68 1
1394
# $%
107 - 95
! "# $#
&1
! '(
*2
&
+ ' , $# - &3
/ + (
4
1 . 2+
3 4 5
6 7
'8 9 7 :
-+ & "! ; <
2 . '8 9 7 = > ! :
-+ & "! ; <
3 . '8 9 7 = > ! :
-+ & "! ; <
4 . '8 9 7 = > -+
: -+ & 6$ 7(
) :
23 / 8 / 1392 - :
17 / 6 / 1393 (
6 ?@
*+, - ./ /0 1 2 3 2
4 56 * 7 89 3 :8;
<,
= # 5> * 1? 7 3 @9 5@ 1 A+B+6 3 2
CD . F
*+, / 3 2+GB H ? , * -
> * IJ * + K . $8* 2 -
@ K L9 # 7M
5J * F * 3 * 3 2 5 > / IN>
O P, I2 6 2 3Q
5 /@> ./ 7 .
I2 R@0
*+, / 3 2+GB * 5 8* F Q > S T -
IP 3 * @* 58U 0 V + 0 2
. @ +@W F /@
> / X :, Y 0 -
Z * */ B 3 @2
1371 1377 1381 1389 5@[N>
3 @6 3 @2 /
@N] F @ I@ +0 -
5 B ] ./
/ 5 , . 5N ^0 Y . $8* ^_*
3/
) 3 42 5@[N> 3 CD @2
( 5@7+ J @6 5J @* 3
3 @2
bM6 c]* F * 3 *
) 5J * H 3 @2 PD MPS ED LPI (ENN @*+, - J @*
- )R d @> @ Q@K
ArcGIS 9.3 (
@*+, 3 2+GB 2 G8>+1* 3 6 # L, * 5 51B c]*
- /@ 5@8U 0 V .
F@ H@% T e @8>
*+, G> > I2 R0 -
N] 2 G8>+1* 3 6 -
5 B ] ./
Z * 51B / 56 * U 3 2 5 *+, /; 3 2
5@8K
) N I QK MPS
ED I2 6 LPI
P (ENN I2 6 I2 @6 @> / 3+GB V @0
I Q@K /@ 3+@GB
>
* . + . 2 .
6 $ > = :
3 * F * 3 * 3A+B+6 # L, 3 * 1 V IJ *
.
Z+g ./ +>*
Email: jabbarian@ut.ac.ir
1 . 6/
Q9 5> @*
5@ 3 @2 @2
4 8@*+ 0 -
3 @6 # L, 3 /
F @* I@ +0
H@@ +7 @@1 4@@
@@
h = 5> @@* F@@ @@
3 @@2
@@* 1 A+@@B+6 )
Mondal & Southworth,
.(2010
3 6 # L, F /
F * I +0
*+, - 2 @ @,
<
# = 3 @* V O@; 8
F @@*
@@ ,
@@,
<
/@@ i 0 #j @@ $> H@@ K =
/@ @ , @ 3 1? 7 3 8U * 3 2 +86 K
* * 9
*+, - H +7 3 :8;
4@
/ 2 L, F I +0
5 /@ V
)
Tang
et al., 2008; Matsushita et al., 2006
(
,<
# = 48 *+6 1? 7 3 3
2
@@
5
@@ @@9 /@@> CD )
Costanza et al., 1997;
Dosskey 2001; Randolph, 2004
.(
@@
@@[> 5@@ H@@ , I Q@@K @@ 9 /@@
5 B K /T I Q6 , H B 3 @:8; 3 @2
@
2 @ 7 89 O@9+
@, /@
40 Z @*
I @ 9 58 CD
40 @$> +@ ?
/@T [> Q 40
/@ I Q@K /@%
)
Iranian Bureau of Statistics, 2011
.(
F Z T
+* 2 / 5
3j @ k @> H@ B
+@@@* @@@ 9 /@@@
@@@G 3 5@@@
H@@@ B
O@@* , F8@@@ />
@@@*+, - V Y 8@@@ D @@@ @@@2
U * 8 2 3 3 2 lK Q J, +, 2
@* . @6 /@ 0 /@ X )
Mozaffari & Ola
zadeh, 2007
.(
@@ IJ @@* . @@
@@
@@
5[N> 3 # 7M 3 @6 3 *
/ F @ I@ +0
I 0 3
V 8 3 +86 K Q > 2
5 > / 3/ ?6
m+@ 3 3Q
Y b @* F@ + 3 @ 3 @ 3 @2
V I 0 3 * 1 V @* ./@ . 5 *+, 2
)
Zhang et al., 2002
.(
Y 3 @@* 1 V 3 @@2
Y . D # L, @ 3 @2
@ 0 - I @,
1
1. Spectrum based
Y 5N ^0 3 2 /@> ; 3/
)
Tang et
al., 2008
.(
Y
@@ 3 @@2
@@ 0 - 8@@[ I @@,
V /> 6 F * 3 2 * @2
5[N> 9 2
23 + @* D Q B >V / > 5> / X
5@@[N> o@@ $,
@@ . $8@@* @@2 +@@
. @@9 U
Y 3 2 0 - 5 I ,
3 # +%
) @ (
* # @ L, , @ p
qP@[ # @ L,
@@
@@ 6 / /@@> # @@ L, @@ 2 5@@ 9+@@, .
Y 5@N ^@0 3 2 H@% F@ @ Q@ > 3/@
42 56 /> +8*
+0 5@[N> >
5@N 3 @2 3/@
./
@ r@?8P 3 @2 +@ > +@,
@
@6 5 @* F @ , # L, .
Y 3 @2
5N ^0 2 # L, D Q . M7 3/
@ qP@[ Q@ > # @ L,
+@
)
Tang et al.,
2008; Jensen, 1996
.(
+*
5J @* . $8@* G 3 3 @* 3 @2
F @@*
@@* H@@ ? , /@@ $ 3 Q@@
m @ T 5@ F @* I@ +0 > @1 # %+:U
@@
@@ V / )
Farina, 2006
.(
5J @@*
3 @@* 3 @@2
@@2 @@U F @@*
- 1980
@@
b @@*
@@ W>
-
/>/ 5s # 7M 3 +g, )
Herold et al., 2005
(
, 5 + 6 3 2
3 / 8 5? 9
/@
mV @ @ )
Amiri & Nakane, 2009
(
F @@@ I@@@ +0 3 @@@6 # @@@ L, @@@
)
TalebiAmiri etal., 2009; Fitcheraet al.,
(2012
F @@* /@@
)
Mitsova et al.,
(2009
G8@@ /@@ @@
. # @@ T 3 @@2
I@T )
Jackson et al., 2005
( o @ F @ ,
8t @@$T )
Sheikh Goodarzi et al., 2012
(
. $8*
/@
. /@>
. 5J @* F @ i 2 3 @* 3 @2
H@@ ? , r @@%+, /@@ , /; 3 Q@@ F @@*
3 6 # L, /
m+ 3 I +0
/>+
5 9 U / > +, 3 @* @ L, 0 3 2
/ 6 1 V 2 .
5@ 9 F@
# @ B ] @2
* 2 / H ? , 3 >+D >+D /
. /@>
V u @@ , +@@ @@U @@ @@2
K 3 2/@@
2. Map algebra
97
I @ 8 9 3 * 8*
270 @$> Q@2
@ @ 5>j @* /@ k >
88 / 2 /@%
. 3 @
3 * 5>j * *+8 9
/ 18 -9 8> * @D
>j @* D/> v+ J -
I @ V 500
@?
@8
Iranian Bureau of Statistics, 2010
.(
+9
. u+@]U 8 @% 3 2 Q@6 , Q@ > F@2V
@, @* ./@ O@9+ @ F 3 Q6 +@ 7 5 V Q6 3 *
/@ 6 @ w, +@U . G 9 , )
Toolaei &
.(
/ 56 * *
3 * 5 +@U
5 *+, # L, 3 +D
+@ 0 3 @* @
o I 0
@* > / 3 2
/ F I +0 5
# L, x+:U
@@N] 2 G8>+1@@* 3 @@6 -
5@@ B ] ./@@
T . H1 5 250
812 Q2
8 +? 6 ( ]N>
- @; >+> @6 Q@6 @
Z+
05 / 53 y @7 ; @ 55
/ 36
:, /9 / @ /@ 3 @2+GB ,
5@@ B ] ./@@
@@
5 @@* +@@U +@@
.
/ 2 N]
- 5 B ] ./
* .
$ % &' (%
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, %
Miller et al., 1998; Yang & Lo,
:8; 3 2 3
- 7 89 )
Tang et
al., 2005; Kong
( @* H ? ,
48@@ * @@ +0 z 3 @@2
/@@ i 0 3 @@
@ @ 3 5@? 9
G@[2 R0 3 I 0 Hs -@
/@
@* @ @ @t $T )
Turner et al.,
I2 R@0 F@
5@
@* +@W
@> / X @:, 3 @* @ # L, -
. +2 @
3 @2 1371 1377 1381 1389
- , [N>
- 3 6 / I +0 F @*
./@
Q@ @* H@ ? , 5@
3 @* @ F * 3 * D/ 51, )
@
5J * 3 F @* 3 * 3 2
@*+, Q F , -
/@ 6 0 V
51B c]* R
( + 58U 0 .
B= =
6 Q@6 Q > /> 8* Q6 I @ 8 9 3 * 8*
@ @ 5>j @* /@ k >
3 * 5>j * *+8 >j @* D/> v+ J * )
Bureau of Statistics, 2010
z . u+@]U 8 @% 3 2 @, @* ./@ O@9+ @ F 3 Q6
X Z+
+@ 7 5 V Q6 3 *
/@ 6 @ w, +@U . G 9 ,
Khazaei, 2006
.(
J>V / 56
5 *+, # L, 3 +D
> V o
3 6 # L, /
@@N] 2 G8>+1@@* 3 @@6 / T . H1 5
) v 9 8 +? 6
3 * ) Z+
B ( :,
@@N]
- 5@@ B ]
H1 1 [>
/ 2
56 1 . 89 : 2 , 9 0&
:
$ % &' (%
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, %
1 A+@B+6 )
., 1998; Yang & Lo,
(2002
:8; 3 2
., 2005; Kong et al., 2007
./
* . 48@@ * @@ +0 z
=V - *+, @ @ 3
G@[2 R0 3 I 0 Hs @* @ @ @t $T
(1993
. F I2 R@0 F@
@> / X @:, 3 @* @ # L, Z * */ B 3 @2
, / . $8*
- , [N>
-N]
5 B ] ./@
51, 3 @* @ F * 3 * D/ 51,
57+ J . $8*
5J * 3
bM6 c]*
( @*+, Q F ,
) J * . $8*
-
R
2 . B= =
1.2 . /C7 5 C 6
5 3 * -BQ
Q@6 Q > /> 8* Q6
2.2 . 6
I2 R@@0 F@@
@@
@@:, @@ $ 6 b @@*
+2 b 8*
+9 */ B F8 />
I@ +0
N] 3 -
5 B ] ./
+9+
3
5[N> % :, Y 0 H% T 3 2
/@@ , 4 { U +@@:, . @@
Z @@*
3 @@2 1371 1377
1381 1389
/@@ m @@P8>
) Z /@@9 1 .(
^17 F i 2 Z @* +2 3 2
1373 +@:,
. +2 @@
# _@@* 3 4
F@@
1377 u @@N>
. G8@* @*+, ./
Z @* GPS
3 @2
1383 1389
5@@[N> @@% @@ 3 @@
3 @@2
/ . $8* :, Y 0 H% T .
< &=
1 . 0 +/ >3 ? >@A 0 1(% $
0&
0 +/
0& B %
CD E
F 3
$& +G
$ H
*/ B ) 4 (
TM
35 / 163
USGS 1
29 U 1371 19 Fs A 1992
*/ B ) 5 (
TM
35 / 163
USGS
22 U 1377 12 Fs A 1998
*/ B ) 7 (
ETM+
35 / 163
USGS
9 U 1381 30 2002
*/ B ) 5 (
TM
35 / 163
USGS
7 U 1389 28 2010
3.2 .
1 B=
@N] 3 * /9 ^0 -
5@ B ] ./@
@:,
| > 9 3 2
3 2 ]U 5
+@9 ./@ V
F @@ . +2 @@ @@6 T d @@G 2
3 +@@:,
)
Alavipanah, 2003
( @@*/ 2 c @@:, H@@ 7
:, 5 V } ]> +W ; @ @2
@ @
/@ d J>
. @B +@W F /@
- 5@? 9/ X 3
9 - 5>+ > H 7 Z . $8@* :, 3 D
~@@ Q> Y /@@ . $8@@* 5 @@ 2 F @@,
.
#j @ . $8@* Q > ~ 8 + # :, 5s @*+, ./
Chander
@1 2 )
2009 (
@*/ B @:, /@ 2 H@ K +@9+ # 7M @K D # +%
. I @0 Z @ 7 ^@0 Y @0
@2
5N Y b * 3/@
Anderson
@1 2
) 1973 ( / , 5 N - 3 6 / F @* I +0
mV I +0 3 [6 2 G8>+1* 3 6 H 5@@N Y @@* @@ H@@G 9 3/@@
# @@N F@@ 5@@ @@:, Y @@0 3 @@ /@@ 2 / . $8*
. F / I@ +0 3 @* /9 3 @ +W
# @@$, qU @@ 3 @@[6 3 @@6 H@@G 9
1. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),EarthResourcesObservation and Science (EROS) Center, http://glovis.usgs.gov.
Z >
/ 2 D ) (NDVI
5> 8*V /T F , 2
/ . $8* 5N 2 3 .
qU ) (NDVI
1
qU 3 2 Z /8 2 @ D I@ +0 5@ u+
Q@ ; 3 2/@> . $8@* @ 5@6 * )
(Xred
~ Q> Q ; )
(Xnir
] . $8*
- 1
5 * +
)
Arnoff, 2011
.(
) 1 (
nir red
nir red
X X
NDV I = − X +X
H@S $, qU @ mV I +0 3 * /9 3 Z @@ >
/@@
mV ) (NDWI
/@@ . $8@@* 3
. F@@
Q @* 3 2/@> . $8@* qU )
Xgreen
(
~ Q> Q ; )
(Xnir
] . $8*
- 2
5 * +
)
Jafari et al., 2010
.(
) 2 (
green nir
green nir
X X
NDV I X X
= − +
5N Y 3/
F 8[
3 @ Q@ > Z 8T
@@ I@@ +0 2 G8>+1@@* 3 @@6 3 @@* /9 5[N> , / . $8* G /1 3 @6 3 @2
/ I@ +0
Z @@* F @@
5@@ , I2 R@@0 +@@ 3 @@2 +@@
.
5>+ >
2 G8>+1* 3 6 bM6 3 + V 3 2
2. Normalized difference vegetation index 3. Normalized difference water index
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, % 99
~ Q> Q ; /> o )
/>
4 ( @*/ B
o @ @ @? ; @ V o bM6 3 )
> U - FJ, ( F@ F@ / $* •>
/@ 5 , N NT G> O 6 , bM6 .
@ >
N - 5[N>
5N 3 2 3/@
Z @* ./@
3 @2
1389
; @[N> 3 2 -
Z @*
1381 @
u N> . $8*
. G8@* @*+, ./
GPS
Z * 1383 [N>
- Z * 1377 u N> . $8*
+@:, ./
+2 @ # _@*
4 Z @*
1377 ) - +K 1999 ( [N>
- 3 6 / Z @* I +0
1371 [N>
- K D+@0+, Z @*
1373 b @ N @
1:25000 )
5 , 5@[N> @* *+, ./
3 @
+[6 ( @* 3 ]U ^ , -
@?6 @%
/ H 1[, 0 6 O S .
N -
^0 5@N Y @1 3/@
3 @2
Y 0 H% T # L, 3 * 1 V 3 Z+
* 5> / X :, )
Tang et al., 2005
( 5@6
@ N V -
@[N>
- 5@N HN8@
3/@
/@
3 6 / Q@ # @$8 @ F I +0
bM6 2 L, 3 6
/ bM@6 5@ F @ I@ +0
@@ 5 @@* @@G +@@
)
Yang & Lo, 2002
.(
F ^0 - , 5@[N>
3 @6 3 @2 /
I@ +0
3 H 7 F 42
5@[N> F@ 3 CD @2
Q@
N 2 # L, -
3 6 / 5N 5 F I +0 3
/ 5 * G .
5J @@* . $8@@*
F @@* 3 @@* 3 @@2
N 3 . F 8 -
F * 3 * S
o ; u , F8K 3 * Q
3 @@6 @@1? 7 8U @@* F @@
r@@?8P 3 @@2
@* F @* 3 @*
)
Karami & Feghhi,
.(2010
F@@
^@@0 Y @@6 @@ . M@@7
5N 3 H@ 7 3/
4@2 5@[N> 3 C@D @2
/ , 5 J * - J @* H @ F @* 3 @*
-
51B 46 , )
(PD
5 T 46 , 1
) (ED
?@% K 2
-
~ Q> */ ?;
5 @ 2 F , )
(ENN
/@> 3
1. Patch Density 2. Edge Dendity
3. Euclidean Nearest-Neighbor distance
51B *+8 )
(MPS
• Q qU 4
5@1B F @,
) (LPI
@@, /@@ . $8@@* 5
4 ?@@% @@%+:U
46 @, . /> H 2 G8>+1* 3 6 3 * 5 T /9
5 * D 8K +
. 5J * F @2
, 3 @ # B ] + 6 5@
@* +@W
O@; 8 # @= / DR # %+:U . $8* F * 3 * V /
* . )
Sun
et al., 2013; Aguilera et al., 2011; DiBari, 2007, Herold et al., 2005
.(
Z /@9 2 G> @ >
5J * r %+, . $8* 3 2
./
I2 R@0 F@
* . ^@@0 Y @@6 @@ . M@@7 F @@ i 2
5@@N 5J @@* $8@@* 3/@@
./@@ 3 @@2
-J * )R Sun et al., 2013
( @* 3 @ Q@ >
5@@ B ] -@@N] 3 @@ /@@ 3 @@2+GB ./@@
/ . $8*
. F @B 3 @ @ / 3 2+GB @
Z * F +K *+, 1995
/@ r @%+, 3
@* @ / v+> 5* H 56 / 5s )
Shi et al., 2012
.(
/@@ 3+@GB +@GB F @@B
6 >
@*
) H1@
2 r@B @ .(
5@ @> /@
F @* 3 @* 8U @* # L, +GB 56 . B @U 3 @lK ~@ V b *
7
5@1B @*+, 3 @ /; -1B ~ 3 @2
5 *+, Z L 58K +
. /@ 3+@GB F @
5 T /
83 * ) H1 2 m @ .(
F@
51B / 3+GB v+>
5 / /9 3 2 +9
./ V
51B - T +9 5 3 4 /; 3 2
/ V
> / 3+GB +GB F +*
* 9
) H1@
2 @
‚ ( 51B V 56 5 *+, 3 2
58K 5 Q@J # +%
51B /; 3 2 @ 5 *+,
/@
)
Shi et al.,
2012; Xu et al., 2007
.(
H1@@
2 3 @@2+GB
5*
[> - *+, -> D /2
.
4. Mean Patch Size (AREA-MN) 5. Largest patch index
6. Infilling 7. Gap/ Hole 8. Edge-expansion 9. Outlying
< &=
2 . 2B % E K+3 0 1(% $ /
0&
) UMASS, 2012 (
K+>G
% 2B % N+'
29
&O P(
. />
• Q qU F ,
51B
( )
ijmax max a ( )
A 100
/%
aij = 1B T - )ij m2 (
=A 8 D H6 F * 3 *
) m2 (
*+8 />
51B
n
i ai
n
∑=1
812 ai
= 51B T 2 G8>+1* 3 2 )
m2 (
=n 51B / , 2 G8>+1* 3 2
46 , 51B 46 ,
ni
( )( ) A 10000 100
/ , 100
812 ni
= 51B / , 2 G8>+1* 3 6 3 2
=A 8 D H6 F * 3 *
) m2 (
5 T 5 T 46 ,
E ( ) A 10000
/T / E
= T Z+
- 2 G8>+1* 3 6 )
(m
=A 8 D H6 F * 3 *
) m2 (
/9 D 8K -?% K
*/ ?;
~ Q>
5 2 F ,
ij h
8 hij
=
?% K - 51B G /1 2 G8>+1* 3 6 3 2
) (m
56 2 .
& $ /+4, :
E, ( ' Q R (
2 O
S $ ( '
5
* +W -
J * / 3 2+GB -
R
d @>
Q@K
ArcGIS
@K 5 @*+, .
F@
> 5J *
) 5 T ( 51B 56 2 5
D ,
58K 5 *+, 5@1B F@ z 8@[ />
@ @2
51B 5 * /; 3 2 / 6
) ] - 3 .(
) 3 (
lc
R = l
5] F @1B @ l
- 5 @*+, 5@8K
lc
51B z 8[
3 2 5 @*+, 5@1B 5@8K
3 @2
@ L8 ~@ @, $% V N 56 * /;
* . 3 5J * F N 5i> X b * F
51B 3 2 5 *+, @ /@ 3+GB + $% 58K
* >
. , $% N 5
/ 0 5 @ T /@
3
N 5 / 0 , 1 @ @[> @> /@
/@2
)
Sun et al., 2013
.(
I2 R0 F
3 . +2 :, Y 0 3
d >
QK
ENVI 4.8
+W 5
* - 5J @*
@2
d >
QK
Fragstats 4.1
*+, 3 - J @*
-
R
d >
QK
ArcGIS 9.3
/ . $8*
.
3 . D! +
1.3 .
B E
N] 3 * /9 -
5 B ] ./
. +2 :, 3
Z * I 0 I2 R0 + 3 2 Y 0
5@ B 3 @2
@ ~@ 8 + c @:, */ 2 c :, H :, 3 / d J>
. @*/ 2 # :, d J>
?6 ~ 8 + -
@]U @ F G> :,
1
8 6 4 / 0 # @:8P 48@ * 5 UTM
39
1. RMSE
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, % 101
3+l 48 * B
WGS 1984
@9 F
Z+?* Y />/@ m , N 5 2
. @ ^_@*
w6 /T 8? K Z 7 / 2 Y . $8*
3
* 3
5@[N> ./@ Y @0 @ > @:, 3 3 @2
3 @@6 / />/@@ 5@@ , F @@ I@@ +0 .
H1@@
3
Z /9 3 5[N>
3 6 3 2 /
e @8> F @ I@ +0 V %
[> 2 /2
. e @8> b *
5
* @[N> ./@ V -
3 @6 / Z @* F @ I@ +0
1389 1377
@ ?6 % 0 6 O S
90 94 /%
85 89 /%
5 ,j O , , F
F 0 5N % F , /> [> 3/
.
56 3 . 2A8'
$ - $ / /
$ % ) U +V
< &=
3 .
0 +/ >3 W V K 8
$
< % V - X Y (%)
[- K (%)
1389 90
94
1381 87
92
1377 85
89
1371 89
92
2.3 . F G ? 4
6 * 3
2 G8>+1*
Z @*
1371 @, 1389
I 7500 812 5@8K I QK @*
5@6 @ F
/N /T 2700 812 H% T L,
3 @6 @6 5@ 3 @[6
3 2 G8>+1@*
/@@T 4800
@@812 H@@% T L,
@@
I@@ +0
@@
5@@
@@6 3
2 G8>+1*
. +
* . 8[
F Q / 3 @6
2 G8>+1*
]N
>
1371 @, 1377 ) /@
B *
>
- 526
812 Z *
( @8 6 F V
]N
>
1381 , 1389 ) / B@*
>
- @ @
325
@@812 Z @@*
(
@@
5 58@@*+ 0 v+@@;
@@*
.
Z /9 3 2 4 5 6 ~ 2 H / , H% T e 8>
3 6 # N /
@G # @N 5 F I +0
5@
> @ @N O@ , , 1381
@ 1389 1377 @
1381 1371 @ 1377 [>
/2 .
< &=
4 . 3
\ P3 -
$ / U +V )
) (6/
( ' 98 1381
] 1389
1381 1389
$ A-
0 4('+6%
54 =
R^
3 [6 196365
960
2041
409
3116
. G8>+1*
84
20627
0
0
112
HG 9 2250
0
14932
0
0
mV 591
0
0
313
16
4148
1836
0
0
2200
< &=
5 . 3
\ P3 -
$ / U +V )
) (6/
( ' 98 1377
] 1381
1377 1381
$ A-
0 4('+6%
54 =
R^
3 [6 196771
759
1629
481
2981
. G8>+1*
30
19129
0
0
71
HG 9 3040
0
15553
0
0
mV 364
0
0
439
0
2686
935
0
0
5132
< &=
6 . 3
\ P3 -
$ / U +V )
) (6/
( ' 98 1371
] 1377
3.3 . H:: $<
+ ?:: :: ::
IJ KC
5@@N ^@@0 Y . $8@@* ^@@0 3/@@
3 @6 # @ L, 3 * 1 V /
F @ I@ +0
Z * 3 2 ./
?6 - d @> 5 :, Q@K
Fragstats 4.1
5J * 3 2
PD ED ENN
MPS
@N 3 LPI
- 2 G8>+1@* 3 @6
/ 5 * bM6 c]*
. H1@
4 /@> G> @ >
5J * ~ 2 # L,
* 2 . 4.3
. H:: $<
+ ?:: :: ::
? KC
b * 8>
e H% T J *
- ]N R
>
1371 @ 1377
@@
8@@[
F
@@ >
/@@ 3+@@GB
@@>
) 68 / 3 /@@%
5 / 19
@@812 Z @@*
(
8 6 F @ Q /@ 3+@GB @>
) 53 /@%
5 / 284 812 Z *
( 59 + . + @*
. F@
@@]N 5@@6 @@* B @@T
> @@
1381 @ 1389
8[
F >
/@ 3+@GB @>
) 58 /@%
5 / 254 812 Z *
( 58@
@*
. F @ i 2
1371 1377
$ A-
0 4('+6%
54 =
R^
3 [6 197549
1258
3609
412
2479
. G8>+1*
78
15671
0
0
123
HG 9 2783
0
14984
0
0
mV 234
0
0
364
0
1977
2301
0
27
6151
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, % 103
@@]N
> @@
1377 @ 1381
@@8 6 F
@@ >
/@@ 3+@@GB
@@ @@ @@>
07 / 2 /@@%
) 03 / 0
Z * 812 (
@* . k .
H1@
5 @*
H1 3 / 3 2+GB ~ 2 6
+@ >
V > 1 / X > @ @]N @2
1381 @,
1389
* ./ qP[
.
56 4 . 2B % ? P3 + '
`H- a9% ) % $ % $ /
56 5 . O
$ /+4, 2%
' D :
&
U/ bV + ' 8
56 6 . + '
& c
$ /+4, ' 6 2%
' D :
&
' 98 1381
3 1389
4 .
L<
M +
=>
@ 5 B ] F 5
3 @* 1 V +@ K 3 D @6
57+ J 6 # L, 5J * 3
3 * 3 2
F *
@*+, 3 @2+GB * 5 -
3 @* @
8U 0 / 5 . F i 2 3 * 3A+B+6 K 2
3 @2+GB r @%+, 3 @ 5@1B c]@* F *
*+, - /@ . $8@* 2 G8>+1* 3 6 .
O@ 6 ,
H @ 5@ B ] F@ @9 U 5@* H% T e 8>
3 @@* 1 V
@@ B ] # @@ L, -
3 @@6 3 @@*
bM6 „+]* 2 G8>+1*
@[> 5@1B /@ 2
*+, -
~ +*
- 3 * 5 -@BQ • Q@
F @,
1B - N] 2 G8>+1*
- 5 B ] ./
* .
> ]N 3 * / 18
@ 5X D
B [2 6 k >
@*+, - 8@ 2 - 3Q@6 ) /@>
B Q>
J * - 51B 46 , (
2 @* . + . .
J @*
-
F @* 3 @* @ G 2 @:U 51B 46 , @@@*
F @@@0 @@@N I Q@@@K @@@[> V
./ 6 0 51, 2 G8>+1* 3 6 3
/@ 5@1,
F * 3 *
)
Sun et al., 2013
.(
I2 @6
5J * N ?@% K 5@1B 46 @, 3 @2
- @*/ ?;
~ Q>
I Q@K . @ 2 5@ 5 @ 2 F @, @N
5J *
• Q qU 5 T 46 , 3 2 51B F ,
J * - /> F G>
5 *+, [> 51B
I QK
T 51B 3 2 +@9+ 2 G8>+1@* 3 @6
N]
- 5 B ] ./
5 F@ @ 9 I Q@K H B
4@2 o +@9
)
Asgarian et al., 2014
(
V 51B V 56 @* +@9+ 3 @2
2 G8>+1
5 51B x+:U 42 3 2
+@9 8@ 2 - @ 3Q@6
3 * ./ d p G /1 />
+ > B :,
5 *+, 5
. V +9 />
.
Z+
5 B ] ./
@> /@ 3+@GB
I2 6 > / 3+GB
5@8K I Q@K @*
.
F v+S+
2 G8>+1* / Q6 , I2 6 G> >
. @@D /@@ /0 I Q@@K Q@@6 8 3 @@2
@@*+, -
* ./ 6 0 )
Xu et al., 2007
.(
@G 3+@*
+@@GB H@@% T 3 @@6 @@ L, 3
/@@
@@>
8[
F @ >
L, @ I@ +0 @
5@
@6 3
2 G8>+1*
F @*
@2+GB 3 /@
@
58@@
@@*
) I @@
60 /@@%
(…
B @@T 5@@6
8[
F >
L, 6 3 [6 3 5 6 3
2 G8>+1*
5 B H +GB 3 /
>
. + @*
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, % 105
) I 80 /%
( . F 5 59+, e 8>
+@ F
u 8*
+ 56
*+, - Z+@ 3 @* @
5 H B
|CT B U 3 2 lK /
)
> / 3+GB I2 6 (
@ +T * 5 -
@
) /@@ 3+@GB I Q@K @>
( 5@@X 2 O@ P,
F 8[
* Y 8 D Z T 3 [6 3 2 .
# B ] * d J>
./
/ > 5 F
B ] - 1 2 Sun
) 2013 ( R> +D
1
@@@@ B ] -
@@@@1 2 Shi
) 2012 ( @@@@
+ B
•> D F @X +[6 2
3/@> 3 @ /@
6 5 J, 5 +*
* . . @> /@ 3+@GB
Z * 5 B 3 2 F@
I2 R@0 @2
O@B p 3+@GB
*+, - @*+, I Q@K @ @Bj 5@6 + 3 -
@@B @@ ./@@ 6 0 5@@
H@@ B 5@@
3 D @@6
* * @*+, Z @8 6 5@ u+@ 3 2 -
./@ 6 0
Z * > / 3+GB /@ 3 @2
3 3+@GB 5@
@@*+, O@@B p -
H /@@ , 3 @@
@@*+, 5@@J 8>
-
* . G8>+1 . D 2 /@ Q6 8 3 2
. 5@9+, /@
56
† ; 8 > / 3+GB I QK /@@@ /0
@@@*+, - 3 /@@@ 8 # @@@= ./@@@ 6 0
b N 3 2
? 5@N]
3 > @ 9 @*
5@6
5? 9 F
# = +,
5 I QK D +BV
mV z U +2 I QK | @:
3A @>
/ /@[,
/ /0
3 # T Q9
L, 4 @?;
O@ P,
F 2 D I +0 3 @[6 3 @2
F @ i 2
# =
$ M*
@T @ 9 6 @*
2 . 6 )
Asgarian et al., 2014
.(
5X D # @ B ] @* H% T e 8> b *
3 @@* @@
2 G8>+1@@* 3 @@6 @@* @@W>
5 K 2 3 / /0 + 2
*+, - / 6 0 3 @
@* ./@[> 59 + )
Asgarianet al., 2013
( @B …
F @ +@ 6 5 W>
@ Q@6 B @U 3 @2
Q2 - . G8>+1@* U * 3 o @ F@
5@ QD 5 >
@ +T @2 -
U @* 3 @ @
@ L, v+@> Z @8 6 @ . M@7 V 5@6 . G8>+1*
3 6 5 3 [6 S O P, x+:U 5
H@ B
> / 3+GB I QK 51, 5 J
51, D/
5 +[> F * 3 * b T #/
+ .
REFERENCES
1. Amiri, B.J., Nakane. K., 2009. Modeling the linkage between river water quality and landscape metrics in the Chugoku District of Japan. Water resources management, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp: 931-956.
2. Aguilera, F., Valenzuela, L.M. and Botequiha-Leitao, A. 2011. Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 99, No. 3-4, pp:226-238.
3. Alavipanah, S.K., 2003. Application of Remote Sensing in the Earth Sciences (soil). Tehran university publication, Tehran, 478. (In Persian).
4. Arnoff, A. 2011. Remote sensing for GIS managers. Tehran univercity press, Tehran, 710 p. (In Persian).
5. Asgarian A, Jabbarian Amiri B, Alizadeh Shabani A, Feghhi J. 2014. Predicting the spatial growth and urban sprawl in Sari,
Iran using Markov Cellular Automata model and shannon entropy. Applied ecology. 3(6), 13-25.16
6. Asgarian, A., JabbarianAmiri, B., AlizadehShabani, A., Feghhi, J. 2013.
Assessment of urban sprawl in Sari:
Application of remote sensing and Shannon’s antropy index. 20st national geomatics conference. National Cartographic Center (NCC). (In Persian).
7. Chander C, Markham B, and Helder D.
2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors.
Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 893-903.
8. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V.,
1. Guangzhou 2. Lianyungang
Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387,253–260.
9. DiBari, J.N. 2007. Evaluation of five landscape-level metrics for measuring the effects of urbanization on landscape structure: the case of Tucson, Arizona, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3-4), 308-313.
10. Dosskey, M. 2001. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land.
Environmental Management, 28, 577–598.
11. Fichera, C.R., Modica, G. and Pollino, M.
2012. Land Cover classification and change-detection analysis using multi- temporal remote sensed imagery and landscape metrics. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 45,1-18.
12. Herold, M., Couclelis, H. and Clarke, K. C.
2003. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Journal of Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(4), 369–399.
13. Iranian Bureau of Statistics. 2010.
Statistical yearbook of Mazandaran
province, Available from
http://www.amar.org.ir/Default.aspx?tabid
=667&fid=11275 salname-02-98.pdf.
Accessed September 2012.in Persian.
14. Iranian Bureau of Statistics. 2011. Census of Population and Housing. Available on http://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/0/Files/abst ract/1390/sarshomari90_nahaii.pdf Accessed September 2012.in Persian.
15. Jackson, L.V, L. Laack, L.L. and Zimmerman, G.E. 2005. Landscape metrics associated with habitat use by ocelots in south Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69(2), 733-738.
16. Jafari, H.R., Hamzeh, M., Nasiri H., Rafii, Y. 2011. Developing decision tree and data mining based conceptual model for detecting land cover changes using TM images and ancillary data. Environmental sciences, 8, 1-19. in Persian.
17. Jensen, J. 1996. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective, 2nd edn, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
18. Karami, A., Feghhi, J. 2010. Investigation of Quantitative metrics to protect the landscape in land use by sustainable pattern (Case study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad). Journal of Environmental Studies, 60, 35-44. in Persian.
19. Kong, F., Yin, H. and Nakagoshi, N. 2007.
Using GIS and landscape metrics in hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan city, China. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 79( 3-4), 240–252.
20. Matsushita, B., Xu, M., and Fukushima, T.
2006.Characterizingchanges in landscape structure in the Lake Kasumigaura Basin, Japan using a high-quality GIS dataset,Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 241-250.
21. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J. 1995.
FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program forquantifying landscape structure, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR- 351. Portland, OR:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest ResearchStation.
22. Miller, A.B., Bryant, E.S. and Birnie, R.W. 1998, An analysis of land cover changes in the northern forest of new England using multitemporal Landsat MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(2), 245-265.
23. Mitsova, D., Shuster, W. and Wang, X.
2009. A cellular automata model of land cover change to integrateurban growth with open space conservation. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 99( 2), 141–153.
24. Mondal, P. and Southworth, J. 2010.
Evaluation of conservation interventions using a cellular automata-Markov model, Forest Ecology and Management, 260(10), 1716-1725.
25. Mozaffari, GH., Ola zedeh, A. 2008. A Study and Analysis of Physical Development of Saghez and it's Future Optimization Development with the Use of GIS. Journal of Environmental Studies. 47, 11-20.
26. Randolph, J 2004, Environmental Land Use Planning and Management, Island Press, Washington, DC.
) % $ % $*+,+- . / 0 1(% $ % 2 %+3 $ /+4, % 107
27. Sheikh Goodarzi, M., AlizadehShabani, A., Salman Mahiny, A., Feghhi, J. 2012.
Investigation of urban growth impacts on suitability of conservational patches using a landscape ecological approach (Study Area: Korganroud Watershed), Applied ecology, 1, 30-40. (In Persian).
28. Shi, Y., Sun, X., Zhu, X., Li, Y. and Mei, L. 2012. Characterizing growth types and analyzing growth density distribution in response to urban growth patterns in peri- urban areas of Lianyungang City.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(4), 425– 433.
29. Sun, C., Wu, Z., Lv, Z.,Yao, N. and Wei, J. 2013. Quantifying different types of urban growth and the change dynamic in Guangzhou using multi-temporal remote sensing data, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 409-417.
30. TalebiAmiri, SH., AzariDehkord, F., Sadeghi S.H., Soofbaf, S.R. 2009. Study on landscape degradation in neka Watershed using landscape metrics.
Journal of environmental studies. 6(3), 133-144. (In Persian).
31. Tang, J., Wang, L. and Zhang, S. 2005.
Investigating landscape pattern and its dynamics in Daqing, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, (11), 2259– 2280.
32. Tang, J., Wang, L., Yao, Z. 2008.
Analyses of urban landscape dynamics using multi-temporal satellite images: A
comparison of two petroleum-oriented cities, Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 269-278.
33. Toolaei, S., Khazaei, A., 2006. Spatial distribution of population in Sari province.
Geography. Vol. 11, pp: 125-142. (In Persian).
34. Turner, B. L. and Meyer, W. B. 1994.
Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspectiv, Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. UMASS, (2013), Landscape Ecology
program, Available
fromhttp://www.umass.edu/landeco/resear ch/fragstats/documents/Conceptual%20Ba ckground/Background%20TOC.
Html.Accessed 26th June 2012.
36. Xu, C., Liu, M. S., Zhang, C., An, S. Q., Yu, W. and Chen, J. M. 2007. The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landscape Ecology, 22(6), 925–
937.
37. Yang, X. and Lo, C.P. 2002. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23,(9), 1775–
1798.
38. Zhang, Q.,Wang, J., Peng, X., Gong, P.
and Shi, P. 2002. Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multi-temporal Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(15), 3057–3078.