186 QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION WORK: A REVIEW
Shraddha Gupta
Research Scholar, RKDF College of Engineering, Bhopal Pushpendra Kumar Kushwaha
RKDF College of Engineering, Bhopal
Abstract- Quality administration frameworks are being worked in certain areas in India. In any case, meeting this framework in development industry is interesting. There are numerous preventions that make it challenging to apply the framework actually because of the idea of development and accordingly no true method for estimating the viability of this framework exist in development industry. The current exploration tends to three main pressing issues.
The first is to assess the adequacy of value the board framework (QMS) in development projects. The second is to distinguish the basic variables influencing the quality administration framework. The third one is to propose an execution system for quality administration in development projects.
Through a review survey, an endeavour has been made to investigate the best quality administration practices to be continued in development projects.
Keywords: ANOVA; development projects; the executives; association; quality; quality administration frameworks; relapse; importance; difference.
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General
Development industry is a mainstay of economy for each nation including India.
It is time bound and utilizes immense assets of men, material and apparatus.
Subsequently it get through has significantly affected the development business. Development area has gone through extreme cycle changes step by step. Development adds to the development of many related businesses, for example, assembling of development material, concrete, pipes, clean products, tiles, prepared blend concrete, and so forth. Other than from being a significant resource that creates benefit to the country, development supports the improvement of HR and produces more work than other modern areas.
Considering the meaning of development, it is important to recognize significant issues influencing the proficiency of this area. The unfortunate condition of innovation embraced by the development business in numerous nations as well as divided connection between development cost and time defer which thus influences the quality.
Numerous clients now-aprice and the hour of conveying an end result of required quality.
Presently a-days, the board of development organizations is zeroing in
on quality issue on a strategic advantage.
Conveying projects that fulfilled client prerequisite has turned into a primary need to keep up with business connections and thus the development business ought to foster principles during each stage to convey good results.
1.2 Quality
Overall the quality might be characterized as the capacity of item or administration to fulfill clients. According to global norm, the attributes capacity to fulfill expressed and inferred needs is characterized as quality. The definition for the term quality given by different creators and specialists are introduced in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Definition of Quality
1.3 Research Problem
As development projects for the most part include huge amounts of assets and numerous powerful cycles, accomplishing
187 great isn't just finished result based, yet
in addition thinks about the administration of interrelated hierarchical cycles. In any case, the appraisal of the result of development organizations can frequently be obstructed by various translations of value by the specialist co- ops and related parties included.
The current review tends to three main pressing issues. The first is to assess the adequacy of Quality Management Systems (QMS) in development projects. The second is to recognize the basic elements influencing the quality administration framework. The third one is to propose an execution structure for quality administration in development projects.
Except if strategies and best practices for overseeing and working on the presentation of value in development projects and the basic factors thereof are recognized and executed, the quality related issues in development activities will keep on happening at extraordinary expense for the economy and the organizations in question.
1.4 Scope of the Study
The basic variables to be recognized are constant viable issues and hardships confronted basically by the undertaking engineers, quality architects, wellbeing designers and site engineers. The review will help the venture members to painstakingly design every single movement for a compelling quality administration and fruitful culmination of the tasks.
1.5 Objectives of the Study
1. To assess the adequacy of value the board framework in development projects.
2. To assess the basic factors that influences the quality administration framework on quality improvement and execution in development projects.
3. To propose an execution structure for quality administration framework in development projects.
4. To propose relapse condition for the distinguished most grounded indicator among the autonomous factors which have a circumstances and logical results relationship on subordinate factors.
5. To proposed reasonable suggestion for viable quality administration and quality framework.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
This part means to assemble a hypothetical establishment whereupon the exploration is based, by auditing the applicable writing to distinguish research issues in the space of value the board frameworks in development industry.
Garvin (1984) made sense of the peculiarity of value as a coordinated with multi-layered interests of interaction and item partners. The creator presented five distinct perspectives about quality as extraordinary quality, item based quality, client based quality, producing based quality and worth based quality.
Fig. 2.1 Theoretical Aspects of Deming’s Quality Management Model
188 Benson (1991) talked about the
authentic foundation of framework underlying perspective on quality administration by alluding crafted by Astley and Van de Van (1983). Framework primary view characterized that the quality administration endeavors made by an association are driven and constrained by the outer variables and the job of the board is to see and answer decidedly against client requests, serious tensions, unofficial laws, and assumptions for other compelling partners of association.
Hendricks and Singhal (1997) chosen an example of 463 quality honor wining firms from a data set of 4,400 firms and utilized monetary execution of these organizations over a time of 10-year to lay out a connection between execution of complete quality administration and working execution. Execution of value the board methods required a great deal of exertion and responsibility all through the authoritative progressive system, particularly commitment by the top administration. Quality administration is an outcome situated system expected to further develop cycle and item quality to improve business execution. The creators inferred that organizations that have won quality honors, in view of the progress of their quality administration process were undeniably more productive, contrasted with firms that had a place with control test, in accomplishing the better working pay execution, development in deals, and control in costs.
Dale (1998) given a decent outline, which additionally incorporates the advancement way from quality control to TQM and explain the various definitions utilized by scholastics and professionals. Feigenbaum and Ishikawaare were the best supporters of the term advancement. The other perceived quality administration masters, for example, Crosby, Deming and Juran have molded the aspects, practices and system which support the idea, yet it is noticed that none of these three really utilizes the TQM expression. TQM began to be utilized during the 1980s and just turned into a perceived piece of the quality related language in the last part of the 1980s. The name TQM was first
proposed by Nany Warren, a social researcher in the United States Navy.
Suleiman and Steven (1998) conducted a study on Mexico manufacturing industry to identify the critical organizational factors that are essential to have successful implementation performance evaluation based on quality outcomes, and reward for quality ideas not only facilitate the implementation of TQM but also have significant effect on cost and profit.
Low et al., (1999) dissected the adequacy of ISO 9000 in increasing development quality expectations in the Singapore development industry (an agricultural nation like South Africa) and they reasoned that the development firms affirmed by the ISO 9000 quality guidelines accomplished higher Construction Quality Assessment System (CONQUAS) scores than non-guaranteed firms. In any case, the execution of the ISO 9000 quality administration framework has not superior the Construction Quality Assessment System scores of those development firms that have taken on the framework.
Jagadeesh (1999) beginning from its introduction to its ongoing status and furthermore portrays how the authoritative endeavors by different offices empowered the foundation of TQM culture. For that reason, he investigated the overviews directed by the scientists and business distributions in India. He referenced that drives originally set by the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) in the mid 1980s, was the spearheading endeavors in advancing mindfulness about quality among Indian ventures.
Further investigations show that the Indian enterprises and money managers are showing a distinct fascination with working on the nature of items through TQM. It was effectively proliferating through an assortment of preparing and instructive projects. Further he proposed the necessities for quality to prevail in Indian associations. Like concentration to client and quality, authorizations of guidelines, evasion of numerous evaluating of value and improvement in the administrations.
Gunasekaran (1999) proposed a structure for the fruitful execution of TQM
189 in an assembling organization. By
applying contextual investigation strategy, organized surveys were utilized to gather information from the workers and staffs on TQM execution. The consequences of the review show that correspondence between chiefs/managers and staffs being viewed as the major empowering influence in the execution of TQM. Notwithstanding, this isn't quite as great as they ought to accomplish at the contextual investigation association. The significant perceptions are that the absence of interior correspondence, preparing and perspectives towards their work should be worked on by changing the way of life of the organization. Directors need to have abilities to impart and rouse every one of the workers in the group. At last, the creator proposed the system for the execution of TQM in an assembling organization for certain essential focuses worried about the social and conduct issues of the TQM execution process.
Sun (2000) investigated the empirical relationship between Employee Involvement (EI) and TQM. He views EI as that the people closest to a problem or opportunity are in the best position to make decisions for improvement if they have control of the improvement process.
The study is based on a survey of 180 manufacturing organisation in Norway.
By using the questionnaire method, which covers questions related to employee involvement and people satisfaction.
Montgomery (2000) the author assumes that repeatability of process with natural variations in process would
produce products with more uniformity and consistency.
Mathews et al., (2001) divided quality tools and techniques that are in support of quality programs into three main types, i.e., hard quality tools, mixing methods and soft methods. Hard quality tools are formal quality systems, documented quality systems, quality costs, control charts and statistical sampling standards. Mixing methods are strategy and action plans review, flexibility of organization structure, control charts, quality circles, and quality planning tools. Soft methods are training, customer satisfaction surveys, regular contact with vendors and external organizations, actions to optimize environment impact, empowerment, self- assessment, and benchmarking.
Gallo (2002) reported that lot of the quality and efficiency problems experienced during the design process are due to inadequate design management and poor quality control of the end product. Whilst modern construction projects range in their level of complexity, they all still require the skills of many diverse individuals to be brought together, objective.
Sila and Ebrahim (2002) provided a comprehensive discussion on critical success factors by reviewing research studies performed from 1989 to 2000.
They identified 25critical success factors from 347 studies. Fig. 2.2 shows the theoretical framework used by Sharma (2006) in conducting his research study.
Source: Sharma (2006)
Fig. 2.2 Theoretical Framework of Bishnu’s Study
190 Quazi et al., (2002) stated in their study
that, in Singapore construction sector there is evidence to suggest that it cannot always be proven that ISO 9001 certified companies do actually provide qualified products and services. From these contrary views, the key question that arises is why some construction companies cannot effectively empower their organisations to establish successful QMS arrangements, while others are successful in implementing a quality management system.
Le Van Thong (2003) discussed about determination of quality management activities in the construction in the Oil and Gas Company and reviewed the effectiveness of quality management in construction of the Oil and Gas Company. Recommendations were given to improve the quality management system in oil and gas Construction Company.
Sasmita Palo and Nayantara Padhi (2003) examined role of training and its effectiveness in successful implementation of TQM concept in a leading Public sector enterprise in India.
They collected data by using structured
questionnaire from the employees selected on the basis of stratified random sampling method across the levels and department of the study organizations. The findings of the study indicate that there was a significant relationship between TQM training with teamwork and skill development. The results also implied that TQM training has not reduced the stress level of employees associated with TQM Implementation. Further, the analysis reveals that sufficient training was not provided to employees to manage and improve their communication competence, which constitutes the very essence of TQM. Finally the authors concluded that training is an effective medium of creating awareness, developing organizational communication, competence building, generating enthusiasm and commitment for effective TQM implementation.
Stephen (2005) concised the research work of Garvin and Saraph and reviewed their work and identified 8 components of product quality and 8 dimensions of management quality and presented in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Quality Dimensions Source Stephen (2005)
Tilley (2005) reported that the inadequate and deficient design impacts directly on the efficiency of the construction process. Unfortunately, contractors are often supplied with project design documents that are considered to be substandard or deficient due to incomplete, conflicting or
erroneous information. Also the author stated that projects that run over time and budget are often underpinned by faulty contractual documents but in fact does not properly specify or describe the built solution.
Alira (2005) prioritized the knowledge role in defining the success of
191 quality management programs in the
organizations and suggested a new approach of quality management practices as deep quality concept (DQC) that defined the way to acquire the essential knowledge for realizing the productive performance outcomes of quality management efforts.
Barbara and Brook (2006) conducted a research study to assess the significance of quality management constructs, used in Malcolm Baldrige quality award, in global perspective of cultural differences. The authors compared the quality management constructs used in Baldrige quality award with construct used in national quality
awards like Hong Kong Management Association Award, European quality award, New Zealand business excellence award, Japan quality award, and Egyptian quality award to identify the impact of national culture on prioritizing the influential quality management constructs. Table 2.2 shows comparison of quality management constructs used in above mentioned quality awards along with their standardized weights on a scale of 1-1000 points. The distribution of weights depicts the relative importance given to quality management constructs in the particular quality management model and in quality management award.
Table 2.2 Quality Award Criteria and their Weights in selected National Quality Awards (Source: Barbara and Broke - 2006)
Burcuakincia and Frank Boukampa (2006) stated that effects experienced during construction are costly and preventable. However, inspection programs employed today cannot adequately detect and manage defects that occur on construction sites, as they are based on measurements at specific locations and times, and are not integrated into complete electronic models. Emerging sensing technologies and project modeling capabilities motivate the development of a formalism that can be used for active quality control on construction sites. In this paper, we outline a process of acquiring and
updating detailed design information, identifying inspection goals, inspection planning, as-built data acquisition and analysis, and defect detection and management. We discuss the validation of this formalism based on four case studies.
Chini and Valdez (2006) stated that the ISO 9000 series, developed by the International Standards Organization (ISO) is a standard related to implementing better quality management, control and assurance in companies. It focuses on customer focus, leadership, people involvement, process approach, systems approach, continual
192 improvement, and promotes a factual
approach to decision making.
Ekambaram Palaneeswaran (2006) reported that the construction industry is construction projects. Many clients require their contractors to have a Quality Management System (QMS) certified under ISO 9000. This paper portrays the key findings from a focused study that relate to the client satisfaction aspects from implementation of the ISO9000- based QMSs.
Sharma (2006) played out an experimental review to lay out the quality administration aspects and logical elements which contribute altogether in upgrading authoritative execution in Queensland business by consolidating quality administration programs like TQM, IS0 9000, and both TQM and ISO 9000, all the while. The creator duplicated same 12 quality administration factors proposed by Powell (1995) as thorough elements of a total quality administration program.
Turk (2006) announced that the improvement of an ISO9001certified QMS requires an immense measure of composed documentation and necessities quite a while to coordinate into the executives framework, prompting possible significant expansions in working expenses. The creator further notes other critical issues defying the ISO9001 certificate process inside the Turkish development firms that drags out the enlistment interaction as well as making it costly. Some concrete isn't available to research and analysis, while in others the faculty frameworks needs rebuilding for the foundation of value the executives framework.
Wan Yusoffwan Mahmood, et al., (2006) examined the issues related with quality culture and its improvement in development industry. The creators revealed that the ongoing authoritative culture should move to add up to quality culture. Aspects of value culture like top administration responsibility, correspondence, quality preparation, preparing and instruction, collaboration and provider association were taken on by association towards the execution of absolute quality administration for its constant improvement.
Oztas et al., (2007) revealed the distinctions and uniqueness of the development business from different ventures (e.g., quite a while for project finishing; human connections for the most part framed once; trouble in principal quality norms and input connecting with the development processes) make it challenging for development organizations to carry out quality administration framework, which can be divided and slow in their endeavors at quality improvement. That's what the creator presumed, reality that the development business has generally been hesitant to manage changes is reflected in more slow execution of ISO 9001 particularly in emerging nations.
Karuppusami and Gandhinathan (2007) evaluated the situation with quality administration in Indian Industries. The overview in light of Visual Basic (VB) programming has been produced for gathering reactions through econvenience of noting and furthermore for a quicker reaction rate. 300 messages with the review poll record connected were shipped off chosen ISO 9001 guaranteed organizations in India. A sum of 104 reactions were gotten and were dissected utilizing the SPSS factual bundle. The investigation shows that top administration in Indian producers communicated a high obligation to quality administration. Supervisors had solid quality mindfulness and were ready to get a sense of ownership with quality improvement. Further the investigation discovered that Indian makers give enough hands on preparing in quality administration for workers. Most Indian makers have carried out powerful quality administration programs and have set clear particulars for their items and administrations.
Raji Al-Ani and Firas (2008) analyzed the impact of complete quality administration on client fulfillment, worker fulfillment, nature of development execution and undertaking execution.
Through poll review the discoveries uncovered that provider quality administration affects the exhibition of development projects in Yemen development projects. The discoveries further demonstrated that project
193 collaboration fulfillment show beneficial
outcomes on development project execution and development project execution show beneficial outcomes on client fulfillment.
Rodney (2008) consolidated grounded hypothesis research strategy and fostered a quality administration model that includes quality angles kept up with by conventional quality administration models and key parts of value the executives. The functional and key quality drivers model proposed by the creator. From quality administration models, it is seen that there is solid homogeneity in hypothetical comprehension of value the executives independent of huge effect of distinction in public societies and other relevant elements on materialness of value the board.
Firas (2008) inspected the impact of complete quality administration on client fulfillment, representative fulfillment, nature of development execution and venture execution. Through poll review the discoveries uncovered that provider quality administration affects the presentation of development projects in Yemen development projects. The discoveries further demonstrated that project collaboration fulfillment show beneficial outcomes on development project execution and development project execution show constructive outcomes on client fulfillment.
Soltani (2008) proposed a hypothetical model to identify the role of top management in success or failure of total quality management. The author stated that in order to meet the challenges imposed by ever-increasing market competition, the postmodern business demands effective role as leader from the top management.
2.1 Need for the Present Study
The real factors talked about above drove the analyst to a reality that everything on paper, when placed into execution, experienced viable challenges and the ground the truth is a significant issue to be tended to. It is important to distinguish those factors that should be checked ongoing during the headway of the task, make fundamental healing
measures to defeat the elements that are answerable for the execution of value the board in development projects.
Subsequently it is basic to recognize the basic elements to be observed in the ongoing administration of development projects.
3 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
The hidden basic elements which are liable for the execution of value the board in development projects have been recognized. The recognized basic elements are to be given a lot of need in the ongoing observing. The elements with less importance worth ought not be dismissed however should be given due significance.
The distinguished basic variables uncovered that the quality preparation is more significant for the representative.
The main goal was to assess the adequacy of value the executives framework in development projects. The review reasons that job of value the board framework appears to have a positive impact in development projects.
The subsequent goal was to assess the basic factors that influence the quality administration framework on quality improvement and execution in development projects.
The third level headed of the review was to propose an execution structure for quality administration framework in development projects. The review proposes an execution structure.
The fourth unbiased of the review was to propose relapse condition for the distinguished most grounded indicator among the free factors which have a circumstances and logical results relationship on subordinate factors. The review proposes relapse condition for the forecast boundaries.
4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
EFFECTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY SYSTEM
Albeit top administration shouldn't have to direct the everyday activities of the quality administration framework, they are expected to lay out the quality arrangement and the quality targets, lead the board surveys, guarantee accessibility of assets, and convey the significance of
194 meeting client necessities and any
material administrative commands.
Top administration should be involved during the turn of events, as well as the execution, audit and investigation, of the quality administration framework for upkeep and persistent improvement.
All degrees of the executives ought to guarantee that all administrations gave and related exercises are arranged, carried out, controlled and checked.
All degrees of the executives should be answerable for recognizing and working with the correspondence of issues and make a move to determine them.
REFERENCES
1. Abd. Majid, and McCaffer, R. (1998), Factors of Non-excusable Delays that influence Contractor's Performance, Journal of Management in Engineering, 14(3), 42-49.
2. Alira, S., Alojzij, S., and Ivan B. (2005), A quality management model based on the deep quality concept, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(3), 278- 302.
3. Al-Ani, Raji, and Firas I. Al-Adhmawi. (2008), Implementation of Quality Management Concepts in Managing Engineering Project Site. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering 5(1):
89-16.
4. Ambroz, M. (2004), Total Quality System as a Product of the Empowered Corporate Culture, The TQM Magazine, 16(2), 93-104.
5. Ang, C. L., Davies, M. and Finlay, P N. (2000), Measures to Assess the Impact of Information Technology on Quality Management, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17(1), 42-65.
6. Arditi, D., and Gunayadin, H.M. (1998), Factors that Affect Process Quality in the Life Cycle of Building Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(3), 194-203.
7. Ashokkumar D.(2007) Study of Quality Management in Construction Industry.
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 3.
8. Asim, M., uz Zaman, S., & Zarif, T. (2013).
Implementation of Total Quality Management in Construction Industry: A Pakistan Perspective, Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 9(1), 24-39.
9. Babbar, S. and Aspelin, D. (1994), J. TQM it is as easy as ABC? The TQM magazine, 6(3), 32-38.
10. Barbara B. F., and Brooke, S. (2006), Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context: A study of national culture, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 583-603.
11. Belle, R. A. (2000), Benchmarking and Enhancing Best Practices in Engineering and
Construction Sector, Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(1), 40-47.
12. Benson, P. G., Saraph, J. V., and Schroeder, R.G. (1991), The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigation, Management Science, Vol. 39, pp. 1107-1124.
13. Benson, T. (1993), TQM: A Child takes a First Few Faltering Steps, Industry Week, 242(7), 16-17.
14. Black, S. And Porter, L. (1996), Identification of Critical Factors of TQM, Decision Sciences, 27(1), 1-21.
15. Burati, J. L., Mathews, F. M., and Kalidindi, S. N. (1992), Quality Management Organisations and Techniques, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 112-118.
16. Burcu Akinci., Boukamp, F., Gordon, C., Huber, D., Lyons, C. and Park, K., 2006. A formalism for utilization of sensor systems and integrated project models for active construction quality control. Automation in Construction,15(2), pp.124-138.
17. Butch, K., and Rivers, D. (2001), TQM: Role of Leadership and Culture, Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, 22(8), 365-371.
18. Chan, E. H. W and Tse, R. Y. C. (2003), Cultural Considerations in International Construction Contracts, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), 375-381.
19. Chini, A. R., & Valdez, H. E. (2006), ISO 9000 and the US Construction Industry, Journal of management in engineering, 19(2), 69-77.
20. Christini G., M., Hendrickson, C (2004), Environmental Management Systems and ISO 14001 Certification for Construction firms, ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 130(3), 330-336.
21. Coffey, A., Mason, B and Atkinson, P.A., (2005). Qualitative Research and Hypermedia.
SAGE Publications Limited.
22. Coffey, Yong and Low (2008), A profile can actually improve construction outcomes and organizational effectiveness as well as more specifically in Indonesian construction firms.
A case study. 148-189.
23. Cynthia, A. L. (1996), Customer contributions to quality: A different view of the customer- oriented firm, The Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 791-824.
24. Dale, B.G. (1999), Managing Quality, Third edition, Blackwell Publisher Inc., Oxford, UK.
25. Dale, B.G., and Lee, R.G. (1998), Business process management: a review and evaluation. Business process management journal, 4(3), pp.214-225.
26. Deming Prize (2004), Guide for Deming Application Prize 2004.
27. Deming, W.E., 1986. Out of the crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Center for advanced engineering study, Cambridge, MA, 510.
28. Digalwar, A. K., and Metri, B. A. (2005), Performance Measurement Framework for World Class Manufacturing, The International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 3(2), 83-101.
195 29. Ekambarampalaneeswaran, (2006). The
construction industry is predominantly quality based and projects: A case study 30. EQA (2004), EQA Information Brochure 2004,
http://www.efqm.org
31. Federley, M O., and Chase, G.W. (1993), Applying Total Quality Management to Design and Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(4), 357-364.
32. Firas AL. Adhmawi (2008), Integrated management system for site quality control, Proceedings of building and construction department of university of technology, Baghdad, Iraq, 7.
33. Flynn, B., Schoeder, R. and Sakibaba, S. S.
(1994), A Framework for Quality Management Research and Associated Measurement Instrument, Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 339-366.
34. Gallo, G., Lucas, G., McLennan, A., Parminter, T. and Tilley, P., 2002. Project documentation quality and its impact on efficiency in the building and construction industry. Queensland Division of the Institution of Engineers, Australia.
35. Garvin, D.A. (1984), What does product quality really means? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
36. Gunasekaran, A., (1999), Enablers of total quality management implementation in manufacturing: a case study. Total Quality Management, 10(7), 987-996.
37. Hendricks, K.B. and Singhal, V.R. (1997), Delays in New Product Introductions and the Market Value of the Firm: The Consequences of Being Late to the Market, Management Science, 43(4), 422-436.
38. Hosseinali, Mohammadsaleh and Hesami, (2014), Application of Total Quality Management Ideas in Construction Projects, Journal of Current Research in Science, 2(5), 651-654.
39. Howard S. G. (1994), A comparison of Japanese Total Quality Control and Deming s theory of management, The American Statistician, 48(3), 197-203.
40. Irianto, D. (2005), Quality Management Implementation: A Multiple Case Study in Indonesian Manufacturing Firms, University of Twente.
41. ISO, B., 2000. 9001: 2008 Quality management systems. Requirements.
International Organization for Standardization.
42. Jabnoun, J., and Anwar, S. A. (2002), TQM and National Culture: A Contingency Model, Journal of Productivity, 42(4), 591-596.
43. Jagadeesh, R., (1999), Total Quality Management in India-perspective and Analysis. The TQM Magazine, 11(5), pp.321- 327.
44. Jenner, R. A., Hebert, L., Appell, A., and Baack, J. (1998), Using Quality Management for Cultural Transformation of Chinese State Enterprises: A Case Study, Journal of Quality Management, 3(2), 193-210.
45. Juran, J. M. .., Editor, and Gryna, F. M.
(1993), Why quality initiatives fail, Journal of Business Strategy, 14(4). 35- 38.
46. Ka Chi Lam and Ng, S.T., (2006), A cooperative Internet-facilitated quality management environment for construction.
Automation in Construction,15(1), pp.1-1 47. Kano, N. (1993), A Perspective on Quality
Activities in American Firms, California Management Review, 35(3), 12-31.
48. Karuppusami, G., and R. Gandhinathan.
(2007), Web-based measurement of the level of implementation of TQM in Indian Industries. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 18(4), 379-391.
49. Kazaza, A., and Birgonul, M. T. (2005), The Evidence of Poor Quality in High Rise and Medium Rise Housing Units: A Case Study of Mass Housing Projects in Turkey. Building and environment, 40(11), 1548-1556.
50. Khanam, S., Siddiqui, J., and Talib, F. (2013).
Role of Information Technology in Total Quality Management: A Literature Review.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering &Technology, 2(8), 2433-2445.
51. Kiwus, C. H., and Williams, T. P. (2001), Application of TQM to Environmental Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(3), 176-183.
52. Kometa, T. S., and Olomolaiye, P. O. (1997), Factors Influencing Construction Client's Decisions to Build. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(2), 77-86.
53. Lam, K. C., & Ng, S. T. (2006), A Co-operative Internet-Facilitated Quality Management Environment for Construction, Automation in Construction, 15(1), 1-11.
54. Laszlo, G. P.(1998), Implementing a Quality Management Program-3 Cs of Success:
Commitment, Culture, Cost. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 281-287.
55. Le Van Thong, et al (2003), Determination of quality management activities in the construction in the Oil and Gas Company and to review the effectiveness of quality management in construction of the Oil and Gas Company. A Case Study.
56. Lewis, D. (1996), Organizational Culture Saga - from OD to TQM: A Critical Review of the Literature, Part-2 Applications, Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, 17(2), 9-16.
57. Low Sui Pheng, Tan Boon Kee, and Allen Ang Aik Leng.(1999), Effectiveness of ISO 9000 in raising construction quality standards: some empirical evidence using CONQUAS scores.
Structural Survey 17(2), 89-108.
58. Magd, H. A. TQM constructs development and validation in the context of Egyptian manufacturing sector: A snapshot perspective. Best Practices in Construction and Manufacturing, ST 7 (2014): 1-16 59. Heshammagd Magd, (2014) Innovative
Engineering Organizational Excellence Best Practices through Capturing Tacit Knowledge:
Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Nang Yan Business Journal, 2(1), 112-122.
60. Mahmood, Wan Yusoff Wan, Abdul Hakim Mohammed, Mohd Saidin Misnan, Zakaria Mohd Yusof, and Ahmadon Bakri. (2006), Development of Quality Culture in the Construction Industry. 1-11.
196 61. Mallon, J. C., and Mulligan, D. E. (1993),
Quality Function Development-A System for Meeting Customer Needs, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 516-531.
62. Mathews, B. P., Ueno, A., Kekäle, T., Repka, M., Pereira, Z. L., & Silva, G. (2001), European Quality Management Practices: The Impact of National Culture. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(7), 692-707.
63. MBNQA (2004), Baldrige National Quality Program - 2004. http://quality.nist.gov 64. Metri, B.A. (2004), Imperatives of
Benchmarking and its Implementation Strategy for Construction Industry, Industrial Engineering Journal, 33(4), 24-29.
65. Metri, B.A., (2005), TQM critical success factors for construction firms. Management:
Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 10(2), pp.61-72.
66. Moller, J. D., & Montgomery, M. T. (2000), Tropical Cyclone Evolution via Potential Vorticity Anomalies in a Three-Dimensional Balance Model, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 57(20), 3366-3387.
67. Motwani, J., 2001, Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. The TQM magazine, 13(4), 292-300.
68. Montgomery, D. C. (2000), Introduction to statistical quality control, (4th ed.), NewYork:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
69. Naceur, J., and Hssan, A. (2005), Leadership Styles Supporting ISO 9000:2000, Quality Management Journal, 12(1), 21-29.
70. Nawaz, T., & Ikram, A. A. (2013), Benefits and Impediments in Implementing TQM in Pakistani Construction Sector, European Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 205-227.
71. Nwabueze, U. (2001), How the Mighty have Fallen: the Naked Truth about TQM, Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(9), 504-513.
72. Oakland, J.S. (1993), Total Quality Management: The Route to Improving Performance, Butterworth-Hienman Limited, Oxford, 128 157.
73. Palaneeswaran, E., Ng, T., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2006), Client Satisfaction and Quality Management Systems in Contractor Organizations, Building and Environment, 41(11), 1557-1570.
74. Palo, S., & Padhi, N. (2003). Measuring Effectiveness of TQM Training: an Indian Study. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(3), 203-216.
75. Perry, C. (1997). Total Quality Management and Reconceptualising Management in Africa, Journal International Business Review, 6(3), 233-243.
76. Pheng, L. S., and Wei, V. A. (1996), Framework for Implementing TQM in Construction, The TQM Magazine, 8(5), 39- 46.
77. Powell, T.C. (1995), Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15-37.
78. Quazi, H. A., Hong, C. W., & Meng, C. T.
(2002), Impact of ISO 9000 Certification on
Quality Management Practices: A comparative study, Total Quality Management, 13(1), 53- 67.
79. Raji Al-Ani and I. Al-
Adhmawi,(2011),Implementation of Quality Management Concepts in Managing Engineering Project Site, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 89-106.
80. Reeves, V.A. and Bednar, D.A. (1994), Defining Quality: Alternatives and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 419-445.
81. Rodney, M., Leonard, D., Henderson, J., and Hazlett, S. (2008), A grounded theory research approach to building and testing TQM theory in operation management, Omega, Vol. 36, pp. 825-837.
82. Rodney, J. (1997), Cultural Implications of Implementing TQM in Poland, Journal World Business, 32(2), 152-158
83. Rosenfed, Y., Warszawski, A., Laufer, A.
(1992), Using Quality Circles to Raise Productivity and Quality of Work Life, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 17-33.
84. 86. Saraph, J. V., George Benson, P., and Shroeder, R. G. (1989), An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management, Decision sciences, 20(4), 811- 829.
85. Sharma, Bishnu.(2006) Quality management dimensions, contextual factors and performance: An empirical investigation. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 17.9: 1231-1244.
86. Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002), An Investigation of the Total Quality Management Survey based Research Published between 1989 and 2000: A literature review, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 902- 970.
87. Sinclair, J., and Collins, D. (1994), Towards a Quality Culture? International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 11(5), 19-29.
88. Soltani, E., Lai, P. C., Javadeen, S. R. S., &
Gholipour, T. H. (2008), A Review of the Theory and Practice of Managing TQM: An Integrative Framework, Total Quality Management, 19(5), 461-479.
89. Stephen C. Jones, Tami L. Knotts, and Karen L. Brown. (2005), Selected quality practices of small manufacturers, Quality Management Journal, 12(1), 41- 53.
90. Steyn, H., Basson, G., Carruthers, M., Du Plessis, Y., Prozesky-Kuscke, B., Kruger, D., Van Eck, S. &Visser, K. (2006), Project Management: A Multi- Disciplinary Approach.
Pretoria: FPM Publishing.
91. Suleiman, K., and Steven, A. (1998), Training, Performance Evaluation, Rewards, and TQM Implementation Success, Journal of Quality Management 3(1), 25-38.
92. Sun, H., Kee Hui, I., Tam, A. Y., & Frick, J.
(2000), Employee Involvement and Quality Management, The TQM Magazine, 12(5), 350- 354.
93. Tahir Nawaz and Amjad Ali Ikram, 2013.
Benefits and Impediments in Implementing
197 TQM in Pakistani Construction Sector,
European Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 205-227.
94. Talib, Faisal, Zillur Rahman, and M. N.
Qureshi.(2013), An empirical investigation of relationship between total quality management practices and quality performance in Indian service companies.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 30(3), 280-318.
95. Thiagarajan, T., Zairi, M. and Dale, B.G.
(2001), A Proposed Model of TQM Implementation based on An Empirical Study of Malaysian Industry, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18( 3), 289-306.
96. Tilley, Paul A.,(2005), Lean Design Management: A New Paradigm for Managing the Design and Documentation Process to Improve Quality?. In 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference:
Proceedings, 283. International Group on Lean Construction,
97. Turk, A.M., 2006. ISO 9000 in construction:
An examination of its application in Turkey.
Building and environment, 41(4), 501-511.
98. Yang, C. C. (2006), The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on the Implementation of Total Quality Management:
An Empirical Study on High- Tech firms, The TQM Magazine, 18(2), 162-173.
99. Ruchini Senarath Jayasinghe, Nicholas Chileshe and Raufdeen Rameezdeen,
“Information-based quality management in reverse logistics supply chain A systematic literature review”, Benchmarking An International Journal · June 2019, DOI:
10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0238.
100. Abuaraki Osman Ahmed, Abdalla Abdelrahim Idris, “Examining the relationship between soft total quality management (TQM) aspects and employees’ job satisfaction in “ISO 9001”
Sudanese oil companies”, TQM Journal · July 2020, DOI: 10.1108/TQM-05-2019-0147.
101. Phi-Hung Nguyen, “A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Based on SERVQUAL for Hotel Service Quality Management: Evidence from Vietnam”, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Vol 8 No 2 (2021) 1101–1109.
102. Mohammad Abazid, Hüseyin Gökçekuş, Tahir Çelik, “Study of the Quality Concepts Implementation in the Construction of Projects in Saudi Arabia by using Building Information Modelling (BIM)”, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), ISSN: 2278- 3075, Volume-8 Issue-3, January 2019.
103. Volker Coors, Matthias Betz, Eric Duminil, “A Concept of Quality Management of 3D City Models Supporting Application‑Specific Requirements”, PFG (2020) 88:3–14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-020-00094- 0.
104. Fabio Carbone, Luiz Oosterbeek, Carlos Costa, Ana Maria Ferreira Fabio Carbone, Luiz Oosterbeek, Carlos Costa, Ana Maria Ferreira, “Extending and adapting the concept of quality management for museums and cultural heritage attractions: A
comparative study of southern European cultural heritage managers' perceptionsz”, Tourism Management Perspectives 35 (2020) 100698.
105. Ingaldi M., “A New Approach to Quality Management: Conceptual Matrix of Service Attributes”, Polish Journal pf Management Studies, 2020 Vol.22 No.2.
106. Tsai-Chi Kuo, Muniroh Muniroh, and Kristin Halisa Fau, “An Integrated Kano Model, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process, and Decision Matrix for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Palm Oil Industries Indonesia, a Case Study”,
Processes 2021, 9, 1078.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061078.
107. Kambiz Ghafourian, Kamyar Kabirifa, Amir Mahdiyar, Maziar Yazdani, Syuhaida Ismail and VivianW. Y. Tam, “A Synthesis of Express Analytic Hierarchy Process (EAHP) and Partial Least Squares-Structural Equations Modeling (PLS-SEM) for Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management Assessment:
The Case of Malaysia”, Recycling 2021, 6, 73.
https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6040073.
108. Anh Chi Phan, Ha Thu Nguyen, Hao Anh Nguyen and Yoshiki Matsui, “Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants”, Sustainability 2019, 11, 3093;
doi:10.3390/su11113093.
109. Saeed Talebi, Lauri Koskela, Patricia Tzortzopoulos and Michail Kagioglou,
“Tolerance Management in Construction: A Conceptual Framework”, Sustainability 2020, 12, 1039; doi:10.3390/su12031039.
110. Kai Xue, Md. Uzzal Hossain, Meng Liu, Mingjun Ma, Yizhi Zhang, Mengqiang Hu, XiaoYi Chen and Guangyu Cao, “BIM Integrated LCA for Promoting Circular Economy towards Sustainable Construction:
An Analytical Review”, Sustainability 2021,
13, 1310.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031310.
111. Tomas Cherkos Kassaneh, Ettore Bolisani, and Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,
“Knowledge Management Practices for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Challenge for Business Education”, Sustainability 2021, 13, 2956.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052956.
112. Xiaoxiao XU, Patrick X. W. ZOU, “System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions”, Eng.
Manag. 2021, 8(1): 17–31,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0091- 7.
113. Aawag Mohsen Alawag, Wesam Salah Alaloul, M.S. Liew, Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, Syed Saad, Syed Ammad, “Total Quality Management Practices and Adoption in Construction Industry Organizations: A Review”, 2020 Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference:
Technology and Innovation in Building
Designs, 2020 IEEE, DOI:
10.1109/IEEECONF51154.2020.9319992.
