• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Coding: Generating Themes The purpose of thematic analysis is to generate

Approach to Data Collection and Analysis

Stage 2 Coding: Generating Themes The purpose of thematic analysis is to generate

subtypes of key constructs (e.g., types of compe-

tencies or types of stressors), provide inductive definitions based on what the students say, and consider how the definitions are influenced by cultural norms.

Competencies: Consider the following as you generate themes:

• What are the culturally valued competencies?

Make a list of specific competencies (e.g., academic ability, social skills). You can depict the competencies on a continuum from posi- tive to negative if that makes sense (e.g., star student vs. academic failure).

• How is each competency defined? For each competence listed in #1, provide the defini- tion based on students’ descriptions (e.g., Academic ability = making good grades; being good at math, etc.).

• What cultural norms are reflected in the com- petencies? (For example, one theme might be that academic competence is especially valued or most important. Social skills are important but only in relation to developing friendship.) Stressors: Consider the following as you gener- ate themes:

• What are the types of stressors that children experience?

• Which stressors are internal (e.g., frustration due to academic failure)? Which are external (e.g., parental conflict, peer bullying)

• What are the sources (or triggers) of stress?

(e.g., parents, peers, school, weather) Response to Stress: Consider the following:

• What are the emotional reactions (i.e., feel- ings)?

• What are the cognitive reactions (i.e., thoughts)?

• What are the behavioral reactions (i.e., behav- iors/actions)?

• What are the somatic or bodily reactions (e.g., get headaches, feel tense muscles)?

Supports: Consider the following as you gener- ate themes:

30 B. K. Nastasi and A. P. Borja

• What are the types of social support that chil- dren experience?

• What are the sources of support (e.g., parents, peers, school, priest, pets)?

Response to Support: Consider the following:

• What are the emotional reactions (i.e., feel- ings)?

• What are the cognitive reactions (i.e., thoughts)?

• What are the behavioral reactions (i.e., behav- iors/actions)?

• What are the somatic or bodily reactions (e.g., feel relaxed muscles)?

Appendix 2.H

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA: STUDENTS For student participants, please gather the fol- lowing information so that we can describe the sample.

School: _______________

Age (years): _________

Grade: _________

Gender: ___ female ___ male Language: ________________

Ethnic Origin: _______________

Religion: __________

Parental/Guardian Education levels (for each parent/guardian):

#1. (mother or other guardian) ______________

#2. (father or other guardian) _____________

Parental/Guardian Occupation (for each par- ent/guardian:

#1. _____________________

#2. _____________________

Family Income: _________________

Family Status: _______ married; ________

divorced; ________ single parent

Number of siblings: ________________

How many people live in your household?

_____________

With whom do you live (for example, parents, grandparents, etc.)?_______________

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA: Parents

For parent participants, please gather the fol- lowing information so that we can describe the sample.

Age (years): _________

Gender: ___ female ___ male Language: ________________

Ethnic Origin: _______________

Religion: __________

Parental/Guardian Education levels (for each parent/guardian):

#1. (mother or other guardian) ____________

#2. (father or other guardian) _____________

Parental/Guardian Occupation (for each par- ent/guardian):

#1. _____________________

#2. _____________________

Family Income: _________________

Family Status: _______ married; ________

divorced; ________ single parent

How many people live in your household?

_____________

With whom do you live (for example, spouse/

partner and children, parents, grandparents, etc.)?_______________

School(s) children attend:

___________________

Number of children: ___________________

Ages of children: ______________________

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA: Teachers

For teacher participants, please gather the fol- lowing information so that we can describe the sample.

School: __________________

Age (years): _________

Gender: ___ female ___ male Language: ________________

Ethnic Origin: _______________

Religion: __________

Education level: _____________________

What grade level(s) do you teach? __________

Number of years teaching experience: ______

References

Baumgartner, J., Burnett, L., DiCarlo, C. F., & Buchanan, T. (2012). An inquiry of children’s social support net- works using eco-maps. Child Youth Care Forum, 41, 357–369. doi:10.1007/S10566-011-9166-2.

Borja, A. P. (2013). The ecomap: A graphic tool for assessment, intervention, and research. Unpublished preliminary examination literature review. Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.).

Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Driessnack, M. (2005). Children’s drawings as facilita- tors of communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 20, 415–423. doi:10.1016/j.

pedn.2005.03.011.

Erkut, S. (2010). Developing multiple language versions of instruments for intercultural research. Child Devel- opment Perspectives, 4, 19–24. http://web.ebsco- host.com.libproxy.tulane.edu:2048/ehost/pdfviewer/

pdfviewer?sid=e9c363f1-9943-4e6c-8b5d-9f31bacde c00%40sessionmgr113&vid=2&hid=112. Accessed 3 July 2013

Hartman, A. (1978). Diagrammatic assessment of fam- ily relationships. Social Casework, 59, 465–476.

http://www.historyofsocialwork.org/1978_hart- man/1978,%20Hartmann,%20diagramatic%20assess- ment%20OCR%20(C%20notice).pdf. Accessed 3 July 2013

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nastasi, B. K. (2014). Empowering child voices through research. In C. Johnson, H. Friedman, J. Diaz, Z.

Franco & B. Nastasi (Eds.), Praeger handbook of social justice and psychology: Vol. 3. Youth and dis- ciplines in psychology (pp. 75–90). Santa Barbara:

ABC-CLIO/Praeger.

Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validitiy of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 177–195.

doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.003.

Nastasi, B. K., Schensul, J. J., Tyler, C. L., Araujo, R., DeFalco, K., & Kavanaugh, M. (2000). The New Haven social development program: Social problem solving-cooperative education, Grade 6 Curriculum.

Hartford: The Institute for Community Research (Developed in collaboration with New Haven, CT, Schools Social Development Department).

Nastasi, B. K., Moore, R. B., & Varjas, K. M. (2004).

School-based mental health services: Creating com- prehensive and culturally specific programs. Wash- ington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcock, J. H., Varjas, K., Jayasena, A., Sarkar, S., Moore, R. B., et al. (2010). School-based stress and coping program for adolescents in Sri Lanka: Using mixed methods to facilitate culture-spe- cific programming. In K. M. T. Collins, A. J. Onwueg- buzie & Q. G. Jiao (Vol. Eds.), Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches. The research on stress and coping in edu- cation series (vol. 5, pp. 305–342). Charlotte: Infor- mation Age Publishing.

Nastasi, B. K., Jayasena, A., Summerville, M., &

Borja, A. P. (2011). Facilitating long-term recov- ery from natural disasters: Psychosocial program- ming for tsunami-affected schools of Sri Lanka.

School Psychology International, 32, 512–532.

doi:10.1177/0143034311402923.

Rempel, G. R., Neufeld, A., & Kushner, K. E. (2007).

Interactive use of genograms and ecomaps in family caregiving research. Journal of Family Nursing, 13, 403–419. doi:10.1177/1074840707307917.

Summerville, M. (2013). The ecomap as a measure of psychological well-being: Results from primary school children identified as at-risk for psychologi- cal distress. Master’s thesis. Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

33

3

Psychological Well-Being in