Iranian Journal of Critical Care Nursing
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
!"#
:
$
%
$&
Pages: 125-128
لﻮﺌﺴﻣ هﺪﻨﺴﻳﻮﻧ :
ﻲﺴﻴﺋر ﻪﻧﺎﺴﻓا ﺮﻓ
. ﺖﺳاﻮﺧرد مﺎﻤﺗ ﻲﻧﺎﺸﻧ ﻪﺑ ﺪﻳﺎﺑ ﺎﻫ
[email protected] ﺪﻧﻮﺷ هدﺎﺘﺳﺮﻓ
.
ﻪﻟﺎﻘﻣ ﺖﻓﺎﻳرد :
29 / 7 / 88 ﻪﻟﺎﻘﻣ شﺮﻳﺬﭘ :
9 /4 / 89
(KTQ-25)
MSc
*
MSc PhD
MD MSc
!
MSc
*
)...
! (
"# $ # ) ...
( !
%&'( )*
)...
! (
: ! " #$ %&" ' (! )**
+, -!.
!"
/ %"
012 %&" - ' # 345 '6
. 89 %!. ' %&" ' !" : " !; <=>
6 .
:
<=> ?@A - B.
C D 2.
EEF
<G! &"
" )**
H*
' DI=!
%&"
' %!. !6 3J*
K LMNN 6 89 .
@! O6 )'' DP'! Q"
%&" )A D'! R5#S
(KTQ-25) '"
. )' " Q"
T$! D=P U VW
/F
@! -<.
6 O&Y. %&" Z.
. )'' 8! )' "
Q
SPSS 16 U
! !4 O2. Q9. ' 2. B. P D .
: - E[
/
\
± V /]
"
^"! )!& -!" P ' '" +!. < " " ^"! )!& -!& !_ < " "
. -"
`*G 31 !" %Q )
FF\
/ F p<
(
* D&" c ? D
) FE / F
= (p Oe6 c ? )
FFE / F
= ( p
; %Q D'f4 <; D*
) FE /F
= ( p
*< R.
6 ) ' .
: !4 Z <; ' !g %!. !6 %&"
' .
"#$%!
: + ) ",- /() + ) ",- /()
) * ) *
Review the renal transplantation patients’ quality of life by using kidney transplantation questionnaire (KTQ-25)
Tayebi A.1 MSc, Raiesifar A.* MSc, Ebadi A.1 PhD, Eynollahi B.2 MD, Rafiyan Z.1 MSc, Keyvanloo F.1 MSc
٭Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
1Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Nephrology Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Aims: Quality of Life (QOL) is a strong predictor of mortality for end stage renal disease patients. This has resulted in QOL becoming the most important measure by which to present the outcome of these patients. The aim of this study was to measure QOL in renal transplant patients in Tehran.
Methods: This is a descriptive-analytic study which was performed on 220 renal transplant patients referred to transplantation and nephrology clinic of two Tehran city selected hospitals in year 2009. A demographic and a Kidney Transplant Questionnaire (KTQ-25) were used in order to collect data. The reliability of KTQ-25 was determined 0.93 by Cronbach Alpha method and the questionnaire was filled by patients. Data were analyzed by SPSS 16 and descriptive and analytic statistics.
Results: The mean of QOL in this study was 4.9±1.27, the maximum score was obtained in appearance dimension and the minimum score was obtained in fear dimension. Relation between QOL score and gender (p<0.001), cause of End Stage Renal Disease (p=0.02), occupation (p=0.002) and economic satisfaction (p=0.02) was significant.
Conclusion: Tehran city kidney transplant patients’ QOL level is moderate.
Keywords: Quality Of Life, Renal Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Questionnaire (KTQ-25)
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
!"## $ %&' () *" ' * % + +,- . +/#0/
1'. # 23 # %#
%4 ]5 .[
+&17 %8 9 1
(ESRD) :
; "4
<
% 8
>? # "
!"@ A; % *3
B CDD
%7# E1 : 1 ) ?
%%
. * %
FG
+ !"4 H- ) ? ]F
.[
*#" *1
*%
I7
"3J A % % 3 .
* % FDDG
# * K *L7 % MDD
*% +@' ) ? I7 ?
* . "38-
<N % /%1?
N % # )O /%
FP %
% % -". "
"3?%
]P .[
* % Q
/ GF %
1? . *1 # /%
G / CG % % " . "
]C .[
7'
; 3? # STU /% !I% IJ# "3 J V7' W *1 "3?%
" X" % A () Y3
"31 ]G
<
Q N .[
. ? " *1 Z8 "
*%
/% ? +# !"3?%.
?- # - \%%
"?%
]M .[
" *#8 %7#
*1 " 1^ . _
# ""7 A0, . ?:
# "4 ]G
<
Q N .[
. 5MCD +4"L L7 *. . *3^
# # 1J7 !8 1 %7# X"^ 8O # ^17
-". +) /J % `&' ' # Aaa@' % b
+: # %01^ c % +8 +1? 3/ ?
] 5D .[
%
*%
;b L3' d"? I7 ? () # -". *%
-". +) a' # () 0 +J %
%- .
I, 98 -". +) *1 % e !"33
ESRD
>L # + % W^ # c * fa '
SJ@ *1 %4
]G .[
-". +) 23 % "'
3.
gh,' ?
! . # 3 +: X2 ,-
# ?
!4 # *1 i1 ") # j % ?
"4 >/ %8 ]
55 .[
i30' # ? f -". +) 23 % !%) % ?
>Y3' !@ &/T % !#- k A#) H# #
"3J?
. . +) k #% b %7# -"
%%
:
`/
m +&17 % in 1^ ? 1^ ?
!%)
%4 S. m %& 1 Oo ?
1 , )
q r4 (
"% 91' "3T:' .
k #%
% # "% )&U # A ta X"? # !%: a' % I"B
"34 W3 + 01 `h r4 .
>L . B ? '
) . % Oo
" . "& -". +
9 "
(KTQ) + ] 5F .[
" *1 % -". +) # * % '&/T 1' % 1^ ? . + 8- AO
P<
)SF X8 uv w1
+ w !'9 (
KDQOL )
-". +)9
9 *1 (
) +) Oo *3' # + !"4 !%
+ 8I !%) % " *1 % -".
.
" *1 % -". +) d"? U &/T 3 . !%) " *1 Oo
) FG (KTQ-
"4 X2 # b .
)O' k . &/T m
% + &Ta xuyy
X2
"4 .
&7 *1 ?#z &7 # % #% !"33
&/T %## r4 % 9 *L' L4 VT % " i3 0,' "%
"%%
. 1 L >2 : A&/T f ?
{u{
) ) U SJ *31b W
|}
% H # x~
(%
9 " +%
1 H#
""4 Sh d"? 3: - .
%#" +L %
{xy ) V@O # 9 b
/ # "%1 1B' ?
+8- X2 L # L .
8& 1U " % b 9 &7 . _ ?#z !#-
% t A^b +8% X" ?#z d"? * #
"%1 1 . .
. 9 1 X1' u
1^ . !
*4"
+4- )
" . _ % !#% . _ (
!"4 &/T %#
' % 1 # # -j' 1J7 r4 # ?
-". +)
""4 &/T . "%
. /# :o
AO *1 # +8-
# %8 Aoh, t ?
10' L r' " *1 -". +)
"4 .
"4 !%) . 4 #% . % :
`/
( i8-% A^b ?#z d"? f
L' 4 +U# ?' +&U# +J37 4 # !"4
1 A" Ao@' VT %o +&U#
ESRD
*. A" # !"3?% k : 3I7 *% *. A" # k
% "
. S (
!." 9 Oo % -". +) -
" *1 (KTQ-25)
% . r'
#
L' *01?
% # !"4 {}
# } IJ 08 T
f' / q AB, 7' # + )b^ # ? *31b X"^
!." *, -". +)9 " *1 -
"39 ] xu .[
!1 - ' K . 3- ?
!%%
%4
9 b B1 +/ '" I, K # !1 L I,
+ .
> %"&' # $17 T ? A1 k12 _
* ?
>Ja' T T * L !1 # %4
+%
"
. %
T ? A1 k12
';
K # -". +)9 !1
+ B1 -". +)9 !1 ' .
A&8%
(KTQ-25)
!
"
# $ %
# &' % #() Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
!
"#
/
$ %
&
/
$ '(
)*
] +, - +.
- +0 .[
2 3
42% 5 (6! 78 3 9 -
)*
. 3 42% : ; < =>
?;
+0 5 @ 4?< A6 B< CCD 5 !
E!
)6% -F% F* @*( G?<
9 H5%
! ,0 I) 6742 6742 5 !
5)!
! : ' ! 6 ) )
"#
/
$
= .(α
H42 M<NO -F!
G! 5 )*
( SPSS 16
' P6?:% (Q% ?6?:% 6;%
.
) H5% :! 3667% RS 5 5 4T
I4T U
V% I!64
!4!
2% T )*
$0 /
$ p>
5 -W! H5% 5 X P6?:% PYZT
V =!
O .
S ?; 78 46
\^
U _^
)S* W
F! S 36E!6
`a
± a_
W .
\ /
^b % )! 5 6Y -F!
.
36Sd4 e /
\_
% )! Q 6Y P .
f / ba %
!4!
g! -
-)!X6h )SST) e
/ _i % )Z2 _ /
^ % )!X .
36E!6
F! )!5 66T
`\
/ _
± j / a ) . 66T 4! k!
78 46 )!5 7 V6@%
9 W)2 ! _
)* ! .
(
!
! /
"
±
# /$
"#$
!%
/
"
±
#%
/$
%&
/ ')* +!
&%
/
"
± ' /$
,-
$' /
"
±
# /
*!
!"
/
"
±
&&
/$
k!
66T (6 V6 T X 36 l%
W)2 )!5
` )* '(
. 4! ZY 36Sd4
)!5 66T S65 46 g! V6@%
-6?T ! QS
46 l 4! 36 !<
)
^f /
^ ( 4! 34T
46 l 5
) aa / a ( 4! 36 R! 5
S65 46 g! m )!5 66T S7 M%
)
)*
) i`
/ i
= .( p
S7 M% )!5 66T 4! 6n l%
)! ) )
i^
/ i p>
.(
.
( ( )* +, - .0 1 ,-23
0#
)1
2 345 '65
78
) 34
9 ) 5 ( 78
"# <
/
"
± 9!
/ :;< = >?
;
>@
78 / A
= 7C F / D
=
p /$!!±"/'H 7GFED
G8 F EA
%!
/
"
± 9' /
G8<
'"
/
"
±
&$
/$
)
%!
/
"
± '!
/$
IJ / 8
= ) T T
=K,L DDA ( /D p<
"$
/
"
±
%H / EG / 8
= T
:;<&
M N
%&
/
"
± HH /$
:;< = >?
;
>@
78 / A
= JJ F / D
=
p /$#!±"/% M>O;;
M>O;
'#
/
"
± H$
/$
M>O; P
%$
/
"
±
&"
/$
), =6
<Q;N- H!
/ 9
±
&' /$
:;< = >?
;
>@
78 / A
= C F / D
=
p /$H%±"/'" <Q;N- R
L(
%%
/
"
±
&%
/$
' : >
6 ) 5 ( A <
%%
/
"
±
#' /$
:;< = >?
;
>@
78 / A
= A F / D
= p
8 F A
%&
/
"
±
&' /$
AD F G '%
/
"
±
&!
/$
A8 F AA 9%
/
"
±
# /
A8<
%&
/
"
±
%&
/
46 3 )!5 66T 36E!6 ,o
/ +
±
"
/ . 36E!6 5 T
78 4T 6!>
) 0&
/ 0 ( 78 36E!6 5
6 @ ): Mp )
0, / . ( 9 364 T !
)! )* '(
. qZT 4! 36 rs 78 36Sd4 )*
!D4 Tt 78 T ) u 67r )7 . 4! 34T T m% )7 l 3
!4Z2 vN< )7 w?7 (6 3 )*Tx 78 ] +0 - +y .[
5 46 T 2 3667% FS%
)!5 66T 5 z )SST
-=S2 -3 ?42 5 E t6{% P< 5 6Z Z6!
9Y! 6h MN6C:%
9X )!5 66T 5 5 4F
66T V6 6n 36 | G5p 3S -
* H 5 )!5 .
)!5 66T 36E!6 78 3
S7 O
78 k! T !5 5 6
6
M% =S2 36 T P6
S7
@! )
* Mn )!
. (6 36 3
S7 8 )!5 66T MN6C:%
k! T )! )
78 9( MN6C:% }8 9( T 3 ~S
S7
~ P;s )!5 66T Mn *
k! -
w8
] +o - +&
.[
! ?D M78 )
p4s )!5 66T -3 9( T )S g* P6
Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2010
.
!" #$ $% &'" #% !(
)*
+, - /0 1' 2 3% 4 " &5% 6
1 7!%
%89
] 0:
4 0;
.[
<
= > ?@ %A BCD ' 1 C @ EF $% &'" #% 4=
G 1' 4#9 H%
% @
&5 .
% @ I9 9
J K > L 9 BCD E9 = M 4?@ L !N % OPA # ( E9 3%
.
>(% Q<!8 1 R!% > " 9
A 9" $% &'" 4>
"
] 0;
.[
2 1' " S9 1
#% !( 4(% & $% &'" #% %A TA >
> 1 " 9$ $% &'"
0*
- 00 >
!5P$ >( %A .
U V9 W<! $% &'"
!( " 9$
0*
7!% " !5P$ N%2 %A
&X .
YZ !\%
A #% > @
^ #$
" 9_
5% %
2 1` > " a 9 >
9_ &A >
5 . % #$ b A #% V9
>(% % #9
%c% a >
b! 9 %A dCD 9
# ( =R% = " 5 R &($
> 9 45
Yd >2 %A <de YUZ >(% E3
9 . &'" Y" #% #$ A #%
!5 c(S ` % $%
#% !" " f
#$ % $% &'"
2 &
) )) / 0
± :G / / .(
R dC!D 9 #'! Mj j
% &'"
#k &9 >N@ $
& D .
@ $% &'" R > >" "
N(A 4& #5 #'! >
" 5
4 (" <" %A > WZ &M &'" R l9 $ 1 d #'! $%
5 1e\( m BCD 4> &M >5
% 4N%2 $% &'"
$ 1 d =a 9 .
&M $% &'" 3% > 4HR
% Z n!
. #% !( !"
o p
b /
& 9_ >f = .
WZ &9 @
4<" %A > BD &9 @ $% &'"
dC!D 9 #'! $% &'" m 1 =R%
%9 KTQ-25 3% M
.
:
=a D %d \9 " E%
!" Z2 q@
>ar? 4p >(% \9
U N5 %A ^<" > !A k%
!" Z2 q@ #k
> !A >ar? 4 >! 6s'% #c%
X
)...
E%D " (
49 !"#$
%#&
q@
Z2
#'( &)*
#c(% >R(% 4 X
)...
(
!
E% % Z \( 4%% tf !N S9 =R%
.
1- Nasabeh Z, Hazrati M. Medical surgical nursing. Tehran:
Salami-Jamenegar Publication; 2008.
2- Ghods A, Savaj S. Iranian model of paid regulated living- unrelated kidney donation. Clin Asoc Nephrol. 2006;1:1136- 45.
3- Grassman AN. ESRD patients in 2004: Global overview of patient numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(1):2587-93.
4- Haghigh AN, Broumand BD, Amico M, Locatelli F, Ritz E.
The epidemiology of end stage renal disease in Iran in an international prospective. Nephrol Dial Transpalant.
2002;17(1):28-32.
5- Shu-Fen N, Chu A. Quality of life of patient having renal replacement therapy. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(1):15-21.
6- Mohajer M. The survey of psychosocial change in-patient before and after renal transplantation in Taleghami and Shahid Hashemi Nejad hospitals. Res Med. 2002;28(2):3135-40.
7- Poorghaznein T, Ghafari F. The survey of relation between hopeless and self-steam in kidney transplant recipients in Emam Reza hospital in Mashhad (2001-2002). Yazd Univ Med Sci J. 2005;13(1):57-61.
8- Fisher R, Gould D, Wainwright S, Fallon M. Quality of life after renal transplantation. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7:553-63.
9- Weety S. The health related Qol of renal transplants. J Clin Nurs. 2007;13:201-9.
10- Marci AT, Donald CS. Assessment of Qol outcomes.
1996;334(113):835-40.
11- Rahimi A, Ahmadi F, Gholiaf M. The effect of continues care model applying on quality in hemodialysis patient. Iran Univ Med Sci J. 2006;13(52):123-32. [Persian]
12- Fiebiger W. Health related Qol outcomes after kidney transplantation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:2-5.
13- Pus N. Administrative guide to the kidney transplant questionnaire. London: Robarts Research Institute; 1999.
14- Neipp M. Qol in adult transplant recipients more than 15 years after kidney transplantation. Available from:
http://www.ssn-sa.com
15- Rebollo P. Spanish validation of the kidney transplant questionnaire: A useful instrument for assessing health related quality of life in kidney transplant patient. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:56-9.
16- Oveilly F. Baseline quality of life and anxiety in solid organ transplant recipients: A pilot study. Dermatol Surg.
2006;32:1480-5.
17- Taghizadeh-Afshari A, Ghareh-Aghagia SR, Kazeminejad A. The survey of kidney transplantation effect on hemodialysis patient’s quality of life in Uromieh. Uromieh Med J.
2006;17(3):175-80. [Persian]
18- Vosughi M, Movahedpour A. Comparison quality of life between hemodialysis and transplant patient in Ardabil medical centers. Ardabil Univ Med Sci J. 2009;9(2):171-9.
[Persian]
