• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Tribunal holds that capital gains arising under section 46A of the Act, on buyback of shares, not exempt under section 47(iv) of the Act

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Tribunal holds that capital gains arising under section 46A of the Act, on buyback of shares, not exempt under section 47(iv) of the Act"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Tax Insights

from India Tax & Regulatory Services

www.pwc.in

Tribunal holds that capital gains arising under section 46A of the Act, on buyback of shares, not

exempt under section 47(iv) of the Act

January 15, 2020

In brief

The Bangalore bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal)1, in the case of the taxpayer, analysed the taxability of buyback of shares in the hands of shareholders. The Tribunal held that exemption under section 47(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) is not available in cases of buyback of shares that are taxable under section 46A of the Act. Further, even otherwise, exemption under section 47(iv) of the Act is not available where one company or its nominees do not hold the entire shareholding.

In detail

Facts

• The taxpayer is a domestic company in which the foreign parent company holds 99.99% shares and the remaining o.o1% shares are held by another group company.

• The taxpayer purchased its own shares from the parent company under a buyback scheme and claimed it to be exempt under section 47(iv) of the Act.

• During assessment

proceedings, the Tax Officer (TO) held that exemption under section 47(iv) of the Act is not available as parent company is holding

1 ITA Nos. 1783 and 1784/Bang/2018

only 99.99% shares in the taxpayer.

• The First Appellate

Authority affirmed the TO’s order and also held that section 47(iv) of the Act is applicable in the context of prescribed modes of transfer specified in section 2(47) of the Act and the transaction involving buyback of shares being distinct from such prescribed modes, is not covered under section 47(iv) of the Act.

Issue before the Tribunal

• Whether exemption under section 47(iv) of the Act is av ailable to gain arising on buyback of shares that is

taxable under section 46A of the Act?

• Whether section 47(iv) of the Act is applicable where the parent company or its nominees do not hold the entire shareholding?

Taxpayer’s contentions

• As per the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, a minimum of two

shareholders are required for the incorporation of a private limited company. In the taxpayer’s case, 99.99%

of the shares was held by the parent company and the balance was held by a group company. Consequently, for all practical purposes, the parent company should be

(2)

Tax Insights

2 pwc

considered to hold whole of the share capital.

• If, for applicability of section 47(iv) of the Act, the v iew that the entire share capital should be held by the parent company in its own name, is taken, practically, then there will be no situation in which section 47(iv) of the Act can be applied, and therefore this cannot be a correct view.

• Further, section 45 of the Act and not section 46A of the Act, is a charging section for capital gain and section 47 of the Act provides exemption from chargeability of capital gain.

Therefore, the transaction of buyback of shares should not be taxable.

Revenue’s contentions

• Section 47(iv) of the Act is not applicable, as the parent company is holding 99.99% of the share capital of its

subsidiary company and the remaining shares are held by the group company.

• Section 47 of the Act is limited in its application only to section 45 of the Act, which is a general provision for the taxation of capital gain arising on transfer of capital asset. It does not apply to gain arising on buyback of shares to which provisions of section 46A of the Act applies.

Tribunal’s ruling

• Tribunal observed that to avail the exemption under section 47(iv) of the Act, one of the prescribed conditions is that shareholding in the Indian company should be entirely held by one company or its nominees.

• In the facts of the case, the Tribunal observed that group company was not holding the shares in the capacity of nominee of the parent company. Therefore, the exemption under section 47(iv) of the Act is not av ailable.

• The Tribunal observed that

section 45 of the Act deals with the taxability of capital gain on transfer of capital asset, and section 47 of the Act provides exemption to certain category of transfers.

• Section 46A of the Act, applicable in case of buyback of shares does not require transfer of any capital asset.

• Therefore, buyback of shares taxable under section 46A of the Act is not entitled to exemption under section 47(iv) of the Act.

The takeaways

The Tribunal stressed that to be covered within the purview of section 47(iv) of the Act, strict compliance of the conditions prescribed in that section is required.

Let’s talk

For a deeper discussion of how this issue might affect your business, please contact your local PwC advisor

(3)

Tax Insights

For priv ate circulation only

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional adv ice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwCPL, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. Without prior permission of PwCPL, this publication may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to in any documents.

© 2020 PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited. All rights reserved. In this document, “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (a limited liability company in India hav ing Corporate Identity Number or CIN : U74140WB1983PTC036093), which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers I nternational Limited (PwCIL), each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.

About PwC

At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with over 276,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services.

Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.

In India, PwC has offices in these cities: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Chennai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune and Raipur. For more information about PwC India’s service offerings, visit www.pwc.in

PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.

© 2020 PwC. All rights reserved

Follow us on:

Our Offices

Ahmedabad Bengaluru Chennai

1701, 17th Floor, Shapath V, Opp. Karnavati Club, S G Highway,

Ahmedabad – 380051 Gujarat

+91-79 3091 7000

6th Floor

Millenia Tower ‘D’

1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, Bengaluru – 560 008 Karnataka

+91-80 4079 7000

8th Floor

Prestige Palladium Bayan 129-140 Greams Road Chennai – 600 006 Tamil Nadu +91 44 4228 5000

Hyderabad Kolkata Mumbai

Plot no. 77/A, 8-2-624/A/1, 4th Floor, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hy derabad – 500034

Telangana

+91-40 44246000

56 & 57, Block DN.

Ground Floor, A- Wing Sector - V, Salt Lake Kolkata – 700 091 West Bengal

+91-033 2357 9101/

4400 1111

PwC House Plot No. 18A,

Guru Nanak Road(Station Road), Bandra (West), Mumbai – 400 050 Maharashtra

+91-22 6689 1000

Gurgaon Pune For more information

Building No. 10, Tower - C 17th & 18th Floor,

DLF Cy ber City, Gurgaon – 122002 Hary ana

+91-124 330 6000

7 th Floor, Tower A - Wing 1, Business Bay, Airport Road, Y erwada, Pune – 411 006 Maharashtra

+91-20 4100 4444

Contact us at

[email protected]

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The prohibition of cross holding of shares as provided under Article 36 UUPT is because capital increase in company share issuance is not achieved, and there is no legal

Record of determination and sanction 7.1 If a determination is made in relation to a suspected breach of the Code by a person who is, or was, an APS employee in the Office, a written

It is noteworthy that in the founding affidavit in the review application by the Steinhoff appellants it was said: ‘The Commission confirmed in its replying affidavit and heads of

Otherwise, there will be a gap for the business operator to set up a new small and low income company, for merger purpose to avoid the meaning of market dominance and it is also

In section 6 of the Commonwealth Act- a before the definition of “company” there were inserted the ‘‘ “Companies Acquisition of Shares Queensland Code” or “Code” means the

As we know 9th and 10th standard is one of the most crucial years for child educational growth and from this year’s only the free and compulsory education process stop of economically

• For the purpose of computing depreciation, the actual cost/ WDV of the assets acquired in the scheme of amalgamation in the hands of the amalgamated company will continue to be the

In a number of cases in the various divisions of the High Court, it has been held that, where a company is placed in business rescue pursuant to a resolution of its board of directors,