Iranian Journal of Critical Care Nursing
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
!"#
:
$
%
$ Pages: 129-132
لﻮﺌﺴﻣ هﺪﻨﺴﻳﻮﻧ :
ﺮﮕﺴﻣ ﺪﻤﺤﻣ يﺮﻴﻣا رﻮﭘ
. ﺖﺳاﻮﺧرد مﺎﻤﺗ ﻲﻧﺎﺸﻧ ﻪﺑ ﺪﻳﺎﺑ ﺎﻫ
mailer.amiri@yahoo.com ﺪﻧﻮﺷ هدﺎﺘﺳﺮﻓ
.
ﻪﻟﺎﻘﻣ ﺖﻓﺎﻳرد :
26 / 2 / 89 ﻪﻟﺎﻘﻣ شﺮﻳﺬﭘ :
20 / 5 / 89
PhD MSc*
BSc
*
"
!#$#% &
"
"
! ' (
)
"
*$# +,-.
)...
(
:
. ! "#$ "% &
'( ) *!
" +, *!
( ) - ,
/0 $
"
*" ( 1 20 ) 3 4)0 * (5$ &
6(0 7, 8 (" !3
!9% :3 -
. ( *! (
; < =>?
@
!(
( "#$ "% A"
B# &
! - /7 .
: &($ =>? *! ( C
D"E F G$ = ;#"#H
"#$ "% &
8 ( IJKL &
M!
N, ( (5$ &
"=3 A(> ,H, ) ,"3 N!<
OP / (AQ Excel 2007
!A7 ( ) - +R) G"#H .
: G$ = (5$ ( "#$ "% &
STL *! $
= ; IUJ )
LL (%
- (R ( .
:!
(5$ "=3 "
YQ SZ % [! " ) "#$ "% &
KZ % (" ( ( 1 -
, . 4 ( & *! A" ,"3 N!<
\ /Z ^!
.
: ! ( "#$ "% ^ ( *! +! /0 G">
( 3) .
: *$-0 ,$ ! ' 1
Rate of inequality in kidney transplantation services access in Iran
Amerioon A.1MSc, Mesgarpour Amiri M.* MSc, Amini Anabad H.2MSc
٭Department of Health Economy, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
1“Health Management Research Center” and “Department of Health Care Services Management”, Faculty of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Health Economy, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Aims: Having equal access to healthcare services is one of the basic rights of all people. Kidney transplant beds are one of the most important and valuable resources of healthcare system which their unequal allocation can cause irrecoverable complications in addition to emergency patients’ transportation. Present study was designed to evaluate the access to kidney transplantation services in different provinces of Iran.
Methods: In this applied descriptive-analytical study, number of kidney transplant beds for each province in portion with province populationin year 2006 was analyzed using Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve with Excel 2007 software.
Results: The total number of kidney transplant beds in Iran was 295, which 163 (55%) of them were located in Tehran. Approximately, half of population, only has access to 20% of kidney transplant beds and the other half has access to 80%. Gini coefficient was 0.4 which demonstrated the non-equality.
Conclusion: There isn’t equal accessibility to kidney transplant services in Iran due to unequal distribution of kidney transplant beds.
Keywords: Equality, Accessibility, Kidney Transplantation Services, Iran
[ Downloaded from jccnursing.com on 2023-08-13 ]
1 / 4
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
! "# $%& ' ( ) $ * + $')
) !' ,- (( .$ ' ( + . 0$ 12 .$34 *
56 (( 7
8 * & .$)
* 9:;
5.$ < ' ( + =9 >* * + ? # 1@
5A '! 12 * &
6 * 8
>
B6 "C .$) !' C B6
6 ]D .[
0 (( "# %( 8 ((
( .
5 * E3 6$CF E6) ( .6 19! %( 8 C ((
]G 5 H .[
IJ J() K !L 7C 1$>
3$
3$ MNO) * 8 58&%<
5 * :6
E3 ,- M$NO) 5 82
36 . E6) 5P .6
O) ($
)
%( AP E3 96 3&
(
&
) SNO>
O +T6*
) 3&
M 96
CU P 8 ((
]V .[
? +&
.W $ XJ ' ( .6 3$ .6 (3' ( ) 5 * ) 8%$0) (( A& &
$ 6 Y
.
AI 8 * +T6* $ XJ Z 7$ (
\ CL (( (; * 9:;
^96
#_3 `_( 7 5+T6* 8%$0) ' 2 1&
*
( +T6* 8aa 6 36: 5 `_( 7 .
bO
+T6*
$>
3LL c 1 3$?3( 36: 58:$d) c *
>_
3' . bO $ 36:
5+T6*
H ) V
U bO 36: ) ( &
. ,(3 E6) A&
7 5 L J +T6* 8%$0) L ( & .6)
b>Z 8 ((
3L . O) * >
O) L * <3 XJ U 5e# 6(
(& .6 .
O) K#J * E6) .$34
f& +T6*
O) .6 ' $ g()
c g- <
+ ) 0 AI g6 ICU
30$
( KF
]h 5 i .[
O) (( $ ( . * .* +T6*
.
j :$ b6:C 59 * ' $ $*
bO +T6*
+! C6k;
+* B6 K< 5 H
i * +T6*
J>_a 5 .
j ! Y6
5! l6k; * 3 l6k; $ ' $ $ GV
% !$
+ l6k; ' ( + $ ]n
.[
&
O) ' #$# .a6 7- ' $ o( 6 +T6*
E3 536 %( ) $U 0
30 C' 8 .6 3$ (( ,- :$
.
J>_ 59 * ( .9 ' & 6(3 3$
Ad 53 b# +T6* 8 p#) b6:C +
.
MNO) .$J J) ( + ! 8#$#@)
P% 1 <
$ 5 J) .6a!$ ' C6 b6:C
, .6 * 3a I< l6k; $ ' 30 O) J) ' g) NNO)
( + MNO) ]q
.[
O) +36:C +r( * L K NNO)
$>JC * 0$ +$; 0L
. O)
L NNO) j: W6 3&
U * .6) 8:$d) .6)
s0@ ($
$ * )$ b# 5
]t .[
O) 7 W6 5$L $;
l * .6) .6)
O) M$NO) A& L + NNO) I& *
( .$
+*%& ( .W 5!L $ 6
u& d3 5K 6k;
. I $ )
O) )$ 8 6 NNO) $ * $L $;
!L $J .$ I& * 6$CF E6) 5$
5 .6 #@) 82 L ( 6I $0 $ 12 & 6p * 8 .6 ((
.
($( * ##@ +*
:U +36:C <
(( :$
%( E3 )
+$- * 8:$d) * B:; * O) $P (
3&
) & %( M +
]V 5 Dv .[
3 K .6
w$ 5 8&%<
J>_ U :$ bd3( 3$
O) ((
( C? 82 !L `_( $L $;
.
O) (( :$ ^6 x J>_ .6 $L $;
+36 3&
((
Ad 8 .6 .
L L J>_ .6 r$2) +$
1L J) 5( $@)
O) ( y6 $L $;
E3 o( !L
5W:; l * 5 8* 30 * J GtV
&
(@
. + 1L z{(
( $J ,(3) "C
.6)L ; 6< * .W0 * or ( .6 <
J6) >& bd3( M )
3$ ,6p (
A :C Excel
CU 1$@) * 6:d) 2007 .
|O( :> 3@3 ' 3$ M 6 3$ ,6p 0U 5 + +r( M .6) >& :$ bd3( +
( E3 ((
]G 5 V .[
S $F y6 E6) 5:> 3@3
0W6 E6) )
$F (
06# 5( ?6 L
3L . :> 3@3 b6 1W L <
D + !
[ Downloaded from jccnursing.com on 2023-08-13 ]
2 / 4
! "
"
#$
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
X
.
Y
!" # #$ % .
&' () #
&' *$ +, -+ /' # .
0%
&' 1+ , 23 "" #45 ]
66 .[
#37
X
# 89:
%
; <
= Y
# #4$ > % 89:
< % .
&' #? @AB , ; #C 23 "" #+> " !+D E F? 70 &' +, #B7" G 23 "" ; 70
] 6H .[
(
.
!"
#$ %&' %$ & () *+
, &- /
%$ -- 0 1 ]
23 [.
: #$ 8+ ; : 1 " I' J B "%
8+ ; F$
F$ "%
. B #$ ,
, " I' K
/ M +J +, F$ $
. I' B N 1 "
H / O ; P / O +,
+J +, ? .
1 +B P
/ O ; Q / O
1 +B +, Q
/ O ; R / O +B 'S ; +, +,
, S R / O F$
% ] 6P 6Q
.[
, HTQ < = 6RP
U V WW
%
= 0 Y #4$ > % )
U;
\ .(
_CJ #
= , , - Y `+
#4< > % .
&B5 1+ #< 3? 1+
\a % ' <
.
' Y , 1 D
K\
> =
; G; `+ #4$
$ , ; ,' %
\b
" 0 G `+ #4$ > = .
# /
= &
# #4$ > % : 4 8+ % ,
;?
( Y c 1+ , #$ J J 3 ' ;
\K J , U; `+
) ; G; `+
J 3 b
/ (
" 0 G `+
.
(
%4 5, 6 - %7 !8 !$ &9 &: +
"
←
↓
;
;
! 2<=>><??
2@
2?<
AA
"#
BCDCEFGH I2
2<2 FB
CDFJBCKL $ 233
>@=
GDD
= 23 ""
$ #4$ > % "%
= +,
# #4$ > % #45 d+/ , ; _
&' , ""
QW # ) 6 .(
" !+D
= > %
2 # $e #3 dC/ 2 $ #4$
(f / M #$ #C
0;
= +, #4$ > %
# , ; J _
&' , 23 "" #45 ?A CA #C d+/
() # #
+, g7 F$ ?A CA .
! &9 &: +%4 ( &%
% C+B #< #N KM
% , , - <
= 3? ' #4< > % #<
hM % B
= , , < i
"A% #4< > % .
#C3
j5 &B5 <k3
#
= +, !37 @Y: c"
%
< #A+B < lB + Y #4< >
.
# -+
#< : 23 "" , 4< /
3
' )* +&%
0 1 --
) , - 1
=A (
2 2
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
[ Downloaded from jccnursing.com on 2023-08-13 ]
3 / 4
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
!
"#$
%
&
# ) '(
( +,
# -. # "
. 012.
#3 4
,#
. +5 2 , 6 7 8( &9 # 19 : "
; <=> , "
. . -. # 31;, ? # 19 : "
# # 0,9 " %&9 .
@ ? A3
, B " ? CD . E, + ",
#
6
=2, F, ?
G / I J / I %## K
'( B . -. # "# " %+5 "
"
## # &6 # 16 : .
#3 . L ? 3 M 012. +N. # . 6
"
7, 3 #, - , =2, E, ?.
+N. : %O+: 13 .
"P. 5K # =2, "
. 0,$ % #, : #E.
.=2, : $
, #C
# . . -. # " ?3 : "
16 3 Q L+: ": ,( -. # "
###
. # " R$ - , ? , -. %S$ " E, #
=K, ,# ,( # .
&, 0T# 6U #
. -. #, # " ? V , 16 : "
#, .
#3 0U :
X SB YY. ,( Z .T [> # .
X . YY. , 'Y. 16 : "
# #, "
, ?
X %O+: 13 - , 'Y. \: -, 7; # S$
"Y. Y&. +N. . %:
X # # ]^ -. ?]DB# %- , 'Y.
V K _ ]! ,(
@&# `a S1$ "
L+:
, " ? 3;K VD ,( Z SB .
YY.
,( ? YY. , ? A3 .T [> # . %## =;
] 3;K # C " . E5>, bc 5
, & + SB ?]DB# # c @ 3 ? 6 #
bFE, %,( YY. , Z .
05# # , ? #
'Y. - , 'Y. \: -, 7; # S$ E ( . ?]DB# - , %,( # # ]^ -
, C `& \F 6
.
- , 'Y. 3;, -, \: ` 3; #N %: # SB X
. 13 ,#
" d =K, "
7 %=K, ,# %Y&. ,( # 0e ; f25 7 36 g25 %C6
` 5$ h+ $
, # &: &6 # ,i ,( #
# . %i$
: , & . )
1! - , $ 6
,(
( , # &:
E5>, # ]^ -. 2 #, # "
: 5E] \ 'Y. OLC.
j, C6 + "
# SN &6 k> # +5 2 , #C % ` #, .
. ]^ -.
16 : "
16 : ,( b=#
# # E. 5$ ; %&9 # ,( ? #C Q
# # l1>, .
, 5;, ?
"# &K ,2, : 13 - , 'Y.
bc 3 #;D bF 6 " ,( 3 ? # ] #3 %&6 "
.
:
0c, # 6 L3 S3. <Q ?
#K L&. 33! %## " , E5>, ? m1, , 73 .
1- Motevallizadeh S, Zakiyani S. Allocation of limited resources. Babol Univ Med Sci J. 2005;8(3):96-101. [Persian]
2- Dennis P, Kam Ki T. A rethink on measuring health inequalities using the Gini coefficient.Australia: University of Queensland; 2008.
3- Calman KC. The ethics of allocation of scarce health care resources: A view from the center. J Med Ethics.
1994;20(2):71-4.
4- Dejian L, Jin H, Jan M, Risser A. Statistical properties of generalized Gini coefficient with application to health inequality measurement.New York: Springer Science; 2007.
5- Mooney G, Blackwell S. Whose health service is it anyway.
Med J Aust. 2006;180:76-8.
6- Mooney G, Houston S. An alternative approach to resource allocation: Weighted capacity to benefit plus MESH infrastructure. Appl Health Econ Health Policy.
2007;3(1):29-33.
7- Mintyre D, Mooney G. The economics of health equity.
UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
8- Cusumano AM, Gioia C, Hermida O, Lavorato C. On behalf of the Latin American registry of dialysis and renal transplantation. Am Transplant Ann Rep. 2007;97:46-52.
9- Miao C, Zhuo L, GU Y. Study of large medical equipment allocation in Xuzhou. J Zhejiang Univ Med Sci.
2007;8(12):881-4.
10- Theodorakis PN, Mantzavinis GD. Inequalities in the distribution of rural primary care physicians in Greece and Albania. Int J Rural Remote Health. 2005;5(457):1445-54.
11- Vinod T, Yan W, Xibo Fan. Measuring education inequality: Gini coefficients of education. World Bank Institute; 1999. JEL Classification Code: C43, D63, I32, J24, O11, O15
12- Hiroshi N, Sujan B, Saranath L. Health inequalities in Thailand: Geographic distribution of medical supplies in the provinces. Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;3:735-40.
13- Kobayashi Y, Takaki H. Geographic distribution of physicians in Japan. Lancet. 1992;340:1391-3.
14- Yukiko Asada. Assessment of the health of Americans:
The average health-related quality of life and its inequality across individuals and groups. Popul Health Metr. 2005;3:7- 10.
[ Downloaded from jccnursing.com on 2023-08-13 ]
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
4 / 4
