272 A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS ON STRUCTURAL FAILURES AND REMEDIAL MEASURES
IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MEASURES: A REVIEW Ramesh Kumar
Research Scholar, Eklavya University, Damoh (M.P.) Raushan Kumar
Eklavya University, Damoh (M.P.)
Abstract - In this Research, different purposes behind underlying disappointments like Faulty Design, Inferior nature of materials, Poor Workmanship, Weathering conditions, Natural catastrophes and so forth, have been talked about. It is additionally examined about the different strategies for doing the maintenance woks that is healing measures. To know better about the idea of substantial components, Eighteen (18) cement footers with ostensible support have been projected. They were gathered into Six (6) bunches each containing Three individuals. Every one of the bars were exposed to stacking test in Loading Frame at Government College of Engineering, Salem. Three shafts were kept as control examples. Every one of the bars were first tried up to introductory break condition. The control examples were tried up to extreme disappointment. The upsides of burden and avoidances were acquired and organized. Five strategies for fix work was finished on the five gatherings of individuals. The maintenance materials utilized are GPRF of 25 GSM, 300 GSM, 400 GSM, Jute Fiber and Steel Jacket. In the wake of restoring they were tried up to disappointment. The upsides of Load and Deflections were noted. Load Cells are utilized for noticing down the Deflections. From the qualities acquired it was noticed that, out of the multitude of strategies applied Steel Jacketing is viewed as the best and furthermore generally conservative. So technique is suggested for the substantial fixing work.
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General
In early days man used to live in cottages which were built with the materials accessible in overflow in nature. They could construct their hovels in safe spots which were not impacted by normal disasters by experience. Assuming that whatever happened like disappointment they might fix them with the smallest expense materials that anyone could hope to find in nature. In any case, because of expansion in populace and the creation of new structure materials, it becomes essential to be familiar with primary disappointments in a structure and healing measures to be finished.
Disappointments in designing development are brought about by crumbling of different structure materials with age because of different causes.
Mindfulness about different offices causing weakening is fundamental to grasp the issue and to figure out the arrangement.
1.2 Practical Investigation
In the ongoing situation there could be no appropriate recovery techniques and codes are recommended. A portion of the techniques are very little successful in the
part of solidarity but rather because of deficient information about the restoration material and strategies.
Generally individuals are picking some unacceptable one, which prompts disappointment of design and cause annihilation of the construction and making risk the existence of the structure clients.
Materials utilized for Rehabilitation incorporates FRP (Fiber Reinforced Polymer), Epoxy Resins, Water sealing specialists (Acrylic Polymers, SBR, EPDM, APP), Wood Preservatives and coatings, Jute Fiber, Steel Jackets and so on.
The above materials are utilized not exclusively to recognize break in radiates yet in addition to fix and fix old structures and landmarks.
2 FAILURES OF STRUCTURES
Muhammed Saleem led an investigation on a concurrent expansion break take out model for post introduced anchor. The anchor bar is typically utilized in different fortifying strategies to reinforce the built up substantial designs. The properties of the infill materials utilized for post
273 introduced anchor bar were described by
a nonlinear connection point between the encompassing concrete and the anchor bar. It was another kind of anchor fill gathering in which the infill material was separated into two layers to give a bigger disappointment way length bringing about increment of the energy retention and take out load limit. The mechanical properties of the infill layer were not the same as the encompassing cement. The interfacial debonding was analyzed by strength rule communicated as far as interfacial shear pressure. Reexisting breaks addressing counterfeit indents at the highest point of infill layers for recognizing break area and settling its spread bearing. Every one of the conceivable outcomes related with two- breaks in the nearby area have been researched exhaustively. It was presumed that a bunch of material properties like by expanding the take out load limit, expanding the energy retention and expanded energy way length were accomplished at most minimal expansion in take out misshapening in this way demonstrating the viability of two layer model. It additionally showed that restricting the take out twisting is alluring according to the perspective of restricting the harm.
Eight full-scale RC sections with ties and with huge separating (S>d/2) and 90° snares were tried by Kurt Henkhaus.
The experimental outcomes showed that rising the quantity of dislodging cycles and applying removals along more than one hub diminished the greatest float proportion arrived at before the sections experienced disappointment in pivotal pressure. Tried sections had little float limit past shear disappointment. The mean distinction between the greatest float proportion at pivotal disappointment and the float proportion at shear disappointment was viewed as under 1%.
Dario Coronelli concentrated on a test examination on cover breaking, spalling, delamination Corrosion peculiarities, including stirrup erosion.
Already it has been worried about consumption levels prompting cover breaking along the principal support just, though erosion of stirrups is frequently ignored. Erosion peculiarities, including stirrup consumption, were concentrated
on in a trial examination. It was observed that elevated degrees of consumption were reached, up to 20% of the primary bars and 34% of the stirrups legs. The event of break commencement, proliferation, and cover delamination were additionally analyzed. The examples had the state of a pillar end and were consumed with a sped up strategy; a forced current was utilized, taking consideration to keep the ongoing thickness as low as for all intents and purposes feasible for the term of the research facility testing. The impacts of this interaction were contrasted and those of regular erosion utilizing models from the writing. The area of the bar, center and corner situation, how much cross over support, and the consumption level of longitudinal support and of cross over support were considered. The outcomes concerning the substantial breaking in the exploratory mission were introduced.
The break examples and widths were broke down, showing contrasts between examples regardless of stirrups and whether stirrups were eroding. At long last, the impact of consumption was mimicked as the extension of erosion items in a finite element (FE) model, and the outcomes, chiefly the break example and width, were contrasted and the experimental outcomes. The ends tended to the significance of thinking about both high consumption levels and erosion of stirrups for the evaluation of crumbled structures.
A Study about the overall relocation detecting Techniques for post occasion primary harm evaluation was finished by Li, H. Dong. From the review it was expressed that the relative uprooting, which is removal of a guide on a design with deference toward its unique area or a neighboring point on the construction that has likewise gone through development, can be a powerful mark of post occasion primary harm. The accessible methods for estimating relative misshapenness, distinguish their constraints, and propose regions where further exploration is required were likewise investigated. Ideas for momentum difficulties and exploration valuable open doors are proposed with accentuation on precision contemplations, the requirement for
274 making a public data set of construction
data, and strategies for enormous scope computerized evaluation.
Dimitrios G. presents key boundaries that influence mathematical displaying of steel outline structures for dependable breakdown reenactments. The breakdown evaluation depended on exploratory information got from a full- scale shaking table breakdown trial of a 4-story steel second edge and a visually impaired mathematical examination challenge that was coordinated in lined up with the breakdown test. It was shown that (1) there is no reasonable benefit between three-layered (3D) and two layered (2D) examination in the expectation of a side influence breakdown component for structures with a customary arrangement view as on account of study; (2) the suspicion of Rayleigh damping prompts better expectations of underlying reaction contrasted and solidness relative damping; and (3) exact expectation of breakdown requires that P-Δ impacts forever be viewed as in the investigation.
It was likewise demonstrated that exact reenactment of steel part decay is a vital component for solid expectation of breakdown conduct. It was prominent that a mix of bowing strength increment and postponement of neighborhood locking in first-story segments is best for the improvement of seismic execution against breakdown.
2.1 Remedial Measures
Dr. B. Shivakumara Swamy directed a test concentrate on nine RC pillar examples with glass fiber built up polymer (GFRP). The under supported and over built up radiates were retrofitted with two layers of U-formed GFRP wrapping on full length of the shaft. The shaft examples were tried under two point stacking and the heap avoidance conduct was seen up to disappointment. Additionally the greatest burden, the pressure strain ways of behaving and the total break design were recorded and introduced. Trial examination uncovers that the reasonable and over built up RC radiates retrofitted with two layers of GFRP show more strength and solidness than the under supported RC radiates retrofitted with GFRP. The wrapping of shaft was done
exclusively on three countenances of the bar which are soffit face and shear faces (side face) of the pillar. Top surface of the shaft was kept away from and wrapping was not finished on the top surface.
An intricate review was finished by D.N.Shindeon the Flexural conduct of R.C.C. shaft wrapped with GFRP (Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer) sheet. An all out 8 pillars, with (150×150) mm rectangular cross segment and of range 700 mm were projected and tried. Three primary factors to be specific, strength, malleability and harm level of R.C.C.
under built up bar and R.C.C. bar frail in flexure were examined. The creator has reasoned that, to build the flexural strength of the bar, soffit locale is just have to cover with the GFRP, it's not expected to folded all around the pillar faces. What's more, to build the shear strength of the shaft, shear area (Beam side locale) of the pillar is covered with the GFRP, it's isn't expected to fold all around the bar faces.
T. P. Meikandaan, states that, full base GFRP sheet enveloping by 70%
preloaded pillar can increment flexural limit of the shaft by 14%(on extreme burden) when contrasted with Controlled Beams. It is reasoned that the shaft gives less admonition when contrasted and the bar strength just at the soffit of the bar, because of imperceptibility of the underlying break when the bar is wrapped along the edge countenances of the pillar.
Examinations done by T.
Manikandan and G. Balaji Ponraj uncover that the flexural attributes of RC radiates utilizing GFRP sheets and strips, show extraordinary commitment in fortifying supported substantial designs. The exploratory aftereffects of RC radiates fortified in flexure with different remotely reinforced GFRP setups, showed delay in the GFRP debonding as well as to build the productivity of the GFRP strips, extra U-coat strips or sheets situated in debonding commencement locale. Ten rectangular RC examples were tried to assess the impact of utilizing the extra U molded GFRP sheets and separated U strips on the halfway break debonding of the overlay. The fiber direction impact of the side reinforced sheet were likewise examined. The shaft examples to be
275 restored were at first stacked to 75% of
assessed extreme burden, treated and tried to disappointment. The boundaries considered for the review are extreme burden conveying limit load redirection disappointment modes and flexural solidness of the reinforced shafts.
Limited component examination (FEA) was utilized by Medhat Mohammedto anticipate the way of behaving of supported cement footers fortified in shear with fiber built up polymer (FRP). To check and quantify the precision of the FEM model, the FEA results were contrasted and both pervious trial and hypothetical outcomes. Two shafts were considered. Initial one is a control pillar with no reinforcing fiber.
The subsequent one is wrapped with glass fiber built up polymer (GFRP) covers to support the bar in shear. Results were addressed by load-strain bends for cement, steel and fiber. What's more, the heap redirection bends and break designs created in the bars were introduced. The outcomes showed that FE displaying was precise in reproducing the tried pillars. It was likewise certain that involving FRP in fortifying supported cement footers is a compelling strategy in further developing shear conduct of the pillars.
Dr Paul Robinson has lead to the rising utilization of composites for thick segments. Current test guidelines (eg.
ASTM and ISO) for compressive strength of unidirectional overlays was centered around moderately slender (for example 2mm thick) covers for configuration purposes, however makers should be certain of the essential material properties of thick overlays for use in plan. Research programs did up to this point, at IC and somewhere else, propose that when the main variable is the coupon thickness, 10mm thick coupons produce "evident"
qualities around half lower than those from 2mm thick overlays. The strength of a thick overlay may not be equivalent to that of a more slender cover because of contrasts in, for instance, fiber waviness, leftover burdens and imperfection dissemination that emerge during produce, which could all be exacerbated as the overlay thickness increments. Yet, it was additionally the situation that the disappointment mode seldom happens in the measure area when current test
strategies were applied to thick overlays thus the low 'obvious' compressive strength probably won't be illustrative of the real strength. It made sense of a test technique for the plan, improvement and assessment for pressure strength estimation of thick composite overlays.
The procedure is utilize limited component examination in the plan of the test technique (example and dance) before production and assessment preliminaries.
Plan strategies for adhesively reinforced composites with hypothetical models to anticipate both strength and solidness was managed by B G Falzon.
Albeit scientific and exploratory work has been accounted for on the static strength of reinforced composites, little data is accessible on their weakness conduct.
This work will address a portion of the essential designing issues engaged with the portrayal of weakness life of fix fixes fortified with low-temperature fix cements. Fix honesty will be surveyed utilizing NDT and further developed mathematical strategies created to anticipate strength and exhaustion life.
Dr. Brian planned to portray and display the instruments related with skin/stringer de holding during post- clasping of composite solidified boards under monotonic stacking. The ensuing point is foster improved on models, in light of the basic actual systems which control stringer de holding utilizing a business limited component code (HKS ABAQUS). The examination zeroed in on both perfect and part of the way de reinforced/harmed skin/stringer arrangements, and thought about basically auxiliary fortified structures.
Through recognizing the controlling elements that impact skin/stringer de holding, a further point will be to foster upgraded underlying setups that restrain stringer separation and consequently further develop post clasping execution.
A concentrate on Composite materials is finished by Dr Lorenzo Iannucci and it was expressed that, Composite materials are step by step dislodging metallic materials as the essential selection of materials in military designs and parts, both in the aviation and surface vehicle fields. Composite materials have a known huge aversion to stacking rate, which can affect the
276 underlying exhibition, contingent upon
the material framework and the stacking setup. Be that as it may, at times it tends to be gainful. These noticed rate impacts might result from 'underlying latency impacts' as well as strain rate awareness of the systems that control the harm improvement processes, however a few cases it may not be obviously perceived.
The adjustment of stacking rate might affect the general harm, however may make delamination happen at various times or areas inside the part - hence possibly causing unanticipated disappointments, which might keep the composite from engrossing a more noteworthy likely energy in an accident situation, or emphatically lessening the capacity of the construction to endure configuration loads. Ballistic stacking on carbon fiber composites structures has proposed a likely multiplying of disappointment strain and in glass fiber composites the impact of stacking rate can essentially build the strength and strain to disappointment. The capacity to take advantage of such strain rate conduct in a plan climate could prompt an improvement in ballistic execution with a comparing weight decrease. This undertaking will look to foster a comprehension of the stacking rate responsiveness in polymer composites through a restricted trial program joined with work to mathematical model way of behaving. Displaying work specifically will look to foster rules to anticipate how designs could answer in a unique occasion from tests on limited scope coupons, in this way tending to the requirement for a scaling system for sensible designs or parts.
Ezz-Eldeen learned about fortifying and retrofitting of supported cement footers totally harmed due to flexural disappointment. The reinforcing method comprised of steel wire network with and without extra longitudinal steel points. 24 shafts 100mm width, 160mm profundity and 1250mm generally speaking range (1050mm successful range) were casted and tried under two focuses stacking. All bars were tried and monotonically to disappointment, and breaks were loaded up with ground mortar. The pillars were fortified and retrofitted under the current
disfigurement utilizing two and three outer heaps of extended stirred steel wire network with square lattices as U-coat.
The researched boundaries were the size of longitudinal steel points
(10x10x3mm,20x20x3mm and
30x30x3mm)which were added at the base corners of the pillars inside the steel wire network. Moreover, number of vertical steel clips (2, 4 and 6) were utilized to fix the coat to take out the debonding. The fortified and retrofitted radiates were again tried under two focuses stacking. The outcomes showed that the Strengthening and retrofitting cement footers utilizing steel wire network with and without extra longitudinal steel points had an impressive expansion in load conveying limit. Retrofitting radiates utilized 2 and 3 steel wire network heaps just fixed with 2,4 and 6 vertical braces brought about an expanded pillar conveying limit from 26.59% to 49.55 3 NEED FOR RESEARCH WORK
In every one of the above said writings the examination works were finished in the space of disappointment review and applying the healing measures by testing a couple to a most extreme number of three and furthermore by applying a couple of strategies for retrofitting that is medicinal measures. Yet, in this postulation eighteen individuals from radiates were casted and five strategies are applied. The maintenance materials are likewise applied on four sides of the shafts though in past explores it was finished of top and base faces as it were.
So in this proposition every one of the techniques are applied accurately and load avoidance examination qualities and burden conveying limit are likewise concentrated on which will be particularly required for the ongoing circumstance.
REFERENCES
1. Abd-Elhamed. M.K, “Retrofitting and Strengthening of Reinforcement Concrete Damaged Beams using Jacketing of Steel Wire Mesh with Steel Plates” International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology, Volume-04, Issue-04, PP 596- 604, April-2015.
2. Abo-Alanwar, M.M and Elbatal, S.A, “A Smart Reinforced Steel Wire Mesh U-Shape Jacketing Technique in Strengthening and Retrofitting RC Beams”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology,
277 Volume-04, Issue-12, PP 46-55, December-
2015.
3. Alfred M Freudenthal “Safety and the Probability of Structural Failure” Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers, Volume 80, Issue8,pp : 1- 46, 1954.
4. Anutag K. Jain, Prof. D. S. Padole,
“Enhancement of Rupture Strength using Carbon Fiber Polymer and E-Glass Fiber”, International Journal for Scientific Research
& Development, ISSN(Online), pp:2321-0613, Volume-4, Issue-03,2016.
5. Ayyanar J, Shanmugavalli. B, “Experimental Study in Flexural Behaviour of RCC Beams, Using Natural Fiber Wrapping”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, Volume-06, Issue-05, PP 5252- 5258, 2016.
6. Bank. L. C and Gentry, T. R, “Composite for Construction – Structural Design with FRP Materials”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2006).
7. Beryl Shanthapriya. A, Sakthieswaran. N,
“Optimization of GFRP Confinement in RC Columns using Shape Modification Technology”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Volumn- 04, Issue-08, PP 705-713, Aug-2015.
8. Drs Brian Falzon and Emile Greenhalgh and Victoria Bloodworth “Mechanisms and modeling of stringer de bonding in post- buckled carbon-fibre composite stiffened panels” Ethos ,imperial college London, 2008.
9. Brown, M. D., Bayrak, O. and Jirsa, J.O.
“Design for Shear Based on Loading Conditions” ACI Structural Journal Volume 103, Issue 4, pp: 541- 550, 2006.
10. YS Chung, C Meyer, M Shinozuka, “Modeling of Concrete Damage” Structural Journal 86 (3) 259-271, 1989
11. Cui, C. and Sheiek, S.A. “Experimental Study of Normal – and High- Strength Concrete Confined with Fibre Reinforced Polymers”, Journal of Composite for Construction, ASCE, pp 553-561, 2010.
12. Dario Coronelli, KamyabZandiHanjari, KarinLundgran “Severely corroded RC with cover cracking” published in the Journal of Structural Engineering 139 (2) 221-232, Apr 2012.
13. David Aveiga and Marcelo L. Ribeiro, “A Delamilation Propagation Model for Fiber Reinforced Laminated Composite Materials”, Hindawi, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 1861268, 9 pages, 2018.
14. Dimitrios g. A.M.ASCE Lignos, Tsuyoshi Hikino and Masayoshi Nakashima M.ASCE Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2K6 (corresponding author). Manager, Steel Structures Engineering Division, Nippon Steel Engineering Co., Ltd., Osaka Center Building, 1-5-1 Osaki, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo 141-8604, Japan; formerly, Researcher, EDefense, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED). Manager, Steel Structures Engineering Division, Nippon Steel Engineering Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan;
formerly, Researcher, E-Defense, National Research Institute for Earth Science and
Disaster Prevention (NIED). 4Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto Univ., Uji, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 611- 0011, Japan. “Assessment of Steel Moment Frames Based on E-Defense Full-Scale Shake Table Collapse Tests" by Published: 10 March 2012
15. Dipesh K. Rathod, Prof. Tarak P. Vora, “To Study the Effect of Different Strengthening Patterns Using GFRP on Shear Capacity of the Beam”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Volume- 02, Issue-06, PP 156-161, June-2013.
16. 16 Li, H., Dong, S., El-Tawil, S., Kamat, V
“Relative displacement sensing Techniques for post event structural damage assessment – review” American Society of Civil Engineers September 2012.
17. 17 Elsevier. Bank. L. C and Gentry, T. R
“Composite for Construction – Structural Design with FRP Materials”, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc. January 2006.
18. Drs Emile S Greenhalgh, Paul Robinson and Charlotte Rogers “Physically-based mixedmode failure criteria for delamination growth in composite materials” EPSRC – 19th Oct’ 2004.
19. Ertugrul Turker Uzun and Mutiu Secer,
“Evaluation of Building Retrofitting Alternatives from Sustainability Perspective”
Procedia Engineering Volume 171, pp 1137- 1146, 2017.
20. Ezz-Eldeen. H. A, “An Experimental Study on Strengthening and Retrofitting of Damaged Reinforcement Concrete Beams using Steel Wire and Steel Angles”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Volumn-04, Issue-05, PP 164-173.May 2015.
21. Falzon, B. G., Davies, G. A. O., Initial Failure of Mechanically fastened Joints with Offset Loading, Advanced Composite Letters, Vol.6, Pages: 91-94,1997.
22. B G Falzon, J M Hodgkinson and U Galvanetto and Rosen Tenchev “Composite bonded repairs: strength and fatigue performance” Key Engineering Materials Publications, 383, 25-34,2008.
23. N. F. Grace, G. A. Sayed, A. K. Soliman and K.R. Saleh, “Strengthening Reinforcement Concrete Beam using Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Laminates” ACI Structural Journal, PP 865-875September – October 1999.
24. Halliwel, S. M, “Polymer Composites in Construction”, BRE Centre of Building Fabric, CRC Ltd, BRE Publications, ISBN 1 86081 429 8,2000.
25. Harishankar. N, Dr. Joyamta Pal, “Shear Characteristic Study of RC beams Retrofitted with FRP and Cement Matrix Composite”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Volume-06, Issue-02, PP 164-168, February-2017.
26. D. C. Hart(v), Udinski, E.P.(v), Hayden, M.J.
(v), Dr. Liu, X.(v), “Fatigue Performance and Analysis of Composite Patch repaired Cracked Aluminum Plates” 2014.
27. Heena R. Mulaniand M.B. Kumthekar,
“Special Materials for Rehabilitation of Monuments” International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT)
278 ISSN: 2278-0181, Volume-4 Issue 04, April
2015.
28. Hollaway, L. Cand Head, P. R, “Advance Polymer Composite and Polymers in Civil Infrastructure” ISBN: 008 043661 7 ELSEVIER SCIENCE Ltd. 2001.
29. Jagadish B.M, Praveen J.V, Sachin M.
Kulkarni, “Performance Evaluation of RC Members using GFRP as Strengthening Technique”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Volumn- 04, Issue-07, PP 966-970, July-2015.
30. K. P. Jaya and Jessy Mathai “Special Materials for Rehabilitation of Monuments”
15WCEE LISBOA 2012.
31. JeongYeon Lee Deuck Hang Lee, Jin-Ha Hwang, Min-Kook Park, Heung-Youl Kim, and Kang Su Kim, “Structural Engineering Investigation on Allowable Compressive Stresses in Pre tensioned Concrete Members at Transfer” KSCE Journal of Civil Engg.17 (5) 1083-1098, 2013.
32. Karbhari, V. M, “Durability of Composites for Civil Structural Application” Woodhead Publishing Materials, A Volume in Woodhead Publishing series in Civil and Structural Engineering ,USA,2007.
33. V. M. Kharbari, J. W. Chin, D. Hunston, B.
Benmokrane, T. Juska, R. Morgan, J. J.
Lesko, and D. eynaud “Durability Gap Analysis for Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites in Civil Infrastructure” Journal of Composites for Construction, Volume 7, Issue 3, 238-247, 2003.
34. M. D. Kotsovos,” Shear Failure of Reinforced Concrete Beams”, Engineering Structures, Volume 9, Issue 7, pp: 32-38, January 1987.
35. Kurt Henkhaus, Santiago Pujal and Julio Ramirez “Axial Failure of Reinforced Columns Damaged by Reverse Versal” published in the Journal of American Society of Civil Engineers on June 13, 2013
36. Lokesh. A. Doddamani, Dr. B. Shivakumara Swamy, Dr. S. Vijaya, “The Study on Strength and Stiffness of RC Beams Retrofitted with GFRP Wrapping”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology”, Volume-3, Issue-9, PP 240-249, September- 2014
37. 37 Drs Lorenzo Iannucci and Paul Robinson and Lucio Raimondo “Predicting the dynamic behavior of polymer composites” ICCM- CENTRAL ORG. Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, 2007.
38. Dr. s Lucio Raimondo, Lorenzo Iannucci, Paul Robinson, Silvestre T. Pinho, Paul T. Curtis, Garry M. Wells “Predicting the Dynamic Behaviour of Polymer Composites” 16th International Conference on Composite Materials. ICCM- CENTRAL ORG. Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, 2007.
39. Luke A. Bisby, Aaron J. S. Dent and Mark F.
Green, “Comparison of Confinement Models for Fiber Reinforced Polymer Wrapped Concrete”, ACI Structural Journal;
Farmington Hills, PP 62-72.
40. T. Manikandan, G. Balaji Ponraj,
“Strengthening of RC Beam using GFRP Wraps”, International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology, Volume-04, Issue-05, PP 1527-1530, May 2013.
41. T. P. Manikandan, Dr. A. Ramachandran Murthy, “Flexural Behaviour of RC Beam Wrapped with GFRP Sheets”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Volume-8, Issue-02, PP 452-469, February 2017.
42. Marta Slowik, “The Analysis of Failure in Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Beams with Different Reinforcement Ratio”, Archive of Applied Mechanics, 89, 885-895, 2019.
43. Masanobu Shinozuka, “Basic Analysis of Structural Safety” Journal of Structural Engineering 109 (3) 721740, 1983.
44. Medhat Mohammed, Ahmed A Elshafey, Mostafa M. El-Shami, Kamel S Kandil,
“Strengthening of Concrete Beams In Shear”,
Concrete Research Letters,
www.cri.issres.net, Volume.4(4), PP 668-683, Dec-2013.
45. T. P. Meikandaan, Research Scholar, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. and Dr. A. Ramachandra Murthy, Senior Scientist CSIR – Structural Engineering Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. “Flexural Behavior of RC Beam Wrapped With GFRP Sheets” IJCIET – Volume 8, Issue 2, PP -452-469 Feb’2017.
46. Mohini G. Dhande, P. P. Saklecha, Shweta A.
Yelne, “Review on using Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer In Concrete”, International Journal of Computer Application, International Conference on Quality Up-Gradation in Engineering, Science and Technology (ICQUEST 2015).
47. Muhammed Saleem, Asad Ullah Quazi, Asif Hammed and Mohammed Hen Bashir “A Multi-layer Parallel Crack Extension Model for Deformational Response of Post Installed Hanger” published in the Journal KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering in August 28, 2012.
48. Nagajothi. S, Elavenil. S, “Study of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer in Geopolymer Concrete using M-Sand”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Volume-11, Number-2,PP 1006-1015, (2016).
49. KG Papakonstantinou, M Shinozuka,
“Planning Structural Inspection and Maintenance policies via dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. Part I – Theory” Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol: 130, pp 202-213, 2014.
50. Drs. Paul Robinson, John Hodgkinson and Silvestre Pinho and JasweenDogra.
“Development of a compression strength test for thick CFRP composites” Journal of Composite materials, Year 2007.
51. Rahuk Kumar Satbhaiya, Shishir Gupta, T.R.
Arora, “Rehabilitation and Strengthening of R.C.C Structures by using FRP Composited, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Volume-03, Issue-10, PP 261-273, October- 2013.
52. Sabahattin Akac, Ilker Kalkan, Bengi Aykac, Servet Karahan, Sinan Kayar, “Strengthening and repair of RC beams using exterior steel plates” published in Journal of Structural Engineering 139 (6) 929-939, 2012.
279 53. M. R. Sanjay and B. Yogesha, “Study on
Mechanical Properties of Natural-Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Composites: A Review”, Science Direct, Materials Tpday:
Proceedings, Volume 2, Issue 4-5, pp: 2959- 2967, 2015.
54. A C Satpute and M B Varma, “Retrofitting of Concret Beams Using Externally Bonded GFRP Wraps- an Overview”, International Journal of Scientific Research and Development (IJSRD), Volume 3, Issue 12, pp 720-723, 2016.
55. S G Sawant, A B Sawant M B Kumthekar,“
Strengthening of R. C. C. Beam – using Glass Fibre”, International Journal of Inventive Engineering and Sciences (IJIES), Volme 1, Issue 2,pp: 01-08, January 2013.
56. Schubbe, J., and Mall, S., “Investigatigation of a Cracked Thick Aluminium Panel Repaired with a Bonded Composite Patch”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 63, 305- 323, 1999.
57. K. Schulte and Ch. Baron, “Load and Failure Analysis of CFRP laminates by means of Electrical Resistivity Measurements”, Science Direct, Composites Science and Technology, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp: 63-76, 1989.
58. Shibata, A., and Sozen, M., “Substitute Structure Method for Seismic Design in Reinforced Concrete” Structural Division, Journal, ASCE, VOL102, no.1. 1976.
59. D. N. Shinde, Pudale Yojana. M M, Nair Veena. V, “Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Cement Concrete Beam Wrapped with GFRP Sheet”, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Volume-3, Special Issue-03, PP 760-763, May-2014.
60. Dr. B. Shivakumara Swamy, Dr. S. Vijaya, Lokesh. A. Doddamani, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India.
“The Study on strength and stiffness of RC beam retrofitted with GFRP Wrapping”
International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN: 2278 -0181 Vol.3 Issue 9 Sep’2014.
61. R. Sudhakar and P. Partheeban
“Strengthening of RCC Column using Glass
Fibre Reinforced Polymer”
www.academia.edu. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973- 4562 Volume 12, Number 14, pp 4478-4483, (2017).
62. G. Spadea, F. Bencardino and R.N. Swamy,
“Structural Behaviour of Composite RC Beams with Externally Bonded CFRP”, Journal of Composite for Construction, Volume- 02, Issue-03, PP 132-137 August - 1998.
63. Stefano Miranda, Lusia Moliari, Giulia Scalet, and Franscesco Ubertini (Researcher, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Researcher, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Bologna, ASCE Publications. Journal of Structural Engg.,138(8) 1065-1074, 2011.
64. Subrata Chandra Das, MD. Enamul Haque Nizam, “Application of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites (FRP) in Civil Engineering”, International Journal of
Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering, Volume-03, Issue-03, PP 299- 309, July-2014.
65. Tara Sen. and H.N. Jagannatha Reddy,
“Pretreatment of Woven Jute FRP Composite and Its use in Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Flexural”, Advances in Material Science and Engineering, 2013.
66. Varpu M Miettinen and Pekka Vallittu,” Water sorption, Solubility and Effect of Post-Curing of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymers”, Science Direct, Biomaterials, Volume 20, Issue 13, pp” 1187-1194, July 1999.
67. Vathsala, Jagannath Reddy and Malathesha,
“Behaviour of Post-Tensioned Beams Strengthened by CFRP and GFRP Wrapping”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, Volume-02, Issue- 12, PP 3076-3082, December-2013.
68. Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy (corresponding author)., 3Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
4Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Univ. of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.)
“Simple Beam Model to Estimate Leakage in Longitudinally Cracked Pressurized Pipes”
2011.
69. Zhanhu Guo, Kenny Lei, Yutong Li, Ho Wai Ng, Sergy Prikhodko, H. Thomas Hahn ,
“Fabrication and Characterization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Reinforced Vinyl- Ester Resin Nano C0mposites” Composite Science and Technology, Vol: 68, pp 1513-1520, 2008.
70. ACI 364. 1R-94 (1994), Guide for Evaluation of Concrete Structures Prior to Rehabilitation, American Concrete Institute, Farmington 421’
[-Hills, MI.
71. ACI 440. 2R-02 (2002), Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP system for strengthening Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
72. ACI Committee – 440 (2002), Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP system for Strengthening Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
73. ACI Committee – 503 (1992), Guide for the Selection of Polymer Adhesive with Concrete.
74. Gaurav Tiwari & Gali Madhavi Latha,
“Stability analysis and design of stabilization measures for Chenab railway bridge rock slopes”, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and
the Environment, 2019,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01602- 2.
75. Klara Kroftova, “Most Frequent Problems of Building Structures of Urban Apartment Buildings from 2nd Half of 19th Century and the Start of 20th Century”, Buildings 2021,
11, 27.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010027.
76. Shiferaw Garoma Wayessa, Ayana Abera Beyene, “Assessment of the Cause and Effect of Early Damage of Cobble Stone Road Construction and Its Remedial Measurements: A Case of Nekemte Town
280 Cheleleki Sub City”, Journal of Building
Material Science | Volume 03 | Issue 01 | June 2021.
77. Thi My Dung DO, Thanh Quang Khai LAM, Cong Bang Truong, “Analysis of Structural Failures and Remedial Measures”, Materials Science and Engineering 988 (2020) 012061.
78. J. S. Gidon, S. Sahoo, “Rainfall-Induced Slope Failures and Use of Bamboo as a Remedial Measure: A Review”, Indian Geotechnical Journal, January 2020.
79. Nathan Chilukwa and Richard Lungu,
“Determination of Layers Responsible for Rutting Failure in a Pavement Structure”, Infrastructures 2019, 4, 29;
doi:10.3390/infrastructures4020029.
80. Agnieszka Czajkowska and Manuela Ingaldi,
“Structural Failures Risk Analysis as a Tool Supporting Corporate Responsibility”, J. Risk
Financial Manag. 2021, 14, 187.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040187.
81. Sharmin Khan, Anwar Hussain, Mohammad Saquib, “Causes of Defects in Buildings and their Relationship with Life Cycle - Design, Construction and Post Occupancy Stage”, PACE 2021.
82. G.U. Alaneme, G.C.Ezeokpube, E. M.
Mbadike, “Failure Analysis of a Partially- Collapsed Building Using Analytical Hierarchical Process”, Reliability Engineering and Resilience 2-1 (2020) 01-20.
83. Bassam A. Tayeh, Ahsen Maqsoom, Yazan Issa Abu Aisheh, Mansour Almanassra, Hammad Salahuddin, Muhammad Irshad Qureshi, “Factors affecting defects occurrence in the construction stage of residential buildings in Gaza Strip”, SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:167 |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-1959-1
