, NJ.
7. ACI Committee 232.1R-00. 2000. Use of Raw or Processed Natural Pozzolans in Concrete (ACI 232.1R-00). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, NJ.
8. ACI Committee 229R-99 (Reapproved 2005).
2005. Controlled Low-Strength Materials (ACI 229R-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, NJ.
9. Al-chaar, G.K., Alkadi, M., Yaksic, D.A., and Kallemeyn, L.A. 2011. The Use of Natural Pozzolan in Concrete as an Additive or Substitute for Cement.
10. Al-chaar, G.K., Alkadi, M., and Asteris, P.G.
2013. Natural Pozzolan as a Partial Substitute for Cement in Concrete. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 7(6): 33–42.
11. Al-chaar, G.K., and Alkadi, M. 2016. Natural Pozzolan as a Partial Substitute for Cement in Concrete. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
267248129.
12. AL-Jumaily, I.A.S., Naji, N., and Kareem, Q.
2015. An overview on the Influence of Pozzolanic Materials on Properties of Concrete. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology &
Engineering, 4(3): 81–92.
13. Altwair, N.M., and Kabir, S. 2010. Green Concrete Structures by Replacing Cement with Pozzolanic Materials to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emission for sustainable Environment. In American Society of Civil Engineers 6th international Engineering and Construction Conference (IECC’6). pp. 269–
279.
14. Antiohos, S.K., Tapali, J.G., Zervaki, M., Sousa-coutinho, J., Tsimas, S., and Papadakis, V.G. 2013. Low embodied energy cement containing untreated RHA: A strength development and durability study.
Construction and Building Materials, 49:
455–463.
15. ASTM International. 2001. ASTM C 136 - 01 Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates.
16. ASTM International. 2008. ASTM D6527 - 08 Standard Test Method for Determining Unsaturated and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Porous Media by Steady State Centrifugation.
17. ASTM International. 2015. ASTM C128 - 15 Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate.
18. ASTM International. 2015. ASTM C143/C143M - 15a Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete.
19. ASTM International. 2016. ASTM C457/C457M - 16 Standard Test Method for Microscopical Determination of Parameters of the Air-Void System in Hardened Concrete.
20. ASTM International. 2017. ASTM C39/C39M - 17b Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.
21. ASTM International. 2017. ASTM C231/C231M - 17a Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method.
22. ASTM International. 2017. ASTM C618 - 17a Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete.
23. ASTM (STP No. 99) 2018. Symposium on Use of Pozzolanic Materials in Mortars and Concretes.
24. Balog, A.A., Cobirzan, N., Aciu, C., and Ilutiu-Varvara, D.A. 2014. Valorification of volcanic tuff in constructions and materials manufacturing industry. Procedia Technology, 12: 323–328.
25. Baronio, G., and Binda, L. 1997. Study of the pozzolanicity of some bricks and clays.
Construction and Building Materials, 11(1):
41–46.
26. Bentz, D.P., Lura, P., and Roberts, J.W.
2005. Mixture Proportioning for Internal Curing. Concrete International, 27(2): 35–
40.
27. Bentz, D.P. 2007. Internal Curing of High- Performance Blended Cement Mortars. ACI Materials Journal, 104(4): 408–414.
28. Bevington, P.R., and Robinson, D.K. 2003.
Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. In Third Edition.
McGraw-Hill.
29. Binici, H., and Aksogan, O. 2006. Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cement.
Cement & Concrete Composites, 28: 39–46.
30. Binici, H., Aksogan, O., Cagatay, I.H., Tokyay, M., and Emsen, E. 2007. The effect of particle size distribution on the properties of blended cements incorporating GGBFS and natural pozzolan (NP). Powder Technology, 177: 140–147.
31. Bouzoubaa, N., and Fournier, B. 2005.
Current situation with the production and use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete construction in Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(2): 129–143.
32. Bustos, F., Martinez, P., Videla, C., and Lopez, M. 2015. Reducing concrete permeability by using natural pozzolans and reduced aggregate-to-pasteratio. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2):
165–176.
33. Celik, K., Meral, C., Mancio, M., Mehta, P.K., and Monteiro, P.J.M. 2014. A comparative study of self-consolidating concretes incorporating high-volume natural pozzolan or high-volume fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 67: 14–19.
34. Cheerarot, R., and Jaturapitakkul, C. 2004.
A study of disposed fly ash from landfill to replace Portland cement. Waste Management, 24(2): 701–709.
35. Chen, H., Soles, J., and Malhotra V.M.
1993. Investigations of Supplementary Cementing Materials for Reducing Alkali- Aggregate Reactions. Cement & Concrete Composites, 15: 75–85.
36. Choucha, S., Benyahia, A., Ghrici, M., and Mansour, M.S. 2017. Effect of natural pozzolan content on the properties of engineered cementitious composites as repair material. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering: 1–9.
37. Cobirzan, N., Balog, A.-A., and Mosonyi, E.
2015. Investigation of the natural pozzolans for usage in cement industry. Procedia Technology, 19: 506–511.
38. Colak, A. 2003. Characteristics of pastes from a Portland cement containing different amounts of natural pozzolan. Cement and Concrete Research, 33: 585–593.
39. Conca, J.L., and Wright, J. 1992. Diffusion and Flow in Gravel, Soil, and Whole Rock. In Applied Hydrogeology. pp. 5–24.
40. Cook, J.E. 1982. Research and Application of High-Strength Concrete Using Class C Fly Ash. Concrete International, 4(7): 72–80.
41. Crawford, L.W. 1951. An Investigation of the Properties of Saskatchewan Volcanic Ash.
M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Saskatchewan.
42. Crawford, G.S. 1955. Pumicite in Saskatchewan. Department of Mineral Resources, Industrial Minerals Research Branch, Report No. 16. pp - 1–35.
43. Davis, R.E., Carlson, R.W., Kelly, J.W. and Davis, H.E. 1937. Properties of Cements and Concretes Containing Fly Ash. American Concrete Institute Journal Proceedings, 33(5): 577–612.
44. Davis, R. 1950. A Review of Pozzolanic Materials and Their Use in Concretes.
Symposium on Use of Pozzolanic Materials in Mortars and Concretes. ASTM International (STP39401S): 3–15.
45. Debella, D.C., and Ries, R. 2006.
Construction Delivery Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Their Performance within School Districts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11): 1131–1138.
46. Debella, D.M.C. 2004. Construction Delivery Systems: A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of systems Within School Districts. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Pittsburgh.
47. Department of Civil and Geological Engineering-University of Saskatchewan.
2016. Laboratory Manual - Particle Size Analysis. Saskatoon.
48. Dhir, R.K., Hewlett, P.C., and Csetenyi, L.J.
2002. Innovations and Developments in Concrete Materials and Construction:
Proceedings of the International Conference, Volume 1. Thomas Telford: 159–173.
49. Dunstan, R. 1980. A Possible Method for Identifying Fly Ashes That Will Improve the Sulfate Resistance of Concretes. Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, CCAGDP, 2(1):
20–30.
50. Dunstan, E.R. 1984. Fly Ash and Fly Ash Concrete.
51. Dunstan, E.R.J. 2011. How Does Pozzolanic Reaction Make Concrete ―Green‖? In 2011 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference. pp.
1–14.
52. Elfert, R.J. Jr. 1973. Bureau of Reclamation Experience with Fly Ash and Other Pozzolans in Concrete. In National Ash Association and Bureau of Mines Third International Ash Utilization Symposium.
pp. 80–93.
53. Ezziane, K., Bougara, A., Kadri, A., Khelafi, H., and Kadri, E. 2007. Compressive strength of mortar containing natural pozzolan under various curing temperature.
Cement & Concrete Composites, 29: 587–
593.
54. Feng, X., and Clark, B. 2011. Evaluation of the Physical and Chemical Properties of Fly Ash for Use in Portland Cement Concrete. In World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference. pp.
1–8.
55. Gartner, E. 2004. Industrially interesting approaches to ―low-CO2‖ cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(1): 1489–1498.
56. Ghafari, E., Feys, D., and Khayat, K. 2016.
Feasibility of using natural SCMs in concrete for infrastructure applications.
Construction and Building Materials, 127:
724–732. Elsevier Ltd.
57. Ghiasvand, E., Ramezanianpour, A.A., and Ramezanianpour, A.M. 2014. Effect of grinding method and particle size distribution on the properties of Portland- pozzolan cement. Construction and Building Materials, 53: 547–554. Elsevier Ltd.
58. Gebler, S.H. and Klieger, P. 1983. Effect of Fly Ash on the Air-Void stability of Concrete.
American Concrete Institute Special Publication, 79(5): 103–142.
59. Ghrici, M., Kenai, S., Said-mansour, M., and Kadri, E. 2006. Some Engineering Properties of Concrete Containing Natural Pozzolana and Silica Fume. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 5(2):
349–354.
60. Ghosh, R.S. and Timusk, J. 1981. Creep of fly ash concrete, American Concrete Institute, 79(5): 351–357.
61. Grubbs, F.E. 1969. Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples.
Technometrics, 11(1): 1–21.
62. Halstead, W.J. 1986. Use of fly ash in concrete. National cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis of Highway Practice (Report No. 127). pp. 1–72.
63. Helgeson, S.R. 2014. Evaluation of Curing Compound Application Time on the Surface
Durability of Concrete. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
64. Henriks, C.A., Worrell, E., Jager, D. De, Blok, K., and Riemer, P. 2004. Emission Reduction of Greenhouse Gases from the Cement Industry. In Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Paper - Cement. pp. 1–11.
65. Huntzinger, D.N., and Eatmon, T.D. 2009. A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(7): 668–
675.
66. Isaia, G.C., Gastaldini, A.L.G., and Moraes, R. 2003. Physical and pozzolanic action of mineral additions on the mechanical strength of high-performance concrete.
Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(1):
69–76.
67. Jafari Nadoushan, M., and Ramezanianpour, A.A. 2016. The effect of type and concentration of activators on flowability and compressive strength of natural pozzolan and slag-based geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 111: 337–347.
68. Jin, R. 2013. A Statistical Modeling Approach to Studying the Effects of Alternative and Waste Materials on Green Concrete Properties. PhD Thesis, Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University.
69. Joshaghani, A., Moazenian, A., and Shuaibu, R.A. 2017. Experimental Study on the Use of Trass as a Supplementary Cementitious Material in Pervious Concrete.
Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 6: 39–52.
70. Juenger, M.C.G., and Siddique, R. 2015.
Recent advances in understanding the role of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 78(3): 71–80. Elsevier Ltd.
71. Kaid, N., Cyr, M., and Khelafi, H. 2015.
Characterization of an Algerian natural pozzolan for its use in eco-efficient cement.
International Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(4): 444–454.
72. Kaid, N., Cyr, M., Julien, S., and Khelafi, H.
2009. Durability of concrete containing a natural pozzolan as defined by a performance-based approach. Construction and Building Materials, 23(12): 3457–3467.
73. Keck, R.H., and Riggs, E.H. 1997. Specifying Fly Ash for Durable Concrete. Concrete International. 19(4): 35–38.
74. Kelley, L.I., and Swanson, F.J. 1997.
Preliminary Investigation of Pumicite (Volcanic Ash) Deposits in Southwestern Saskatchewan. In Summary of Investigation.
Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Saskatchewan Energy Mines Misc. (Report 97-4). pp. 180–187.
75. Klieger, P., and Lamond, J.F. 1994.
Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials.
ASTM (PCN 04-169030-07).
76. Keppert, M., Urbanová, M., Brus, J., Čáchová, M., Fořt, J., Trník, A., Scheinherrová, L., Záleská, M., and Černý,
R. 2017. Rational design of cement composites containing pozzolanic additions.
Construction and Building Materials, 148:
411–418.
77. Khan, M.I., and Alhozaimy, A.M. 2011.
Properties of natural pozzolan and its potential utilization in environmental friendly concrete. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 38: 71–78.
78. Khan, S.U., Nuruddin, M.F., Ayub, T., and Shafiq, N. 2014. Effects of Different Mineral Admixtures on the Properties of Fresh Concrete. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 1–11.
79. Khatri, R.P., and Sirivivatnanon, V. 1995.
Effect of Different Supplementary Cementitious Materials on Mechanical Properties of High Performance Concrete.
Cement and Concrete Research, 25(1): 209–
220.
80. Khatri, R.P., and Sirivivatnanon, V. 1997.
Role of Permeability in Sulphate Attack.
Cement and Concrete Research, 27(8):
1179–1189.
81. Kosmatka, S.H., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W.C. 2002. Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. In Fourteenth Edition. Engineering Bulletin 001. Portland Cement Association (PCA R&D SN2561).
82. Kruft, H.W. 1994. A History of Architectural Theory from Vitruvius to the Present.
Princeton Architectural Press. pp. 1–65.
83. Kulovaná, T., Rovnaníková, P., Pavlík, Z., and Černý, R. 2014. Effect of Porosity on Mechanical and Hygric Properties of Concrete with Natural Pozzolan Addition.
Advanced Materials Research, 982: 22–26.
84. Labbaci, Y., Abdelaziz, Y., Mekkaoui, A., Alouani, A., and Labbaci, B. 2017. The use of the volcanic powders as supplementary cementitious materials for environmental- friendly durable concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 133: 468–481. Elsevier Ltd.
85. Lane, R.O. and Best, J.F. 1982. Properties and Use of Fly Ash in Portland Cement Concrete. Concrete International, 4(7): 81–
92.
86. Lauer, K.R. 1990. Classification of concrete damage caused by chemical attack.
Materials and Structures, 23(3): 223–229.
87. Lea, F.M. 1960. Cement Research:
Retrospect and Prospect. Chemistry of Cement. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium, Volume I (National Bureau of Standards Monograph 43 – Volume I). pp. 5–8.
88. Lerch, W. 1950. Studies of Some Methods of Avoiding the Expansion and Pattern Cracking Associated with the Alkali- Aggregate Reaction. In Symposium on Use of Pozzolanic Materials in Mortars and Concretes. American Society for Testing Materials (Special Technical Publication No.
99). pp. 153–177.
89. Lerch, W.C. 1956. Concrete Aggregates:
Chemical Reactions. In Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete Aggregates. American Society for Testing Materials (Special Technical Publication No.
169). pp. 334–345.
90. Liu, M., Wu, J., Gan, Y., Hanaor, D.A.H., and Chen, C.Q. 2016. Evaporation Limited Radial Capillary Penetration in Porous Media. American Chemical Society, 32:
9899–9904.
91. Lohita, R.P., Nautiyal, B.D., and Jain, O.P.
1976. Creep of fly ash concrete. American Concrete Institute, 73(8): 469–472.
92. Lovewell, C.E., and Hyland, E.J. 1971.
Effects of Combing Two or More Admixtures in Concrete. Highway Research Board, 370(4): 90–98.
93. Ludirdja, D., Berger, R.L., and Young, J.F.
1989. Simple method for measuring water permeability of concrete. American Concrete Institute, Materials Journal, 86(5): 433–439.
94. Malhotra, V.M. 1990. Durability of Concrete Incorporating High-Volume of Low-Calcium (ASTM Class F) Fly Ash. Cement & Concrete Composites, 12: 271–277.
95. Malhotra, V.M., and Mehta, P.K. 1996.
Pozzolanic and Cementitious Materials. In Volume 1. Gordon and Breach. pp. 1–58.
96. Malhotra, V.M. 2002. Introduction:
Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology. Concrete International, 24(7):
22–26.
97. Malhotra, V.M. 2006. Reducing CO2 Emissions. Concrete International, 28(9):
42–45.
98. Malhotra, V.M. 2010. Global warming, and role of supplementary cementing materials and superplasticisers in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the manufacturing of portland cement.
Technology. International Journal of Structural Engineering (IJSTRUCTE), 1(2):
116–130.
99. Malvar, L.J., Cline, G.D., Burke, D.F., Rollings, R., Sherman, T.W., and Greene J.L.
2002. Alkali-Silica Reaction Mitigation: State of the Art and Recommendations. American Concrete Institute Materials Journal, 99(5):
480–489.
100. Manmohan, R., and Poz, I. 1981. Influence of Pozzolanic, Slag, and Chemical Admixtures on Pore Size Distribution and Permeability of Hardened Cement Pastes.
Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, CCAGDP, 3(1): 63–67.
101. Masmoudi, R., Kupwade-Patil, K., Bumajdad, A., and Büyüköztürk, O. 2017.
In situ Raman studies on cement paste prepared with natural pozzolanic volcanic ash and Ordinary Portland Cement.
Construction and Building Materials, 148:
444–454. Elsevier Ltd.
102. Massazza F. 1998. Pozzolana and Pozzolanic Cements. In Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. Elsevier. pp. 471–601.
103. Mather, K. 1982. Current Research in Sulfate Resistance at the Waterways Experiment Station. American Concrete Institute Special Publication, 77(10): 63–74.
104. Mehta, P.K. 1981. Studies on Blended Portland Cements Containing Santorin Earth. Cement and Concrete Research, 11:
507–518.
105. Mehta, P.K. 1986. Concrete: structure, properties and materials. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. pp. 20-67.
106. Mehta, P.K. 1989. Pozzolanic and Cementitious By-Products in Concrete—
Another Look. Cement and Concrete Research, 114 (1): 1–44.
107. Mehta, P.K. 1990. Durability of High- Strength Concrete. Special Publication, American Concrete Institute, 122: 19–28.
108. Mehta, P.K. 2002. Greening of the Concrete Industry for Sustainable Development.
Concrete International, 24(7): 23–28.
109. Mehta, P.K., and Monteiro, P.J.M. 2006.
CONCRETE Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. In Third Edit. McGraw-Hill. pp.
15–128.
110. Meissner, H.S. 1950. Pozzolans Used in Mass Concrete. ASTM International Special Publication (STP99-EB/Aug. 1950): 16–30.
111. Mielenz, R.C., Witte, L.P., and Glantz, O.J.
1950. Effect of Calcination on Natural Pozzolans. ASTM International Special Publication (STP99–EB/A): 43–92.
112. Mielenz, R.C., Greene, K.T., and Schieltz N.
Cyril. 1951. Natural Pozzolans for Concrete.
Economic Geology, 46: 311–328.
113. Mielenz, R.C. 1983. Mineral Admixtures – History and Background. American Concrete Institute Concrete International, 5(8): 34–42.
114. Miller, S.A., Horvath, A., and Monteiro, P.J.M. 2016. Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%. Environmental Research Letters (074029), 11: 1–7.
115. Mohamad, A., and Aliyan, S.D. 2015. Effect of Adding Scoria as Cement Replacement on Durability-Related Properties. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(2): 241–254. Korea Concrete Institute.
116. Morgan, M.H. 1914. VITRUVIUS: The Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge Harvard University Press. pp. 1–50.
117. Najimi, M., Sobhani, J., Ahmadi, B., and Shekarchi, M. 2012. An experimental study on durability properties of concrete containing zeolite as a highly reactive natural pozzolan. Construction and Building Materials, 35: 1023–1033.
118. Nastaranpoor, R. 2013. An Investigation for the Effects of Local Natural Pozzolans on Some Mechanical Properties of Concrete.
M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University.
119. Neville, A.M. 2011. Properties of Concrete. In Fifth edition. Pearson.
120. Newman, J., and Owens, P. 2003. Properties of lightweight concrete. In Advanced Concrete Technology 3: Processes (Accession No. 01031428). Elsevier. pp. 1–29.
121. Nili, M., and Salehi, A.M. 2010. Assessing the effectiveness of pozzolans in massive high-strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 24(11): 2108–2116.
122. NRMCA (National Ready Mix Concrete Association). 2012. Concrete CO2 Fact Sheet. NRMCA Publication Number 2PCO2:
1–13.
123. Owaid, H.M., Hamid, R.B., and Taha, M.R.
2012. A Review of Sustainable Supplementary Cementitious Materials as an Alternative to All-Portland Cement Mortar
and Concrete. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(9): 287–303.
124. Osei, D.Y., and Jackson, E.N. 2012.
Compressive strength and workability of concrete using natural pozzolana as partial replacement of ordinary portland cement.
Advances in Applied Science Research, 3(6):
3658–3662.
125. Paiva, H., Velosa, A., Cachim, P., and Ferreira, V.M. 2016. Effect of pozzolans with different physical and chemical characteristics on concrete properties.
Materiales De Construcciόn, 66(322): 1–12.
126. Paiva, H., Silva, A.S., Velosa, A., Cachim, P., and Ferreira, V.M. 2017. Microstructure and hardened state properties on pozzolan- containing concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 140: 374–384.
127. Patzias, T. 1987. Evaluation of Sulfate Resistance of Hydraulic Cement Mortars by the ASTM C 1012 Test Method. American Concrete Institute, 100: 2103–2120.
128. Peters, C.A. 2001. Statistics for Analysis of Experimental Data. Environmental Engineering Processes Laboratory Manual.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering- Princeton University.
129. Phung, Q.T., Maes, N., Schutter, G. De, Jacques, D., and Ye, G. 2013. Determination of water permeability of cementitious materials using a controlled constant flow method. Construction and Building Materials, 47: 1488–1496.
130. Powers, T.C. 1958. Structure and Physical Properties of Hardened Portland Cement Paste. Journal of American Ceramic Society Journal of American Ceramic Society, 41(1):
1–6.
131. Ramadani, T. 2013. Effect of Silica Fume on Moisture Flow and the Advective- Dispersive Transport of Ionic Species in Unsaturated Concrete. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil and Geological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan.
132. Ramezanianpour, A.A. 2014. Cement Replacement Materials Properties, Durability, Sustainability. Springer. pp. 1–
345.
133. Sabet, F.A., Libre, N.A., and Shekarchi, M.
2013. Mechanical and durability properties of self consolidating high performance concrete incorporating natural zeolite, silica fume and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 44: 175–184.
134. Safiuddin, M., and Zain, M.F.M. 2006.
Supplementary Cementing Materials for High Performance Concrete. BRAC University Journal, III (2): 47–57.
135. Sennour, M.L., and Carrasquillo, R.L. 1989.
Creep and Shrinkage Properties in Concrete Containing Fly Ash. Center for Transportation Research Report (FHWA/TX- 90+481-6): 1–132.
136. Setina, J., Gabrene, A., and Juhnevica, I.
2013. Effect of Pozzolanic Additives on Structure and Chemical Durability of Concrete. Procedia Engineering, 57: 1005–
1012. Elsevier B.V.
137. Siddique, R. 2004. Performance characteristics of high-volume Class F fly ash concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34: 487–493.
