• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Sharing insights

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Sharing insights"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1

Mauritius entity entitled to capital gains exemption on sale of Indian shares In brief

The Authority for Advance Rulings (“AAR”) has, in its recent ruling on the case of D. B. Zwirn Mauritius Trading No. 2 Ltd. (“the Applicant”)1, re-affirmed that capital gains on sale of Indian shares by a Mauritius resident company is not taxable in India.

1 D. B. Zwirn Mauritius Trading No. 2 Ltd. In re [2011-TII-04-ARA-INTL]

The conclusion of the AAR was based on the Supreme Court decision in the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan and another2, certain other judicial precedents3 and the Central Board of Direct Taxes (“CBDT”) circulars4.

Facts

• The Applicant, an investment company incorporated in Mauritius, held a Tax Residency Certificate (“TRC”) issued by the Mauritius tax authorities.

2 UOI and Anr. v. Azadi Bachao Andolan and Anr. [2003] 263 ITR 706 (SC)

3 E*Trade Mauritius Ltd., In re [2010] 324 ITR 1 (AAR); and DDIT v. Saraswati Holding Corporation [2009-TIOL-529-ITAT-DEL]

4 CBDT Circular No. 682 dated 30 March, 1994 and Circular No. 789 dated 13 April, 2000 www.pwc.com/in

Sharing insights

News Alert

11 April, 2011

(2)

PwC News Alert April 2011

2

• In September 2007, the Applicant had acquired equity shares in an Indian company at INR 245 million.

• In November 2009, the Applicant sold its entire stake to another Mauritius based company, under a share purchase agreement, earning capital gains of INR 347 million.

Issues

The question raised, by the Applicant, before the AAR, was as follows:

Whether the Applicant was liable to tax in India on the capital gains earned on sale of Indian shares, under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) and the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (“Tax Treaty”).

Applicant’s contentions

• The Applicant was a tax resident of Mauritius holding a TRC and was filing tax returns as a resident of Mauritius.

• Article 13(4) of the Tax Treaty provided that the profit made on sale of shares in an Indian company by a resident of Mauritius would be taxable in Mauritius.

• Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court decision in the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan and other judicial precedents (above) which support the view that a tax resident of Mauritius would be eligible to claim exemption from capital gains tax liability in India. This was further supported by the CBDT Circulars.

It is noteworthy that there were no representations / submissions from the revenue authorities to challenge the Applicant’s contentions.

AAR Ruling

• Capital gains on sale of shares in an Indian company is taxable in India.

However, the Applicant, being a non-resident, is entitled to seek relief under the Tax Treaty, if the provisions of the treaty are more beneficial as compared to the provisions of the Act.

• The fact that the capital asset (being shares in an Indian company) is located in India is immaterial.

• In light of the judicial precedents and the CBDT Circulars relied upon by the Applicant, it was ruled that the Applicant was not liable to pay capital gains tax in India in respect of transfer of shares of an Indian company.

• Accordingly, the withholding tax provisions were also not triggered on the transaction of sale of shares.

Conclusion

This is a reassuring decision, particularly for investors from Mauritius investing in India. It relies on the Supreme Court decision in the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan (above) to hold that capital gains earned by Mauritius entities are not taxable in India, in light of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty.

While the ruling is legally binding on the concerned parties involved, it has a persuasive value on decisions on similar matters referred to the Indian tax authorities.

(3)

PwC News Alert April 2011

3

Our Offices

For private circulation only Ahmedabad

President Plaza, 1st Floor Plot No 36 Opp Muktidham Derasar

Thaltej Cross Road, SG Highway Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380054 Phone +91-79 3091 7000

Bangalore

6th Floor, Millenia Tower 'D' 1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, Bangalore 560 008 Phone +91-80 4079 7000

Bhubaneswar

IDCOL House, Sardar Patel Bhawan Block III, Ground Floor, Unit 2 Bhubaneswar 751009

Phone +91-674-253 2279 / 2296

Chennai

PwC Center, 2nd Floor 32, Khader Nawaz Khan Road Nungambakkam

Chennai 600 006 Phone +91-44 4228 5000

Hyderabad

#8-2-293/82/A/113A Road no. 36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 034, Andhra Pradesh

Phone +91-40 6624 6600

Kolkata

South City Pinnacle, 4th Floor, Plot – XI/1, Block EP, Sector V Salt Lake Electronic Complex Bidhan Nagar

Kolkata 700 091

Phone +91-33 4404 6000 / 44048225

Mumbai

PwC House, Plot No. 18A, Guru Nanak Road - (Station Road), Bandra (West), Mumbai - 400 050 Phone +91-22 6689 1000

Gurgaon

Building No. 10, Tower - C 17th & 18th Floor, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon Haryana -122002

Phone : +91-124-3306 6000

Pune

GF-02, Tower C, Panchshil Tech Park, Don Bosco School Road, Yerwada, Pune - 411 006 Phone +91-20 4100 4444

For more information contact us at, [email protected]

The above information is a summary of recent developments and is not intended to be advice on any particular matter. PricewaterhouseCoopers expressly disclaims liability to any person in respect of anything done in reliance of the contents of these publications. Professional advice should be sought before taking action on any of the information contained in it. Without prior permission of PricewaterhouseCoopers, this Alert may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to in any documents

©2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. "PwC", a registered trademark, refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (a limited company in India) or, as the context requires, other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

1 Royalty income of a non-resident taxable on receipt basis under the tax treaty In brief Recently, in the case of Johnson and Johnson USA1, the Mumbai Income-tax Appellate

1 Interest received for delay in completion of the process of buy-back of shares under open offer to be treated as capital gains and not interest income In brief Recently, in the

The Special Bench adjudicated the matter in favour of EAB by holding that: - EAB had no BC in India, and therefore, no part of income from sale of equipment was taxable under the Act;

Ltd.1 the “assessee” or the “company”, the Supreme Court held that a deduction under section 80HHE for the purpose of computing Minimum Alternate Tax “MAT” on adjusted book profit under

• The Ahmedabad bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal the Tribunal upheld this view by placing reliance on the Hon'ble Supreme Court SC verdict in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd.2

Ltd.1, the Pune Income-tax Appellate Tribunal the Tribunal held that the receipts for rendering information technology IT support services to group companies in India are not taxable as