View of FACTOR AFFECTING ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND THE COST OF CAPITAL ON FINANCE

(1)

ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING

Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal, ISSN No. 2456-1037 IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL) Vol. 03, Issue 11,November 2018 Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

1

FACTOR AFFECTING ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND THE COST OF CAPITAL ON FINANCE

Dr. K Devi

Jeypore (Dist. Koraput), Odisha, India

Abstract- The primary destinations of the organization's monetary administration are to guarantee monetary exhibitions and to pick the capital construction that compares to the least all out cost of capital. The motivation behind this paper is to examine the connection between the capital construction and cost, and the monetary presentation of Engie Transnational Group, perhaps the main worldwide power makers.

Keywords: Financial execution, total list, monetary construction, dissolvability.

1. INTRODUCTION

The advancement of contemporary society is impacted by the immediate association of the business climate, which is dynamic and whose improvement continually suggests defining objectives and accomplishing execution. The endeavor is the foundation of the economy and its significance legitimizes the interest that different monetary and social accomplices accommodate their monetary working and wellbeing.

The endurance of the undertaking in this powerful and serious climate by keeping up with it on a line of proficiency and expanding execution requires steady variation to the necessities of the outside climate.

Current financial flimsiness forces lasting changes in the organization that should be expected, known, examined and oversaw. Thusly, any monetary movement requires a significant investigation of monetary execution to empower the genuine circumstance to be known, with the goal that the endeavor can work under states of unrivaled productivity and, simultaneously, guarantee the upkeep of

dissolvability and monetary harmony. Subsequently, monetary execution investigation is a need for all organizations, as getting and keeping up with execution are the conditions to buy in to the philosophy of progress.

The primary destinations of the monetary administration to be sought after at the level of an endeavor to guarantee execution are the decision of the capital design as per the size of the expense of capital. In this manner, the two destinations conclusively impact the monetary presentation taking into account the accompanying contemplations: the financing modalities infer certain expenses for the endeavor, the effectiveness of the movement requires the utilization of modest capital, the decision of an ideal capital construction creates the amplification of the worth of the venture, specifically by limiting the expenses of all contributions of capital.

2 AIMS OF THE RESEARCH

The reason for this paper is to break down the impact of the capital design and cost of capital

(2)

2 on the monetary execution of the Engie Transnational Group. The justification choosing the Engie Group is identified with the importance of the energy area wherein it works, which has become an imperative segment and an expense factor for current monetary turn of events. Likewise, the Engie Group is one of the world's driving worldwide power makers. The curiosity and inventiveness of the paper comprises of proposing a total

monetary presentation

investigation file approved by the Conan and Holder score Z [10] and applying the system portrayed on a bunch of organizations inside a transnational gathering. We notice that the proposed total list and philosophy can be applied to firms or gatherings of firms in various areas and to a bigger example of firms in various areas of action.

3 CONCLUSION

From the investigation we can reason that the negative connection between the capital construction and the monetary presentation is affirmed both for the Engie bunch and for the organizations inside the gathering, except for the UK 2 firm which shows a positive relationship, the greatest exhibition being recorded when value was negative.

REFERENCES

1. Adochitei M. Finantele întreprinderii. Bucharest: Sylvi, 2000. 427 p.

2. Andres C, Cumming D, Karabiber T, Schweizer D. Do markets anticipate capital structure decisions? - Feedback effects in equity liquidity. J Corp Financ, 2014 March 05; 27: 133–156.

3. Barbuta-Misu N. Finantele întreprinderii. Galati: Didactica si Pedagogica, 2009. 301 p.

4. Barbuta-Misu N. Management financiar. Galati: Europlus, 2010.

272 p.

5. Berger AN, di Patti EB. Capital structure and firm performance: a new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. J Bank Financ, 2005 June 23; 30(4): 1065-1105.

6. Bevan AA, Danbolt J. Capital structure and its determinants in the United Kingdom – a decompositional analysis. Appl Financ Econ, 2002; 12(3): 159- 170.

7. Brezeanu P. Finante corporative.

2nd Volume, Bucharest: C.H.

Beck, 2009. 637 p.

8. Bucătaru D. Finantele întreprinderii. Iasi: Tipo Moldova, 2010. 306 p.

9. Chang X, Dasgupta S. Target behavior and financing: how conclusive is the evidence? J Financ, 2009 July 16; 64(4): 1767- 1796.

10. Conan M, Holder J. Variables explicatives de performances et controle degestion dans les P.M.I.

[Explanatory Variables of Performance and Management Control in the SMEs, Paris Dauphine University]. Paris:

Universite Paris Dauphine, 1979.

448 p.

11. De Haas R, Peeters M. The dynamic adjustment towards target capital structures of firms in transition economies. Econ Transit, 2006; 14(1): 133-169.

12. Dragotă V, Obreja Braşoveanu L, Dragotă IM. Management financiar, 1^st Volume - Diagnosticul financiar al companiei, 2nd Edition, Bucharest: Economică, 2012. 279 p.

13. Flannery MJ, Rangan KP. Partial adjustment and target capital structures. J Financ Econ, 2005 October 10; 79(3): 469–506.

14. Helfert EA. Tehnici de analiză financiară, 11th edition, Bucharest: BMT, 2006. 560 p.

15. Isfănescu A, Robu V, Hristea AM, Vasilescu C. Analiza

(3)

3 economicofinanciară, Bucharest:

ASE, 2002. 270 p.

16. Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ, 1976 October; 3(4): 305-360.

17. Myers SC. Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ, 1977 November; 5(2): 147- 175.

18. Ozkan A. Determinants of Capital Structure and Adjustment to Long Run Target: Evidence from UK Company Panel Data. J Bus Financ & Account, 2001 January;

28(1-2): 175-198.

19. Petrescu S. Analiză şi diagnostic financiar-contabil, Ghid teoretico- aplicativ, 3rd edition, Bucharest:

CECCAR, 2010. 408 p.

20. Robu V, Anghel I, Serban C, Tutui D. Evaluarea întreprinderii, Bucharest: ASE, 2002. 143 p.