RECENT ANALYSIS ON INFLUENCE OF INVASIVE ENVIRONMENTS CONCEPTS ON PORTLAND SLAG CEMENT CONCRETE: A REVIEW
Sidhharth Pandey
Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Rajesh Joshi
Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.)
Abstract - The durability of concrete depends on how it withstands changes in air, temperature, humidity, the amount of impurities in the air, and environmental effects such as sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides. These environmental effects reduce the durability of concrete by changing the structure of the bonds between the individual materials. Concrete must be impermeable in order for the structure to be more durable.
In this study, M30 grade Portland slag cement concrete produced with and without mixtures and with or without rebar specimens was examined to investigate the various environmental impacts on the concrete. Additional samples were cured for 178 days in marine and acidic environments. Samples cured in potable water for a period of 28days and later in 5% concentrated hydrochloric acid, 5% concentrated acetic acid and marine environment for a period of another 150days is also considered for studying the behaviour of concrete under different environments.
The effect of different environments was evaluated by comparing the compressive strength, percentage of water absorption, and weight loss of samples exposed to different environments. All specimens exposed to different environments show a loss in compressive strength, loss in weight and increase in water absorption with age compared to 28days curing results.
Micrological properties were studied through SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy), EDAX (Energy Dispersive Xray Spectroscopy) and XRD (Xray Diffraction) on samples after 28 days and 178 days curing. The SEM analysis confirmed pore refinement with age. The phase identification analysis in XRD indicated the presence of calcium carbonate and silica.
Keywords: Portland Slag Cement (PSC), Compressive strength, Water absorption, Weight loss, SEM, EDAX, XRD.
1. INTRODUCTION
Concrete is the primary material in the construction of a massive civil engineering structure, and it is gaining vital importance by the reason of its economy, superior durability, workability, and its bend ability into any desired shape at the site. The plasticity of concrete and the ability to mold into any shape at a green stage and harden with age to achieve strength are its added advantages.
Concrete has to be designed like other engineering materials for stability and serviceability criteria. Apart from strength durability also playing a key role in deciding the service life of the structure. To achieve strength and durability in the most economical way the concrete making materials have to be mixed by their weight/volume ratio in a way decided by the concrete mix design.
Concrete strength is decided by its grade. Due to the necessity of multistory structures, use of precast and in prestress concrete, higher grades of concrete is becoming inevitable nowadays.
IS: 4562000 also suggests the use of high grade (M30) concrete to overcome problems in severe exposure conditions and to improve durability against severe environmental conditions. In the present construction industry, new generation mineral and chemical admixtures are mixed with concrete to achieve higher grades of concrete. The addition of fly ash, rice husk ash, Metakaolin, silica fume, and blast furnace slag found to be supportive in improving in stability and durability of concrete. The use of these mineral and chemical mixtures in concrete requires proficiency and caution when mixing in the field.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Concrete is widely used in the construction industry to build structures that must serve their intended purpose, such as residential, commercial, and dangerous structures. The structure must be designed to support the loads applied to the structure throughout its life.
During its lifetime, concrete structures are exposed to a variety of environments such as acidic, marine, and alternating wet and dry cycles for extended periods of time. The durability of concrete is affected by various environments such as air, temperature, wind speed, and various chemical pollutants in the environment, resulting in changes in the micro structural properties of concrete. To overcome these problems, concrete needs to be strong enough using a mixture of minerals and chemicals along with traditional mixed materials. In the present chapter, the research work carried out by various researchers is discussed to understand the effect of various environments on concrete and the remedial measures to overcome these problems.
2.1 Effect of an Acidic Environment As an engineering material, concrete can be directly exposed to all kinds of acidic environments. Acidic media have a wide range of sources and can be produced by industrial processes and some urban activities. The soil may contain a variety of acids. As a result of bacteriological activity, some organic and inorganic acids can be produced in seawater. Significant amounts of free acid can be found in plants and factories. Air pollution from gaseous carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides is widespread.
Environmental water and atmospheric precipitation can be two major causes of acid-affected concrete structure corrosion.
In such an acidic environment, the strength of concrete and its corresponding structural stability are minimized (Wang et al., 2017). The pH value of the concrete pore solution is strongly related to the hydration phase present in the concrete. Ion leaching also causes chemical and mineralogical zoning, as the dissolution of various hydrates during leaching is directly dependent on their dissolution properties in relation to the decrease in pH (Plusquellec et al., 2017).
Examination of crack patterns on concrete surface. Cracks can occur due to the expansion of the concrete surface when the concrete is exposed to acids such as sulfuric acid and a mixture of sodium sulphate in water pipes. The swelling of concrete occurs when the calcium silicate hydrate gel and calcium
hydroxide react with the surrounding acid to form anhydrous silicate. These anhydrous silicates are very porous and increase the diffusion of acids from the environment, eventually causing desquamation. The range revolves around the level of acidity in the environment (Girardi et al., 2010).
Acid rain can affect the performance of reinforced concrete structures. The concrete exposed to acid rain showed mass loss and splitting tensile strength decrease followed by increasing as a function of corrosion time when the pH value of the simulation solution is 3 or 4, while they decrease continuously in the simulation solution at pH 2 (Wang et al., 2017b).
2.2 Influence of Sulphate Rich Environment
Sulfate-rich environments can be found in river waters that carry industrial wastewater. These toxic acids in river water contaminate groundwater and surrounding soil. Contaminated groundwater and soil begin with a degraded concrete surface layer. Adding sulfate to groundwater raises the pH and can lead to acid attack (Bellmann et al., 2012). The higher the sulfate concentration, the greater the swelling of the sample. The internal expansion force produced by delayed ettringite and gypsum is considered as the main cause of the expansion. The more severe damage was found with a high water cement ratio (Zhang et al., 2013). The thaumasite form of sulfate deteriorates concrete properties by the formation of secondary gypsum and brucite. Limestone cement concrete deteriorates more when compared to concrete made without limestone. With the increase in limestone content, the disintegration is harsher and speedy. The concrete collapse of samples stored in a sulfate environment due to sulfate attack is significantly accelerated compared to samples stored in a complex chloride sulfate environment. The current presence of chloride accelerates the deterioration of concrete caused by sulfate (Sotiriadis et al., 2012). Sulfate attacks can be divided into chemical and physical attacks due to their different decomposition regimes. Chemical sulfate attack is considered a complex physicochemical process. Sulfate ions
permeate cement-based materials and react directly with the cement hydration product calcium hydroxide (CH) to form harmful products (such as ettringite and gypsum), which soften and swell the cement base. A material that causes cracks, peeling, and decomposition (Chen et al., 2017).
Comparing with plain cement mortars, fly ash and grounded blast furnace slag can improve the resistance of cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate solution, resulting from the continuous pozzolanic effect, which decrease the continuity of capillary pores.
In general, a sulfate attack initially has a constructive effect on concrete performance but this shows a negative effect on time and significant degradation can occur in concrete influenced from a long term sulfate attack. External salt/sulfate attack and influence of harsh environment on cement based materials is a major durability issue and on this topic, an intensive investigation has been carried out for several decades. Dissolved sulfate salts are going to react with cement based materials inflicting expansion, internal and surface cracking and also spelling, resulting in softening of concrete and disintegration (Bassuoni and Nehdi, 2009).
2.3 Influence of Sewer Environment on Concrete
The predominant trouble of corrosion in concrete located with inside the sewer surroundings is because of the formation of biogenic sulfuric acid which ends up in deterioration of the concrete structures (Monteny et al., 2000).
The wastewater containing acid and sulphate flowing with inside the sewer pipe and raise station reasons the harm to the internal wall surface. The carrier existence of concrete in phrases of sturdiness and energy of the concrete shape is substantially decreased while uncovered to contrasting environments.
Erosion is the primary reason of degradation in those varieties of environments.
2.4 Effect of Carbonation
Carbon dioxide present in the environment reacts with moisture to form carbonic acid, and when exposed to such an environment, concrete deteriorates
over time. The maintainability of structures is affected by changes in climate change in the surrounding area.
Advanced simulation techniques were used to predict the increase in corrosion damage associated with the initiation corrosion of the rebar and the damage induced by corrosion due to climate changes. Climate changes due to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration, humidity, and temperature were considered to study structural degradation. Infrastructure degradation can be controlled by changing construction practices such as increased surface thickness, the use of premium materials in concrete, surface coatings and barriers (Stewart et al., 2012).
2.5 Effect of the Marine Environment and Industrial Environment
In harsh marine and industrial environments, one of the main causes of premature destruction of concrete structures is the corrosion of reinforcing bars embedded in concrete (Venkatesan et al., 2006). The highly alkaline pore water present in good quality concrete in the presence of oxygen reacts with the surface of the embedded rebar and weakens. The passivation film of the reinforcement can be destroyed by chloride ion permeability, carbonate formation during the hydration process, and loss of alkalinity (Pruckner et al., 2004). In addition, Venkatesan et al. (2006) show that the bond loss between the paste and the rebar is due to the electrochemical process that occurs between the alkali produced by the attack of the anode and cathode. Chloride corrosion of rebar is one of the major factors affecting the durability of reinforced concrete structures exposed to the marine environment. Reinforced concrete is a polymorphic composite material made of mortar, coarse aggregate and rebar. Both coarse aggregate and reinforcement can affect the chloride diffusion properties of concrete (Wang et al., 2019). Surface chloride concentration is independent of the effects of coarse granules, but apparent chloride diffusion decreases with increasing exposure time.
There are three possible exposure conditions for reinforced concrete structures in a marine environment. They are (1) atmospheric zones, (2) intertidal or splash zones, and (3) underwater zones.
The formation of phases such as gypsum and ettringite leads to a lowering of the quality of the concrete surface zone (Santhanam and Otieno, 2016). The overall effect of the chemical attack is a progressive reduction in the integrity of the concrete. In other words, the surface concrete gets weaker and more prone to erosion by the splashing action of the waves. In this manner, the chemical and physical mechanisms act together to cause deterioration.
Fig. 2.1 Different exposure conditions in the marine environment (Source:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08- 100081-6.00005-2)
2.6 Effect of Chloride Ion Concentration
Chloride ions from the sea breeze damage marine structures. Chloride ions are absorbed by the CSH solution and the chloride content decreases in a stimulating environment, but the effect depends on the addition of CSH and changes in the pH of the pore solution.
For pore solutions PH 12.5 and 11.9, treatment with CSH reduces PH values (Tang et al., 2012).
In many environments, chloride penetration is complicated by periodic temperature changes in the environment and wet and dry cycling. Accessing the strength and durability of concrete structures based on chloride diffusion is very cumbersome (Malheiro et al., 2011).
The impact of chloride salt type will also lead to corrosion of rebar i.e., reinforcement in concrete. Chloride of potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium are considered as a source of chloride salt (Jiang et al., 2012). However, the diffusion of chloride ion is changed with the cation valence of chloride salts,
and the definite reaction hangs on the solutions. The corrosion of steel in reinforced concrete develops in a no uniform manner. The rate of corrosion increases with an increase in the proportion of chloride diffusion which leads due to rising temperatures as a catalyst. Interestingly it is observed that corrosion potential and mass loss were low at 500C temperature compared to 400C (Alhozaimy et al., 2012).
The chloride induced damage can be controlled by adding an admixture premium (watertight concrete and is composed of natural inorganic minerals containing tuff, volcanic ash, and perlite).
Due to its binding capacity with chloride ions and also this admixture controls bleeding thus making concrete more impermeable (Tae, 2012). The use of sulphate rich mineral admixtures in concrete enhances the durability and sustainability by showing resistance to penetration of chloride (Malheiro et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012)
2.7 Influence of Harsh Environment The harsh environment is comprised of high temperature change ranges from 20oC to 54oC along with high humidity ranges from 80 to 95% (Tamimi et al., 2008). Further, it was stated that the presence of chloride and sulphate along with a harsh environment alters the concrete pore structure and leads to deterioration of the structure by reducing its service life. The durability and service life of a concrete structure is altered by chloride diffusion. Porosity directly relates to chloride diffusion, which leads to corrosion of rebar. To increase porosity addition of mineral admixtures like silica fume (SF) and other durability strengthening materials such as fly ash (FA) and Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in certain proportion can intensify the durability of concrete remarkably (Tamimi et al., 2008).
Increasing fly ash replacement in concrete reduces chloride penetration, chloride penetration factor, and steel corrosion in concrete (Chalee et al., 2010).
Interestingly, concrete using a fly ash substitute with a 25-50 wt% binder with a water binder ratio of 0.65 shows no rebar corrosion at a depth of 50 mm in the concrete cover after 7 years of exposure in the marine environment. Slag cement is
suitable for manufacturing all concrete classes. B. Major civil engineering projects (roads, tunnels, bridges). For tunnels, it would be very interesting to assess the performance of concrete exposed to high temperatures (Zemri and Bachir Bouiadjra, 2020). The use of GGBFS offers the important advantage of helping to avoid thermal cracking of concrete due to the low hydration process. Concrete with ground granulated blast furnace slag has a later setting time and a lower stiffness. When the material is subjected to heating at higher temperatures up to 10000C, like during a fire, thermal damage occurs due to dehydration of the cement paste and the thermal mismatch of strains between the shrinking cement paste and expanding aggregates, which induces cracking (Hager et al., 2019).
2.8 Influence of Alternate Wetting, Drying, and Freeze-Thaw Environment In the marine environment, underwater zone structures are particularly susceptible to corrosion due to their high chloride concentration and low oxygen content. The drawdown zone is the area defined by the change in water level. This zone is covered and uncovered according to the sea level (the descending area determined by high and low tides). In this zone, concrete is repeatedly exposed to wet drying cycles. There is a high concentration of chloride ions and a sufficient amount of oxygen in this area, which causes the reinforcement to corrode. This area represents the most unfavorable zone of the life of the structure. In addition to these limitations, structures in this area are also affected by the freeze-thaw cycle (Djelal et al., 2020).
Three months of wet/dry cycling exposure in a marine environment resulted in a significant reduction in average bond strength. Breakage occurs at the bond between the concrete and the epoxy/adhesive interface, and also between the dolly and the epoxy (Fazli et al., 2018). Studies of free chlorine and total chloride levels in concrete samples that alternate between wetting and drying cycles over a 10-month period conclude that the number of chloride ions decreases as the sampling depth increases (Muralidharan et. al. 2005). In the countries where the temperature goes less than 0 kelv in suffer from durability
criteria under freezing and thawing. Most of the subzero temperature countries develop electricity from nuclear power plants where concrete has to undergo free thaw cycles. The microstructure of concrete get affects when it is exposed to free thaw cycles. Barite can be used as a supplementary cementations’ material for constructing a structure in subzero countries (Penttala and Al Neshawy, 2002; Basyigit et al., 2006). The rate of diffusion of chlorides is influenced by internal damage to the concrete surrounding the reinforcement. This may be due to local stresses caused by concrete shrinkage or external loads.
Usually, the time to the onset of active corrosion is shortened, more localized corrosion occurs, and load bearing capacity and structural stiffness decrease prematurely (Melchers et al., 2008). In countries where temperatures are below 0 Kelvin, shelf life standards suffer from freezing and thawing. Most sub-zero countries generate electricity from nuclear power plants where concrete must be exposed to freeze-thaw cycles. The concrete microstructure deteriorates when exposed to freeze-thaw cycles.
2.9 Effect of Initial Curing
Concrete samples cured under all-space curing conditions have superior performance in terms of compressive strength, bending strength, shallower carbonation depth, and lower chloride ion diffusivity than other alternative curing conditions. Shown (Zhao et al., 2012). The types of hardening and exposure conditions have a significant impact on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Climatic conditions such as temperature, atmospheric moisture, precipitation, and wind speed change during construction (Kockal and Turker, 2007). The type of curing can be changed by field engineers due to changes in environmental conditions. Problems of loss of durability can often occur as a result of cracking (due to plastic shrinkage), inadequate strength at later ages, and inadequate hardening. Concrete that is affected by seasonal fluctuations can become vulnerable due to these problems. Adding a small amount of silica fume to the concrete mixture will reduce shrinkage.
Metakaolin and fly ash-based alkali-activated cement (geopolymer) were less sensitive to drying conditions than alkali-activated slag and conventional Portland cement paste (Zhang et al., 2019). Solvent substitution as a drying technique is suitable when the focus of the study is on the influence of pore structure. This is to remove dissolved species and minimize the collapse of fine pores while avoiding the resulting chemical effects.
2.10 Influence of the Water-Cement Ratio
Water can be held in fresh concrete in four ways: hydration of set cement compounds, water absorbed in the gel formed by set cement structure, water present in capillary voids within the set cement structure, and water present in capillary voids existing between the set cement and aggregates (ElRazek and AboElEnein, 1999).
Cement type, w/c ratio, age, and curing procedure had a significant effect on both the strength and durability characteristics of concretes. Both plain and blended Portland cement concretes subjected to uncontrolled curing in the air had lower performance in terms of strength and corrosion resistance compared to the controlled and wet curing procedures (Güneyisi et al., 2005).
The investigations showed that the majority of the evaporating water is lost from the green concrete surface during the initial 2days. The decrease in the water cement ratio will reduce the effective depth requirement of rebar (Chalee et al., 2007; Castro et al., 2001).
The concrete containing Fly ash shows better resistance to chloride ion penetration than plain cement concrete, and when the dosage of fly ash is 15% or at a W/B of 0.25, this concrete shows similar chloride ion permeability level as the concrete containing silica fume.
2.11 Use of Mineral Admixtures in Reinforced Concrete
Pozzolan filler materials are widely used around the world. The pozzolan material reacts with the calcium hydroxide formed during the hydration of the cement.
Amorphous silica present in pozzolan materials combines with calcium hydroxide to form cementations materials.
Auxiliary materials that exhibit pozzolan behavior can usually improve the durability of concrete and slow down the rate of heat released by hydration. This is useful for bulk concrete applications (Lublóyetal., 2017). In general, incorporating ground fly ash (PFA) and slag into Portland cement or mixed cement can maintain higher levels of mechanical properties of concrete after high temperature heating. 40%
replacement of cement by slag led to reduced porosity, water absorption and permeability (Aghaeipour and Madhkhan, 2017).
The addition of appropriate mineral or chemical admixture to concrete mix often improves its durability and strength properties. The addition of admixtures will also reduce the bleeding of concrete and gives a fine surface finish.
The ultimate goals of using admixtures are to improve one or more aspects of concrete performance or to maintain the same level of performance (Venu et al., 2009). The substitution of fly ash with GGBS by more than 50% leads to an increase in flexural strength only (Yazdi et al., 2018).
The alternative sustainable cementitious materials (viz. metakolin, fly ash, GGBS) with the alkali activated solution (a combination of NaOH and Na2SiO3) could produce Geopolymer concrete (GPC) (Venu and Gunneswara Rao, 2017). The deformation capacity or stiffness of geopolymer concrete is quite low compared to conventional concrete.
2.12 Corrosion Rate of Rebar
Reinforcing bar corrosion is one of the most important factors affecting the durability of reinforced concrete structures. Therefore, traditional low carbon (LC) steels may not meet the durability design requirements of reinforced concrete structures, especially in harsh marine environments (You et al., 2020). Various methods have been used to reduce steel corrosion and extend the life of reinforced concrete structures. The use of corrosion resistant steel is considered a promising method. Low alloy (LA) steel is a type of coating-free rebar made by adding various trace elements (Cr, Cu, Ni, etc.) during the hot rolling process. LA steel is expected to exhibit optimal anticorrosion performance but
with a much lower cost compared to traditional stainless steels (Shi and Ming, 2017a). The high longterm corrosion resistance of LA steel is mainly achieved through the synergistic effect of a gradually formed compact, adherent and well distributed Crenriched inner rust layer and the physical barrier protection effect of mill scale (Shi et al., 2018).
The corrosion of rebar occurs when iron in rebar reacts with atmospheric oxygen resulting in a volumetric increase of around 600%.
These iron oxides occupy the empty spaces in concrete and thereby proceed by enlarging the voids. This leads to crack generation thereby weakening the bond between constituent materials. When these cracks reach the surface, they become less durable and stronger (Aveldaño and Ortega, 2011).
2.13 Influence of Corrosion Inhibitors Organic base or calcium sulphate based corrosion inhibitors are widely used in the construction industry to protect rebar against corrosion. These inhibitors can be introduced in concrete either at the time of mixing or by using any injection method into the hardened concrete (Kubo et al., 2013).
2.14 Epoxy Coating on Rebar
The usage of epoxy resins in the construction industry is increasing drastically in the past decade. The benefits of epoxies include adhesion, versatility, chemical resistance, low shrinkage, rapid hardening, and moisture resistance. They will be used as protective coatings to protect concrete against aggressive environments, as decorative coatings, as skid resistant coatings, as grouting and repair materials, as adhesives for cementing various materials to hardened concrete, and as a bonding medium between fresh and hardened concrete. Many structures are disintegrated and accordingly repaired with epoxy resins (El Hawary et al., 1998).
Good protection of rebar can be attained through the epoxy coating and for the cathode, protection galvanized coating is preferable. As a top priority, the epoxy/zinc double coating on the rebar protects the rebar under construction from a corrosive environment (Dong et al., 2012). Polyurethane-based coatings can
be used to protect concrete from corrosive environments (Vipulanandan and Liu, 2005). The adhesion of the coating is affected by the wet condition of the surface. In addition, the performance of the two coatings turned out to be remarkable. Blast furnace slag is a well- known material, but it lacks applications in various fields. Most of the published research uses pastes and mortars during the development phase to study their strength and microstructure. There is limited literature on the concrete production and durability of Portland slag cement. Portland granulated cement can only be used for general construction if it is considered "safe", and concrete can only be called "safe" if it meets both strength and durability requirements. I can do it. From the literature reviews discussed so far, it is clear that concrete is particularly important in a variety of intrusion environments. The exposure time and properties of plain concrete or reinforced concrete adjust the durability of concrete exposed to a particular environment. The porosity of concrete defines its susceptibility to external influences. The low permeability of concrete improves the durability of the concrete. Various researchers have recommended the addition of pozzolan material to make the concrete more impervious. Portland slag cement also exhibits better resistance to chloride ion penetration in the marine environment.
Portland slag cement suppresses the corrosion of embedded rebar due to the diffusion of chloride ions. Therefore, in this study, we selected Portland slag cement, which enhances the permeability of concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement. Many chemical additives are on the market, of which calcium nitrate- based additives have proven to be corrosion inhibitors. Therefore, in this study, we selected a mixture of added calcium nitrate salt and commercially available calcium nitrate to study the behavior of concrete in marine and industrial environments.
3 CONCLUSIONS
In the available study, the conduct for cement presented to diverse situations might have been mulled over. Those study serves clinched alongside finer Comprehension of the impact of obtrusive
situations around Portland slag bond cement. Conclusions of the test effects gotten starting with those current consider would provided for beneath.
1. Those physical properties of Portland bond and different elementary element materials were found. Properties similar to particular gravity, fineness, setting time also compressive quality were investigated also discovered with be suitableness for the study.
I. Particular gravity about fine aggravator will be 2. 69 it might have been adjusting with zone-III as stated by IS:383-1970.
II. The particular gravity about coarse aggravator might have been 2. 79, also might have been found will be to extend as for every IS: 2386-3 (1963).
III. Iii. Water absorption to course aggravator might have been found will a chance to be 0. 2%, which will be inside the extent as for every Indian standard IS: 2386-3 (1963).
IV. The physical properties for bond were investigated for fineness particular gravity, stand consistency, setting run through also compressive quality. The fineness might have been 2%, particular gravity might have been 2.69. Standard consistency might have been to be 31% and the beginning last setting chance from claiming 120 and 240 minutes.
The physical properties of cement is:
a. Fineness 2%
b. Specific gravity 2.69 c. Standard consistency 31%
d. Initial setting time 120min e. Final setting time 240min and V. Compressive quality bonds and
mortality table 3d shape will be 34.93 N/mm2 during a time for 28 days.
VI. The generally accessible potable water is tried to its acknowledgement done cement preparation. Dependent upon those test effects the water example might have been found will be suitableness for cement preparation.
VII. The workability about cement blend for M30 evaluation may be assessed utilizing droop cone test it will be discovered on make 80mm.
VIII. The compressive quality for configuration blend might have been discovered on make 30. 55N/mm2.
2. The analyses led to discover those impact of obtrusive earth uncovered that the compressive quality of cement examples might have been discovered higher In a time for 28 days at cured Previously, mainly accessible water inasmuch as cement examples cured under natural earth hint at the bring down quality In both 28 days and 178 days. Most elevated quality reduction discovered in test cured to hydrochloric corrosive and the rate for decline clinched alongside compressive quality might have been in the fierceness for 11.87% on 23.34%. Those rate quality reduction might have been watched more Previously, specimens cured clinched alongside 5% hydrochloric corrosive over specimens cured for 5% acidic corrosive result. Tests cured clinched alongside marine and acidic corrosive situations indicated lesseps safety to quality over cement tests cured on generally accessible water.
3. Weight loss: it might have been found that every last one of specimens demonstrated weight misfortune then afterward a curing time about 178 times but to marine earth. Those rate from claiming weight passing might have been in the reach for 0 with 8.
32%.
Water absorption: the specimens cured in the marine nature's domain indicated the most reduced water absorption inasmuch as tests cured in the misting (sea salt spray) nature's domain demonstrated the most noteworthy water absorption. The rate about expansion to water absorption might have been in the extent about 0.01 to 5.08%.
4. No measurable erosion might have been watched to cement up to an curing period about 178 days to every last one of seven situations. Those rebar covered for epoxy tar might have been found on stay over its first manifestation significantly after 178days for curing in distinctive situations altogether cases.
5. Those chi-square esteem ascertained for every last one of instances is more terrific over chi-square quality from table to 0.05 likelihood critical level.
This, demonstrating the impact from claiming curing surroundings on the
compressive quality of cement. Hence, it might be closed that those sort for curing surroundings will be setting off with influence compressive quality for example ready under distinctive cases.
REFERENCES
1. Aghaeipour, A., and Madhkhan, M. (2017).
“Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) on RCCP durability.”
Construction and Building Materials, 141, 533–541.
2. Aguiar, J. B., Camões, A., and Moreira, P. M.
(2010). “Performance of Concrete in Aggressive Environment.” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2(1), 21–25.
3. Alhozaimy, A., Hussain, R. R., Al-Zaid, R., and Al-Negheimish, A. (2012). “Coupled effect of ambient high relative humidity and varying temperature marine environment on corrosion of reinforced concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, Elsevier Ltd, 28(1), 670–679.
4. Almusallam, A. A. (2001). “Effect of environmental conditions on the properties of fresh and hardened concrete.” 23(2001), 353–
361.
5. Aveldaño, R. R., and Ortega, N. F. (2011).
“Characterization of concrete cracking due to corrosion of reinforcements in different environments.” Construction and Building Materials, 25(2), 630–637.
6. Babaee, M., and Castel, A. (2018). “Chloride diffusivity, chloride threshold, and corrosion initiation in reinforced alkali-activated mortars: Role of calcium, alkali, and silicate content.” Cement and Concrete Research, 111(May), 56–71.
7. Bader, M. A. (2003). “Performance of concrete in a coastal environment.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(4-5 SPEC), 539–548.
8. Bassuoni, M. T., and Nehdi, M. L. (2009).
“Durability of self-consolidating concrete to sulfate attack under combined cyclic environments and flexural loading.” Cement and Concrete Research, 39(3), 206–226.
9. Bellmann, F., Erfurt, W., and Ludwig, H. M.
(2012). “Field performance of concrete exposed to sulphate and low pH conditions from natural and industrial sources.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(1), 86–93.
10. Boa, A. R., and Topu, L. B. (2012). “Influence of fly ash on corrosion resistance and chloride ion permeability of concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 31, 258–264.
11. Boubekeur, T., Boulekbache, B., Aoudjane, K., Ezziane, K., and Kadri, E. H. (2019).
“Prediction of the durability performance of ternary cement containing limestone powder and ground granulated blast furnace slag.”
Construction and Building Materials, 209, 215– 221.
12. Boubekeur, T., Ezziane, K., and Kadri, E. H.
(2017). “Quantification and analysis of heat hydration of blended cement at different temperature.” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Taylor & Francis, 31(24), 2741–2756.
13. Castro, P., De Rincon, O. T., and Pazini, E. J.
(2001). “Interpretation of chloride profiles
from concrete exposed to tropical marine environments.” Cement and Concrete Research, 31(4), 529–537.
14. Chalee, W., Ausapanit, P., and Jaturapitakkul, C. (2010). “Utilization of fly ash concrete
15. in marine environment for long term design life analysis.” Materials and Design, 31(3), 1242–1249.
16. Chalee, W., Teekavanit, M., Kiattikomol, K., Siripanichgorn, A., and Jaturapitakkul, C.
(2007). “Effect of W/C ratio on covering depth of fly ash concrete in marine environment.”
Construction and Building Materials, 21(5), 965–971.
17. Cheah, C. B., Tan, L. E., and Ramli, M.
(2019). “The engineering properties and microstructure of sodium carbonate activated fly ash/ slag blended mortars with silica fume.” Composites Part B: Engineering, 160, 558–572.
18. Chen, F., Gao, J., Qi, B., and Shen, D.
(2017a). “Deterioration mechanism of plain and blended cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate attack.” Construction and Building Materials, 154, 849–856.
19. Chen, R., Yang, K., Qiu, X., Zeng, X., Wang, P., Xu, J., and Chen, J. (2017b). “Degradation mechanism of CA mortar in CRTS I slab ballastless railway track in the Southwest acid rain region of China – Materials analysis.” Construction and Building Materials, 149, 921– 933.
20. Criado, M., Bernal, S. A., Garcia-Triñanes, P., and Provis, J. L. (2018). “Influence of slag composition on the stability of steel in alkali- activated cementitious materials.” Journal of Materials Science, 53(7), 5016–5035.
21. Dhapekar, N. K., Majumdar, A. S., and Gupta, P. K. (2015). “Study of phase composition of Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete using X-Ray Diffraction.”
International Journal of Scientific &
Engineering Research, 6(11), 433–440.
22. Djelal, C., Long, M., Haddi, A., and Szulc, J.
(2020). “Effect of marine environment on the behaviour of concrete structures reinforced by composite materials.” Mechanics and Industry, 21(4).
23. Dong, S., Zhao, B., Lin, C., Du, R., Hu, R., and Zhang, G. X. (2012). “Corrosion behavior of epoxy/zinc duplex coated rebar embedded in concrete in ocean environment.”
Construction and Building Materials, 28(1), 72–78.
24. El-Hawary, M., Al-Khaiat, H., and Fereig, S.
(1998). “Effect of sea water on epoxyrepaired concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 20(1), 41–52.
25. El-Razek, M. M. A., and Abo-El-Enein, S. A.
(1999). “Moisture performance through fresh concrete at different environmental conditions.” Cement and Concrete Research, 29(11), 1819–1825.
26. Fazli, H., Yassin, A. Y. M., Shafiq, N., and Teo, W. (2018). “Pull-off testing as an interfacial bond strength assessment of CFRP-concrete interface exposed to a marine environment.” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 84(May), 335–342.
27. Girardi, F., Vaona, W., and Di Maggio, R.
(2010). “Resistance of different types of concretes to cyclic sulfuric acid and sodium
sulfate attack.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 32(8), 595–602.
28. Giri Prasad, G., Seshagirirao, M. V, Ramarao, G. V, and Ramprasad, A. V. (2009).
“Assessment of self compacting concrte immerced in acidic solutions.” ACSGE-2009, Oct 25-27, BITS Pilani, India ASSESSMENT, 1–
10.
29. Hager, I., Tracz, T., Choińska, M., and Mróz, K. (2019). “Effect of cement type on the mechanical behavior and permeability of concrete subjected to high temperatures.”
Materials, 12(18).
30. Horszczaruk, E., Sikora, P., Cendrowski, K., and Mijowska, E. (2017). “The effect of elevated temperature on the properties of cement mortars containing nanosilica and heavyweight aggregates.” Construction and Building Materials, 137, 420–431.
31. Huang, P., Bao, Y., and Yao, Y. (2005).
“Influence of HCl corrosion on the mechanical properties of concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, 35(3), 584–589.
32. Huo, R., Li, S., and Ding, Y. (2018).
“Experimental Study on Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Mortar Subjected to Acid Corrosion.” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018.
33. Ishwarya, G., Singh, B., Deshwal, S., and Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2019). “Effect of sodium carbonate/sodium silicate activator on the rheology, geopolymerization and strength of fly ash/slag geopolymer pastes.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 97, 226–238.
34. Jakobsen, U. H., De Weerdt, K., and Geiker, M. R. (2016). “Elemental zonation in marine concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, 85, 12–27.
35. Jayakumar, S., and Saravanane, R. (2010).
“Biodeterioration of coastal concrete structures by Macro algae - Chaetomorpha antennina.” Materials Research, 12(4), 465–
472.
36. Jiang, J., and Yuan, Y. (2012). “Prediction model for the time-varying corrosion rate of rebar based on micro-environment in concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 35, 625–632.
37. Jiang, L., Huang, G., Xu, J., Zhu, Y., and Mo, L. (2012). “Influence of chloride salt type on threshold level of reinforcement corrosion in simulated concrete pore solutions.”
Construction and Building Materials, 30, 516–
521.
38. Kakooei, S., Akil, H. M., Dolati, A., and Rouhi, J. (2012). “The corrosion investigation of rebar embedded in the fibers reinforced concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 35, 564–570.
39. Karakurt, C., and Topu, L. B. (2012). “Effect of blended cements with natural zeolite and industrial by-products on rebar corrosion and high temperature resistance of concrete.”
Construction and Building Materials, 35, 906–
911.
40. Kockal, N. U., and Turker, F. (2007). “Effect of environmental conditions on the properties of concretes with different cement types.”
Construction and Building Materials, 21(3), 634–645.
41. Kubo, J., Tanaka, Y., Page, C. L., and Page, M. M. (2013). “Application of electrochemical organic corrosion inhibitor injection to a
carbonated reinforced concrete railway viaduct.” Construction and Building Materials, 39, 2–8.
42. Kumar, S. (2000). “Influence of water quality on the strength of plain and blended cement concretes in marine environments.” Cement and Concrete Research, 30(3), 345–350.
43. Li, F., Yuan, Y., and Li, C. Q. (2011).
“Corrosion propagation of prestressing steel strands in concrete subject to chloride attack.” Construction and Building Materials, 25(10), 3878– 3885.
44. Lublóy, É., Kopecskó, K., Balázs, G. L., Restás, Á., and Szilágyi, I. M. (2017).
“Improved fire resistance by using Portland- pozzolana or Portland-fly ash cements.”
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Springer Netherlands, 129(2), 925–936.
45. Malheiro, R., Meira, G., Lima, M., and Perazzo, N. (2011). “Influence of mortar rendering on chloride penetration into concrete structures.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(2), 233–239.
46. Manjunath, N. K., C, L. K. B., Annapurna, B.
P., Jogi, P. K., Engg, C., and Robe, B. (2017).
“Effect of Effective Porosity and Saturated Water Absorption on Rice Concrete, Husk Ashfiltered Sand Self-compacting.”
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology(IRJET), 4(3), 1218–1225.
47. Mastali, M., Kinnunen, P., Dalvand, A., Mohammadi Firouz, R., and Illikainen, M.
(2018). “Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders – A critical review.” Construction and Building Materials, 190, 533–550.
48. Melchers, R. E., Li, C. Q., and Lawanwisut, W. (2008). “Probabilistic modeling of structural deterioration of reinforced concrete beams under saline environment corrosion.”
Structural Safety, 30(5), 447–460.
49. Midhun, M. S., Gunneswara Rao, T. D., and Chaitanya Srikrishna, T. (2018). “Mechanical and fracture properties of glass fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete.” Advances in Concrete Construction, 6(1), 29–45.
50. Monteny, J., Vincke, E., Beeldens, A., De Belie, N., Taerwe, L., Van Gemert, D., and Verstraete, W. (2000). “Chemical, microbiological, and in situ test methods for biogenic sulfuric acid corrosion of concrete.”
Cement and Concrete Research, 30(4), 623–
634.
51. Muralidharan, S., Vedalakshmi, R., Saraswathi, V., Joseph, J., and Palaniswamy, N. (2005). “Studies on the aspects of chloride ion determination in different types of concrete under macro-cell corrosion conditions.” Building and Environment, 40(9), 1275–1281.
52. Al Mutlaq, F. M., and Page, C. L. (2013).
“Effects of electric arc furnace dust on susceptibility of steel to corrosion in chloride- contaminated concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 39, 60–64.
53. O’Connell, M., McNally, C., and Richardson, M. G. (2012). “Performance of concrete incorporating GGBS in aggressive wastewater environments.” Construction and Building Materials, 27(1), 368–374.
54. Olivia, M., Pradana, T., and Sitompul, I. R.
(2017). “Properties of Plain and Blended Cement Concrete Immersed in Acidic Peat
Water Canal.” Procedia Engineering, 171, 557–563.
55. Pack, S. W., Jung, M. S., Song, H. W., Kim, S.
H., and Ann, K. Y. (2010). “Prediction of time dependent chloride transport in concrete structures exposed to a marine environment.”
Cement and Concrete Research, 40(2), 302–
312.
56. Parande, A. K., Babu, B. R., Pandi, K., Karthikeyan, M. S., and Palaniswamy, N.
(2011). “Environmental effects on concrete using Ordinary and Pozzolana Portland cementParande, A. K. Babu, B. Ramesh Pandi, K. Karthikeyan, M. S. Palaniswamy, N.” Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 288–297.
57. Penttala, V., and Al-Neshawy, F. (2002).
“Stress and strain state of concrete during freezing and thawing cycles.” Cement and Concrete Research, 32(9), 1407–1420.
58. Pilehvar, S., Szczotok, A. M., Rodríguez, J. F., Valentini, L., Lanzón, M., Pamies, R., and Kjøniksen, A. L. (2019). “Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the mechanical behavior of geopolymer concrete and Portland cement concrete containing micro-encapsulated phase change materials.” Construction and Building Materials, The Authors, 200, 94–
103.
59. Plusquellec, G., Geiker, M. R., Lindgård, J., Duchesne, J., Fournier, B., and De Weerdt, K. (2017). “Determination of the pH and the free alkali metal content in the pore solution of concrete: Review and experimental comparison.” Cement and Concrete Research, 96, 13– 26.
60. Pu, L., and Unluer, C. (2018). “Durability of carbonated MgO concrete containing fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag.”
Construction and Building Materials, 192, 403– 415.
61. Raheem, A. A., Soyingbe, A. A., and Emenike, A. J. (2013). “Effect of Curing Methods on Density and Compressive Strength of Concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 3(4), 55–64.
62. Ranganthan, A., and R Maalthy. (2009).
“Durability of alkali activated geopolymer concrete against sulphuric acid attack.”
ACSGE-2009, Oct 25-27, BITS Pilani, India, 1–
8.
63. Rao, K. J., Keerthi, K., and Vasam, S. (2018).
“Acid resistance of quaternary blended recycled aggregate concrete.” Case Studies in Construction Materials, 8(January), 423– 433.
64. Ribeiro, D. V., Labrincha, J. A., and Morelli, M. R. (2012). “Effect of the addition of red mud on the corrosion parameters of reinforced concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, 42(1), 124–133.
65. Santhanam, M., and Otieno, M. (2016).
“Deterioration of concrete in the marine environment.” Marine Concrete Structures, 1, 137–149.
66. Seo, J. H., Park, S. M., and Lee, H. K. (2018).
“Evolution of the binder gel in carbonationcured Portland cement in an acidic medium.” Cement and Concrete Research, 109(March), 81–89.
67. Shi, J. jie, and Ming, J. (2017a). “Influence of mill scale and rust layer on the corrosion resistance of low-alloy steel in simulated concrete pore solution.” International Journal
of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 24(1), 64–74.
68. Shi, J. jie, Ming, J., and Liu, X. (2017).
“Pitting corrosion resistance of a novel duplex alloy steel in alkali-activated slag extract in the presence of chloride ions.” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 24(10), 1134–1144.
69. Shi, J., and Ming, J. (2017b). “Influence of defects at the steel-mortar interface on the corrosion behavior of steel.” Construction and Building Materials, 136, 118–125.
70. Shi, J., Ming, J., and Sun, W. (2018).
“Electrochemical behaviour of a novel alloy steel in alkali-activated slag mortars.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 92(May), 110–124.
71. Shi, X., Xie, N., Fortune, K., and Gong, J.
(2012). “Durability of steel reinforced concrete in chloride environments: An overview.”
Construction and Building Materials, 30, 125–
138.
72. Somna, R., Jaturapitakkul, C., and Amde, A.
M. (2012). “Effect of ground fly ash and ground bagasse ash on the durability of recycled aggregate concrete.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(7), 848–854.
73. Sotiriadis, K., Nikolopoulou, E., and Tsivilis, S. (2012). “Sulfate resistance of limestone cement concrete exposed to combined chloride and sulfate environment at low temperature.” Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(8), 903–910.
74. Stewart, M. G., Wang, X., and Nguyen, M. N.
(2012). “Climate change adaptation for corrosion control of concrete infrastructure.”
Structural Safety, 35, 29–39.
75. Tae, S. H. (2012). “Corrosion inhibition of steel in concrete with natural inorganic minerals in corrosive environments due to chloride attack.” Construction and Building Materials, 35, 270–280.
76. Tamimi, A. K., Abdalla, J. A., and Sakka, Z. I.
(2008). “Prediction of long term chloride diffusion of concrete in harsh environment.”
Construction and Building Materials, 22(5), 829–836.
77. Tang, Y. M., Miao, Y. F., Zuo, Y., Zhang, G.
D., and Wang, C. L. (2012). “Corrosion behavior of steel in simulated concrete pore solutions treated with calcium silicate hydrates.” Construction and Building Materials, 30, 252–256.
78. Tengli, S. K., and Kalpana, M. S. (2009).
“Effect of variation in concentration of alkaline solutions on the behaviour of geopolymer concrete.” ACSGE-2009, Oct 25- 27, BITS Pilani, India.
79. Tennakoon, C., Shayan, A., Sanjayan, J. G., and Xu, A. (2017). “Chloride ingress and steel corrosion in geopolymer concrete based on long term tests.” Materials and Design, 116, 287–299.
80. Thunuguntla, C. S., and Gunneswara Rao, T.
D. (2018a). “Effect of mix design parameters on mechanical and durability properties of alkali activated slag concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, 193, 173–188.
81. Thunuguntla, C. S., and Gunneswara Rao, T.
D. (2018b). “Appraisal on Strength Characteristics of Alkali-Activated GGBFS with Low Concentrations of Sodium Hydroxide.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering,
