• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

VOOD rROM THE DECCA T INTERTl APPEAN SERIES, Ii TDIA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "VOOD rROM THE DECCA T INTERTl APPEAN SERIES, Ii TDIA"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

NJALLOTOXYLON KERIENSE GEN. ET SP. NOV., A FOSSIL DICOTYLEDONO S \VOOD rROM THE

DECCA

T

INTERTl APPEAN SERIES, Ii TDIA

R. N. L\.1\ l-J.\.. T L',\ To 8: R. DAYAL Tlirhal Sallni In~tiLule of Pala('oholany. Luckno\\'

ABSTRACT that proposed by the International Asso­

Tile rFlper describes a new fos,il wooel from the J)cccan Interlrappean beds o( I\.cria (21 59'40"::-1;

7<;"10'15"£) iu ~Jad!!\'a I'radc,], The s rtictUI'C of this fossil wooel sholl·s closr rescmblance ,,·itll ,klt of the living .acnus 111111 vl/ls of the f":uphorhi;'tceC1c.

INTRODUCTlON

T

HE present paper (lcals with the ana­

tomical details of a new Deccan Intertrappf'an wood collected from Keria (21 0 59' 40" N; 79° 10' 15" E), about two miles south-west of the wdl kllO\\11 locality of Mohgaon Kalan in District Chhind­

wara, Madhya Pradesh. The exact fossili­

ferous locality is situated about 500 yards to tile north of the village Keria. !\lthough this place is quite rich in Jo~sjl wocels, so far only two hJ.\'e been clC'~C1ibed from here.

The first is Palllloxylon sU1'II1lgei (L.\I{HAN­

PAL, 1955) and the second is Lu/JIlOrhioxylon Ilme1l';tlii1 (PRAKASH, 1957). The prL'"ent find is a further addition to our knowledge of the fossil flora of this locality.

Tille fos"il :,pecimen invcstig,Ltec! "vas a fairly well-preserved petriflfd wood dis­

covered partly embedded in a big piece of chert. its extemal surface was rusty brown but when cut, the interior appeared clark brown to almost l)lack. A number of gl·o1.lI1c1 sections were pn'pared from all the three planes, viz., the trn.nsverse, tangential longi­

tudinal and raclial longitudinal. The . !ides were examined after smearing with glycerine.

No stain. were used as the natural colour of the petrifaction revealed the internal struc­

ture yuite clearly.

Comparison of the fossil wood with th' living was made with the large number of authentic samples and slides of modern woods at the Wood Anatomy Branch of the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun. The des­

criptive terminology llsed here conforms to Originally sl'clt as ilt'lil'scil I,,· the alit/lor

ciation of Wood Anatomists, 1957.

DESCRIPT[O

The petrified wood described here consists of pith, secondary xylem and a portion of the ba.rk. Defore cuttinff it measured about 15 cm. in length and 8 em. in diameter.

Topography - Wood (nEuse-porous (PI.. 1, FIr;. 3). Pith prcspnt. Grn,~,th n:ngs in­

distinct (PI.. 1, FIG. 1). Vcssi'ls appe:1.ring as pin points to the naked eye, clearly visible under the microscope, small to medium-sited, mostly moderately small, solitary ;1.Ilcl in numerous radial multiple:: of 2-4 or more ceil., (Pr.. 1, FIGS. 3, 4), distri­

butecl willio It ailY pattern, 6-18 per sq. mm., rarely in short double rows, usually with I'av" conti,l:uous on one or both tile sides, sparsely 1ylosed (PI.. 1, FIG. 7); vessel-ray pits similar to inten'ascular pit-pairs, several to each ray cell. with wiue aperture and narrow' bord 1'; vessel-parenchyma pits not observed. Pare'nchy111a clearly visible only under tile microscope, paratracheal and apotrac.llC'al; paratracheal parenchyma sparse, as few cells associa ed with the vessC'ls; apotrachcal parenchyma abundant, as scattered cells or more commonly as sllort ilTerfular and interruptecl uni:;eriate lines (PL. 1, FIG. 4) bridging the narrow gaps lJctwcen the adjacent rays. XylcJl! rays not distinct with the naked eye, ('ven with a l)and lens their outlines obscure, fine, 1-3'cel1s (PL. 1. FIG. 2) ane! 16-45 [l- broad, rather closely distributed, 8-14 per mm., ray tissue markedly heterogeneous (PL. I, FIGS. 2, 5);

divisible on the basis of siz,e and composition into two types: (a) uniseriate 1'<'1" homo­

cellular. consisting ~wholly of upright cells (PL. 1, FIG. 2),225-750 iJ. and 7-13 cells high;

(b) multiseriate rays 2-3 seriate, 675-1500 fL high, hetC'roce1l1.11ar, consisting of procumbent cells through the thickened central portion, with uni~eriatemarginal extensions of up to

J4!1 1

(2)

150 'J;HE PALAEOBOTANIST 10 upright cells (PL. 1, FIG. 2), margincll

extensions of different rays sometimes con­

fluent. Fibres nicely preserved only at some places, aligned in radial rows, these rows interrupted by the lines of apotracheal parenchyma.

Elements - Pith cells parenchymatous, cir­

cular or oval (PL. 1, FIG 6) sometimes with dark deposits, t.d. 30-75 fl-. Vessels vvith thin to slightly thicker wall, t.d. 45-120 fl"

Ld. 45-105 fl., circular or oval, in radial groups flattened at the place of contact; vessel­

members medium-sized to sometimes large, 400-840j.L long, truncate or with tailed ends;

perforations simple, perforation plates hori­

zontal to oblique; intervascular pit-pairs bordered, alternate (PL. 1, FIG. 8), meclium­

sized to large, 8-10 fl" border usually oval, sometimes hexagonal through crowding, aper­

ture lenticular and horizontal. Parenchyma cells thin-walled, circular or oval in cross­

section, t.d. 15-20 1.1., Ld. 12-14 (.L, without infiltration. Ray cells thin-walled; procum­

bent cells t.cL 12-40 (.L, Ld. 16-40 fl.; npright cells t.d, 16-20 (.L, Ld. 40-57 (.L, sometimes with infiltration. Fibres non-septate, thin to moderately thick-walled, squarish or polygonal in transverse section, t.d. 12-19 fl';

interfibre pits not observed,

DISCUSSION

Comparison with the Living Species - The combination of structural features exhibited by the Intertrappean fossil is found in vary­

ing degrees in a number of dicotyledonous families of which the important ones are Ebenaceae, Sapotaceae, Apocynaceae and Euphorbiaceae, With these four a detailed com parison is made below.

In the Ebenaceae (METCALI'E & CHALK, 1950, pp. 880-886), there are two genera Diospyros and NIaba that could be compared with the fossil. A number of species of these genera such as Diospyros ehretioides, D. mela­

noxylon, D. burmanica, D. chloroxylon, D.

brandisiana, D. ebenum, D. lotu,s, D. ln1'cro­

phylla, D. hah, D. dasyphylla, Maba buxi­

jolia, lvI. merguensis, lV[. andamanica and NI. nigrescens were studied, some from their thin sections of the living woods while others from their figures and detailed descriptions (METCALFE & CHALI" 1950; PFAESON &

BEOWN, 1932, pp. 689-708; GAMBLE, 1902, pp. 452-463). It has, however, been observed that woods of these two genera differ from the fossil in some important

structural details. In them .the intervessel pits are small to minute and the xylem rays are mostly uniseriate or with occasional biseriate parts and typically short, being less than 1 mm. in height.

Among the modern Sapotaceae (METCALFE

& CHALK, 1950, pp. 871-880) the woods of Dichopsis, Nlimusops and Bassl:a show simi­

larity with the fossil in gross features. Hut a detailed microscopic study on the woods of Dichopsis elliptlca, D. obovata, D. polyantha,

!.1imusops elengi, 111. hexandra, NI. littoralis, Bassia latijolia, B. longzfolia B. butyracea and B. malabarz'ca has revealed certain fundamental differences as in these plants vasicentric tracheids are invariably present, the intervessel pits are small and the fibres are very thick-walled.

In the Apocynaceae (METCALFE & CHALK, 1950, pp. 905-917), many genera have special­

ized wood structure characterised by the presence of vasiccntric tracheids, latex tubes, exclusively uniseriate rays or included (inter­

xylary) phloem. After eliminating all such genera, Holarrhena and Wrightia could be compared with the present fossil wood. But in both these genera the vessels are very small to extremely small and their frequency (Number per sq. mm.) is too large (In Holar­

rhena 40-71 per sq. mm., in Wrlghtia 27-45 per sq. mm,) to be compared favourably with the fossil. :Moreover, the intervessel pits are small to minute and vestured.

Lastly, the Euphorbiaceae has a number of genera which show a combination of characters similar to what is seen in the fossil.

Euphorbiaceae is a markedly heterogeneous family (iVIETCALFE & CHALK, 1950, pp, 1207­

1235; ]ANSSONIUS, 1929) and for that reason the woods of this family are mostly grouped under two distinct types - the Phyllan­

thol:deae (Aporosa- and Glochidion-type) and the Crotonoideae.

The Aporosa-type of. woods are charac­

terised by vessels often with scalariform perforation plates, small to minute intervessel pits and the xylem rays which are 4-17 cells wide and several mm. high, These charac­

ters distinguish the members of this type from the Intertrappean fossil.

The Glochidion-type of woods also differ from our fossil in having little or practically no parenchyma, in the composition of xylem ra ys and in possessing septcLte fibres.

A survey of all the available woods of the modern Crotonoideae indicates that the closest resemblance of the fossil wood is with

(3)

LAKHA~PAL & DAYAL - J1/IALLOTOXYLON KERIEN. E TE~, ET SP, NOV. 151

the modern genus Mallohts. The fossil IVood also shows a somewhat Sl1 perncial rC':(,Ill­

blance, in gross features, with the wood struc­

ture of the extant genus Drypetes. How­

ever, the presence of minute intervessd pits, very thick-walled fibres and the ray struc­

ture in Drypetes distinguish it from the Intcr­

tmppean fossil.

Thin sections of Mallottts ph-ilippl:nensis and M. alb1f.s were examined. At the same time descriptions of six other species, viz., M. l'OXlntl'ghianus, lVI. nepalensis, .11. anda­

maniws (C,\MBLE, 1902), M. blumeanus, M. l'icinoides and M. florib-nnd·us (JA,\SSON­

lUS, 1930) were also available for comparison.

An examination of all the available data reveals that the nearest affinitie: of the fo<::sil within this genus are with the species YI.

pkihppincnsis although there are some variations.

Except for the slight variation in size, the distribution of the vessf'ls in our fossil wood agrees with the distributional pattern in M. philippine·lm:s. The tangential dia­

meter of the vessels in the fossil species is 45-120 ')' whereas in the extant wood it is 45-170 '11" In both, the perforations are simple and the intervascular pit-pairs are medillm-siled to large (8-10 fl. in the fossil and 8-11 I). in the modern wood), bordered, alternate with usually oval border and lenti­

cular and horizontal aperture. Tylo:es have also been obs(~rvedin somr specimens of 111.

Philippinensis.

The natnre and distribution of parenchyma appear' to he almost identical in both as also the fibre structure.

PREYIOt;s N .;ME

J'hyt/anlhiuiulII pscudohobashimislli Ogura Clochidio;t;ylon ler!'lMum Eamanlljam Clochidioxylou sahllii Prakash

Cuphorbio;t;)'lol/. hra.cu,dii Prakash

Bischofio.~ylon 'mioceuiru1lt Eamanu jam Aleu/"i.fes miocenica vVatari

EEVlSED NAME ACCORDINr. TO :',[ADEL

PMa!'h !/alllho;t; lion pseurlohobashiroishi PITrflphytlalllhoxylo!l ferliaru·m

l'w'aphytl ulIlho.,.,yl0/1 salt nii Flride/i.oxylon kraCllsrlii 13ridclioxvloll miocellic7l111 i1lelfrilox~ylol1 m'inc /I 'clIm

The composition of xylem rays in the fossil and the modern wooel is basically similar, except for some minor differences. In the extant wood the upright cells of the xylem rays contain abundant cry:;tals whereas in the fossil wood th crystals have not been seen.

Comparison with the Fossil Species - A number of fo:;sil woods assigned to Euphor­

biaceac are known from a wide range from many part. of the world. They are Euphol'­

bioxylO1I specioswn (FELIX, 1887) from th·

Tertiary of Colomhia; Dl'yoxyloll drypeteoide

(H.\;-lCROFT, 1932) from tlte diocene (?) beds of East Africa; PhyUanth-inium pselldo­

hobashil'aisJl1: (OCURA, 1932; VrA ARI, 1943) from the Tertiary of Japan; Euphorbioxylon lcjrancii (B01.;RE.w, 1951) from the Tertiary of Algeria; Heveoxylou microporosuJn (KRt:SE, , 1954) from the Eocene of 'den Valley, Wyoming, U.S.A; Alenrites miocenica

(W.\TARI, 1956) from the ~liocene heds of Isikawa Prefecture, Honsyu; Piranhcoxylon stochmansi (GR.UlB.\. T, 1961) from the Eocene of Belgium; Putranjivoxylon pura..

tamun, Bl'idelioxylon cuddalorcnse, Glochidio­

xylon tertiarum (RAlIIANl;]AM, 1956), Bischo­

jioxylon miocenic~tm (RAlI!.\"'VJ A)[, 1960) and Phyllanthinium bangalamodl'nse (. :.,\VALE, 1960) from the Tertiary rock. (? Cuddalore Series) of South India; Eu;bhol'bioxylon hracuselii (PRAK.\SH, 1957) aml Glochidioxylon salmii (PRAKASH, 1958) from the Inter­

trappean Series of India; Paraphyllanthoxy­

lon arizonense (BAILEY, 1924) from the Cretaceous Colorado group of Arizona and Paraphyllanthoxylon idahoense ( PACKM.\N, 1948) from tIt Cretaceous of Way< n, Idaho, .S.A. and Euphorbiox.ylon bridelioides

(ALARD, 1961) from the Tertiary of Peru.

Quite re ntly Madel (1962) has d scribed three new fossil euphorbiaceous woods, viz., ParaphyUanl hoxylon capense, Bridclioxylon flbrosum and ecurinegoxylon biseriatwm from the 'C'pper retaceous of South Africa. In this paper she has revised the names of a number of already known specie:; into ne""

combinations as given in the table below:

She has also changed the name of Carpin­

oxylon pjefferi Platen (1908) in to Paraphy­

llanthoxylon pfeffer'l: (Platen) Madel (lac. cit.).

ccordingly the fossil wood described by Navale (1960) under the genus Phyllanthini­

um as P. bangalamodense should also be renamed as Pal'aphyllanthoxylon bangala­

modense (lJavale) comb. nov.

Of all the euphorbiaceolls fossil woods so

~ardescri bed from various parts of the world only Putranjivoxylon puratanum, Glochid-iQ­

(4)

152 THE V\L,\EOBOT,\.~IST

Xl'lon Ir:rtiarlllll, Dryuxylon drypeleoidr:s and fleveoxylol1 micruj>oro, 11111 can be c0nlparct!

with the present IntertrappC'an fo,;sJl.

However, PIIJranjivoxylnn pu-ratanulJI Ramanujam differs from the prc:cnt fossil in the absence u[ tyloses in the \. 'ssel, in posscssing Talariform perfofation.-,. small intervc. sC'! pit,-· and the ray cells \\'hlch arc abundantly crystallifiToLh,

Pa1'aphylla1llhoxyloll tcrtiarum (Ram::ull1­

jam) Madel also differs from th present fossIl in the absence of tylose', in having wry scant_ parenchyma as diffuse cdb rilld the fibres which arc septate and \'l~ry thick­

walled.

Dryoxyloll dr_vpetcoidcs Bancroft com parcel especially with the woud f DrvJ'cles sp., 1S

very imperfectly preserved ancl the anato­

mical details have bccn described [rom 1he cross surface only. Consequently the pres('nt fossil cannot be comparvd "'ith thl' East African species in :tJl its details. Howe\'cr, it differs from the presentfus:il ill the absence of tylos 'S, in having small intern'ss J pits, very thick-walled fibr':' and supposed shghtly

heterogeneous rays. .

H ei'coxylon micra porosum Kruse also dIffers from the }<.:eria fossil in havin fille intervessd pits and in the apotrachcal par nchyma which is in the form of JI1ultiscriate bands. 1\'1ore­

over, in H. microporos'U1/I. the freqncncy of the vessels is too larg' (30-100 per sq. mm.) to be favourably comparc1 with the present fossil.

Because of its close resemblance with the wood structure of Mallotus, th present fossil wood ha.s ben namedlVIaUotoxylon gen. no\'.

It is specifically named as .vlaLLotaxylrm kaiense sp. nov., after the nam of Its locahty.

Nlallotus, a larg genlls of trees ancl shrub:, cumprising about 120 species (VhLLIS, 1957), is spread over a wide area coverIng Incha, Burma, }[adagascar, Australia, Tropi al Africa, the Philippines, Cochin-China and Malayan Archipelago. About 20 species are repre'sented in the modern Indian flora.

N[aUotus plzilippincnsis MilcH. Arg., \\'lth which the fossil shows its near st resem­

blance, "is a ubiquitous shrub or a small much-branched tree of India and Burma which also extends hI' afield into Ceylon, the Malayan Peninsnla and Archipelago, Australia, China and

r:

onnosa" (PEAHSON

& BROWN, 1932, p. 888). In India this ever­

:rreen plant occurs in C;uh-I-1imalayan tract and outer hills from the Indus eastwards, a cending occasionally to nearly 5,000 ft.

into the region of PiJlllS lung/ltd/a and Qucy­

cus ·iuGal/a, in Bengal, Chitta Xagpm ;l11l1

Indian Peninsula. This is a \'l·ry comnlOIl tree in sal forest ;).nd in cc ta in types uf mixed and scrub forest (Trwl'l', 1Y21, p. 837).

DIAGNOSES

M(jlloto:~yloll~en, nov.

n"ood di[f\lsl'-poro\l~. (;rl,lclli rings in­

(1istinct. Vessels small to meditlll1-sizrd, solitary and in radial Jl1\11tip1<-s of 2-4 ur more cells; ;'('ssd-mem bel'S small to ll1cdiull1-si7.ed.

somdime:.; luge; perforaticJIls simple; inLcT­

"ascular pit-pairs lJ1c'diull1-'i;:ec! to large, burdered, alte 'nate. Parcnchyma apvtra­

clll'al aud paralrachcal. XylclIl mys [llIC,

1-3 (_.1-) sc'ri:tLc. divisihit' on the b;bis nf size an I compositiull into two typc's; ray f LSsne 111arkedly heU'roO' ·IWOUS. Fibrcs non­

septate', thin to mod rat ely thick-\\'alle(], Gcnotypc - JJfallotoxylon li1'ricnsc

Mallotoxylol1 heriense sp. nov.

Yl'ssl'ls moderately s111:1ll, solitary :1nd commonly in radial J-';nlltil'!cs of 2-4 or more cells, without any pattern, plugged with tylose<;; \'l'sscl-mrmbers small to medium­

si7;('c1, sometin es large, trullcate or WIth taile<1 ends; perforations simple, horiwntal or slightly oblique'; inter";bC'ular pit-pairs mdium-"izcd to large. 8-10 iJ.., bordered, :i1ter­

nette with len ticular and horizontal aperture and circular or oval border. Pa')tcllchYlJla as few cells associated with the vessels and more commonly as scatterecl cells or short irreC>'ular unisc;'iatc lines (apotrach al).

Xl'lcm ra)!s fine, 1-3 seriate, of two dis­

ti;1ct types; tlte' uniseriate, hOJl1ocdlular, uf upright cells only; the multi,;rriate, hetero­

cellular, consisting of procumhent ce\1s in the thickened portion, with up to 10 marainal upright cell; ray tissue markedly heteroaeneous, Fibres llon-sept:J.tc, thlll to moderately thick-walled, polygonal in cross­

section.

Holatype - B.S.I.P. ,}Iuscum No. 32735.

LocaWI' - Keria, Chhinc1"'ara (llstrIct, i\ladhva - Pradesh.

HOJ~iZiJn - Deccan InterTappean Series.

Age - Early Tertiary (probably LO\\Cf Eoc ne.)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We arc thankful to Shri K. Ram .. h Rao, Officer-in-Charge, \Vooel Anatomy Branch,

(5)

TilE PAt.\I;:OlJOT.\XrST, \·OL. 11 LAKII.-\:\'PAL 8: D.\ Y AL - PL~\TE 1

2

3 4 5

6 7

(6)

LAKHANPAL & D.'\Y.-\L - NIALLOTOXYLON KERIENSE CEY. ET . l' ~OV. 153

Forest Re.-;earch Institute, D2hra DUll, for suit their exten'ive collection of slides and laboratory facilitie:; and permission to coo- samples of modern woods.

REFERENCES

R\II_E\', 1. IV. (1924). The prol>lcm of identifying the wooel of Crelace,ous a.nd later Dicotyledons' f'(,rapltyllaJlllr,JXylon Clrizollci/\lJ. Aun. 1301., LOl/d. 38' 439-451.

BANCROFT, H. (1932). Somc fossil dicotyledonous woods from tile lVIioccnc (l) heds of East Africa.

Tbid. 46([8+): 745-767.

BOURE.W, E. (1951). Etude paleoxylologique du Sahara (X\"). Sur lin nOll\'C,Ul bois mineralise, t:llphnr/,ioxyluJI !ffrancii n. sp., n:'colt6 en ,\lg'ri6, au Nord-Odcst de l'orl-FI::l.lters. RIIII.

j1111i. Hi.,I. 1/.1//. Pan.,. 23(6)' 706-712.

Commillce on NomC'lIcla.ture, Int. .\ssoc. \Vood .\ lat. (1957). International glos,;ar)' of lerms use:1 in \Vood :\niltomy. Tmp. Woods. 107:

1-36.

Ff'LTx, J. (1887). Untcrsuchungen iiber fossile Holzer III. Z. dlsch. /ico!. Gcs. 39: 517-528.

C.\MUU:, J. S. (1902). .\ :Vfanual of Indian timbers.

London.

GR.~~li"AST, N. (1961). Piralll,eoxv!ol, slockmallsi n.

g-ell. n. 51'., nois d' Euphorbi,~cecs ell' I' Eocene de Belgiquc. B1I11. f1/sl . . ·ci. 1/al. He/g. 37 12):

1-12

r\NSSONIUS, H. H. (19291. .\ contribution to the n;tt.uml cla~si(icalion of the Euphorbiaceae.

Trap. Woods 19: 8-10.

Idem (1930). ;vrikrocrraphic des Holz(~s dcr auf Ja\'a \·orkommenclen Baumarten. Lieferung 10. Lcillett.

KRUSe:, H. O. (1954). Some Eocene dicotyledonous woods from Eden \'alley, \Vyoming.· Ohio.J.

Sci. 54(4): 243-268.

LAKHA:"I"\L, R. X. (1955). Palmoxyloll sural/gei, a new species of petrified palms from the Deccan Intertrappean Series. Palaeobotallist. 4: 15-21.

"fAnEL, E. (1962). Die fossilen Euphorbiaceen­

holze~ mit besonderer Ber(icksichtigung ncuer I'-unde aus der Obefkreide Siid-.\frikas. Senel<.

lelh. 43 (4) : 283-321

METC.\LFE, C. R. & CH.'LK, L. (1950). ,\n8.tomyof the Dicotyledons. 2. Oxford.

)[AY,\LF, G. K. B. (1960). f'hylla IIlhinilll/! ballgala­

iitvdel/se: a ncw species of fo 'il Euphorbiaceolis

"'oml from thc "Cuddalore Scri s" of India.

Pa!acoboianisi. 9: 11-16.

O(;'URA, Y. (1932). On th structure of a silicified wood found nenr "hobashira-ishi" at Najima near Fukuoka City. jal>. I Hal. 6(2): 183­

190

lE.\RSON, R. S. & BROWN, H. P. (1932). Commer­

cial limbers of India. 2. Calclllla.

PLUloN, P. (1908). ntC'rsllchungen fossiler hulz r aus dem \Vl'st n der Vf'reinigten Staaten Von '\iordJmerika. Leipzig.

PRAK,\SH, U. (I957). Studies in the Deccan Inter­

lrappean Flora. 3. On a nc,,· sp cies of fossil

\\'ood~ of Ellphorbiaceae rom the Int<:rlrappean beds of :\fadhya Pradesh. Palaeobola/li:;l. 6(2):

77-81­

Idem (1958). Stud ies in the ncccan In brtrappean Flam. 4. Two silieifi.ed woods from Madhya Pradesh. Ibid. 7(1}: 12-20.

R\MANU].\M. C. G. K. (1956). Fossil woods of Euphnrbiaceae frum the Terli;uy rocks of SOllth .\rcot. District, :\Iadras. ]. India1/. bal. Soc ..

35(3). 284-307.

Idcm (1960). Silicificrl. wooels from the Tertiary rucks of South India. Pa/aeo/llographica. B.

106: 99-140.

S.\L.\RD, M. (1961). E uph01"bioxylon b,.irldioides n. sp. bois fossilc du P':rou. C.R. 86th Cong Soc.

Savanles : 581-591

SPAC10IAN JR, W. (1948). A dicotyledonous wood found associated with thc Idaho Tempskyas.

.'111.11.1110. bal. Gdn. 35 107-115.

TROUP, R. S. (1921). The silviculture of Indian trees. 3. Oxford.

\VATARI. S. (1943). Studies on the fossil woods from the Terliary of Japan. Ill. A lar'-"e silicified trunk of Phyltanthinillll! pswdo­

Iwbasliirai:;hi Ogura from the Palaeogene o[

Tobala City. .Tal> . .J. Bal. 13: 255-260.

Idem (1956). A large silicifIed wood of A1i'lIrilc's from tlte Miocene of Isikawa Prefecture, Honsyu.

Bot. Mag. Tokyo. 69 : 468-473.

,VILLIS, J. C. (1957). A dictionary of the fio\\'ering plants and ferns. Call1bridfie.

EXPLANATION OF PLATE 1 fi1allolo.ry/on kel'iense gen. et sp. nov.

1. Cross-scction of the fossil to show the gross featu res. X 1.

2. Tangential longitudinal section to show lh dislribution and nature of the xylem rays. x 50.

3. Cro,s-~ection at low magnification to show the distribution of the vessels. Note the vessel multiples. XIS.

4. ·CrQs~-section showing the nature a,nd di.tri­

bution of the parenchyma. X SO

5. Radial longitudinal section hawing the hcterog '/leous fa tissuc. X 190.

6. Cross-section of the wood showing the pith cells. x SO.

7. J';trt of a vessel in longitudinal section sho\\'ing tl'!oses. X 170.

. 8. Intervascular pit-pairs. X 450.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The data in the discussion section revealed that there was no significant difference in all linguistic features, including lexical sophistication, syntactic

1) the primary units of language are not merely its grammatical and structural features, but categories of functional and communicative meaning as exemplified

Thereupon, when compared based on VHDL programming architecture, as shown in figure 8, hybrid architecture a combination of behavioral and structural architecture has the amount of used

Thus in combination with morphological features of the mosquitoes that were collected from the field, molecular markers based analysis further confirmed the identity of the mosquito

Film morphology of the 3’ linked duplexes differs from that of its 5’ counterpart as observed by scanning probe microscopy in contact mode under buffer solution.. No structural features

The fossil and extant tholichthys possess the following comparable features: setiform teeth although in the fossils we can see only the outer row of teeth and not the pre- sumed full

1 The combination of Panigrahi and PSO-Search approaches was applied to reduce the traffic features; 2 Improvement of PSO-Search performance in selecting important and relevant

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Effect of Molasses and Tofu Dregs on the Growth of BSF Maggot Maggot Black Soldier Fly Hermetia Illucens Weight The maggot black soldier fly exhibited the