! "
# $ %
! " # $
%
! "#$ %&'
(
$ )
"'
* + " ! %&' , ! -+ .$
/ 0 $ 1$
2 $ 3 + $ 4 5 &+ 6 6 7 4 ' 89: 6 1; < = 6 7
5 $
$ 5 >
*
? $ /0 @ A$ ? ' ! ? $ 5 B C /0 $ 1$ D #:
EF G D' % H
I ( JI C + ! ' G 1$ 3 + $ 4 $ I 7
* JI / 0 ? ' ! 7 5 K
9 ' I
* 3 + $ 4 L =B G D' 6 MC
*
+ #: C + '
L =B 6 6 7 4 6 /0 $ 1$ N
*
4 6 6 7 4 D OP ! 6 MC 3 + $ 4 L =B
*
G Q 4
6 7 4 C 4 9 R
$ %7 C
$ S)B 7 '
* EF OP / 0 $ 1$ H
2 $ 6 6 7 4 % =4 4 6 6 7 4 C + ! 3 + $ 4 5 $ ' 6 7
T
UB
* 2 $ 4 9 R! $ 6 6 7 4 % =4 C + ' L =B ' 6 7
Q R! $
2 $ - 5 $ 6 7 EF
C 6 K R: /0 $ 1$ H
*
OP V"1B D L W /0 $ 1$ C X' , ! -+ .$
$ 4 9 R! $ 3 + $ 4 B 5 &+ 6 6 7 4 XK V > C + ' B C
*
C + ' 3 + $ 4 $ I /0 $ 1$
&
'
*+ , - - ./ 0 012 34 - 5 2
$ ' 3 . 6 7 5 . 6
3 + 89 2
6 +:
"
' 6 7 5
*+ , 6 34 - + ;
( '
*+ , 6 - - ./ 0 012 34 - + ; + .
& ' ( )*
* !+, - . / 0 1
2 -
$1
<
$
<
&")&
( 3 45 -2
$&1
<
=
<
&")&
6! 7.
&%1
<
)
<
&")&
89 :. ;
7 5 ' : $
$ 2YB & 6 6 V$ H B 9C
(
$ QY Z "7 C
9C
"' @ W
* V $ H 3 R": = ' [9 K
(
$ C
? S 1B 5= [' D OP 7
D 7 '
$ 6 4 6 7
\ ]
^*
V$ H 3 6 &+
( C Q -4 ? ' !
2YB 6 & 6 S + = 4 + -B 6 7
$ V > G &B L! 6 7 ' C @ W 6 99C
$
V -B ( C 9_"7 '
$
\
` T
^*
? & &1B ' I C 5 C N 9 + 6
5 $ Q "-$ W
"C 7 ' &$ 7
\ E
^*
2 $ 5 $ 6 7 P ' 6 X 6 6 7
$ X' 3 + $ 4 $ I 4 9 7 ' 97
* 1$
K ' : 6 , 6 7 4 % =4 aH /0
$ K
\ b
^
! [9 K ' ? N $
2 $ X 7 ' : 5 $ 6 7
*
? )B 3
$ 6 7 4 ? N V -B 6 7 $ ' ' B
6 RC c 4 5 0 ? " d9B < 5 99C 5 $ C + ! 5 Q -4 ? 7 ' C 7
+ -4 5 "7 6 "C
\ e
^*
W 6 , 6 7 4 ' S$ /0 $ 1$
6 5
$ Q -4 f 9C 6 W
/0 $ 1$ C TE
, 6 7 4 ? N H
2 $ 6 5 5 7 [X $ I < = 6 7
\ g
^*
/0 $ 1$ $ EF
%7 C H
2 $ 4 9 R! $ 6 , 6 7 4 4 5 $ 6 7
T 5 5 7 '
\ e
^*
$ X ' h ' 3 7
2 $ /0 $ 1$
2 7
)R i$ 6 7 j.
/K NUB 6 6 7 k
* 5 N X
? N D ' 3 + $ 4 $ I 4 9 R! $ C ' S$
6 #$ 6 7
\ F
^*
Gaumond
3 + $ 4 $ I 4 9 Q W C ' X' S"7 2 $ 5 $ 6 7 2 $ &$
, 6 7 4 ' 6 7
6 #$ ' S$ l ! ' 6 "C 6 5 $ m Ai 6
#X$ 7
\ F
^*
$ 1$ N S + = 4 6 7 9 4 ( 9Z 7
9 ' 97 /0
\ e
^
$ $ B
5 ' K + -4 9' $ " ? nB C $ 6 7
9 7 6 , 6 7 4 ? N aH C 6
"' 5
\ ]]
^ + -+ .$ 3 $ @ 7
./0 $ 1$ 6 6 6 7 4 6
2 $ 3 + $ 4 5 &+
' 89: 1; < = 6 7
< k o' 5 $
*
2 $ %7 o 3
) 1 ; 6 7
o '
' 5 1$ < k Tpp
B
`pp G K
\ 6
6 '
^ K 5 )
* -+ .$ %7 o 3
5 ) 3 + $ 4 R # + Q $ 6 4 +
.
! " # $
JI 7 [X $ I ? ' ! % $ I q VP>
V$ C /0
! $ 1$ D Q $ 9
? $ 7 [X $ I ? ' ! 3$=$
EF / 0 H
$ G 1$ V$ C W '
*
% & '( )*
6 O 9$ Q $ 9" 2 3 + $ 4 $ I
1$ ' G $ %D9
$ "
$ [ 6 B
6 7 4 ? N
C $ I 3 Q 4 W = ' !
*
V r %7 o 3 6 &+ 6 3 + $ 4 $ I 5 ) s ] t ' 1B 3 + $ 4 $ I
$ 7 4 P 9$
9C
* T t Q $ P '
! 6 7
<
W 3 + $ 4 $ I ' 1B
$ G $
$ #: 3 S 9 RC X$ ' B
*
` t
!
$ DB 6 "C ( 7 [X $ I 9C
* E t
$ I
$ 4 6 3 + $ 4 B ) $ q ' 4 7 C
$ X' 7
\ ]p u
^*
5 7 X$ d9$ $ I 3
M C @ ) d)1$ ! 6 7 4
- j. $
`p v
`p v
`p 89 : SR
(Y K
5 )
*
3 ! 6 D9 5 7 X$ 6
9 I @ ) d)1$
5 P-B 6
* B 3 bp
3 + $ 4 Q R1$ + S $ T
6 D9 ;
5 "' B !
`p L =B
* 3 +
$ q H 3 + $ 4 L =B Q P' R! $ 5 ' K & $ + -4 [' X' C . 1$ 6 7
*
Q R! $ Q P'
\ g t p
& >
^ 4 9 R! $
\ ]E t F
& >
^ 6 7 4 V$
SB C Vw$ 6
%7 C 7 4 3 h B C : 8 +
$ x.> 4 '
*
$ I G 4
\ up t ]b
& >
^
wC ! 3 + $ 4 ]b
$ q L =B - & >
C K
J A H ! % =4 . 1$ + -4 5 99C 8S-9$
6=C $
* L =B Q P' H "D$ ! 3 + $ 4
6
6 i 6 7 4 3 + $ 4 5 &+ 6 7 4 5 "' C X' p
B
` 5
* ) ; 5 "' s
3 $ 6
! 6 3 4 K >
5 "' - PW W ]s
6 A i$
5 "' 3 4 K > 3 $ 6 Ts
: 3 $
5 "'
`s 3 4 K K 8 +
\ ]`
]T
^*
7 4 3
4 9 B 4 3 C 5 V SXB 4
\ 6 7 4 %7 C
^
$ : [ S '
*
Q 4
& >
p B g
& > G 4 8k 6
]b B up PB 6 9
$
* " > 6 ( N yiX$ #:
&B " > R! $ 3 G 4 # ' i' V$
\
B1& >
]b B ep
^
\
B2& >
e]
B
up
*^
! 4 3 9_"7 & > 7 $ 3 [' $ q "D$
\ g Q & >
^ 3$= $ 4
\ gb ' & >
^ P 1$
K
*
&$ C + '
mg/kg
` 2 $ 5 $ ' 6 7
2 $ Q 9C 5 K /0 $ 1$ 6 7
EF H
L =B > ); ? ;
* 5
5 ) 7
6 $I $ I
One-way ANOVA
$ I I Q P'
Tukey
R1B =DB $ 4 K > V
*
&$
pb z p
<
P
9-$ ! 9H
? )B 4 K d' 7
*
+ , -
. ! " # . /
01
"2
% & 3 & $ $
VS ] 2 $ 5 K 3 + $ 4 $ I &$
' 6 7
? $ /0 $ 1$
EF 7 5 K H
$ % "' /0 $ 1$
7
* EF $ 1$ H
3 + $ 4 $ I 6 6 7 4 % =4 /0 ' / 0 $ 1$ C 7 5 K &$
'
$ X' 7
* 2 $
% = 4 / 0 5 G 1$ ' 6 7
9-$
4 6
4 4 9 R! $ 6 6 7 ]
T
AT
B$ X' 3 + $ 4 $ I C + ! 3 97
4 T 5 "7 %7 C UB 7 '
\ VS ]
*^
453 , 6 2 3 45 6% 7 7 1 8 *./ $ ! , $ #
9 : % 8 );;
7 1
> ?; @ 9AB * C
> ?;
&
D E '
&
:?0 , F
> ?; 5+
D
&(
'
= :?0 , F
> ?;
$A
D GH '
&%
:0 , F
> ;
$B
D )H ' G&
:0 , F 6@
I
(mean±SEM 6-8 rats per group)
H%*
<
H
P
H&**
<
H
J KP
?K ? : ?+ 0 +L?M 9 1 3 @
N6@
VS T 2 $ 5 K 3 + $ 4 $ I &$
6 7
5 $
? $ /0 $ 1$
EF 7 5 K H
$ % "' / 0 $ 1$
7
* EF H
6 6 7 4 % = 4 / 0 $ 1$
$ 1$ C 7 5 K &$ 3 + $ 4 $ I ' /0
$ X' ' 7
* 2 $ 5 G 1$ 5 $ 6 7
9-$ % = 4 /0 6
4
$ I 6 6 7
4 4 9 R! $ 3 + $ 4 T
B$ X'
3 97
4 C + ! T
5 "7 UB 7 '
\ VS T
*^
7 ! " # 88 & $ $ ' 9 (& . / . 01
% & '( )* $ "2
VS
` C + ' L =B N
$ I #9B
5 % "' 3 + $ 4
* 9-$ NUB C + ' 6 6
2 $ 3 + $ 4 L =B ' 5 $ ' 6 7
' 7 5 K &$
\ VS
`
*^
VS E 7 5 K &$
EF $ 1$ H
2 $ 5 K /0 ' 6 7
EF / 0 $ 1$ H
"7
% "' 3 + $ 4 $ I VP> C + ' L =B 5
$ 7
* EF
% = 4 a H / 0 $ 1$ H
4
&$ 7 ' 3 + $ 4 L =B ' 6 6 7 K 7 5 K
* 2 $ C + ' L =B ' 6 7
? N X K aH /0 $ 1$
6
4 9 3 + $ 4 $ I
\ VS E
*^
VS b 7 5 K &$
EF $ 1$ H
2 $ 5 K /0 5 $ 6 7
EF $ 1$ H
3 + $ 4 $ I VP> C + ' L =B 5 "7 /0
$ % "' 7
* EF
% = 4 aH /0 $ 1$ H
4 3 + $ 4 L =B ' 6 6 7 5 $
7
K 7 5 K &$
* C + ' L =B
2 $
? N X K a H / 0 $ 1$ 6 7 3 + $ 4 $ I 4 9 6
\ VS b
*^
453 : 6 2 3 45 6% 7 7 1 8 *./ $ ! , $ #
9 : % 8 );;
7 1
> ?; @ 9AB * C
> ?;
&
D E '
&
:?0 , F
> ?; 5+
D
&(
'
= :?0 , F
> ?;
$A
D GH '
&%
:0 , F
> ;
$B
D )H ' G&
:0 , F 6@
I
(mean±SEM 6-8 rats per group)
H%*
<
H
P
H&**
<
H
J KP
?K ? : + 0 +LM 9 1 3 @
N6@
453
; 9 ! < % =* >6 ? ; ! 7 1
: % 8 -@ - 7 7 1 8
> ; @ 9AB * .
C
> ;
&
D E '
&
:0 , F
> ?; 5+
D
&(
'
= :?0 , F
> ?;
$A
D GH '
&%
:0 , F
> ;
$B
D )H ' G&
:0 , F 6@
I
(mean±SEM 6-8 rats per group)
H%*
<
H
P
H&**
<
H
J KP
?K ? : + 0 +LM 9 1 3 @
N6@
=
453 0 6 9 ! < % =* >
7 1 45
$ #
*./ $ ! ,
>6 3 3 @ ; 9AB /6? : 6 3 K
)H :?0 , D
mean ± S.E.M. of 6–8 rats
per group
F
> ?; ?@ 9AB* 9. 6 !
C
> ?;
&
D E '
&
:?0 , F
> ?; 5+
D
&(
'
= :0 , F
> ;
$A
D GH '
&%
:0 , F
> ;
$B
D )H ' G&
:0 , F 6@
I
H%*
<
H
P
H&**
<
H
J KP
?K ? : ?+ 0 +L?M 9 1 3 @
N6@
453
<
9 ! < % =* > .
7 1 45
$ #
*./ $ ! ,
>6 3 3 @ ; 9AB /6? : 6 3 K
)H :?0 , D
mean ± S.E.M. of 6–8 rats
per group
F
> ?; ?@ 9AB* 9. 6 !
C
> ?;
&
D E '
&
:?0 , F
> ?; 5+
D
&(
'
= :0 , F
> ;
$A
D GH '
&%
:0 , F
> ;
$B
D )H ' G&
:0 , F 6@
I
H%*
<
H
P
H&**
<
H
J KP
?K ? : + 0 +LM 9 1 3 @
N6@
=#
/ 0 $ 1$ C X' $ h ' EF
H
6 7 4 % = 4 OP 6 ? nB L W
$ $ I B 5 &+ 6 L =B C Z f
6 6 7 4 % = 4 ? N ' B C + ' /0 $ 1$
EF
%7 C 3 + $ 4 $ I H
7
*
5 X' 3
5 B C /0 $ 1$ C '
% =4 aH ? $
$ K ' : 6 K
\ e
^f
# + P ' %9C H ' ? ' ! C Z
$ X'
$ 2YB /0 @ ; 6 "C 97 99C
X ' ? ' ! 3 + $ 4 $ I 4 9 Q W C + ! +r C 4 %7 C 6 6 7 4 C '
' S$ 3 + $ 4 $ I C OR.$ 3 6 7
: 6 #$
\ ]E
*^
? & &1B P+
6
$ X' 9 +
? )B C 7
? $ 3 9: 6 7
$ (
/ K NUB ( ! ' B
f
5 $ ! 3$=$ C 6 W
P ' 7
X 7 '
*
$ 3
? )B ' ' B
C $ 4 9 C
\
+ 7 NUB
^
$ 9 C $ 4
\
7 + NU B
^
S 1B 6 7 $ 6 + 4 $ ? )B 7
89: 7 6 #$
\ u
^*
/ 0 $ 1$
6 7 4 %7 C a H C ? $ 5 B C
$
$
%&' ' B 5 ' K 9 4I
V$ H 6 6 7
W %7 C V
\ ]b F
^f C 6 W
? $ /0 $ 1$
TE 6 S"7 V + H
6 7 4 aH 6
$ 6
\ ]e
^*
a H ( C 5 X' RP> 2 =K 3 9_"7
$ 3 4 'I j. % =4 K
\ ]g
*^
, ! -+ .$
/0 $ 1$ C X' EF
%7 C a H H
6 4 9
*
C + ! 3
Khasar
$ 1$ 3 + $ 4 5 &+ % =4 &4 S"7
/0 EF
5 $ H
' ? N 9 5 7
&4 7 ' 3 + $ 4 $ I 3 + $ 4 L =B 4 @ .-$
T
$ 9 '
* I P+
% =4 3 7
' S$
$ PB $ < OAH " d9B 6 7 9'
\ e
^*
' $ h ' $
$ X / 0 $ 1$ C 7
EF
$ 89 : 7 % = 4 a H H
K
*
/ 0 $ 1$ C 5 C N /K ? X $ I
2 6 6 7 k j.
NU B M R i$ 6 7
$ / K
* 5 "H ? nB Q w$ 6
6 7 k 6
$ 1$ 6=n$ MR i$ =C $ 6 / 0 6 7
5 { MR i$ 6 7
\ ]F
*^
X ' $ h '
5 $ % =4 C
7 ' X 7
*
5 N
6 7 '
X 6 , 6 7
5 ' K
5 $ 6 6 C $ 6 7
5 ' K 7 6 7
9 7 K C +
\ Tp ]u
^*
$ I 4 9 Q W
V$ 6 ' S$ 5 $ 89 : 3 + $ 4
k
6 0 ' 89: C + 6 7
O+ 0
\ ]u
*^
% = 4 3 C X' $ h ' $
$ XK C + ' B 89: 7 9C
* OP 7 ' C + ' L =B
6 7 4 6 K R:
$ X' 3 4 9 6
7 ' 4 9 C 7
$ 5 "7 6 ' B
*
$
"' B
5 $ % =4 C
&4 C V + 3 7
$ K 6
6 7 ' +
6 S"7
6 7 4 %7 C OP 6 0
$ 6
\ T]
^*
$ 6 D '
' B
#$ S ' S$ 3 B
7 6 7 4 6 #$ 6 7
89:
*
>? @ A B > 6 6,> C D - E FG H I% 6 :*
:*! J )
0
% ! 7 ) H 7 J@ 2 H- -
*)6> :*! J 7 K 1 * # J
0
References
1. Craig AD. A new view of pain as a homeostatic emotion. Trends Neurosci 2003;
26(6): 303-7.
2. Sofiabad M, Heidari N, Ghasemi E, Esmaeili M, Haghdoost-Yazdi H, Erami E, et al.
Assesment of orexin receptor 1 in stress attenuated nociceptive behaviours in formalin test. Physiol Pharmacol 2011;
15(3): 395-402.
3. Heidari-Oranjaghi N, Azhdari-Zarmehri H, Erami E, Haghparast A. Antagonism of orexin-1 receptors attenuates swim- and restraint stress-induced antinociceptive behaviors in formalin test. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012; 103(2): 299-307.
4. Riley JL 3rd, Robinson ME, Wise EA, Myers CD, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis. Pain 1998; 74(2-3):
181-7.
5. Hargraves WA, Hentall ID. Analgesic effects of dietary caloric restriction in adult mice. Pain 2005; 114(3): 455-61.
6. Khasar SG, Reichling DB, Green PG, Isenberg WM, Levine JD. Fasting is a physiological stimulus of vagus-mediated enhancement of nociception in the female rat. Neuroscience 2003; 119(1): 215-21.
>?
7. Hamm RJ, Knisely JS. The analgesia produced by food deprivation in 4-month old, 14-month old, and 24-month old rats.
Life Sci 1986; 39(17): 1509-15.
8. Gaumond I, Spooner MF, Marchand S. Sex differences in opioid-mediated pain inhibitory mechanisms during the interphase in the formalin test. Neuroscience 2007;
146(1): 366-74.
9. Abbott FV, Franklin KB, Westbrook RF.
The formalin test: scoring properties of the first and second phases of the pain response in rats. Pain 1995; 60(1): 91-102.
10. Dubuisson D, Dennis SG. The formalin test:
a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine, and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain 1977; 4(2):
161-74.
11. de los Santos-Arteaga M, Sierra-Dominguez SA, Fontanella GH, Delgado-Garcia JM, Carrion AM. Analgesia induced by dietary restriction is mediated by the kappa-opioid system. J Neurosci 2003; 23(35): 11120-6.
12. Azhdari ZH, Semnanian S, Fathollahi Y, Erami E, Khakpay R, Azizi H, et al. Intra- periaqueductal gray matter microinjection of orexin-A decreases formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors in adult male rats. J Pain 2011; 12(2): 280-7.
13. Azhdari Zarmehri H, Semnanian S, Fathollahi Y. Comparing the analgesic effects of periaqueductal gray matter injection of orexin A and morphine on formalin- induced nociceptive behaviors.
Physiol Pharmacol 2008; 12(3): 188-93.
14. LaGraize SC, Borzan J, Rinker MM, Kopp JL, Fuchs PN. Behavioral evidence for competing motivational drives of nociception and hunger. Neurosci Lett 2004;
372(1-2): 30-4.
15. Jurcovicova J, Stancikova M, Svik K, Ondrejickova, Krsova D, Seres J, et al. Stress of chronic food restriction attenuates the development of adjuvant arthritis in male Long Evans rats. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001;
19(4): 371-6.
16. Hamm RJ, Knisely JS, Watson A, Lyeth BG, Bossut DF. Hormonal mediation of the analgesia produced by food deprivation.
Physiol Behav 1985; 35(6): 879-82.
17. Hartwig AC. Peripheral beta-endorphin and pain modulation. Anesth Prog 1991; 38(3):
75-8.
18. Vaswani KK, Tejwani GA. Food deprivation-induced changes in the level of opioid peptides in the pituitary and brain of rat. Life Sci 1986; 38(2): 197-201.
19. Dawson-Basoa M, Gintzler AR.
Involvement of spinal cord delta opiate receptors in the antinociception of gestation and its hormonal simulation. Brain Res 1997; 757(1): 37-42.
20. Dawson-Basoa ME, Gintzler AR. Estrogen and progesterone activate spinal kappa- opiate receptor analgesic mechanisms. Pain 1996; 64(1): 169-77.
21. Henry JL, Yashpal K, Pitcher GM, Coderre TJ. Physiological evidence that the 'interphase' in the formalin test is due to active inhibition. Pain 1999; 82(1): 57-63.
Involvement of Endogenous Opioidergic System in Effects of Food Deprivation on Formalin-Induced Nociceptive Behaviors in Rats
Saroukhani MR., Ph.D.,1 Erami E., M.Sc.,2 Hosseini S.S., M.Sc.,3 Azhdari-Zarmehri H., Ph.D.4*
1. Associate Professor of Biotechnology, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
2. Nursing and Midwifery School, Torbat-e Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat-e Heydariyeh, Iran
3. Master of Physiology, Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran 4. Assistant Professor of Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
*Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Background and Aims: It is well-recognized that endogenous opioidergic system plays an important role in pain sensitivity, pain perception, and response to some stressing situations. The present study examined the probable role of endogenous opioidergic system in effects of food deprivation on formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors in male and female rats.
Methods: To make short-term food deprivation, the rats did not receive food for 48 hours prior to the formalin test. However, they could freely access water. Afterward, 50 µl formalin 2% was injected into the bottom of the rats’ right paw. Naloxone was injected to evaluate the involvement of the endogenous opioidergic system in effects of food deprivation on formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors.
Results: Formalin injection caused nociceptive behaviors in two phases The first and second phases were separated by a brief interphase where nociceptive behaviors decreased. As a result of 48-hour food deprivation, nociceptive behaviors in male and female rats were increased and the second phase was finished with delay. Naloxone administration blocked the pronociceptive effect of the 48-hour food deprivation in the interphase of male rats and in the first phase of female rats.
Conclusion: The present study indicated that food deprivation increased formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors through affecting the opioidergic system.
Keywords: Food deprivation, Opioidergic system, Formalin test, Naloxone Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 2013; 20(3): 244-251
