AN ANALYTICAL RESEARCH AND CONCEPTS ON QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION WORK
Shraddha Gupta
Research Scholar, RKDF College of Engineering, Bhopal Pushpendra Kumar Kushwaha
RKDF College of Engineering, Bhopal
Abstract- Quality administration frameworks are being worked in certain areas in India. In any case, meeting this framework in development industry is interesting. There are numerous preventions that make it challenging to apply the framework actually because of the idea of development and accordingly no true method for estimating the viability of this framework exist in development industry. The current exploration tends to three main pressing issues.
The first is to assess the adequacy of value the board framework (QMS) in development projects. The second is to distinguish the basic variables influencing the quality administration framework. The third one is to propose an execution system for quality administration in development projects.
Through a review survey, an endeavour has been made to investigate the best quality administration practices to be continued in development projects.
Keywords: ANOVA; development projects; the executives; association; quality; quality administration frameworks; relapse; importance; difference.
1 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY
Development quality can be seen as one piece of a triangle as displayed in Fig.1.1.
The expense level as arranged ought to be kept up with by the worker for hire; at required degree of value plan cutoff times ought to meet. Equilibrium ought to be kept up with between the three angles since they characterize the undertaking degree. The part quality should be dismissed for inflated cost reserve funds and time decreases.
Fig. 1.1 Construction Triangle 1.1 Quality Assurance
The quality control and examination were remembered for quality affirmation. The quality control and examination exercises were a piece of wards quality. The norm of items and administration were set by Quality confirmation. Clients need assumes a crucial part in the capacity of value confirmation. Quality affirmation
further develops deviations and looks to fulfill an always showing signs of change, unsound and cutthroat market. The advantages that ought to be accomplished from an appropriately executed quality confirmation framework are:
1. Improving customer satisfaction 2. Improving efficiency
3. Improving effectiveness 4. Reducing rework and waste 5. Creating a well-planned trade 6. Adding credibility to the trade 7. Enabling the business to strive on
an equal basis with larger businesses.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Le Van Thong (2003) discussed about determination of quality management activities in the construction in the Oil and Gas Company and reviewed the effectiveness of quality management in construction of the Oil and Gas Company.
Recommendations were given to improve the quality management system in oil and gas Construction Company.
Sasmita Palo and Nayantara Padhi (2003) examined role of training and its effectiveness in successful implementation of TQM concept in a leading Public sector enterprise in India.
They collected data by using structured
questionnaire from the employees selected
on the basis of stratified random sampling
method across the levels and department of the study organizations. The findings of the study indicate that there was a significant relationship between TQM training with teamwork and skill development. The results also implied that TQM training has not reduced the stress level of employees associated with TQM Implementation. Further, the analysis reveals that sufficient training was not provided to employees to manage and improve their communication competence, which constitutes the very essence of TQM. Finally the authors concluded that training is an effective medium of creating awareness, developing organizational communication, competence building, generating enthusiasm and commitment for effective TQM implementation.
3 METHODOLOGY OF ANALYSIS 3.1 Data Collection
A study survey was arranged in light of foundation data, general quality perspective and standard quality angle. A sum of 500 polls have been shipped off the respondents through email, straightforwardly through printed version, softcopy, postal and messenger. The kinds of undertakings engaged with this overview are multi-celebrated corporate/business structures, private structures and modern structures. The venture cost changed from 1crore to 100 crores. The private area has been considered in this study. Period for assortment of information took 14months.
3.1.1 Literature Survey
A wide range of areas were surveyed to indentify and understand the various critical factors affecting quality in construction projects of Tamilnadu.
3.1.2 Expert Consultation
Experts and specialists with over 20 years of involvement with development ventures, for example, project engineers, quality architects, wellbeing designers and site engineers in development projects were counseled for information assortment and acquiring data from their previous experience. The distinguished variables for quality from writing review were examined with the specialists to the current work circumstance and their
perspectives and ideas were consolidated in the poll study.
4 ANALYSIS OF FACTORS 4.1 Introduction
The information for the current review was gathered from 236 respondents like quality architect, project administrator, site designer and development engineers and the information have been broke down utilizing the Descriptive investigation and Inferential examination factual methods. The variables included under the undertaking foundation perspective, general quality angles and standard code addressing quality viewpoints are those which are to be concentrated cautiously so that no detail is discarded at the venture arranging stage. The variables characterize the idea of the venture and nitty gritty to be acquired in the arrangement of a plausible task plan.
4.2 Descriptive Statistics
Clear examination includes the estimation of the proportions of focal propensity, the mean, proportions of inconstancy and the standard deviation. These two are valuable to decide the focal propensities and scattering of the factors chose for the review. The registered upsides of the mean and the standard deviation are utilized to depict, the properties of specific examples and enlightening measurements is utilized to decrease the greater part of information to reasonable size.
4.3 Conclusion
Fig. 4.1 Most Important Factors under
Project Background Aspects
From the investigation of variables under
project foundation angles the main
elements are distinguished and displayed
in Fig. 4.1. The worker for hire ought to keep up with the using time effectively on delicate accommodation with additional information on work and material expense. The venture engineer must mindful of value the executives with codes and particulars.
Fig. 4.2 Mean and Standard Deviation for factors F1 to F15
Fig. 4.3 Mean and Standard Deviation for factors F16 to F25
Fig. 4.4 Mean and Standard Deviation for factors F26 to F35
Fig. 4.5 Mean and Standard Deviation for factors F36 to F45
5 FACTOR ANALYSIS 5.1 Introduction
In this section factor investigation was done to get factor decrease or aspect decrease. Through this investigation least quantities of variables were removed from the main elements distinguished through expressive examination and one way ANOVA. Factors under broad quality viewpoint and the variables under standard code addressing factors were considered in this review.
6 REGRESSION ANALYSIS 6.1 Introduction
The improvement of a numerical condition to address true peculiarities is expected for anticipating the way of behaving of frameworks. Relapse helps in the development of numerical conditions for noticed peculiarities utilizing factual standards. The goal of relapse is to apply the most un-squared blunders guideline to limit the mistake between the trial results and the anticipated outcomes. The technique includes expecting a reasonable beginning structure for the situation, which roughly looks like the type of connection between the autonomous and subordinate boundaries. A portion of the essential phrasing utilized in relapse investigation is introduced here.
Relapse investigation was done to get a connection between subordinate variable and the extricated fundamental elements. Relapse examination distinguishes the most grounded indicator among the autonomous variable which have a circumstances and logical results relationship on subordinate variable. The underlying elements included under the basic variables are distinguished as most basic factors that are to be observed intently.
6.1.1 Legendre’s Principle of Least Squared Error
The standard utilized for developing
relapse conditions which concur well with
noticed results. The amount of squared
blunders is limited by likening the
subsidiary of the squared mistakes to
nothing. This is the most well-known
system took on for tackling relapse
issues.
7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Altogether 236 reactions got through poll overview were straightforwardly placed into a succeed bookkeeping sheet and afterward imported to the Orginpro information document. Each variable was managed independently all together not to lose the meaning of any element while doing unmistakable examination and one way ANOVA. Through which 86 significant elements were recognized.
From these significant variables, 11 hidden factors were recognized through factor examination. Relapse examination was done to get a connection between subordinate variable and the extricated basic elements. An outcome at relapse investigation recognizes the most grounded indicator among the autonomous variable which have a circumstances and logical results relationship on subordinate variable.
6 variables were profoundly basic in the two elements under broad quality angle and standard code addressing viewpoint. 4 variables were profoundly basic overall quality viewpoint and 2 elements were exceptionally basic in standard code addressing perspective.
2 elements were distinguished as huge in factors under broad quality viewpoint and 4 variables were recognized as critical in factors under standard code addressing angle. 3 variables were distinguished as less critical in factors under broad quality angle and 2 elements were recognized as less huge in factors under standard code addressing viewpoint.
7.1 Highly Critical Factors
The accompanying separated factors were the most grounded indicators displaying circumstances and logical results relationship with more number of ward factors in everyday quality perspective.
•
Chief ought to have the capacity to do test without a trace of professionals.
•
Whenever the meter and instrument are upset, it ought to be recalibrated.
•
Every single thing must be supported by the quality chief.
The accompanying separated factors were the most grounded indicators displaying circumstances and logical results relationship with more number of
ward factors in standard code addressing perspective.
•
The site needs to report Customer objections in month to month quality report.
•
The venture follows a composed hierarchical arrangement to execute quality affirmation.
7.1.1 Manager Should be Capable of Doing Test in the Absence of Technicians
Chiefs assume a significant part in Total Quality Management. Starting and carrying out absolute quality administration programs require lot of arranging and exploration. Chiefs need to get prepared in different TQM rehearses prior to carrying out something similar.
The job of a chief is to go about as a facilitator at work. It is the obligation of director to help representatives in executing TQM.
7.1.2 Whenever the Meter and Instrument are Disturbed, it Should be Recalibrated
Adjustment is the most common way of observing a connection between two amounts that are obscure. The quantifiable amounts might contrast in two gadgets which are same. The gadget with the known or relegated rightness is known as the norm. The subsequent gadget is the unit under test, test instrument, or any of a few different names for the gadget being aligned.
Recalibration of instrument ought to be intermittently done to address the issues, to upgrade attractiveness or fulfill the quality prerequisites.
7.1.3 Each and Every Item has to be Approved by the Quality Manager The quality supervisor will advocate, backing or lead quality improvement drives. The person is liable for guaranteeing that all chiefs, process proprietors and bosses create and keep up with their piece of the quality administration framework.
The quality director screens and
prompts on how the framework is
performing, which may frequently
incorporate the distribution of insights
with respect to organization execution
against set measures.
A vital job of the quality chief is that of guaranteeing that client prerequisites and assumptions have been precisely recognized and that the association is meeting or surpassing client assumptions.
The quality supervisor will be answerable for the endorsement of every single thing engaged with development projects.
7.1.4 The Site has to Report Customer Complaints in monthly Quality Report Overseeing client grumblings successfully could have more possibility measuring up to their assumptions also. Which rapidly transform client grumblings into consumer loyalty rather particularly whenever you view grievances as an amazing chance to further develop what you do and how you make it happen. The client grievances the executives framework is a fundamental yet fundamental necessity for Construction projects. The advantages of client grievance the board are;
•
Accomplish functional effectiveness to recognize patterns and reasons for grievances
•
Resolve more grumblings by embracing a more client centered approach
•
Draw in staff with new client assistance preparing open doors
•
Coordinate with ISO 9001 to work on generally speaking proficiency
•
Screen and ceaselessly further develop your protests dealing with process.
7.2 Significant Factors
The elements recorded underneath display to be huge and to be checked with less need. These variables to be treated as significant elements by the quality group in development projects.
The huge variables under broad quality viewpoint are:
•
Specialist should know about the guideline of the machine and example.
•
The aligned instrument ought to be maintained cautiously against shock.
The huge variables under standard code addressing angle are
The timetable for the item quality checks ought to be accessible and checks ought to be done according to plan.
The site group ought to utilize efficient techniques/instruments with information to investigate quality issues.
The QMS direction must be given to all new staff and laborers.
7.2.1 Technician must be aware of the Principle of the Machine and Specimen Investigating abilities are indispensable to upkeep specialist. Before powerful fixes to be completed, the fundamental standard of machine or instrument ought to be obviously perceived. jobs are Operation Monitoring - Watching checks, dials, or different markers to ensure a machine is working appropriately, fixing machines or frameworks utilizing the required apparatuses, Performing routine support on gear and deciding when and what sort of upkeep is required, Controlling activities of hardware or frameworks in light of their singular rule of machine and leading tests and examinations of machines, administrations, or cycles to assess quality or execution.
7.2.2 The Calibrated Instrument Should be Kept Carefully Against Shock Estimation and estimation related activities have been assessed to represent somewhere in the range of 3% and 6% of the GDP of modern nations. The financial progress of most assembling enterprises is fundamentally reliant upon how well items are made and alignment assumes a vital part in this.
Adjustment is one of the expense things yet every estimating instrument utilized for a significant reason should be aligned at ordinary stretches to guarantee it is performing inside its predetermined cutoff points. The dangers and expenses of wrong estimations are generally speaking a lot higher than the expense of alignment.
7.2.3 The Schedule for the Product Quality Checks Should be Available and Checks Should be done as per Schedule Quality Inspections can help:
To ensure product safety prior to deliver.
Minimize the amount of defective merchandise.
Reduce customer complaints due to inferior items.
Detect merchandise containing non-standard or non-compliant works.
Eliminate delay.
7.3 Less Significant Factors
The elements recorded beneath show to be less huge and to be checked with less need. These variables are to be treated as significant elements by the quality group in development projects.
The less critical variables under broad quality angle are
The standards and principles ought to be observed.
Each contraption ought to be proficient to endure the example obstruction
The less critical elements under standard code addressing perspective are
Efficiency information ought to be gathered and observed for development.
The quality preparation for representative exists in your organization.
7.3.1 The Norms and Standards should be Followed
The standards and norms ought to be adhered to is a less huge component has been inferred in view of the reactions got from respondents having a place with different classifications in the development projects. Out of 236 respondents, 143 have expressed that standards and norms ought to be adhered to has a less critical component. Is the issue has been planned in such a style that there won't be any vagueness in choosing the weightage of each variable.
7.3.2 Every Apparatus should be Capable to withstand the Specimen Resistance
Each mechanical assembly ought to be skilled to endure the example obstruction in any venture is a less huge component has been inferred in light of the reactions got from respondents having a place with different classifications in the
development projects. Out of 236 respondents, 136 have expressed the each mechanical assembly ought to be skilled to endure the example obstruction in any venture has a less critical variable. Is the issue has been planned in such a style that there won't be any equivocalness in choosing the weightage of each element.
7.3.3 Productivity Data should be Collected & Monitored for Improvement
The component, efficiency information ought to be gathered and checked for development is a less huge element has been inferred in view of the reactions got from respondents having a place with different classifications in the development projects. Out of 236 respondents, 210 have expressed that efficiency information ought to be gathered and checked for development has a less huge variable. Is the issue has been planned in such a design that there won't be any uncertainty in choosing the weightage of each element.
7.3.4 The Quality Training for Employee exists in your Company Quality for preparing for worker exists in any organization is a less huge component has been inferred in light of the reactions got from respondents having a place with different classifications in the development projects. Out of 236 respondents, 218 have expressed the quality for preparing for worker exists in any organization has a less huge variable.
Is the issue has been planned in such a design that there won't be any uncertainty in choosing the weightage of each component.
8 CONCLUSIONS 8.1 Introduction
The basic elements which are probably going to influence the execution of all out quality administration in development projects have been distinguished. They are assembled under three classes in view of their importance as exceptionally basic, critical and less huge. The exceptionally basic elements are to be given main concern in the constant observing. The huge elements are additionally to be tended to with equivalent significance.
The less huge variable ought not be
disregarded yet given due significance.
With this multitude of perspectives appropriately tended to at the fitting phase of the task, venture can be effectively finished inside the specified time. The basic variables recognized uncover that the quality supervisory group individuals play a significant part to play. The site designs also called designs additionally play an equivalent part to play.
8.2 Scope for the Future Study
The basic elements distinguished in this concentrate by leading poll review are not comprehensive. Factors all in all influencing the execution of value the board in development projects are to be recognized by directing contextual analyses in different development projects in all states around India. Additionally a correlation could be made between the outcomes acquired all through the conditions of country.
REFERENCES
1. Abd. Majid, and McCaffer, R. (1998), Factors of Non-excusable Delays that influence Contractor's Performance, Journal of Management in Engineering, 14(3), 42-49.
2. Alira, S., Alojzij, S., and Ivan B. (2005), A quality management model based on the deep quality concept, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(3), 278- 302.
3. Al-Ani, Raji, and Firas I. Al-Adhmawi. (2008), Implementation of Quality Management Concepts in Managing Engineering Project Site. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering 5(1):
89-16.
4. Ambroz, M. (2004), Total Quality System as a Product of the Empowered Corporate Culture, The TQM Magazine, 16(2), 93-104.
5. Ang, C. L., Davies, M. and Finlay, P N. (2000), Measures to Assess the Impact of Information Technology on Quality Management, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17(1), 42-65.
6. Arditi, D., and Gunayadin, H.M. (1998), Factors that Affect Process Quality in the Life Cycle of Building Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(3), 194-203.
7. Ashokkumar D.(2007) Study of Quality Management in Construction Industry.
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 3.
8. Asim, M., uz Zaman, S., & Zarif, T. (2013).
Implementation of Total Quality Management in Construction Industry: A Pakistan Perspective, Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 9(1), 24-39.
9. Babbar, S. and Aspelin, D. (1994), J. TQM it is as easy as ABC? The TQM magazine, 6(3), 32-38.
10. Barbara B. F., and Brooke, S. (2006), Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an
international context: A study of national culture, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 583-603.
11. Belle, R. A. (2000), Benchmarking and Enhancing Best Practices in Engineering and Construction Sector, Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(1), 40-47.
12. Benson, P. G., Saraph, J. V., and Schroeder, R.G. (1991), The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigation, Management Science, Vol. 39, pp. 1107-1124.
13. Benson, T. (1993), TQM: A Child takes a First Few Faltering Steps, Industry Week, 242(7), 16-17.
14. Black, S. And Porter, L. (1996), Identification of Critical Factors of TQM, Decision Sciences, 27(1), 1-21.
15. Burati, J. L., Mathews, F. M., and Kalidindi, S. N. (1992), Quality Management Organisations and Techniques, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 112-118.
16. Burcu Akinci., Boukamp, F., Gordon, C., Huber, D., Lyons, C. and Park, K., 2006. A formalism for utilization of sensor systems and integrated project models for active construction quality control. Automation in Construction,15(2), pp.124-138.
17. Butch, K., and Rivers, D. (2001), TQM: Role of Leadership and Culture, Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, 22(8), 365-371.
18. Chan, E. H. W and Tse, R. Y. C. (2003), Cultural Considerations in International Construction Contracts, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), 375-381.
19. Chini, A. R., & Valdez, H. E. (2006), ISO 9000 and the US Construction Industry, Journal of management in engineering, 19(2), 69-77.
20. Christini G., M., Hendrickson, C (2004), Environmental Management Systems and ISO 14001 Certification for Construction firms, ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 130(3), 330-336.
21. Coffey, A., Mason, B and Atkinson, P.A., (2005). Qualitative Research and Hypermedia.
SAGE Publications Limited.
22. Coffey, Yong and Low (2008), A profile can actually improve construction outcomes and organizational effectiveness as well as more specifically in Indonesian construction firms.
A case study. 148-189.
23. Cynthia, A. L. (1996), Customer contributions to quality: A different view of the customer- oriented firm, The Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 791-824.
24. Dale, B.G. (1999), Managing Quality, Third edition, Blackwell Publisher Inc., Oxford, UK.
25. Dale, B.G., and Lee, R.G. (1998), Business process management: a review and evaluation. Business process management journal, 4(3), pp.214-225.
26. Deming Prize (2004), Guide for Deming Application Prize 2004.
27. Deming, W.E., 1986. Out of the crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Center for advanced engineering study, Cambridge, MA, 510.
28. Digalwar, A. K., and Metri, B. A. (2005), Performance Measurement Framework for
World Class Manufacturing, The International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 3(2), 83-101.
29. Ekambarampalaneeswaran, (2006). The construction industry is predominantly quality based and projects: A case study 30. EQA (2004), EQA Information Brochure 2004,
http://www.efqm.org
31. Federley, M O., and Chase, G.W. (1993), Applying Total Quality Management to Design and Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4), 357-364.
32. Firas AL. Adhmawi (2008), Integrated management system for site quality control, Proceedings of building and construction department of university of technology, Baghdad, Iraq, 7.
33. Flynn, B., Schoeder, R. and Sakibaba, S. S.
(1994), A Framework for Quality Management Research and Associated Measurement Instrument, Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 339-366.
34. Gallo, G., Lucas, G., McLennan, A., Parminter, T. and Tilley, P., 2002. Project documentation quality and its impact on efficiency in the building and construction industry. Queensland Division of the Institution of Engineers, Australia.
35. Garvin, D.A. (1984), What does product quality really means? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
36. Gunasekaran, A., (1999), Enablers of total quality management implementation in manufacturing: a case study. Total Quality Management, 10(7), 987-996.
37. Hendricks, K.B. and Singhal, V.R. (1997), Delays in New Product Introductions and the Market Value of the Firm: The Consequences of Being Late to the Market, Management Science, 43(4), 422-436.
38. Hosseinali, Mohammadsaleh and Hesami, (2014), Application of Total Quality Management Ideas in Construction Projects, Journal of Current Research in Science, 2(5), 651-654.
39. Howard S. G. (1994), A comparison of Japanese Total Quality Control and Deming s theory of management, The American Statistician, 48(3), 197-203.
40. Irianto, D. (2005), Quality Management Implementation: A Multiple Case Study in Indonesian Manufacturing Firms, University of Twente.
41. ISO, B., 2000. 9001: 2008 Quality management systems. Requirements.
International Organization for Standardization.
42. Jabnoun, J., and Anwar, S. A. (2002), TQM and National Culture: A Contingency Model, Journal of Productivity, 42(4), 591-596.
43. Jagadeesh, R., (1999), Total Quality Management in India-perspective and Analysis. The TQM Magazine, 11(5), pp.321- 327.
44. Jenner, R. A., Hebert, L., Appell, A., and Baack, J. (1998), Using Quality Management for Cultural Transformation of Chinese State Enterprises: A Case Study, Journal of Quality Management, 3(2), 193-210.
45. Juran, J. M. .., Editor, and Gryna, F. M.
(1993), Why quality initiatives fail, Journal of Business Strategy, 14(4). 35- 38.
46. Ka Chi Lam and Ng, S.T., (2006), A cooperative Internet-facilitated quality management environment for construction.
Automation in Construction,15(1), pp.1-1 47. Kano, N. (1993), A Perspective on Quality
Activities in American Firms, California Management Review, 35(3), 12-31.
48. Karuppusami, G., and R. Gandhinathan.
(2007), Web-based measurement of the level of implementation of TQM in Indian Industries. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 18(4), 379-391.
49. Kazaza, A., and Birgonul, M. T. (2005), The Evidence of Poor Quality in High Rise and Medium Rise Housing Units: A Case Study of Mass Housing Projects in Turkey. Building and environment, 40(11), 1548-1556.
50. Khanam, S., Siddiqui, J., and Talib, F. (2013).
Role of Information Technology in Total Quality Management: A Literature Review.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering &Technology, 2(8), 2433-2445.
51. Kiwus, C. H., and Williams, T. P. (2001), Application of TQM to Environmental Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(3), 176-183.
52. Kometa, T. S., and Olomolaiye, P. O. (1997), Factors Influencing Construction Client's Decisions to Build. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(2), 77-86.
53. Lam, K. C., & Ng, S. T. (2006), A Co-operative Internet-Facilitated Quality Management Environment for Construction, Automation in Construction, 15(1), 1-11.
54. Laszlo, G. P.(1998), Implementing a Quality Management Program-3 Cs of Success:
Commitment, Culture, Cost. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 281-287.
55. Le Van Thong, et al (2003), Determination of quality management activities in the construction in the Oil and Gas Company and to review the effectiveness of quality management in construction of the Oil and Gas Company. A Case Study.
56. Lewis, D. (1996), Organizational Culture Saga - from OD to TQM: A Critical Review of the Literature, Part-2 Applications, Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, 17(2), 9-16.
57. Low Sui Pheng, Tan Boon Kee, and Allen Ang Aik Leng.(1999), Effectiveness of ISO 9000 in raising construction quality standards: some empirical evidence using CONQUAS scores.
Structural Survey 17(2), 89-108.
58. Magd, H. A. TQM constructs development and validation in the context of Egyptian manufacturing sector: A snapshot perspective. Best Practices in Construction and Manufacturing, ST 7 (2014): 1-16 59. Heshammagd Magd, (2014) Innovative
Engineering Organizational Excellence Best Practices through Capturing Tacit Knowledge:
Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Nang Yan Business Journal, 2(1), 112-122.
60. Mahmood, Wan Yusoff Wan, Abdul Hakim Mohammed, Mohd Saidin Misnan, Zakaria Mohd Yusof, and Ahmadon Bakri. (2006), Development of Quality Culture in the Construction Industry. 1-11.
61. Mallon, J. C., and Mulligan, D. E. (1993), Quality Function Development-A System for
Meeting Customer Needs, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 516-531.
62. Mathews, B. P., Ueno, A., Kekäle, T., Repka, M., Pereira, Z. L., & Silva, G. (2001), European Quality Management Practices: The Impact of National Culture. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(7), 692-707.
63. MBNQA (2004), Baldrige National Quality Program - 2004. http://quality.nist.gov 64. Metri, B.A. (2004), Imperatives of
Benchmarking and its Implementation Strategy for Construction Industry, Industrial Engineering Journal, 33(4), 24-29.
65. Metri, B.A., (2005), TQM critical success factors for construction firms. Management:
Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 10(2), pp.61-72.
66. Moller, J. D., & Montgomery, M. T. (2000), Tropical Cyclone Evolution via Potential Vorticity Anomalies in a Three-Dimensional Balance Model, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 57(20), 3366-3387.
67. Motwani, J., 2001, Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. The TQM magazine, 13(4), 292-300.
68. Montgomery, D. C. (2000), Introduction to statistical quality control, (4th ed.), NewYork:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
69. Naceur, J., and Hssan, A. (2005), Leadership Styles Supporting ISO 9000:2000, Quality Management Journal, 12(1), 21-29.
70. Nawaz, T., & Ikram, A. A. (2013), Benefits and Impediments in Implementing TQM in Pakistani Construction Sector, European Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 205-227.
71. Nwabueze, U. (2001), How the Mighty have Fallen: the Naked Truth about TQM, Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(9), 504-513.
72. Oakland, J.S. (1993), Total Quality Management: The Route to Improving Performance, Butterworth-Hienman Limited, Oxford, 128 157.
73. Palaneeswaran, E., Ng, T., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2006), Client Satisfaction and Quality Management Systems in Contractor Organizations, Building and Environment, 41(11), 1557-1570.
74. Palo, S., & Padhi, N. (2003). Measuring Effectiveness of TQM Training: an Indian Study. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(3), 203-216.
75. Perry, C. (1997). Total Quality Management and Reconceptualising Management in Africa, Journal International Business Review, 6(3), 233-243.
76. Pheng, L. S., and Wei, V. A. (1996), Framework for Implementing TQM in Construction, The TQM Magazine, 8(5), 39- 46.
77. Powell, T.C. (1995), Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15-37.
78. Quazi, H. A., Hong, C. W., & Meng, C. T.
(2002), Impact of ISO 9000 Certification on Quality Management Practices: A comparative study, Total Quality Management, 13(1), 53- 67.
79. Raji Al-Ani and I. Al-
Adhmawi,(2011),Implementation of Quality Management Concepts in Managing Engineering Project Site, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 89-106.
80. Reeves, V.A. and Bednar, D.A. (1994), Defining Quality: Alternatives and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 419-445.
81. Rodney, M., Leonard, D., Henderson, J., and Hazlett, S. (2008), A grounded theory research approach to building and testing TQM theory in operation management, Omega, Vol. 36, pp. 825-837.
82. Rodney, J. (1997), Cultural Implications of Implementing TQM in Poland, Journal World Business, 32(2), 152-158
83. Rosenfed, Y., Warszawski, A., Laufer, A.
(1992), Using Quality Circles to Raise Productivity and Quality of Work Life, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 17-33.
84. 86. Saraph, J. V., George Benson, P., and Shroeder, R. G. (1989), An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management, Decision sciences, 20(4), 811- 829.
85. Sharma, Bishnu.(2006) Quality management dimensions, contextual factors and performance: An empirical investigation. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 17.9: 1231-1244.
86. Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002), An Investigation of the Total Quality Management Survey based Research Published between 1989 and 2000: A literature review, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 902- 970.
87. Sinclair, J., and Collins, D. (1994), Towards a Quality Culture? International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 11(5), 19-29.
88. Soltani, E., Lai, P. C., Javadeen, S. R. S., &
Gholipour, T. H. (2008), A Review of the Theory and Practice of Managing TQM: An Integrative Framework, Total Quality Management, 19(5), 461-479.
89. Stephen C. Jones, Tami L. Knotts, and Karen L. Brown. (2005), Selected quality practices of small manufacturers, Quality Management Journal, 12(1), 41- 53.
90. Steyn, H., Basson, G., Carruthers, M., Du Plessis, Y., Prozesky-Kuscke, B., Kruger, D., Van Eck, S. &Visser, K. (2006), Project Management: A Multi- Disciplinary Approach.
Pretoria: FPM Publishing.
91. Suleiman, K., and Steven, A. (1998), Training, Performance Evaluation, Rewards, and TQM Implementation Success, Journal of Quality Management 3(1), 25-38.
92. Sun, H., Kee Hui, I., Tam, A. Y., & Frick, J.
(2000), Employee Involvement and Quality Management, The TQM Magazine, 12(5), 350- 354.
93. Tahir Nawaz and Amjad Ali Ikram, 2013.
Benefits and Impediments in Implementing TQM in Pakistani Construction Sector, European Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 205-227.
94. Talib, Faisal, Zillur Rahman, and M. N.
Qureshi.(2013), An empirical investigation of
relationship between total quality management practices and quality performance in Indian service companies.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 30(3), 280-318.
95. Thiagarajan, T., Zairi, M. and Dale, B.G.
(2001), A Proposed Model of TQM Implementation based on An Empirical Study of Malaysian Industry, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18( 3), 289-306.
96. Tilley, Paul A.,(2005), Lean Design Management: A New Paradigm for Managing the Design and Documentation Process to Improve Quality?. In 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference:
Proceedings, 283. International Group on Lean Construction,
97. Turk, A.M., 2006. ISO 9000 in construction:
An examination of its application in Turkey.
Building and environment, 41(4), 501-511.
98. Yang, C. C. (2006), The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on the Implementation of Total Quality Management:
An Empirical Study on High- Tech firms, The TQM Magazine, 18(2), 162-173.
99. Ruchini Senarath Jayasinghe, Nicholas Chileshe and Raufdeen Rameezdeen,
“Information-based quality management in reverse logistics supply chain A systematic literature review”, Benchmarking An International Journal · June 2019, DOI:
10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0238.
100. Abuaraki Osman Ahmed, Abdalla Abdelrahim Idris, “Examining the relationship between soft total quality management (TQM) aspects and employees’ job satisfaction in “ISO 9001”
Sudanese oil companies”, TQM Journal · July 2020, DOI: 10.1108/TQM-05-2019-0147.
101. Phi-Hung Nguyen, “A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Based on SERVQUAL for Hotel Service Quality Management: Evidence from Vietnam”, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Vol 8 No 2 (2021) 1101–1109.
102. Mohammad Abazid, Hüseyin Gökçekuş, Tahir Çelik, “Study of the Quality Concepts Implementation in the Construction of Projects in Saudi Arabia by using Building Information Modelling (BIM)”, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), ISSN: 2278- 3075, Volume-8 Issue-3, January 2019.
103. Volker Coors, Matthias Betz, Eric Duminil, “A Concept of Quality Management of 3D City Models Supporting Application‑Specific Requirements”, PFG (2020) 88:3–14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-020-00094- 0.
104. Fabio Carbone, Luiz Oosterbeek, Carlos Costa, Ana Maria Ferreira Fabio Carbone, Luiz Oosterbeek, Carlos Costa, Ana Maria Ferreira, “Extending and adapting the concept of quality management for museums and cultural heritage attractions: A comparative study of southern European cultural heritage managers' perceptionsz”, Tourism Management Perspectives 35 (2020) 100698.
105. Ingaldi M., “A New Approach to Quality Management: Conceptual Matrix of Service
Attributes”, Polish Journal pf Management Studies, 2020 Vol.22 No.2.
106. Tsai-Chi Kuo, Muniroh Muniroh, and Kristin Halisa Fau, “An Integrated Kano Model, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process, and Decision Matrix for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Palm Oil Industries Indonesia, a Case Study”,
Processes 2021, 9, 1078.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061078.
107. Kambiz Ghafourian, Kamyar Kabirifa, Amir Mahdiyar, Maziar Yazdani, Syuhaida Ismail and VivianW. Y. Tam, “A Synthesis of Express Analytic Hierarchy Process (EAHP) and Partial Least Squares-Structural Equations Modeling (PLS-SEM) for Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management Assessment:
The Case of Malaysia”, Recycling 2021, 6, 73.
https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6040073.
108. Anh Chi Phan, Ha Thu Nguyen, Hao Anh Nguyen and Yoshiki Matsui, “Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants”, Sustainability 2019, 11, 3093;
doi:10.3390/su11113093.
109. Saeed Talebi, Lauri Koskela, Patricia Tzortzopoulos and Michail Kagioglou,
“Tolerance Management in Construction: A Conceptual Framework”, Sustainability 2020, 12, 1039; doi:10.3390/su12031039.
110. Kai Xue, Md. Uzzal Hossain, Meng Liu, Mingjun Ma, Yizhi Zhang, Mengqiang Hu, XiaoYi Chen and Guangyu Cao, “BIM Integrated LCA for Promoting Circular Economy towards Sustainable Construction:
An Analytical Review”, Sustainability 2021,
13, 1310.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031310.
111. Tomas Cherkos Kassaneh, Ettore Bolisani, and Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,
“Knowledge Management Practices for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Challenge for Business Education”, Sustainability 2021, 13, 2956.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052956.
112. Xiaoxiao XU, Patrick X. W. ZOU, “System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions”, Eng.
Manag. 2021, 8(1): 17–31,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0091- 7.
113. Aawag Mohsen Alawag, Wesam Salah Alaloul, M.S. Liew, Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, Syed Saad, Syed Ammad, “Total Quality Management Practices and Adoption in Construction Industry Organizations: A Review”, 2020 Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference:
Technology and Innovation in Building
Designs, 2020 IEEE, DOI:
10.1109/IEEECONF51154.2020.9319992.
