بررسی پراکنش ویروس برگ بادبزنی مو در ایران با استفاده از روش‌های مایه‌زنی بر روی گیاهان محک، DAS-ELISA و IC-RT-PCR

:

*

! "# $%

E-mail: arezasalami@yahoo.com

!"#

DAS-ELISA IC-RT-PCR

$% &

' (

*1

!

$%

2 *%

!

*,

3 * .

4 / 0

1 2 3 4

!" # $

)

&' ( "

: 1 / 8 / 89 - . /0" ( "

: 6 / 2 / 90 (

23

&

4 5 6 7 /"

5 6 8

(Grapevine fanleaf virus-GFLV)

/

9 /:

; <

"

= 4

> #?: @ A : B @ & / #

C DE

F G HA I

"

H B /:

.

GFLV

K C 4 L @

?M

# / N

: & 4 /O @ IP Q/

: R M

S

= L / 8 A /$

5

T4B

@ P U = /$P @ /

V R W

&

.

W WB X =

5

> /PR H

@

=

" ; < 8 H

B P ! H B L / YZ <

/

&' > M @ P U .

? " Q/49 882

!: @ /4 B

! [ !F G / @

:

\

#?] ? 4 4F

R

? ?:

.

# ^ _

B

< "

0

` : YZ <

a C ] a

>

bc B

/ R B P

d/

P/aP/ b

> /PR

GFLV

@

204 @ /4

? K"

>

? . WB X = H<

> /PR =

@

GFLV

8

@ 5A B

" \ H B

?: _ 5> #?] !:

.

=

> /PR 5

=

@ /4

4F B

@ SZ #?: R

!:

G / 7

/ 63

?f / . 4"

@ /4 B

4F R

E ! !: #?:

? / 8 .

> /PR 5 S

=

8 / 1

"

1 / 43

g ?f

/ . h

#? _ H> $

=

" 8 H

B

YZ < S :

O @ @ ?

?

@4ZM 7 /"

i? / _ H> # /PR

@ '

?:

. 4

& $ 5 6 8 :

> /PR / ]Z"

j / k b

4 H b .

&6

& ' (

&

# )*

#

+, #(

-.#*, /. 0 12

#

&3 45 67' )' &

.

#9 : 3. )5 ;

< ' /= >? @ . 3. A .

% B @

C9 A

Martelli, 1993

) (.

@ ' @ .

& '

;' ' D#' E#7 @ #9 :

1

& ' @ #F

1. Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)

#

(Raski et al., 1983; Andret-

A .

Link et al., 2004)

.

;' ' D#' G # H , 3.

# I

2

G

# 5 . 0 3.

.

3 (Harrison et

A

al., 1971; Ward, 1993)

. .

@

/ J G #

K LM N4F 6( 5 O% '

P 6( 5

2. Nepovirus 3. Comoviridae

F #N$ % 80

(Hinkle, 1995)

J .

R9 .

.

@

*S T' G # U

F V F

Xiphinema index

. ' A . 47' W @ K LM 3.

9 -M X

)Q

CNF 2 ) $B 3. Y9 . ' #

: Z

(

&

A . LM

(Hewitt et al., 1958)

. 9W. )' 3

[4 @ .

' \ B -.# . & ' G #

( K . V F

A . )9] R9 . ^ R # )' LM

(Hewitt et al.,

1970; Zaki-Aghl & Izadpanah, 2003)

. _ .;K @ L .

3.

)' ^ '# -.# . & ' X 1970

!

&

(Vuittenez, 1970)

A .

Ghorbani

.

(1988) Parvizi

(1989) Pourrahim et al.

(2000) Zaki-Aghl &

Izadpanah (2003)

Bashir & Hajizadeh (2007)

Bashir et al.

(2007a,b)

; _ .;K (

#' * .

5 F K LM , - 9

( . a$97 ^ R &

-.#

#5 _ .;K .

.

@ _ .;K ( ' ) . #b c

5.#2

GFLV

K 5 F - 9 (

&

. a$97 dS -.#

' #e )' )5 ) $B V F

2 LM Z

_#9 K a$97 dS

' )9]

.

_ (

&

G # ( 74F P

#' f

G .

\ !%

)% ; ,

(Leonhardt et al.,

1998; Rumbos et al., 2000

( J >0 ' /

g L . h 3

N R9 . )$ , N

)' >%

- ';

(

&

Y$%

(Hewitt et al., 1962; Rumbos et al., 2000)

G W 2

&

K ' i - (

(Leonhardt et al.,

h?

1998)

#'

#9NL. j N #N

(Bovey et al.,

1980)

_ ( L. - k ( h g L # &

(Bovey et

.;

al., 1980; Huss et al., 1986)

_ (

&

L NL

(

#*

.

(Fuchs et al., 1991; Harald et

-

al., 1996)

# Q 3 6 5.

3.# $2 &.

(RT-PCR)

(Minafra & Hadidi, 1994; Rowhani et al., 1995;

Izadpanah et al., 2003;

Zaki-Aghl & Izadpanah,

.

2003) IC-RT-PCR

(Wetzel et al., 1992 ;

Nolasco et al., 1993;

Acheche et al., 1999;

.

Fattouch et al., 2001)

' .

#(

. 3. h

@

.; ( U

*

74F AB .

3. l. 5 #( f

A . / Y9 : M .

3 mT )' ), F ' A45 #

c

9W. 45 [4

. @9]#K

@ . 3. G # 3. -.#

n#S . l % #b ] 5 Y9

:L : 3.

&

%

&

3.

G # (. K A 2 , l %

(

&

T #B ) .

&

k ( CNF AL : @ 9W. ) $B V F #

K LM . )' ' @

&

# A . = ' 45 .

.1L

B . d

@

W. G #

0 b . . ; -.#

k ( bL. @

&

U e )' -M 6 5.#2 3. A

X

' 5 F -M #94 - 9

(

&

,

#"

&

A . . .

@

#' U

, dS F A . . 6 5.#2

@

'

&

# .

k ( -.#

@ K LM -.;

)'

W. -M

GFLV

UF NF ' -. 9' F #K @

#' )

PJ W / %!S.

# B A d

#F

&

#9 5 A:, .

'

&

. AU 3 ' X

#5 %. -M #94 .

, )UL T -M 6 5.#2

GFLV

44 - 9 5 F

W. - 9 L : . a$97

dS - k ( -.#

o#5

/ . ' l#:, 3.#

. l Q . #:'. R )

12 A]#

. . UF X Q 882

)' Z N4 )

K LM '

!% )' ), F

#( p \

&

.#' _ .;K

&

.

@

G # F - k (

$N ' D#' & . 3 - ;

D#' (

D h q.3 AL W D#* G - 3 '

;* 3 & . ( F 5 3

#b (

- a% r

#K (

- h F

) 0 ( 90. N l % -

)*W ( S F #0. . F V . . '

- 9 1385 c , M &

. . UF 3 - 2 E 79 . )F ' #( 3. )0 .

) $B (

&

:F ) F >74 ,. N 9 !2 ) 5 P0.

P? / >97 t F P *B 3.

) . #'

\B l &

- 9 5 F hL l 9]#K .#B - 9 L :

. ) $B ( )'

) /

&

4

?C

9]#K .#B HI

A45 ) .

. . L. - 3M 3. Y9 . ' :' P K LM .;

)'

GFLV

882

#' )

A]#K .#B .

.

.#' 3

&

L. - 3M I 5 3. .;

b

:F

#K ) .

DAS-ELISA

- 3M

P UL. 9 d' T

. 9 . 3. Y9 . '

M 9

& '

AS-0205 (DSMZ)

' A]#K l Q . .#NF

(Clark & Adams, 1977)

.

9 - 3M )Q .; L.

4i / J )' )$J ]

15

F

60

h( i )' .#9 ' $? - ;]. 3. U' )R B (

'

3. . K

#

&

% -.;

&

E1,

&

#(

3. h

h( i

S (

o 405 L. b9 #9

.;

UF -. 0

(Van Regenmortel & Dubs, 1993)

@ .

) (

O.D.

)5

#'.#' PB. W : M b

O.D.

@

Y #9 5 )

#e LM ) -. % )' '

)9]#K .

!"#

$%& ' ( '

)*

W #( 3.

. , PB. W ) L. - 3M )5 )

.;

6 5.

#' .#NF ) ' E 79 . ' . - 4 A*C

&

K h? - (

Chenopodium amaranticolor

Gompherena globosa C. quinoa

:i )$W#

K#' )

3 .

>% #] ' K

#

&

/ Y ] #] '

92

\ 1 / 0

pH

' = 2 / 7 ' .

>% A:, K

#

&

. R K#' A] ' 3. l#K h w 2

$

#9 L #] '

K >%

#

&

Y9 . # .

D#' (

&

' 79 . .#'

&

) 3 .1K A !% . Z '

&

. .#'

&

) 3

mT . 9'.

D#' ( 5 . . R ' 0 EM

H2 H

2 3.

5 . . R -

#' l . '#5 2

&

' : M

#' >% )' * A4b . 3. Y9 .

&

D#' ( L

. HI D#' (

&

) 3

#, '

! - EM \

)9 . i ( -. % )' - ( 3. \L D#' @

K ' l . '#5 2 : F / Y ] #] ' )$

) 3

. ) 3 K .# h? - ( V

)' h 0

R9 3.

Q . m*J l b ( E 9]M \

. l

@

K - (

&

24

?C

- 22

* A' S 60

- 50

. :b J

&

3 #' ( 4 e )'

\ !%

3 #(

3 ' .

!"#

(

+ ' ,

IC-RT-PCR

IC-RT-PCR

R9 #K3 <M 3. Y9 . '

433V

\

GFLV-CP 5'-GAA CTG GCA AGC TGT CGT

)

AGA AC-3'

( G NU #K3 <M

912C GFLV-CP 5'-

)

GCT CAT GTC TCT CTG ACT TTG ACC-3'

(

A]#K / J

(Izadpanah et al., 2003)

. . 9'.

9 M

& '

AS-0205

J F A* )'

#] ' )

4 2 B

d 100

L #N - -M 3. #9

E F (

&

#9 .

PCR

P

\QW ' 2 / 0 $

#9 L )97

. F HI E ( / )'

% F ' N . A

&

37

?C

49 3. U' . .#B

&

' : M

PBST

#] ' 100 L #N

>% 3. #9 (

&

K ( :F )

o.#79 . #] ' ' L.

#K )] ". -M - )' .;

E F (

+ h

&

4

?C

9]#K .#B .

3. U'

49

&

#] ' ' Q A0 6 5. ^ $7

PBST

P

cDNA

5 / 0 2 G NU #K3 <M N

912C

GFLV-C RT buffer

× 1 5 / 0 $

DTT

= 500

^ $7 = #N

dNTPs

20

RNase inhibitor

W.

Roche

) (

#K )] ". -M )' / )'

B )R

&

72

?C

#F b9

#$N ) I 5 ' . ( .#B

)' 6( 5 ' HI A]#K 42

?C

. R 100 W.

; M

\ G NU 3 9I #N #F

(Roche)1

6 5. ^ $7 )'

)] ".

. .#'

&

cDNA

;9

&

42

?C

/ )' 60

B )9]#K #e )R .

Q 3 6 5.

# .

&

$2 3.#

'

: \QW 25

L #N P #9

PCR buffer

× 1 5 / 1

$

MgCl2

= 200

= #N

dNTP

^ $7

Roche

) ( 4 / 0 2

#( N

(#K3 <M 3. h

&

GFLV-CP

912C 433V

GFLV-CP

w 2 L #N

cDNA

#9

h W.

; M

Taq DNA Polymerase

\

Roche

) ( ' .

V .#

/ J )'

PN h

)R B .

&

&

94

?C

35 PN

?C

P 94 / )' 60

y )

A # . )$W#

3

&

51

?C

)' / 45 y

?C

) 72

/ )'

45 y )

PN h A :

72

?C

)'

/ 10 Y9 . ' )R B 3.

#$N #F

#K l Q . .

' PCR - .*

-/ 0 %

: >?

3 KM g

PCR

2 / 1

%

#] '

×

1

TAE

A' y g 9L 70

3 ] #9NL. AL .

. .

)UTB '

#b 4 3. Y9 . ' ; . 9 .

DNA

5 h 3 ' AY, $

&

(1 Kb DNA ladder)

UF

@ .

M {

;

&

g ' F.

#' l A]#K l Q .

:

6Y ' |. V F Z. g b9 A

3 N M

&

>F :F g #

#K ) .

7# 8

!%

)5 )

(

&

c , M

&

mT 3.

44 W. - 9 L : - 9 5 F . a$97

-.#

1. M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase

$N ' P F % D#'

(

& . 3 - ' ; F

' D#' )

PN 1

A

- .(

0#' 3.

) ( (.

&

3.

- a% r

#K ( R$W )NL

&

) PN 1

B

- (

K D#*

.

&

) PN 1

C

- ( k ( q.3 3 #' @ h

9 h ) PN 1

D

- ( .

:p

!%

X 9 \

' V*F#

)k M (

GFLV

}!*B ' _ .;K

5 W , 3.

) (

&

a$97 G # 5 F - 9 (

&

. ' -.#

(Zaki-Aghl & Izadpanah, 2003)

.

PN 1 - ) )' K LM \ !%

;' ' D#' G # a$97 & (

A

. ( D#' AL W # ~F D#* G - 3 ' PN )' (

a Y0 h q.3 \ !% ' .# ( ; F Z G#r ) W ' -;' ' (

B

b9] #] 3 & R$W )NL \ !%

E L d % & (

& (

LM D#' (

C

D#' & . D \ !%

LM & ( (

D

D#' h q.3 \ !%

LM & ( .

) 3 ) . ,

& ( ' 79 . 3 #' )' #Q

!%

\

K LM

#'

&

K

C. amaranticolor

- (

G. globosa C. quinoa

#K .

\ !%

K LM 8 - 7

3. H2 3 )

3 CNF - ';

#

&

. 12 3

3. H2 )

3

C. quinoa

K #( p

Bashir

.

et al.

(2007b)

3.

15 3. H2 3 )

3 D#'

& (

C.

quinoa

\ !%

K LM

GFLV

)'

#5 ( 4 . .

\ !%

&

C. amaranticolor

F % / J )' :p

)NL

& ( 3 . L 0

~F { l#] # D#' ( ' ) PN 2 .(

D#'

& ( ) ' 5 )'

2 ? . n#S h

#5 .

*S PN U . A 3. . 0 .

\ !%

K LM

G. globosa

K 3 #$5 P

9

% T' h

2 k K D#' ( ' . F #$5 ^ R 3. H2 h

7 - 8 )' 3

#' { 3 F @ ;* ^ R M ; #B {

&

D#' (

#( p .

. #' !%

0#' @ 3.

) (

D#'

& ( ) 3 LM >% '

G # AL W

$N ' 9]#K 0 )' n N

& (

% R D#' (

) PN 3 .(

!%

( 4 \

&

K

C. quinoa (Izadpanah et al., 2003)

n Y P

K -

D#*

( 3 #' )NL

& ( F #$5

$N ' h

D#' ( ' ) PN 4 .(

L. - 3M .;

K LM A . F ; )'

;' ' D#' G # .

K R$F h? - (

' m

>%

G # ( - 4 .

L. - 3M E1, / .;

R9 )T'.

!% / ' \

#5 3 #' \ )

(

A . . V 9 E1, -.;

)

& ( LM 4 / 2

#'.#'

)

& ( ' \L .

PN 2 - D#' G # )' K LM \ !%

K ;' '

Chenopodium amaranticolor

)NL :p / J )'

& (

h F #$5 D#' m R$F 3. H2 3 AY( K aB F (

G # )' LM D#' >%

.

A B

C D

PN 3 - ;' ' D#' G # )' K LM \ !%

K

Gompherena globosa

J )' / D#' K k 2 :p (

)NL Q . { ; #B h F #$5 & ( n N

( d % &

D#' $N ' AL W (

>% m R$F 3. H2 3 A4(

G # )' LM D#' .

PN 4 - ;' ' D#' G # )' K LM \ !%

K

Chenopodium quinoa

D#' $N ' / J )' (

:p

)NL ( D#*K - n Y h F #$5 &

( 12 3. H2 3

)' LM D#' >% ' m R$F G #

.

3. Y9 . '

IC-RT-PCR

.#2 AY, (#

&

J >90.

.#'

&

K LM ,

GFLV

0#'

) ( ' )5 _

& (

$*B P' B

* )'

/ J W ' :p )

480 3 ' AY,

&

f74

(Izadpanah et al., 2003)

. L W @ ( )5 '

w

'

&

( )

) Y #9 5 (

#b ( 4

) PN 5 .(

9 G . #' . 3. PJ W w

#' @ K LM ,

)'

;' ' D#' G # 5 F

- 9 ( 0#'

L : - 9 (

&

. -.#

[F . K LM ;5.# #' !%

5 )

}!*B ' _ .;K K LM

. )'

@ W. G #

,

#: - k ( #b - 9

(

&

3#? R o#5

#K . 9 G . #' - 3M w

DAS-ELISA

' 3.

@ 882

) c , M

&

0#' 3.

W.

. X Q -.#

. UF 204 )' LM )

# ' ;' ' D#' G .

'

#94

@

; K LM -.

' / . ' - 9 #:

7 / 63

#K ( 4 J .

F )

(

&

c , M

&

% #:'. - 9 #: 3.

&

3.

' G # .

K LM -.;

' dS #

@ 8 / 1 F 1 / 43 J )

(

&

#'

~9 )9]#K .#B ' #

. _ .;K (

; $*B &

-.; @ #F= ' #b ' K LM

5 F - 9 (

&

- 9 #:

/ . '

(Zaki-Aghl & Izadpanah, 2003)

' .

@ k (

_ .;K G . #' - RR? # & (

W.

E#<

. -.#

3. ; K LM #e 3. RL ' ;5.#

GFLV

)'

(Bashir & Hajizadeh, 2007;

E ?

Bashir et al., 2007 a,b)

.

0#' 3.

) (

!% )i #K.

#( p \

&

K LM

GFLV

)' )' q.3 AL W •

F h

W - ; )

D#' ( - 3M 3. H2 . ' ( 4

DAS-

ELISA

R$F m

&

K

(. h? - (

&

*

#'

K LM A ' .

. UF

&

. 3.

@ ) (

&

K LM Z N4

#

IC-RT-PCR

V F [F

#K . . UF

&

K LM !J. #b 4 3#?

. 3.

n#S 0#' #b )

(

!% )5

#( p \

&

J 0

4 ( 4 : M K LM

V F - 3M (

&

DAS-

ELISA IC-RT-PCR

[F

#K . . X " @

9 )Q K•

(

&

€ 0

;' ' D#' G #

# G # (

&

k ( I H , b9 '. @

.

@

.# )' G #

? V T .#' € 0

&

!% 3 #' ' \

.

. )' 4 R?F . @ / R

; #b

A . _ .;K

(Zaki-Aghl & Izadpanah, 2003; Bashir et al.,

.

2007b)

. i F. ( 4 @ .

} ]#J )5 A . @ NF.

!% )'

#( p \

&

.#'

&

S.

A ! 3. - ) $B

(

K ] 5 - ( ' F #" A

NF 3.

h (

&

74F

>

- k ( = ' AB '

RT-PCR IC-RT-

.#'

PCR

&

[F K A ! CNF - (

#

&

)9]#K #:'

. 0#' 3.

) (

&

!% ,.

#( p \

&

K LM

)'

;' ' D#' G # K LM

# ( V F

•

. 3. h

@ _ ( [F 4 .

. . 9W.

!% @

\

K LM )' ^ '#

)' G # (

&

#b q # (

( * 5

&

1~F ) .

&

65 3#( a$%

2,4-

(

'

D (Bashir et al., 2007b)

.

PN 5 -

>? 3 ] #9NL.

IC-RT-PCR

>90. & (# .#2 ' ;' ' D#' G # J

433V/912C

)

GFLV-CP

.(

V0 10 - 1 :

) c , & ( -.# . a$97 W. 3. & M

M

.

DNA ladder

:

1 Kb

:

P

A*C ) :

N

Y ) .

9 . - 4 w

IC-RT-PCR

5 _ h M

.#'

&

74F K LM f )'

;' ' D#' G # '

.

. 5#F _ @

* NF 3.

h (

&

RT-PCR

_

L. h g L # R?F A . .;

' / R

&

e )'

G # 5 )'

$' B )9]#K A' y -M A

(Nolasco et al., 1993; Fattouch et al.,

A .

2001)

.

; . A NF @

_ )' A* h

RT-PCR

.

@

. l Q . ' )5 A . - 3M @

.#79 . )' 3

RNA

o

RNA

G # K P5 A . . G W )5

' 2

#N (

&

)' )5 G #

= h ) 9 M

& '

J >90.

h( i . , )' P>9

$2 #N A

E1, n 2. )L L

R9 .

}

A0 6 5. .

.

cDNA

' 6 5. ^ $7 )

L 2 P .

&

F #2 4 2 @

# l g = ' / .#W %. ' G

F #2 6 2 3. G #

? . ,

V

.#B 6 5.

K

# . 74F = ' AB f

G #

l Q . AL :

IC-RT-PCR

}!*B

A . _ .;K

(Wetzel et al., 1992; Acheche et al., 1999)

.

.

#' !% 6( •2 @ [F

$*B / .;K

LM € >0 K

0#' 5 F - 9 (

&

. )' -.#

G #

;' ' D#'

(Ghorbani, 1988; Parvizi, 1989;

Pourrahim et al., 2000; Zaki-Aghl & Izadpanah,

.

2003; Bashir & Hajizadeh, 2007; Bashir et al.,

.

2007a,b)

W.

,

&

. 6 5.#2 3.

@ G #

]#U E#7

#K . b ( . / .;K @ 9*

#'

5.#2 _#9 K . c

@ 5 F G # - 9

(

&

. a$97 dS -.#

' #e )' )5 '

#94

) $B V F 2

_#9 K a$97 dS LM Z

' )9]

. . . 3. _ .;K @

\: ‚ ?L @

-.#b 5 F )5 ' 5 - 9

( 3 mT A45 #

U 45 . . € >90. 0 )'

. . ]#S 3.

'

9W. )' ), F [4

. @9]#K

@ . 3. G # l % -.#

#F

?J w ] 5 m .#'

&

3. Y9 . :

(

&

(. K

%

&

' 3.

&

A 2 , l %

(

&

T #B ) .

&

CNF AL : #9 : ) ( 3. 45 ) $B V F #

K LM 9W.

. )'

@ '

&

# ' 6 5.#2

#94

W. -M ,

A . = ' 45 .

.#' ' @

B W. d

. LM

k ( -.#

- #5 f74 @

K LM -.;

bL.

&

. 6 5.#2

@ n. (. 3. )5 G #

. 3. AU e )' A . ' 6( •2 @ ' X

#94

5 F -M - 9

(

&

,

#"

&

. A . F - N . @

NF ' )5 #K \(.#]

PJ W / %!S. #' )

# A

B d

#F

&

. #9 5 A:, . ' @

&

# AU

3.

' X

#5 %. -M #94 .

REFERENCES

1. Acheche, H., Fattouch, S., M'Hirsi, S., Marzouki, N. & Marrakchi, M. (1999). Use of optimized PCR methods for the detection of GLRaV3: A closterovirus associated with grapevine leafroll in Tunisian grapevine plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 17, 31- 42.

500bp P

M N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2. Andret-Link, P., Laporte, C., Valat, L., Ritzenthaler, C., Demangeat, G., Vigne, E., Laval, V., Pfeiffer, P., Stussi-Garaud, C. & Fuchs, M. (2004). Grapevine fanleaf virus: Still a major threat to the grapevine industry. Journal of Plant Pathology, 86, 183-195.

3. Bashir, N. S. & Hajizadeh, M. (2007). Survey for Grapevine fanleaf virus in vineyards of north-west Iran and genetic diversity of isolates. Australian Plant Pathology, 36, 46-52.

4. Bashir, N. S., Nikkhah, S. & Hajizadeh, M. (2007a). Distinct phylogenetic positions of Grapevine fanleaf virus isolates from Iran based on the movement protein gene. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 73, 209-215.

5. Bashir, N. S., Zarghani, S. N. & Hejazi, M. S. (2007b). Diversity of Grapevine fanleaf virus isolates from Iran. Virus Research, 128, 144-148.

6. Bovey, R., Brugger, J. J. & Gugerli, P. (1980). Detection of Grapevine fanleaf virus in grapevine tissue extracts by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immuno electron microscopy (IEM). In:

Proceedings of the 7^th Meeting ICVG. Niagara Falls. Pp. 259-275.

7. Clark, M. F. & Adams, A. N. (1977). Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34, 475-483.

8. Fattouch, S., Mhirsi, S., Acheche, H., Marrakchi, M. & Marzouki, N. (2001). RNA oligoprobe capture RT-PCR, a sensitive method for the detection of grapevine fanleaf virus in Tunisian grapevines. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 19, 235-244.

9. Fuchs, M., Pinck, M., Etienne, L., Pinck, L. & Walter, B. (1991). Characterization and detection of grapevine fanleaf virus by using cDNA probes. Phytopathology, 81, 559-565.

10. Ghorbani, S. (1988). Identification of grapevine fanleaf virus in Iran. In: Proceedings of the 5^th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Kyoto, Japan: ISPP. 61.

11. Harald, P., Uwe, S. & Hans, J. G. (1996). Variation of viroid profiles in individual grapevine plants:

Novel grapevine yellow speckle viroid 1 mutant show alteration of hairpin I. Journal of General Virology, 77, 155-161.

12. Harrison, B. D., Finch, J. T., Gibbs, A. J., Hollings, M., Shepherd, R. J., Valenta, V. & Wetter, C.

(1971). Sixteen groups of plant viruses. Virology, 45, 356-363.

13. Hewitt, W. B., Raski, D. J. & Goheen, A. C. (1958). Nematode vector of soil-borne fanleaf virus of grapevines. Phytopathology, 48, 586-595.

14. Hewitt, W. B., Goheen, A. C., Raski, D. J. & Gooding, G. V. (1962). Studies on virus diseases of the grapevine in California. Vitis, 3, 57-83.

15. Hewitt, W. B., Martelli, G. P., Dias,H. F. & Taylor, R. H. (1970). Grapevine fanleaf virus. C. M. I/ A.

A. B. Descriptions of Plant Viruses. No. 28.

16. Hinkle, R. P. (1995). Fanleaf, the unmentionable virus. Wines and vines, 76, 24-27.

17. Huss, B., Walter, B., Etienne, L. & Van-Regenmortel, M. H. V. (1986). Grapevine fanleaf virus detection in various organs using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Vitis, 25, 178-188.

18. Izadpanah, K., Zaki-Aghl, M., Zhang, Y., Daubert, P. S. D. & Rowhani, A. (2003). Bermuda grass as a potential reservoir host for grapevine fanleaf virus.Plant Disease, 87, 1179-1182.

19. Leonhardt, W., Wawrosch, C., Auer, A. & Kopp, B. (1998). Monitoring of virus diseases in Austrian grapevine varieties and virus elimination using in vitro thermotherapy. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 52, 71-74.

20. Martelli, G. P. (1993). Graft-transmissible disease of grapevines. Handbook for detection and diagnosis.

(Ed) G. P. Martelli, (p. 263) FAO. Roma.

21. Minafra, A. & Hadidi. A. (1994). Sensitive detection of grapevine virus A, B, or leafroll associated JJJ from viruliferous mealybugs and infected tissue by cDNA amplification. Journal of Virological Methods, 47, 175-188.

22. Nolasco, G., de Blas, C., Torres, V. & Ponz, F. (1993). A method combining immunocapture and PCR amplification in a microtiter plate for the detection of plant viruses and subviral pathogens. Journal of Virological Methods, 47, 175-188.

23. Parvizi, R. (1989). Occurrence of grapevine fanleaf disease in vineyards of Ourmia. In: Proceedings of the 9^th Plant Protection Congress of Iran, 9-14 Sep., Mashhad, Iran. p. 164. (In Farsi).

24. Pourrahim, R., Shahraeen, N., Farzadfar, Sh., Golnaraghi, A. R., Irani, H., Amani, H., Tanhamafi, Z. &

Ahoonmanesh, A. (2000). Infection of grapevine gardens with grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) in Ourmia province of Iran. In: Proceedings of the 1^st National Conference of Grapes, 16-18 Sep., Ghazvin, Iran. p. 16. (In Farsi).

25. Raski, D. J., Goheen, A. C., Lider, L. A. & Meredith, C. P. (1983). Strategies against grapevine fanleaf virus and its nematodevector. Plant Disease, 67, 335-339.

26. Rowhani, A., Maningas, M. A., Lile, L. S., Daubert, S. D. & Golino, D. (1995). Development of a detection system for viruses of woody plants based on PCR analysis of immobilized virions.

Phytopathology, 85, 347-352.

27. Rumbos, I. C., Avgelis, A. & Rumbos, A. I. (2000). Certification scheme for production of virus-free propagation material in Greece. In: Extracted abstracts, 13^thMeeting ICVG. Adelaide. PP. 156-157.

28. Van Regenmortel, M. H. & Dubs, M. C. (1993). Serological procedures. In: R. E. F. Matthews (Ed), Diagnosis of plant virus diseases. (pp. 159-214.) CRC Press.

29. Vuittenez, A. (1970). Fanleaf of grape. In N. W. Frazier (Ed), Virus disease of small fruit and grapevines. (pp. 217-218.) University of California.

30. Ward, C. W. (1993). Progress towards a higher taxonomy of viruses. Research in Virology, 114, 419- 453.

31. Wetzel, T., Candresse, T., Macquaire, G., Ravelonandro, M. & Dunez, J. (1992). A highly sensitive immunocapture polymerase chain reaction method for plum pox potyvirus detection. Journal of Virological Methods, 39, 27-37.

32. Zaki-Aghl, M. & Izadpanah, K. (2003). Serological and molecular identification of grapevine fanleaf virus in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 39, 161-171. (In Farsi).