24 1
1401 29 - 15
DOI: 10.22059/jci.2021.312749.2470
:
! " #$
% & ' (
*
!" #
$ % !" # &# ' .) $
:+, - ! . / 09
/ 09 / 1399 :+, - 5 67 . /
07 / 11 / 1399
!
" #
$ $% & ' () * + ,- * . $- / ! 0 * . 2
3 4 - $
# 5 6 & 78 $9 $ : 9) ; # - ) ; # -
Sorghum bicolor L.
=> ( ) $ @6A Medicago
scutellata L.
= / . ( : : )
B 6 + C D8 E 2 F *
; * $% - $C GH =- $I JH 98
- 97 97 - 96
+ ,- P 2 * H . 2 ! 50
S 75 S 100 125 )
=) : %
& ($6) * *
V8 F &
; # - & S
=> V8 F & S$ @6A
100 - ;W H ; # - ) $ @I *
50 S 75 100
=> )
$ @6A
=) : % X Y 4 - . ($% I *
=) Z F H =I 6% G6 % / H D H H
45 / 53578 68 / 13302 & ( YG* ; # 6 100
+; # - 100
>
= H $ @6A
125 / & ) / ._ 9Y- `% = 2 P) A $ ) 29
/ 1 @I S(
82 / 834 H =I 6% YG* ; # 6 36
/ 63 ; # 6
$ ; # - V8 F & = a Z F =I 6%
125
=> 3 - * .&2 $b )
@6A / H b @ S5 6 $ 05
/ 11 )
3* .&I * / c
) ; F Y F ) / H 79
/ 11 ) =I 6% 3d* P E Z F ( ) 04
/ 81 ; # - V8 F & H =I 6% ( )
=> V8 F & 78 - 2 6( e 0 8 ) / H ) $ @6A
94 / 30
= . 2 * ( ) & = &- /G $6 C
=> ; # - 5 6 3 H) $ @6A
100:100 @I S=I 6% $9 $ `% S(
. 2 =Y2 $b @
& S$ @I 5 6 S=I 6% G6 % S/ H b ) S :
./
Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Yield of Forage from Additive Series of Snail Medic in Intercropping with Sorghum under Low Irrigation
Condition
Saeed Sharafi*
Assistant Professor, Department of Environment Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak, Iran Received: November 29, 2020 Accepted: January 26, 2021
Abstract
Compensating water shortage requires the use of proper agricultural management methods. Thus, the present experiment aims at investigating different irrigation levels based on water requirement of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) on qualitative and quantitative yield of forage produced by combined cropping patterns of sorghum and snail medic (Medicago scutellata L.). The experiment is conducted in split plots design based on randomized complete blocks with three replications in two years (2017-2018 and 2018-2019). The treatments include irrigation levels of 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125% (as the main plot) and cropping patterns sole-cropping sorghum, sole-cropping snail medic, cropping pattern of 100% sorghum with additive series of 50%, 75%, and 100% snail medic (as the subplot). Results show that the highest fresh and dry forage yield are obtained in 125% water requirement as well as 100% sorghum and 100% snail medic (with 53578.45 and 13302.68 kg ha-1). In addition to the effective application of land (land equivalent ratio = 1.29), fresh and dry forage yield have increased by 834 and 63.36 kg ha-1, respectively. The analysis of forage quality show that with a decrease in the portion of the snail medic, the percentage of protein has decreased by 11.05%. Also, the highest percentage of crude ash and digestible matter have been obtained in the treatment of sorghumsole cropping (11.79% and 81.04%, respectively) and the highest percentage of acid detergent fiber in the treatment of snail medic sole cropping (30.94%). According to the results, it is possible that the use of crop with low water requirements like snail medic in mix cropping system (100:100) increases the quality and quantity of forage, boosting water productivity as well.
Keywords: Additive intercropping, crop water productivity, forage yield, land equivalent ratio, protein percentage.
1 .
g @
= & 8 c / H h
= Z F iC j E 7 0 C .&- Z F
$8 G F *
S F 3 / H P % ( 2
:k J(
$%
= h
$ iC / 2
)
Sharafi et al., 2016
S=YI # : ) : l8 , 4 - .(
b
$8 G F
&- m 2 iC
)
Abedi & Pakniyat, 2010; Sharafi & Mir Karim, 2020c
3* .(
= / c P 8
$Yl ) 2
=l- H
S 2
/
*
=
&% - A
*
/ . Y *
" 9Y- m &
*
B F & C & I n @I = > $% &
$ 0 J ) 2
Iglesias & Garrote,
" $G .(2015
& *
= =% @
#
3Y -
= = &- =a, * D- $% * %
Z $ oe & b @I ._
* hb =! H
&- - #
$ 2
)
Forouzandeh et al., 2012
.(
F $ * # =8 G :`e 5 6 &
:k a
= Z F iC &- ; - Z F
)
Dhima et al., 2007
= 2 V S(
5 6 &
:k a :`e
= C l G6 % p Y Y(
',- A =
=
&6%
q- H p Y $Y & rH
$ @I :`e V8 F & = a :k a *
)
Nabati Nasaz et al., 2016
3* .(
0 * / c
/ - 3Y
&2 S @I G6 % l
G .&- /
S& j 9Y- * #
m ( ,
$
$ @I )
Vrignon-Brenans et al., 2016;
Eskandari & Alizadeh Amraie, 2016; Bybee-Finley&
.
Ryan, 2018
.(
&
5 6
= j H > P 8 $Y
=6) A - * # A
',-
*
&
$) F F
&- )
Forouzandeh et al., 2012
S(
@I 5 6 & m l H $ o!
=YI
$* H :
$ / ',- ) 2 b
Umesh et al.,
$I C .(2017
S@
5 6 &
= % " Z
JYE
& ! 8 H + ,- H
$! F *
3 H
$ s
# @I / .
= h
F iC b
= Z F Z F
& *
&- F )
Monti et al., 2016; Paudel,
.(2016
@I P k $G &
= 5 6
$ ; 78 = c :`e h * = H
= ) B F ',- H
= - P 8 (= c #
* # = S & V8 F & = a : 5 6 78 / B F & C H
$ 9Y- ) A X Y 4 - .
& $- P
$ = 2 V @ E 8 ; # - 5 6
= 5 6 78 0 J D H H
4 / 29 2 / 12 )
2 " @# @ E 8 ; # - V8 F & H )
Khajeh Khezri et al., 2018
.(
Javanmard et al.
) S(2016 Eskandari & Alizadeh
) (2016 Sharafi
)
2020a
( -
$ 9
&
=I 6%
* 78 t6Y
&
5 6
" @#
= G6 %
=I 6%
Z F : u
&
5 6
= D H H :k a
Z2 P#
=2 F S
= #
=>
$ @6A *
S&I
3d* & 6 E @ /G 8 Z F
& : u
@I :k a 5 6
. 4 - X Y
* hb # 6 5
* & = & k 3 H
v% V8 F
9Y- Y
* dI
$8 F
!
= m9
= #
* $%
8 H G6 % Y
$ ) 2
Moradi et
al., 2015
3* .(
/ c
$C
* t6Y $
= h JI Z F S Y j / H
; s
;
* S 8 H
H
= a
; s
;
* H j 3 H Y2 .
P 8 / /G
&-
$ Y 9Y- m
$, ( s S ) % oe
$ . 2 S 7 0 C
$F
* hb # YI
=
&
*
&
3*
S5 6 ',- g 3 H
&
=
&
$9 Y2
* => Y = m >H
Z F
=
* G6 % H =I 6%
G6 % JYE
)
Pooramir et al., 2010; Huňady & Hochman, 2014
.(
Sharafi
)
2020a
=I 6% : u 5 6 & (
=>
Z F =I 6% G6 % = &I # => Y $ @6A = a 5 6 H V8 F &
& S *
1/
& = a ) =I 6% & 9
= / = =Y2 Hk (: u V8 F P 8
=> p Y a : u # $ @6A
= # & E * t6%
* . *
3*
/ c
Sanderson et al.
) $- S(2013
3 H 6, * = YI :k a :`e 5 6
Z w JYF
; 78 = / ; - 5 6 *
3 H - = a H / . *
=! H
= $, 2 & 9 =I 6% / xH =
$G F
3
$ * 3 / H :`G
&-
%
&
= : yH $ 6E -
* F
=
$
* # P (Y
= q 2
$G F 3*
I l
$
"
*
$Y s
& 9Y- *
5 6 & t6Y C
i c / -
$
$ *
z
= z A * hb o8 S&- - s
. $
t6Y + ,- 3
$#h
* $
& P) A =I 6% $9 5 6 & $ @I *
=> ; # -
$ @6A S . 2 ; >
2 .
2 1.
! .
/
=l8 ,
=% @ I y! { %
$
34 =!
20 I y! C S$8 2 =a E
$ 47 =!
20 E 2 =a E
$ j 9H 1400 ',- Y - S
%
$ 98 - 1396
# ! .
4 -
=a C VF 2
= =l8 , =a, 3 6E S/H $ 6E . Z F
P E F t6Y | % &2 B
/ lH & ! =% @
$#h
* I
@
$G F B
=
!) 2 1
.(
$#h $ ( / lH Z S$Y C *
= D
7 = H t6Y i % =- =,a / c &I # E $- I : (9) 7Y- 9Y- PG2) 1 .(
< #=
1 7 ) .
?) ': / @ A ) " " .*)1"$
i %
&I
BF : u (%)
wJ ;! *n
$% &In
=,a3 $#hb
4Y- PE
=Y-
2
$8
pY
9I
3-Yb
) (cm
/2 4
&6 - ) gr.cm-3 ( ) (% ) (% ) (mm ) ds.m-1 ( ) (% )
mg.kg-1 (
0 - 15
; 8 4 &6 -
2 / 63 2 / 31 6 / 5 57 / 1 27 13 13 3 / 7 13 / 0 51 / 1 17 / 0 4 100
15 - 30
; 8 4 &6 - 4
/ 59 5 / 29 1 / 11 48 / 1 24 10 15 8 / 7 13 / 0 64 / 1 18 / 0 8 110
3 - 45
; 8 4 &6 - 7
/ 53 8 / 32 5 / 13 41 / 1 19 7 13 8 / 7 14 / 0 59 / 1 18 / 0 10 120
1. Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)
) ': , 1 @ A C .D E " .FA G G .1 /*
2 2.
"# $ %& .
' (
= / : )
:
* 2 F D8 E
B 6 = b + C $C S GH =- $I JH P *
) $% - 98
- 1397 97
- 1396 ! ( 2 / .
3 + ,- P 2
50 S 75 S 100 125
) $
# ) ; # -
Sorghum bicolor Var
Speed
= ( : % $ @I & X b $6) *
& S; # - V8 F & P 2 5 6 78
=> V8 F ) $ @6A
Medicago scutellata Var
Rabinson
& ( 100
;W H ; # - )
&
* 50 S 75 100
=> )
= $ @6A %
: . $% I *
; # - # * &2 ~ H
=>
= $ @6A 3* : )
18
F
o * . * & ! . 2 / lH 24
P E &% -
=> * o S&2
= $ @6A &% - 2 :
$ C y : 2 250
$6 YI # E ` H
)
Sharafi, 2020b
.(
&2 "
= $Y- : )
= . 2 ; > : PF : 6 % $YF G JA s
. 2 9Y- $H " S&2 : l
*
5
× 3 Y S
=6) I :
$% I * 50
$Y - =6) I Y :
* $6) 5 / 4 Y =YI # s 2
. : *
X b =6) I &2 t 75
$Y - Y 3 H . 2 &
; # - V8 F &
12 m Y =H
=>
$ @6A 85 l ) m Y =H 125
; #
. 2 / lH (m Y 2
=> &
P) I $ @6A
t
; # - * : )
&I ob
= . e / !
S - : 6 %
= &2 3* G : )
= 6 . 2 ; > * H
= & !
@
3 p % B F & C 4 - S t6Y *
D z % $ H H E l ) =, S H * 1
) 2 9Y- (
Alizadeh, 2004
:(
=, ) 1 (
FC I
SSMD W W A D C
WI S( Y$6 ) B F & C 9SMDS =
WFC
= 9 $% & I n & C $ ) D H H
SB F ! ; #) B F * n w J €AS
$Y - S(DlG Y
$6 ) = =l- H i % €D
( Y €C
$ ( ) ) H * D z
= . 2 s
#
9Y- S * / lH & ! B F $ >A & C
= = Y- ; E ; # - = =l- H i %
= =
= Y 7 = aY •b 2 *
= = 2 :
24
&% - PF
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10
20 30
40 50
9)( 7%H3
20 I .D (%)
PWP (pF=4.11), Teta=20.05
PWP (pF=2.73), Teta=33.1
5 4 3 2 1 0 0 10
20 30
40
50
105 =!
4 6- . 2 / H 2 E
l P E / & C 0`YF = =! H &
P E B F ! & C S /YI # E : (9) 7Y- 9Y- = . 2 #
) I
1600 F1, Iran
= = ( :
24 G &% -
33 / 0 - & C •‚- 2 E G- b 7
. 2 / lH $% & I n a 2 #
3*
i % / lH =, = =! H / c
=, ) 1
= (P ) * 2 H S(
H %
2 =YI # s $I J @ / lH & !
P / lH i % Y- / * i % . 2 = - ( H /
H i % E l * H - ) ! . 2 = - ( H * D z * 2 2
S(
* $I J i % P E B F & C 2 = H H E l / .&-
* i % (P ) * 2
2 = - ( 3>A S: &A = =! H
2 S$ >A Y 9Y- 2 % $ H * H Z *
!) 1 .(
2 3.
* " $%+ %+ ,-./.
t6Y + ,- Z p 8 # = a & ! =l8 , / : 2 9Y- / & =, & 78
=, ) 2 (
I J IJ JI
II JJ
Y Y LER LER LER
Y Y
=, / S
YII
= # G6 % € SV8 F & ; i
YJJ
= # G6 % € SV8 F & J
YIJ
= # G6 % €
S5 6 & I YII
= # G6 % € & j
S5 6
LERI
€ = # $ƒ@!LER J
LERJ
€ $ƒ@!LER
= # =„ c .&- I
$H 9H S 2 Z P LER
; s - /
ZH * ! 5 6 & $Y
# H
S 2 Z
$ & ; s
5 6 H
ZH ; s Y
S4 - / .&- $
$ @! LER
H 5 / 0
- #
H
ZH & lz = & $% # 5 6 &
$Y
$ ) 2
Wang et al., 2012; Talukder et al., 2015
.(
< #=
2 M ' .
"N (% $%F O: P , @ A I .D Q #G 6.7 .! :' "3
) $I J (mm
50
$ )
75
$ )
100
$ )
125
$ )
t •b
&2 ~ H
$I J & C
$ >A
$I J & C
$ >A
$I J & C
$ >A
$I J & C
$ >A
1 2
20
F 35 3 / 28 35 8 / 29 35 4 / 30 35 33
2 10
28
F 30 29 43 1 / 29 65 4 / 28 78 6 / 28
3 21
8
H 38
9 / 27 55 08 / 28 77 6 / 27 90 28
4 32
19
H 43 2 / 27 63 3 / 27 84 2 / 27 101 3 / 27
5 43
31
H 48 6 / 26 70 7 / 26 92 5 / 26 114 6 / 26
6 58
15
53 9 / 25 74 4 / 26 102 26 123 1 / 26
7 73
30
46 6 / 26 64 2 / 27 91 7 / 26
% 113 7 / 26
8 90
16 2 40 6 / 27 53 2 / 28 78 4 / 27 98 5 / 27
) j >
(mm 333
457
624
752
) j >
mm.ha-1 ( 3330
4570
6240
7520
2 4.
%1+ 2+ '" .
$ +# 3# $ 1
; s *
# 0 J
= # 8 H @ * A
) &- $I J
Molden, 1997
=, i C = S(
) 3 (
:&- = - ( P E
=, ) 3 (
I
CWP TDM
WU
; # 6 ) €CWPI S =
S(DlG Y q- H 2 8 H Z F P 7 €TDM
(; # 6 ) #
= a €WU
2
$ ( $# a j > ) &%
= . 2 P 8
/ a S&I # : ) F &2 : 6 % =
. 2 =YI # s 9) | I =, $#
2 5.
25 67 2+ '" .
8 9 26
/YI # s : * 2 PJI b
= 2 A .
=H m Y Z &2 H * *
. 2 & ! G6 % $
=I 6%
H
= S
$ @6A =>
=6A 0`e $*
; # -
=6A
=2 F n
= * 3* : )
=
% S P
= •‚- . 2 / H &2 •b =6) I` *
3*
= SZ F =I 6% G6 % $- & ! / c *
&2
=! 2 : A
75 =!
4 6-
H
& . YI # E Z F
. 2 / H t6Y PA =I 6% & 9 / lH & !
= S 2
&I # : ) .
P 2 $9 : 9)
; F / H b @
; F Y F @ S2
Z F S3
P E 3d*
- 2 6( e 0 8 @ S4
S5
1. Crop Water Productivity (CWP)
2. Crude Protein (CP) 3. Crude Ash (CA)
4. Dry Mater Digestibility (DMD) 5. Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF)
: * @
6( * &2 6
= Y s / . YI # E > - =I 6%
*
) -
Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA
(
$6 Z e 9Y- 0 8 . 2 - Y
" - 2 6( e
Van Soest et al.
) ; G 0 8 = @>H 7Y- 9Y- (1994
)
Fiber Analyzer, Ankom 200, Ankom Technology Crop, Fairprt, NY, USA
= (
* ; G
)
ANKOM F57
: A = ; a ` 98 * (
) 6 7Y- ; F / H b . 2 #
Kjeldahl
Vap50 Gerhardt, Germany
s / . # / lH (
= E •b =, 9Y- S 7Y- *
4 S
= ! p Y 2 #
:
=, ) 4 (
[( ) 0.014 100]
. T B N
T N S
S = S( ) ) P p Y €T.N
- 3>A €T
$6 ) = Y H $I J S( Y 8
- 3>A €B
3>A $I J
$6 ) * 2 $> - S( Y 8
= €S
(; #) $* # ) Z 98 - - =Y 8 €N
02 / 0 .(
•b D z % S= P p Y #
25 / 6 t6Y * H =I 6% ; F / H b )
= ; F Y F . 2 = - ( *
= : 12 &% -
$G YG8 550
=!
4 6-
2 / lH
)
AOAC, 2000
.(
: * #
*
t C " 6(
Z 98 - P I $> -
9Y- 2 )
Dubois et al., 1956
.(
2 6.
';<=.
$ # =
@>H
= 6(H P
*
= P) A S
9Y-
; @I = SAS
2 / 9 2 ; >
)
2009
.(SAS,
a = 7 s : 9) / 9Y-
6. Water Soluble Carbohydrates (WSC)
= c
G / ) X b YA ',-
.&I ob : ) 3*
/ c z 7Y * D
$ b - /
6 : 9) =
$ & 78 P) A =I 6% $9
lH 5 6 / 2 .
3
> + ?' @/ .
3 1.
25 67.
- $ : 9) • = @>H X Y $
- * . / = / xH
& S$
& *
/ = # G * 5 6
=I 6% : 9) *
=I 6% SZ F / & S H
$ l 0`YF ! ) Z ',-
. 4 - @ o : 9) - . X Y /
$ l
!) &- 3
.(
!) / 7 = a 4
S(
H /
H Z F H =I 6% G6 % / xH
125 )
* ; # - & 78 $ 100
)
=>
= $ @6A
= ) &- D H H
45 / 53578
68 / 13302 .( YG* ; # 6
= / P 8
= 5 6 $6) # ; # - = A
$
% 5 6 & yH
&-
$ 3* sY S
% 3 - # / &I 8 H
Z F H =I 6% G6 % c * . 2 =Y2 =I 6%
=
&-
`YF S s H / 0
$ l
* H 125
& $ )
S; # - V8 F 100
) $
100 +; # -
100
=>
.&2 V8 F ; # - $ @6A
=> $6 G a > ; # - 5 6 $ @6A
@I = 82
/ 834 H =I 6% YG* ; # 6 36
/ 63
Z F =I 6% ; # 6 H
; # - & = a
$ H V8 F 125
`% mE . 2 )
/ & ) / ._ 9Y- 29
/ 1 * S(
9Y- S; # - V8 F & 2 55
/ 1 )
=I 6%
!) &- 2 8 H H 4
.(
< #=
3 . 23.) 6.7 .! I - .S ( - E T-% (E % U"S3 " ) V3 ) ( )12N W) C3 X+C5 Y.H! 3 1+0
" :
=! yH m : l / 7
=I 6%
H
=I 6%
Z F / &
- 1
**
2158516667
251515928**
**
422 / 0
**
3 / 73
GH ( -) 4
5807190
582810
003
/ 0 17
/ 0
$ 3
**
5617526674
**
349258193
**
151 / 0
**
82 / 17
$ × - 3
**
62612284
**
8578008
* 0028 / 0
**
3 / 0
78
&
4
**
1549880020
**
104029944
**
666 / 0
**
97 / 51
- × 78
&
12
**
56623021
**
3256581
**
026 / 0
**
23 / 0
$ × 78
&
4
**
184488129
**
14849989
**
083 / 0
**
38 / 6
- ×
$ × 78
&
12
**
5709719
* 536461
**
005 / 0
* 08 / 0
,F
64 1468778
257139
0012
/ 0 04
/ 0
) : yH D z (%
-
58
/ 13 99
/ 15 19
/ 5 53
/ 3
** * Qn.s
G %"[ T"N%N G Q (
\H! ( 9-
'( %N 5 1
# .
$ * hb
EyshiRezaeeet al.
) (2011
* P 8
Z F 6 &
5 = 6 2 S !
*
= $b PF Y2 " @#
*
= - v%
@I
@
JYF w =E - =
o!
$ $C . 2
@ 2 V 7 $ * hb 8 H
&
5 6
=6e - S; 78
=
% P 8
;
! 3s
@I
& E
= # S
$ * H $8 YA &6% =
& E
= # S=6e Z F $9 .
= 8 P
# D- 3 H ! ; %
* ; 78 =6e
: >
3*
) &- 2 u
Ghalenoee et al., 2017
.(
+ ,- / 0`YF SX Y 4 - 3 c
= S # C
& P) A H =I 6% G6 % =
H ; # - V8 F 50
= $ ) D H H
59 / 61 S 42 / 60 73 / 36 3 ) * H H 125
S 100
75 V8 F & X Y / . $ )
=>
H $ @6A 50
= S$ ) D H H
18 / 66 S
14 / 65 65 / 46 3 ) * H H 125
S 100 75
!) 2 " @# $ ) 4
G6 % 0`YF / .(
@ .
= 0 J 4 - / * S &-
$ $ k P Yb ; # - = &I # => Y H
H =
$ / S $* # &
A H Y = 9Y- 5 6 ) P (H
Stoltz & Nadeau, 2014; Paudel, 2016
.(
H /
= * H D H H
100 +; # - 100
=>
; # - V8 F & $ @6A
/ xH * 100
) $ ) 83
/ 2 82 / 2 ; # 6
= / . 2 * ($YI DlG Y Z *
$ X Y 5 6 78 H = *
100
+; # - 100
=>
@ $ @6A = a
P) / * &- G ; # - V8 F &
=>
… * $ @6A o! ; # - $Y E = #
H 7 0 C .&- =Y2 125
$ )
@ 5 6 * 78 = *
3 / $- H H
100 $ )
!) 4
P & H S Y- / * .(
=> ; # - 3 H) $ @6A
100:100 / xH ( 125
S
100 75 H = a $ ) 50
)
= H =I 6% G6 % S$
D H H 18 / 61 S 60 9 / 37
.&2 @I ) V8 F & 8 H X Y = a
=> ; # - P 3 H ; # - 5 6 $ @6A
=YI @I Z F H =I 6% G6 % = 2 V
!) &- 4
Z F iC = =! H .(
= & SiC / =I 6% = Z F
=I 6% * # 8 H
= h $G F = P (Y * #
Y!
$G / .&- ob SD- *
=I )
$ 0 J & @ $ ! . 2
=a, # 4 - / * S 2 4 Y- $I
* # V8 F &
(=8 - c => : u s )
& 78 € * JYE ; # - V8 F
=I 6%
=> 5 6
$ $ @6A A H H
$ 0 J / @7 !
!) 2 = 4
.(
3 2.
8 9 26 67.
- * . Z * S• = @>H X Y 4 - : 9) = 6 5 6 & 78 $ + ,-
S; F Y F S; F / H b ) S3d* P E Z F
6( : * - 2 6( e 0 8
$ l ) Z ',- 3* . 2
P aY . / c
$ + ,- ×
: 9) = 6 @ & 78
$ l ) Z ',- * hb / $-
!) 2 5
.(
< #=
4
" : X+C5 Y.H! %]( U"S3 " ^) W) C3 .
× 23.) 6.7 .! I - .S ( ` A %N $.+, %*+ , % 3 1+0
U" ' % (% Ia^3
5 6 78
H =I 6%
) kg.ha-1 ( Z F =I 6%
) kg.ha-1 ( &
/
) kg.m-3 (
50 $)
V8 F ; # -
18 l / 20256 31 h
/ 5090 -
11 de
/ 1
100 +; # - 50
=>
$ @6A 22 n
/ 17823 77 hi
/ 4818 88 d
/ 0 73 ef
/ 0
100 +; # - 75
=>
$ @6A 24 m
/ 18997 75 h
/ 5111 97 c
/ 0 87 e
/ 0
100 +; # - 100
=>
$ @6A 39 l
/ 20796 26 h
/ 5083 99 c
/ 0 12 de
/ 1
=>
$ @6A V8 F 6 o
/ 9277 2426 k
-
28 g
/ 0
75 $)
V8 F ; # -
13 h / 32019 48 ef
/ 8055 -
7 c
/ 1
100 +; # - 50
=>
$ @6A 33 k
/ 2581010 73 g / 6512 91 cd
/ 0 86 e
/ 0
100 +; # - 75
=>
$ @6A 95 i
/ 29044 8 f
/ 7279 97 c
/ 0 14 de
/ 1
100 +; # - 100
=>
$ @6A 29 g
/ 33493 15 e
/ 8269 04 bc
/ 1 87 bc
/ 1
=>
V8 F $ @6A
29 n / 17393 96 j
/ 3550 -
38 fg
/ 0
100$)
V8 F ; # -
23 b / 51178 45 ab / 12834 -
82 a
/ 2
100 +; # - 50
=>
$ @6A 36 f
/ 44021 06 d / 11081 02 bc
/ 1 71 c
/ 1
100 +; # - 75
=>
$ @6A 76 d
/ 48125 31 bc / 12192 09 b
/ 1 07 b
/ 2
100 +; # - 100
=>
$ @6A 26 ab
/ 51995 88 ab / 12895 18 ab
/ 1 83 a
/ 2
=>
V8 F $ @6A
28 jk / 26616 32 g
/ 6670 -
43 f
/ 0
125$)
V8 F ; # -
63 ab / 52743 32 a / 13239 -
7 c
/ 1
100 +; # - 50
=>
$ @6A 74 e
/ 45363 62 cd
/ 11430 12 b
/ 1 11 de
/ 1
100 +; # - 75
=>
$ @6A 46 c
/ 49595 92 b / 12576 19 ab
/ 1 26 d
/ 1
100 +; # - 100
=>
$ @6A 45 a
/ 53578 68 a / 13302 29 a
/ 1 71 c
/ 1
=>
V8 F $ @6A
61 j / 27437 74 g
/ 6880 -
36 fg
/ 0
U"S3 "
E N : %b3 '( # WG < C0( \H! QM.C! % @%C c %0 ( ( G
( .#3 (#3
< #=
5 23.) 6.7 .! I - .S ( ) " " ." E T-% (E % U"S3 " ) V3 ) ( )12N W) C3 . Y.H! 3 1+0
" : X+C5
yH m =!
: l / 7
; F / H b
; F Y F 3d* P E - 2 6( e 0 8
: * 6( *
- 1
**
13 / 6
**
31 / 3
**
12 / 2
**
33 / 414
n.s 75 / 1
( -) GH
4 78 / 0 004 / 0 094 / 0 061
/ 0 09
/ 1
$ 3
**
82 / 18
**
15 / 3
**
49 / 13
**
208 / 11
**
77 / 30
$ × - 3
017n.s
/ 1
**
073 / 0
**
72 / 27
**
82 / 19
**
03 / 4
78
&
4
**
59 / 429
**
06 / 201
**
29 / 677
**
7 / 355
**
38 / 325
- × 78
&
12
29n.s
/ 1
**
123 / 0
**
734 / 0
**
08 / 1 12n.s
/ 1
$ × 78
&
4
**
49 / 4
**
43 / 0
**
82 / 19
**
13 / 7
**
95 / 2
- ×
$ × 78
&
12 07n.s
/ 1
**
041 / 0
**
32 / 1
**
014 / 1 84n.s
/ 0
,F
64 82 / 0 612 / 0 048 / 0 074
/ 0 689
/ 0
) : yH D z (%
-
54 / 7 42 / 1 29 / 10 19
/ 11 89
/ 7
** * Qn.s G %"[ T"N%N G Q (
9- \H! ( '( %N
5 1
#
