Individualised Care and Rehabilitation
14.13 The Individualised Rehabilitation Process and Transitions in the Care Trajectory
In the contemporary fragmented healthcare, a major challenge for individualised rehabilitation is the threat to the continuity of the rehabilitation process. To develop respect and trust takes time and to start fresh in new contexts is demanding and
information may be lost in the transition between caregivers. Effective team work requires openness and mutual respect and the sharing of information and documents between all involved. This calls for the development of strategies to strengthen the individual through the transitions in the continuum between caregivers in the reha- bilitation process, and it emphasises the importance of rendering support and coach- ing of the individual in assuming responsibility for the own rehabilitation process.
References
1. Coran JJ, Koropeckyj-Cox T, Arnold CL. Are physicians and patients in agreement? Exploring dyadic concordance. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(5):603–11.
2. Tistad M, Ytterberg C, Tham K, et al. Poor concurrence between disabilities as described by patients and established assessment tools three months after stroke: a mixed methods approach.
J Neurol Sci. 2012;313(1-2):160–6.
3. Wade DT. Stroke: rehabilitation and long-term care. Lancet. 1992;339(8796):791–3.
4. World Health Organisation. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO;
2001 http://www.who.int/classifications/. Accessed 3 Oct 2017.
5. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science.
1977;196(4286):129–36.
6. Wade DT, Halligan PW. The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come.
Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):995–1004.
7. World Health Oragnization. How to use the ICF. A practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); 2013. http://www.who.int/classifica- tions/drafticfpracticalmanual.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
8. Wade DT, Halligan PW. Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems?
BMJ. 2004;329(7479):1398–401.
9. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
10. WHO. Milestones in health promotion statements from global conferences, Geneva; 2009.
http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/. Accessed 3 Oct 2017.
11. Eriksson M, Lindström B. A salutogenic interpretation of the Ottawa Charter. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(2):190–9.
12. Lorig K, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mecha- nisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.
13. Wade DT, Smeets RJ, Verbunt JA. Research in rehabilitation medicine: methodological chal- lenges. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):699–704.
14. von Koch L, Holmqvist LW, Wottrich AW, et al. Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descrip- tive study of an individualized intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(6):574–83.
15. Rogers C. Significant aspects of client-centered therapy. Class Hist Psychol. 1946;1:415–22.
16. Wang C, Burris M. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assess- ment. Health Educ Behav. 1997;3(3):369–87.
17. Tham K, Borell L, Gustavsson A. The discovery of disability: a phenomenological study of unilateral neglect. Am J Occup Ther. 2000;54(4):398–406.
18. von Koch L, Wottrich AW, Holmqvist LW. Rehabilitation in the home versus the hospital: the importance of context. Disabil Rehabil. 1998;20(10):367–72.
19. Turner B, Fleming J, Ownsworth T, et al. Perceptions of recovery during the early transi- tion phase from hospital to home following acquired brain injury: a journey of discovery.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21(1):64–91.
20. Rasmussen RS, Ostergaard A, Kjaer P, et al. Stroke rehabilitation at home before and after discharge reduced disability and improved quality of life: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(3):225–36.
21. Kristensen HK, Tistad M, von Koch L, et al. The importance of patient involvement in stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157149.
22. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation.
A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol. 2002;57(9):705–17.
23. Flink M, Bertilsson AS, Johansson U, et al. Training in client-centeredness enhances occu- pational therapist documentation on goal setting and client participation in goal setting in the medical records of people with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(12):1200–10.
24. Bertilsson AS, Ranner M, von Koch L, et al. A client-centred ADL intervention: three-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(5):377–91.
25. Guidetti S, Ranner M, Tham K, et al. A “client-centred activities of daily living” intervention for persons with stroke: one-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med.
2015;47:605–11.
26. Bertilsson AS, Eriksson G, Ekstam L, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial of a client- centred, activities of daily living intervention for people with stroke: one year follow-up of caregivers. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(8):765–75.
27. Bertilsson AS, von Koch L, Tham K, Johansson U, et al. Client-centred ADL intervention after stroke: significant others’ experiences. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(5):377–86.
28. Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJ, et al. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD009727.
29. Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):352–61.
30. Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, et al. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ.
2015;350:g7818.
31. Doig E, Fleming J, Kuipers P, et al. Clinical utility of the combined use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Goal Attainment Scaling. Am J Occup Ther.
2010;64(6):904–14.
32. Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating compre- hensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968;4(6):443–53.
33. Kiresuk TJ, Lund SH, Larsen NE. Measurement of goal attainment in clinical and health care programs. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1982;16(2):145–53.
34. Moorhouse P, Theou O, Fay S, et al. Treatment in a Geriatric Day Hospital improve individual- ized outcome measures using Goal Attainment Scaling. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):9.
35. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82–7.
36. Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, et al. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61(4):191–7.
37. Yang SY, Lin CY, Lee YC, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(3):548–55.
38. Asenlof P, Siljeback K. The Patient Goal Priority Questionnaire is moderately reproducible in people with persistent musculoskeletal pain. Phys Ther. 2009;89(11):1226–34.
39. Gustavsson C, von Koch L. A 9-year follow-up of a self-management group intervention for persistent neck pain in primary health care: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res.
2017;10:53–64.
40. Bring A, Asenlof P, Soderlund A. What is the comparative effectiveness of current standard treatment, against an individually tailored behavioural programme delivered either on the Internet or face-to-face for people with acute whiplash associated disorder? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(5):441–53.
41. Kim H, Xie B. Health literacy in the eHealth era: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(6):1073–82.
42. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
43. Yu L, Norton S, McCracken LM. Change in “Self-as-Context” (“Perspective-Taking”) occurs in acceptance and commitment therapy for people with chronic pain and is associated with improved functioning. J Pain. 2017;18(6):664–72.
44. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev.
1977;84:191–215.
45. Bandura A, Adams NE, Beyer J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35(3):125–39.
163
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 R. Suhonen et al. (eds.), Individualized Care,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89899-5_15 M. Stolt
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland e-mail: [email protected]