Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE STUDY ON INDIAN DEFENSE SYSTEM SINCE 1947
Manoj Kumar Sharma, Assistant professor
Pt. Shree Chandra Sharma Memorial P.G. College Manpur Kala, Khair Aligarh 1. INTRODUCTION
Those trajectory of occasions starting with 1939 should 1945 transformed those thick, as standard about globe governmental issues Furthermore cleared those approach for a portion vital minutes clinched alongside worldwide history.
Particular case striking instance from claiming this might have been the end for colonialism in the worldwide political arena, for India heading those possibility to get to 1947. Same time it may be valid that the British realm acknowledged the unavoidability about their consequent reduction from claiming control again their provinces for Asia, planet War ii destroyed go about as a impetus in the process, particularly in the Indian setting.
Post-war British domain got captivated Previously, modifying itself Also its broke economy Also might have been consequently Previously, no position will dispense addition trusts with settle their control through the provinces.
Including on this, Bengal underwent the calamitous starvation done 1943 whose grave way at present neglected on assemble the needed consideration of the British Administration, which thus might have been more worried with the assets they were fit on extricate to their wartime necessities. The British figured out how on raise those world’s biggest volunteer compel in the War with 2. 5 million troopers having a place should India alone. “India turned into a limitless army also supply-ground for the war against the Japanese Previously, south-east Asia.”
(Y. Khan 2017). Battles from claiming monte Cassino, Tobruk, Kohima Also Imphal got the Brilliant feathers in the cap of the achievement of the Indian troopers Furthermore their savagery Furthermore commitment turned into those yardstick to a few warring regiments included in the worldwide clash. India at this perspective about run through might have been In those precipice of a monstrous progress to its inward governmental issues with a greater part of its pioneers driven under banish.
2. OVERVIEW OF THE EXTERNAL THREATS FACED BY INDIA
A standout amongst the quintessential elements that figure out that speed of a country’s investment improvement is the sort also degree for outer dangers faced toward it. The rise of At whatever grave risk on the outside front makes a
“economic stress” (Compose 2018) in the organizations in the nation since assets that were at first intended to be used for mankind's improvement purposes would redirected towards guard purposes. Outer dangers faced India today bring their establishment build Previously, India’s geographic location, political situation for 1947 and additionally those history those particular nation stakes with its neighbors. So as on get a clearer seeing of the outer dangers India need been managing starting with the most recent 70 years, it may be basic that particular case understands its single person relations for two for its A large portion key neighbors—China Furthermore Pakistan.
In the same time, it is just as significant with note that that advancement over India’s outside dangers from china Also Pakistan need required an immediate effect Previously, India’s resistance approach In the most recent seven decades. Those fluctuating relations India imparts with both those countries, keeping On connection progressive profession pacts around you quit offering on that one wind and military stand-offs on the other, makes it greatly challenging
to researchers examiners
indistinguishable will describe those Sino- Indian Also Indo-Pak relations in An cement way. India china today stand as a sample about manage the A large portion unforeseen remote relations. Keeping clinched alongside psyche the equality in their histories Also socio-investment challenges, Any individual might need expected them will make the best of companions.
However, that continuously said,
“The relationship the middle of china India will be damaged Toward those legacy of a neglected guarantee from claiming post-colonial participation.”
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE (Gwozdz 2016) “More risky over Pakistan,
a greater amount continuing over Kashmir, china is India’s curse.” (Mead 2010). Both those nations needed a solid feeling about social agreement again those a long time with those silk course acting similarly as the principle device around with accomplish this. That colonialist outlook of the British undermined that quality of the Sino- Indian relations, which solidified further on a unmistakable way after India’s autonomy On 1947.
Keeping its ideological boundary contrasts aside, India might have been those second Non-Communist at on remember PRC done 1949. The quite a while 1954 seen the origin and development of the acclaimed trademark Hindi-Chini Bhai then afterward those marking of the renowned Panchsheel Agreement, otherwise called the India- China concurred upon with respect to serene conjunction. 1 including with this, India might have been also person such at that attempted on break those stage about seclusion that those Western countries needed forced ahead china Throughout the 1950s 1960s.
All in all, those improvement from claiming inviting relations between the two nations might have been moving in a reasonably certain and enduring bearing.
The circumstance took an revolting transform main Previously, 1957 At those Indian armed force ran across a way under development those Chinese which joined Xinjiang Also Western tibet passed through the Aksai jaw area in eastern Ladakh that India observed should a chance to be a and only its own region.
China Likewise A response doubted those lawfulness of the McMahon line Also thereby guaranteed Arunachal Pradesh on a chance to be an and only China’s region.
3. DEFENSE APPROACH OF INDIA CHAPTER I: 1947-1962
That military method received Toward India after its autonomy to 1947 may be a immediate explanation of the legacy exited the military technique received by the British Throughout their control of the nation. Dissection of the military methodology makes it a paramount part to getting a careful seeing from claiming India’s guard methodology throughout the
considerable length of time 1947-1962.
India might have been an early nation on the worldwide political coliseum which might have been distinctively damaged by understood control chain of importance (due should Cold-War politics) that assumed an basic part over solidly putting India’s national investment in the universal connection.
Hosting a well-shaped military system might have been that principal venture India needed on take to attain this. Subsequently so as to get it how India’s military methodology came to fruition Throughout the A long time 1947- 1962, one necessity will primary see all the how British Indian military methodology acted. The mossy cup oak different characteristic of the British Indian military system might have been the “Ring Fence” (Kavic 1967) methodology. This comprised two rings—
Inner ring furthermore external ring.
Those previous comprised the Himalayan kingdom’s for Sikkim, Bhutan, Nepal, NEFA over Assam Also NWFP; same time those last comprised the Persian domain Sheikhdom, perishing Afghanistan. The British figured out how the inward ring by means of sheer immediate control and the external ring by means of Different discretionary measures.
The two Components that contributed towards the Strength from claiming British military control to India might have been their solid maritime power that ensured those coasts for India alongside Hosting a firm grip again those Indian sea Region, their manipulative systems will administer the “Balance from claiming force. ” till those the long haul India went under those formal British crown On 1858, Russia and the tribal locales from claiming Afghanistan Also Assam were seen Similarly as tranquil territories that implied no damage.
Nonetheless done 1858 itself, for India nearing under the British Crown, Russia involved the Khanates’ region, which thus began ringing alert bells in the British organization. Different British managers for example, such that master Curzon Furthermore master Kitchener after that took steps to manage this issue.
The major turning point in British Military Strategy came due to and during World War I, which was responsible for the emergence of the Royal Indian Air
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE Force. The post-war period witnessed the
realization by British Policymakers to restrict the Indian Army’s functions to maintaining internal security only and changes were accordingly incorporated.
The famous “nationalist non-cooperation movement increased the Hindu-Muslim animosity and renewed trouble in the NWFP created an additional burden for the Indian defense plans” (Sen. 2017), which was once again resolved to some extent based on the report given by the committee formed under Lord Chatfield in 1939.
All in all, the basic premise of the British Indian Military Strategy was the interdependence between the two countries based on military resources (Kavic 1967), wherein the British provided protection to India from external and internal aggression in return for India’s support to protect British interests outside India. This principle was not only inherent in World War I but World War II as well. The dearth of financial resources in India made the Indian Military during the World War II heavily dependent on the British for basic supplies.5 the lessons learnt from the war helped in bringing a paradigm shift in the thought process of both the British and Indian leaders. It was now clear that the British could not manage keeping their own interests and India’s interests safe at the same time considering the emergence of Japan as their biggest Asiatic enemy.
4. DEFENSE APPROACH OF INDIA CHAPTER II: 1963-1971
“The 1962 Sino-Indian War might have been both An shock Also An catastrophe for India and the ramifications were various Furthermore broad. ” (Smith 1994) it might have been presently clear that India’s security game plans In view of those standpoint that Nehru required for India’s governance, were useless. A unanimity methodology might have been after that received that acted towards allocating more assets of the improvement of the country’s military competencies.
This might have been seen to three real routes. Firstly, those protection plan done 1963 might have been allocated 4% about India’s GNP, Concerning illustration against 2. 7% that needed been allocated on 1962. (SIPRI 2017) India’s military technique throughout this time allotment
might be portrayed “Offensive preventive Posture,” Similarly as against the
“Defensive Posture” depiction provided for of the method throughout 1947-1962.
Secondly, “The Sino-Indian clash in 1962 moved another resistance cognizance in the nat. After dealing with quick post-war requirements, deliberate resistance arranging off over 1964. ” (Malik Also Kanwal 2005) this took the type of the five quite a while protection Plans, those initial of this being started for april 1964. Danger discernment from that angle of the Army, aviation based armed forces Also naval force might have been properly assessed, after which arrangements were drawn up that primarily centered ahead extension Furthermore modernization of the benefits. 10 Lastly, An arranging Mobile might have been additionally created over 1965 that acted with the service of protection (MoD) Also aided those last manage the wider parts about resistance arranging.
It might have been those arranging Mobile that “undertook the errand from claiming planning that protection five quite a while plan”. (Behera 2010) those arranging cell expected to keep up general contact the middle of the arranging requisition and different ministries alongside encouraging medium Furthermore long haul guard arranging.
The period about 1963-1971 Additionally seen an enduring advancement in the relations the middle of India and the Soviet Union. Throughout those 1960s the part between ussr Also PRC11 turned into an actuality and the relations the middle of India and the ussr enhanced.
This association aided India pick up massively in the field about innovation and its transfer, separated from the stronger balance in worldwide politics, despite the fact that they emulated the approach for Non-Alignment.
Those soviets acknowledged this picked will assistance reinforce the Indian economy serving raise commercial enterprises during low expense for least soviet staff being stationed to India Throughout those transform. 12 it might have been because of those soviet backing that India’s military technique throughout this time period turned into “offensive defensive” clinched alongside nature.
Those establishment of the prospering
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE relations between those two nations might
have been laid throughout the late 1940s itself when the Ussr underpinned India Throughout deliberations toward the umpteenth in regards the Kashmir issue.
India as an exchange underpinned the USSR’s determination to truck to Korea. (Zafar 1984) Thereafter, those relations between the two nations grew in the structure from claiming profession pacts and discretionary gatherings which in the end prompted arms trade.
Throughout those Sino-Indian Conflict, the arms exchange the middle of the two nations might have been toward its early stage; however, it finished assistance India to an enormous degree. This can be seen in two ways, the first being that the arms sales took place against deferred rupee payments, which was a major concession for India who severely lacked foreign exchange reserves; and the second being the fact that Soviet arms sales were not accompanied by any sort of demands or expectations from India to change their foreign policy or adhere to Soviet foreign policy for that matter, thereby keeping the Indian autonomy intact.
In 1964, the USA refused to sell their F-104 Fighter Jets to India for political reasons13 which once again opened the doors for a big arms deal between India and the USSR. This arms deal came to India’s rescue in the fall of 1965 when, after a failed attempt at starting insurrection in Kashmir, Pakistan used ambiguity over the borders of Ran of Kutch as the focal point of their second war against India. While Kashmir was the primary motivator for Pakistan, India’s humiliating defeat in 1962 and crippling defense was also a reason that convinced Pakistan that the time was ripe to attack India to maximize their gains. India at this point aptly realized the futility of its efforts to limit its countermeasures to Pakistan’s attacks, which started at the international border of Champ.
Thus, despite the fact that India had made it clear several times that an attack on Kashmir would be taken as an attack on India, India chose to counter Pakistan from Punjab. This in turn meant that India intended to carry out the war by getting inside Pakistan from Punjab and capture as much territory. This was the only way by which India could bulwark Pakistan’s intentions in Kashmir.
The end result of this was seen in the considerable amount of damage that India inflicted upon Pakistan. However in the process of doing so, it suffered significant casualties on its own end as well. This can thus be seen as a major factor that made both the countries agree to a ceasefire called upon by the UN. (Rao 2015) If looked at from a theoretical perspective, then it is a difficult task to ascertain as to who won the war. Defense expenditure was at a peak as was the devastation of their respective economies.
5. DEFENSE APPROACH OF INDIA CHAPTER III: 1972-1980
Military technique starting with 1971 onwards thrived on the idea of Deterrence, which “refers with arrangements outlined with dishearten the foe from bringing immediate or proxy military action, by raising the expense with the goal that it outweighs those additions that he might wish will accomplish. ” resistance alternately prevention arrangements which “are intended to decrease those ability of the foe should reason damage—and own fetches Also risks—in the off chance discouragement falls flat. ” it might have been main in this period of the Indian military methodology that those policymakers understood how discouragement Also guard need aid interrelated on each other.
(Malik Furthermore Kanwal 2005) Thus, military key movement might have been honestly relaxed with India adopting discouragement approaches with admiration to Pakistan prevention strategies towards china. The War about 1971 demonstrated that obvious nature of the prevalence Indian military held over their Pakistani counterparts. However, at that same time, this might have been not the event to India against china and their PLA. China tried their initially atomic shell in 1964 their sake under the
“Nuclear Weapon States” (Kimball 2018) classification of the NPT offered their atomic weapons store real support. For 1972 itself, China’s resistance consumption might have been US$ 31. 1 billion same times India’s might have been US$ 2. 93 billion.
(C. N. Smith 1975) India’s military centering vis-à-vis china consequently included two things: “the advancement of
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE India’s atomic weapons programmed with
the goal that India Might prevent the Chinese starting with making any endeavor during atomic blackmail” Also
“development about India’s accepted military capability, especially the army’s high-altitude mountain warfare proficiency and the air force’s air help capability, thus that Indian constrains Might defeat endeavors Toward the PLA will development under Indian domain over the challenged Sino-Indian outskirt. ” (Ganguly 2015) the credit to establishing those etymological base about atomic research might make properly provided for of the Indian physicist Homi j.
Bhabha, particularly then afterward he established the Bhabha nuclear research focus (BARC) to 1954. Throughout that same year, Indo-Canadian atomic coordinated effort likewise occurred that massively bolstered atomic examination.
6. DEFENSE APPROACH OF INDIA CHAPTER IV: 1980-PRESENT
India’s resistance approach starting with those 1980s onwards could compactly a chance to be clarified concerning illustration one that might have been highlighted by a few key developments so as will manage the strained outside nature's domain India might have been continuing. Indira Gandhi at the end of the day took the lead clinched alongside 1980 the point when she might have been re-elected similarly as those country’s leader. She pushed forward that ticket from claiming modernization of the military which aided over bolstering national security. That flip side here might have been that she similarly as An pioneer might have been frequently tempted to utilize the military Similarly as a method for interceding in the inner governmental issues of the nation.
This might have been seen clinched alongside 1984 throughout the operation blue star On Amritsar which prompted her sad death the same quite a while. Indira Gandhi might have been succeeded by her child Rajiv Gandhi to 1984. “He pushed India’s vital destinations and posture further over any Indian pioneer in the recent past alternately following him.” (Cohen Dasgupta 2010) it might have been Throughout as much authority that India sought after a portion yearning vital
projects, beginning for operation Meghdoot On 1984 (April 13, 1984) which might have been against Pakistan in the Siachen Glacier.
Despite the fact that India proudly wore horde shades of triumph in this operation, till date it may be answerable for overwhelming drains in the country’s military assets. Rajiv Gandhi also acted towards upgrading India’s military modernization, by restarting its atomic programmed and in addition extending the economy thus concerning illustration will fuse additional arms exchange. It might have been throughout as much residency concerning illustration the PM that India’s economy grew toward a quicker rate over its populace. (Cohen Dasgupta 2010) India Notwithstanding captivated clinched alongside arms exchange for France, those USSR, Germany and sweden. That defilement outrage that then again emerged from those arms exchange with sweden brought about Rajiv Gandhi’s annihilation in the 1989 races.
Operation Meghdoot might have been taken after toward operation Brasstacks On 1986. In view of those after that Indian guard boss gen.
Krishnaswami Sundarji’s arrangement to military strategy, Brass-tacks included an enormous military exercise on the Indo- Pak fringe in Rajasthan. The character of the arrange might have been with need
“highly portable strike corps of automated Furthermore protected infantry supported by air power that Might possibly strike profound inside Pakistan with lightning velocity without those require too involved drawn out assembly. ” (III 2007) at the same time, it additionally planned should gage Pakistan’s guard framework and the level about response for its associates.
The result for this might have been Pakistan’s risk to utilize atomic weapons, forcing India with back up.
Same time it might have been depicted as a basic military exercise, Sundarji over a explanation clarified how this operation might have been India’s last possibility on settle those kashmir issue by attacking Pakistan and bulwarking their atomic programmed.
(Cohen Also Dasgupta 2010) Brass-tacks might have been succeeded Rajiv Gandhi’s A large portion renowned vital declaration to 1987 The point when he
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE sent the IPKF to Sri Lanka to wrist
bindings a peacekeeping arrangement he endeavored to temporary the middle of the Sri Lankan legislature and the tamil tigers.
Otherwise called operation Pawan, this move from claiming Rajiv Gandhi brought about that's only the tip of the iceberg reduction of Indian fighters over At whatever free clash India might have been included On preceding. “The latté political progression of sri lanka was totally misread.
7. CONCLUSION
India’s approach towards guard began for a sheer absence of natural thought for 1947 the place resistance arranging might have been took through the crystal of vital limitation Also upkeep about peace.
Following India’s war through Kashmir for 1947- 48 with Pakistan, India figured it out the vitality from claiming military preparedness. Yet till around the Bangladesh war previously, 1971, India’s military method might have been singularly In light of pondering Furthermore execution for strategies on the premise about how grave the circumstances might have been on the outside front, as Might a chance to be seen On the whole the significant wars India courageously battled.
However, in the span about run through Indian organization committed certain with recognize the take-always starting with every for their significant war encounters fuse them done their next methodologies. To example, those war from claiming 1965 made that administration understand the worth of a well-developed brainpower framework Furthermore Consequently crude might have been established to 1968. The military experience India need picked up Throughout the most recent 70 A long time need just presently made India acknowledge the vitality of deliberate guard planning, which Might been seen in the station of the DPC prior not long from now. While there is no doubt about the fact that the personality cult of leaders and politicians alike was something that changed the course of India’s military posture from being defensive in the initial stages to now being a complementary combination of offensive and defensive posture, leader personality is something
that has also immensely bulwarked India’s military development at several junctures with some very harsh implications for the country on the national as well as global fronts.
Keeping these in mind, India’s strategy for national security should be planned in a way that not only creates a harmony between India’s diplomatic ambitions at the international level but also instill stability in areas that have been ridden with conflict and violence for a considerable time. At this stage, India needs to not only deal efficiently with the issues it faces with its neighbors on the western and eastern fronts but also the internal security problems that have emerged as a result of the former. This can only be possible when a national strategy is devised in a manner that envisages of all aspects of defense planning in a holistic manner.
The advent of the twenty-first century has brought India to a stage where it is dealing with complex problems such as cyber-terrorism. As Modi correctly agrees, economic development is the mother lode of military development, thereby making the need for India to establish a thread of synchrony between the two extremely crucial.
8. NOTES
1. The clauses for the same include Mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty; Mutual non- aggression; Mutual non- interference; Equality and Cooperation for Mutual Benefit and Peaceful Co-Existence.
2. The term “Forward Policy” implies to taking up of positions in the inhospitable terrain of eastern Ladakh, along the McMahon Line in Arunachal Pradesh, to reiterate their claim over it.
3. This enabled the Indian Army to quickly take matters into their own hands and push Pakistani forces out of Kashmir.
4. Ironically, even in 1971, Pakistan was supported by both China and the USA even though it was responsible for carrying out massive genocide against the inhabitants of East Bengal due to their demands of better and equal
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE political representation. It is a
series of development projects that connects the two provinces in China and Pakistan. This includes roads, railways, pipelines and hydropower plants. The entire project comes under the broader umbrella of China’s “One Belt One Road” project wherein they are working on creating a new Silk Road.
5. Military vehicles were provided by Canada and America. Adding to this, India lacked an aircraft industry or even repairs facilities during that time.
6. This is with reference to the Japanese incursions in Bay of Bengal and Assam along with their role in the development of the Azad Hind Fauj or the Indian National Army (INA).
7. Nehru and S. C. Bose (eventual leader of the INA) then chose to share their opinions which were strongly in contrast to the prevailing orthodox INC ideology.
They called for the development of the military based on public ownership of defense industries.
8. The Blackett Report written by the British Physicist P. M. S Blackett in 1948, further this stance of Nehru. It suggested reduction in military expenditure in order to fast-track the process of economic development.
9. Refer to the link
http://www.friendsoftibet.org/mai n/sardar.html for the letter Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel wrote to Nehru.
10. The plan also took into account the availability of resources and the kind of military assistance India could get from friendly foreign relations. Broadly, there were six main objectives of this plan, which includes expansion of the R&D wing; modernization but not expansion of the Navy;
Infrastructural improvements in the border areas; Expansion of the Army and modernization of the weapons and equipment it used;
Expansion of the domestic defense production base; and lastly Modernization of the IAF and its stabilization.
11. The split was mainly based on ideology. Mao Zedong (Leader of China) had a completely different take on communism as against Joseph Stalin (Leader of Russia).
In other words, the nature of development of the communist ideologies in China and the USSR were highly distinctive and this eventually resulted in massive diplomatic and military conflict between the two nations.
12. The USSR aided in setting up the Bhillai Steel Plant in 1955.
13. The USA was suspicious of the Indian motives from the time India became a part of the Non-Aligned Movement. Adding to this, their main basis for giving military aid to Pakistan was considering the fact that it was a member of the SEATO and CENTO.
14. The government realised that the process of attaining self- sufficiency in arms production would be a long-term process.
Thus plans had to be formulated in a way that covered this aspect.
15. Refer to (C. Smith 1994), pages 88-89 for thorough details on why the dip in USSR-India relations took place.
16. As per the agreement, Indian scientists got access to Canadian Reactors for research purposes.
Refer to (Sen 2017), pages 94-97 for further information.
REFERENCES
1. AP. All you need to know about Doklam and the India-China Border Standoff. 25
July 017.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national /all-you-need-to-know-about-doklam-and-
theIndia- china-border-
standoff/article19357499.ece (accessed May 25, 2018).
2. Kabir Arafat, “The Maldives Crisis will India intervene?”. 27 February 2018. https://
thediplomat.com/2018/02/the-maldives- crisis-will-India-intervene/ (accessed May 22, 2018).
3. Aritra Banerjee, “10 things you must know about the Rashtriya Rifles (RR)”. http://
www.ssbcrack.com/2017/12/10-things- you-must-know-about-the-rashtriya-rifles- rr.html (accessed May 23, 2018).
4. Gautam Banerjee, India’s National Defense:
Defining Defense Reforms and Military Modernization. (New Delhi: Pentagon Press, 2017)
Vol. 03, Issue 03, March 2018, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE 5. Mark Beeson and Li Fuijan, China’s
Regional Relations: Evolving Foreign Policy Dynamics. (Colorado: Lynne Rienner, 2014) 6. Laxman K. Behera, “Creation of Defense Planning Committee: A Step towards Credible Defense Preparedness”. 19 April 2018.
https://idsa.in/idsacomments/creation-of- defense planning- committee-lkbehera- (accessed May 25, 2018).
7. Laxman Kumar Behera, “Defense Planning in India.” Journal of Defense Studies, 2010, Pg 126-135.
8. Ken Booth and Nicholas Wheeler. Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)
9. Lt Gen Philip Campose, A National Security Strategy for India: The Way Forward. (New Delhi: Knowledge World, 2018)
10. Bipin Chandra, Aditya Mukherjee and Mridula Mukherjee. India since Independence. (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2008)
11. Christopher Clary, “Personalities, Organizations and Doctrine in the Indian Military.” Indian Review, 2017, pg 100-121.
12. Stephen P. Cohen and Sunil Dasgupta, Arming without Aiming: India’s Military Modernization. (Washington D.C:
Brookings Institution, 2010)
13. Steve Coll, “The Stand-off”. 13 February 2006. https://www.newyorker.com/
magazine/2006/02/13/the-stand-off (accessed May 24, 2018).
14. Express Web Desk, What is India’s Cold Start Doctrine. 21 September 2017.
https://Indianexpress.com/article/what- is/what-is-India-cold-start-doctrine- military- trategy-Indiapakistan- Indian- armed-forces-4854019/ (accessed May 24, 2018).
15. Department of Atomic Energy, Important Agreements. 25 May 2018.
http://www.dae.nic. in/?q=node/75 (accessed May 25, 2018).
16. V. Ganapathy, “Military Lessons of the 1965 Indo-Pak War.” Scholar Warrior, 2014, pg 163-170.
17. Rajat Ganguly, “India’s Military: Evolution, Modernization and Transformation.” India Quaterly, 2015, pg 187-205.
18. Prakhar Gupta, “To the Brink: 2001-02 India-Pakistan Standoff”. 22 June 2016.
http:// www.Indiandefense
review.com/spotlights/to-the-brink-2001- 02-India-pakistan-standoff/ (accessed May 24, 2018).
19. Mateusz Gwozdz, “India’s External and Internal Security: Interrelated Issues.”
Future directions. org. 13 December 2016.
http://www.futuredirections.org.au/wp- content/uploads/2016/12/
India%E2%80%99s-External-and-Internal- Security-Interrelated-Issues.pdf (accessed April 18, 2018).
20. Gardiner Harris,”A Largely Indian Victory in World War II, Mostly Forgotten in India”
