• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Topology and its Applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Topology and its Applications"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Contents lists available atSciVerse ScienceDirect

Topology and its Applications

www.elsevier.com/locate/topol

The semigroup of ultrafilters near an idempotent of a semitopological semigroup

M. Akbari Tootkaboni

, T. Vahed

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Science, Shahed University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history:

Received 19 March 2012

Received in revised form 4 August 2012 Accepted 9 August 2012

MSC:

54D80 22A15 Keywords:

Stone– ˇCech compactification Ultrafilter

Central set Syndetic set Piecewise syndetic set Minimal ideal

Let(T,+) be a Hausdorff semitopological semigroup, S be a dense subsemigroup of T and e be an idempotent element of T. The set eS of ultrafilters on S that converge to e is a semigroup under restriction of the usual operation + on βTd, the Stone–

ˇCech compactification of the discrete semigroup Td. We characterize the smallest ideal of(eS,+), and those sets “central” in(eS,+), that is, those sets which are members of minimal idempotents in(eS,+). We describe some combinatorial applications of those sets that are central in(eS,+).

2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Given a discrete space

(

T

, +)

, we take the points of

β

T, the Stone– ˇCech compactification of T, to be the ultrafilters on T (or the ultrafilters in the collection of all subsets of T), with the points of T identified with the principal ultrafilters.

The topology of

β

T can be defined by stating that the sets of the form

{

p

∈ β

T: A

p

}

, where A is a subset of T, are a base for the open sets. For any p

∈ β

T and any A

T, A

p if and only ifp

A, where A denotesclβTA. If A is a subset ofT, we shall use Ato denote A

A.

Let p

,

q

∈ β

T and A

T, then A

p

+

q if and only if

{

s

T:

s

+

A

q

} ∈

p, where

s

+

A

= {

t

T: s

+

t

A

}

. For every p

∈ β

T, the maprp

: β

T

→ β

T defined byrp

(

q

) =

q

+

pis continuous, for everys

T, the map

λ

s

: β

T

→ β

T defined by

λ

s

(

q

) =

s

+

q is continuous. For more details see[11]and[2].

The ultrafilter semigroup

(

0+

, +)

of the topological semigroup T

= ((

0

, +∞), +)

consists of all nonprincipal ultrafilter on T

= (

0

, +∞)

converging to 0 and is a closed subsemigroup in the Stone– ˇCech compactification

β

Td ofT as a discrete semigroup. In[8], N. Hindman and I. Leader characterized the smallest ideal of

(

0+

, +)

, its closure, and those sets “central”

in

(

0+

, +)

, that is, those sets which are members of minimal idempotents in

(

0+

, +)

. They derived new combinatorial applications of those sets that are central in

(

0+

, +)

. Related topics in[3]and[4]can be found.

*

Corresponding author.

E-mail address:[email protected](M. Akbari Tootkaboni).

0166-8641/$ – see front matter2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2012.08.009

(2)

In Section 2 we define ultrafilters near a point and show that ife

T is an idempotent then e

=

p

∈ β

Td:e

Ap

clT

(

A

)

is a compact subsemigroup of

β

Td. (Given a topological space X, the notation Xd represents the set X with the discrete topology.)

In Section 3 we characterize the members of the smallest ideal of

(

e

, +)

and its closure. We also describe those subsets ofT that have idempotents in

(

e

, +)

in their closure.

Especially important in the combinatorial applications have been the central sets, i.e. those sets with idempotents in the intersection of their closure with the smallest ideal. In Section 4 we describe sets that are central near e, and we derive combinatorial results from their existence.

2. Preliminary

In this paper,

(

T

, +)

denotes a Hausdorff semitopological semigroup that is not necessarily commutative. E

(

T

)

denotes the collection of all idempotents inT. For everyx

T,

τ

xdenotes the collection of all neighborhoods ofx, where a setU is called a neighborhood ofx

T ifx

intT

(

U

)

. For a set A, we write

P

f

(

A

)

for the set of finite nonempty subsets of A and

P(

A

)

denote the collection of all subsets of A.

Definition 2.1.Let

(

T

, +)

be a semitopological semigroup and Sbe a subsemigroup ofT. (a) Givenx

T,xS

= {

p

∈ β

Sd: x

ApclTA

}.

(b) B

(

S

) =

xTxS. (c)

= β

Sd

\

B

(

S

)

.

The setB

(

S

)

is the set of “bounded” ultrafilters onS and the set

is the set of “unbounded” ultrafilters onS.

We sayp

x is a near point tox. Ifxbe a limit point ofT, thenx

T

= ∅

. Lemma 2.2.Let

(

T

, +)

be a Hausdorff semitopological semigroup and S be a semigroup of T .

(a) Let x

T . Then xS

= ∅

if and only if x

clT

(

S

)

.

(b) p

∈ ∞

if and only if for each x

T there exists A

p such that x

∈ /

clT

(

A

)

. (c) If

τ

x

p then p

xS.

(d) U is a neighborhood of x if and only if U

p for each p

xS. (e) Let A

T . Then x

clTA if and only if clβTdA

xS

= ∅

. Proof. (a) It is obvious.

(b) Letp

∈ ∞

, so p

∈ /

x for eachx

T. Hencex

∈ /

ApclTA. Thusx

∈ /

clTA for some A

p.

Conversely, suppose for eachx

T, there exists A

psuch thatx

∈ /

clTA. Hencep

∈ /

B

(

T

)

and thusp

∈ ∞

.

(c) LetU

pfor each U

∈ τ

x, thus U

A

= ∅

for eachU

∈ τ

x and for each A

p. This impliesx

clTA for each A

p.

Thereforep

x.

(d) LetU

∈ τ

x andp

x.U

A

= ∅

for each A

p, soU

p.

Conversely, letx

∈ ∂

U

=

U

intT

(

U

)

, so

{

Uc

∪ ∂

U

} ∪ τ

x

p, thus p

x andU

∈ /

p, a contradiction.

(e) It is obvious. ✷

Lemma 2.3.Let

(

T

, +)

be a semitopological semigroup and S be a dense subsemigroup of T , then:

(i) For each x

,

y

T , xS

+

yS

⊆ (

x

+

y

)

S.

(ii) Let e

T be an idempotent, then eSis a compact subsemigroup of

β

Sd.

Proof. (i) Pick p

xS and pickq

yS. Suppose that A

p

+

q, then

{

t

S:

t

+

A

q

} ∈

p. Since

t

+

A

q so y

clT

(−

t

+

A

)

. Therefore there exists a net

{

xα

} ⊆ −

t

+

Asuch thatxα

yand sot

+

xα

t

+

yfor eacht

∈{

s

S:

s

+

A

q

}

. Also sincex

clT

({

t

S:

t

+

A

q

})

, so there exists a net

{

tβ

}

such thattβ

x. Thus limβlimαtβ

+

xα

=

x

+

y. Since for each

α

and

β

,tβ

+

xα

A sox

+

y

clT

(

A

)

. This completes the proof.

(ii) It is obvious. ✷

3. Idempotents and the smallest ideal ofe

Let S be a dense subsemigroup of a semitopological semigroup

(

T

, +)

, ande

E

(

T

)

. Among the consequences of the fact that

(

eS

, +)

is a compact right topological semigroup is the fact that it contains idempotents [5, Corollary 2.10]. If S
(3)

is an arbitrary discrete semigroup, it is a result of Galvin’s (see [6, Theorem 2.5]) that a set A

S is a member of some idempotent in

β

Sif and only if there is some sequence

{

xn

}

inS withFS

(

xn

n=1

) ⊆

A

,

where

FS

xn

n=1

=

nF

xn: Fis a finite nonempty subset of

N

.

We have a similar characterization of members of idempotents ineS. Definition 3.1.Let

(

T

, +)

be a semitopological semigroup.

(a) Let

B

be a local base at the point x

T. We say

B

has the finite cover property if

{

V

∈ B

: y

V

}

is finite for each y

T

− {

x

}

.

(b) Let Sbe a dense subsemigroup ofT ande

E

(

T

)

. Let

{

xn

}

be a sequence inS. We say∞

n=1xn converges neareif for each U

∈ τ

e there existsm

Nsuch thatFS

(

xn

ln=k

) ⊆

U for eachl

>

km.

(c) Let

B = {

Un: n

N

}

be a countable local base at the pointx

T such thatUn+1

Unfor eachn

N,Un+1

+

Un+1

Un for eachn

N, and for each sequence

{

xn

}

n=1ifxn

Un for eachn

Nthen

n=1xn converges nearx. Then we say

B

is a countable local base for convergence at the pointx

T.

(d) Let

B

be a local base at the point x

T. If

B

satisfies in conditions (a) and (c) then

B

is called a countable local base that has the finite cover property for convergence at the point x. For simplicity we say

B

has the Fproperty at the pointx.

Theorem 3.2.Let

(

T

, +)

be a semitopological semigroup and S be a dense subsemigroup of T , e

E

(

T

)

and

B = {

Un

}

n=1have the Fproperty at the point e. Then there exists p

=

p

+

p in eS with A

p if and only if there is some sequence

xn

n=1in S such that limn→∞xn

=

e,

n=1xnconverges near e and FS

(

xn

n=1

) ⊆

A.

Proof. Necessity. Let A1

=

A and B1

= {

x

S:

x

+

A1

p

}

so B1

p. Since

B = {

Un

|

n

N

}

is a countable local base for convergence at the point e, pick x1

B1

A1

U1 and let A2

=

A1

∩ (−

x1

+

A1

)

. Inductively, given An

p, let Bn

= {

x

S:

x

+

An

p

}

and pick xn

Bn

An

Un. Let An+1

=

An

∩ (−

xn

+

An

)

. Then one easily sees that

xn

n=1 is as required.

Sufficiency. Without losing of generality, suppose that xn

Un, limn→∞xn

=

e and J

=

m=1clβSdFS

(

xn

n=m

)

. By Lemma 5.11 in[11], J is a subsemigroup of

β

Sd and contains an idempotent p. Since∞

n=1xn converges, for eachU

∈ τ

e, there arem andk inNsuch thatFS

(

xn

n=m

) ⊆

U

SandUk

U. Then for eachr1

> · · · >

rk

>

k

+

1 implies that

xr1

+

xr2

Ur1

+

Ur2

Ur21 and,

(

xr1

+

xr2

) +

xr3

Ur21

+

Ur3

Ur3

+

Ur3

Ur31

.

Hence xr1

+ · · · +

xrk

Uk

U. Thus for eachk

N, there ism

Nsuch thatFS

(

xn

n=m

) ⊆

Uk

S. Consequently J

eS. ✷ As a compact right topological semigroup,eS has a smallest two sided ideal[1, Theorem 1.3.11]. We turn our attention to characterizing the smallest ideal of eS and its closure. Deducing the parallels with known theory becomes progressively less straightforward as we proceed. If

(

S

, +)

is a discrete semigroup we know from [7, Corollary 3.6] that any p

∈ β

S is in the smallest ideal of

β

S if and only if, for each A

p,

{

x

S:

x

+

A

p

}

is syndetic. (A subset B of S is syndetic if and only if there is a finite nonempty subset F of S such that S

tF

t

+

B. The terminology comes from topological dynamics.)

Definition 3.3.Let Sbe a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

ande

E

(

T

)

. (a) K is the smallest ideal ofeS.

(b) A subset BofS is syndetic neareif and only if for eachU

∈ τ

e, there exist someF

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

and some V

∈ τ

e such that S

V

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

.

Theorem 3.4.Let S be a dense subsemigroup of T and let p

eS, where e

E

(

T

)

. The following statements are equivalent.

(a) p

K .

(b)For all A

p,

{

x

S:

x

+

A

p

}

is syndetic near e.

(c)For all r

eS, p

eS

+

r

+

p.
(4)

Proof. (a) implies (b). Let A

p, B

= {

x

S:

x

+

A

p

}

and suppose thatB is not syndetic neare. PickU

∈ τ

e such that for each F

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

and eachV

∈ τ

e,

(

S

V

) \

tF

(−

t

+

B

) = ∅

. Let

G =

S

V

\

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

: F

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

andV

∈ τ

e

.

Then

G

has the finite intersection property, so pick q

∈ β

Sd with

G ⊆

q. Since

{

S

V: V

∈ τ

e

} ⊆

q, thus q

eS, by Lemma 2.2.

Pick a minimal left idealLofeS withL

eS

+

q, by[1, Proposition 1.2.4]. SinceK is the union of all of the minimal right ideal ofeS [1, Theorem 1.3.11], pick a minimal right ideal R ofeS with p

R. Then L

R is a group[1, Theorem 1.3.11], so letrbe the identity of L

R. Thereforep

r

+

eS

=

R and p

=

r

+

pso B

r. Alsor

eS

+

q so pickw

eS such that r

=

w

+

q. ThenU

S

wand

{

t

S:

t

+

B

q

} ∈

wso pickt

U

S such that

t

+

B

q. But

(

S

U

) \ (−

t

+

B

) ∈ G ⊆

q is a contradiction.

(b) implies (c). Let A

pand let B

= {

x

S:

x

+

A

p

}

. Letr

eS. Assume that, for every U

∈ τ

e, there exists FU

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

andVU

∈ τ

e such that S

VU

tFU

(−

t

+

B

)

. Since S

VU

r, there existstU

FU such thattU

+

r

+

p

A.

Ifxis a limit point in

β

Sd of the net

{

tU

}

U∈τe, then x

eS andx

+

r

+

p

=

p.

(c) implies (a). Pickr

K. ✷

Definition 3.5.Let Sbe a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

ande

E

(

T

)

. A subset B of S is topologically piecewise syndetic neareif and only if for each U

∈ τ

e there exist some F

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

and some V

∈ τ

e such that for each G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

and O

∈ τ

e there existsx

S

O such that

(

G

V

) +

x

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

.

Remark.A subset BofSis topologically piecewise syndetic neareif and only if, for everyU

∈ τ

e, there existG

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

andV

∈ τ

e such that

a

+

tG

t

+

B

:a

V

S

∪ τ

e

has the finite intersection property.

LetB

Sthat for everyU

∈ τ

e, there existG

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

andV

∈ τ

e have the property that

a

+

tG

t

+

B

:a

V

S

∪ τ

e

has the finite intersection property. Therefore for each F

∈ P

f

(

V

S

)

and O

∈ τ

e,

aF

a

+

tG

t

+

B

O

= ∅.

Therefore there existsx

O

S such that x

aF

a

+

tG

t

+

B

and so F

+

x

tG

t

+

B. Thus for eachO

∈ τ

e andF

∈ P

f

(

S

)

there existsx

O

Ssuch that

(

F

V

) +

x

tG

(−

t

+

B

).

So Bbe topologically piecewise syndetic neare.

Now let Bis topologically piecewise syndetic near e. So for eachU

∈ τ

e there existF

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

andV

∈ τ

e such that for eachG

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andO

∈ τ

e there existsx

O

S that

(

G

V

) +

x

tF

(−

t

+

B

).

Thusx

yGV

(−

y

+ (

tF

(−

t

+

B

)))

, and so

yGV

y

+

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

O

= ∅.

Therefore

(5)

a

+

tG

t

+

B

: a

V

S

∪ τ

e

has the finite intersection property.

Theorem 3.6.Let S be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

, e

E

(

T

)

, and A

S. Then K

clβS

(

A

) = ∅

if and only if A is topologically piecewise syndetic near e.

Proof. Necessity. Pickp

K

clβSA. LetB

= {

x

S:

x

+

A

p

}

. By Theorem 3.4, Bis syndetic neare. Then for eachU

∈ τ

e there exist some F

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

and V

∈ τ

e such that

(

S

V

) ⊆

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

. Let G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

. If G

V

= ∅

, the conclusion is trivial, so assume G

V

= ∅

and let H

=

G

V. For each y

H, we have y

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

so pickty

F such that y

∈ −

ty

+

B. Then

−(

ty

+

y

) +

A

p. By Lemma 2.2, forO

∈ τ

e

p, pickx

O

yH

(−(

ty

+

y

) +

A

)

. Thenty

+

y

+

x

A so y

+

x

∈ −

ty

+

A

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

. Thus for eachU

∈ τ

e there exist some F

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

and someV

∈ τ

e such that for all G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andO

∈ τ

e there existsx

S

O such that

(

G

V

) +

x

tF

(−

t

+

B

)

.

Sufficiency. For eachU

∈ τ

ethere exist some FU

∈ P

f

(

U

S

)

and someVU

∈ τ

e such that for eachG

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andW

∈ τ

e there existsx

S

W such that

(

G

VU

) +

x

tFU

(−

t

+

B

)

. For each G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andU

∈ τ

e, let

C

(

G

,

U

) =

x

U

S:

(

G

VU

) +

x

tFU

(−

t

+

A

)

.

By assumption C

(

G

,

U

) = ∅

. It is obvious that for G1

,

G2

∈ P

f

(

S

)

and U1

,

U2

∈ τ

e, we will have C

(

G1

G2

,

U1

U2

) ⊆

C

(

G1

,

U1

) ∩

C

(

G2

,

U2

)

. Thus

C = {

C

(

G

,

U

)

: G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andU

∈ τ

e

}

has the finite intersection property, hence pick p

∈ β

Sd such that

C ⊆

p. So p

eS (by Lemma 2.2). Now we claim that for eachU

∈ τ

e,

eS

+

p

clβSd

tFU

(−

t

+

A

)

.

Letq

eS. To show that

tFU

(−

t

+

A

) ∈

q

+

p, we show that

VU

S

y

S:

y

+

tFU

(−

t

+

A

) ∈

p

.

Let y

VU

S, so C

({

y

},

U

) ∈

p andC

({

y

},

U

) ⊆ −

y

+

tFU

(−

t

+

A

)

. Now pick r

∈ (

eS

+

p

) ∩

K (sinceeS

+

p is a left ideal ofeS). GiventU

FU

U such that

tU

+

A

r, pickq

eS

clβSd

{

tU: U

∈ τ

e

}

. Thenq

+

r

K and

{

tU: U

∈ τ

e

} ⊆ {

t

S:

t

+

A

r

}

. So A

q

+

ras required. ✷

Definition 3.7. Let S be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

, e

E

(

T

)

and

B = {

Un

}

n=1 have the F property at the point e.

A subset A ofSis a piecewise syndetic nearewith countable base if and only if there exists

{

Fn

}

n∈N such that (1) for eachn

N,Fn

∈ P

f

(

Un

S

),

and

(2) for eachG

∈ P

f

(

S

)

and eachW

∈ τ

e there is somex

W

S such that for alln

N,

(

G

Un

) +

x

tFn

(−

t

+

A

)

. Theorem 3.8.Let S be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

, e

E

(

T

)

, and

B = {

Un

}

n=1have theFproperty at the point e. Let A

S.

Then K

clβSA

= ∅

if and only if A is a piecewise syndetic near e with countable base.

Proof. Necessity. Pick p

K

clβSA. Let B

= {

x

S:

x

+

A

p

}

. By Theorem 3.4, Bis syndetic neare. Since

B = {

Un

}

n=1 has theFproperty at the pointe, inductively forn

NpickFn

∈ P

f

(

Un

S

)

andVn

Unsuch thatS

Vn

tFn

(−

t

+

B

)

. Let G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

be given. If G

V1

= ∅

, the conclusion is trivial, so assume that G

V1

= ∅

and assume that H

=

G

V1. For each y

H, letm

(

y

) =

sup

{

n: y

Vn

}

. For each y

H and eachn

∈ {

1

, . . . ,

m

(

y

)}

, we have y

tFn

(−

t

+

B

)

so pick t

(

y

,

n

) ∈

Fn such that y

∈ −

t

(

y

,

n

) +

B. Then given y

H andn

∈ {

1

, . . . ,

m

(

y

)}

, one has

−(

t

(

y

,

n

) +

y

) +

A

p. Now let W

∈ τ

e be given. ThenW

S

pso pick

x

W

yH m(y)

n=1

t

(

y

,

n

) +

y

+

A

.

Then givenn

Nandy

G

Un, one has y

Handnm

(

y

)

sot

(

y

,

n

) +

y

+

x

Aso y

+

x

∈ −

t

(

y

,

n

) +

A

tFn

(−

t

+

A

).

(6)

Sufficiency. Pick

{

Fn

}

satisfying

(

1

)

and

(

2

)

of Definition 3.7. For eachG

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andW

∈ τ

e, let C

(

G

,

W

) =

x

W

S: for alln

∈ N , (

G

Un

) +

x

tFn

(−

t

+

A

)

.

By assumption each C

(

G

,

W

) = ∅

. Further, given G1

,

G2

∈ P

f

(

S

)

and W1

,

W2

∈ τ

e, one has C

(

G1

G2

,

W1

W2

) ⊆

C

(

G1

,

W1

) ∩

C

(

G2

,

W2

)

so

{

C

(

G

,

W

)

: G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andW

∈ τ

e

}

has the finite intersection property so pick p

∈ β

Sd with

{

C

(

G

,

W

)

: G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

andW

∈ τ

e

} ⊆

p. Note that since eachC

(

G

,

W

) ⊆

W

S, one hasp

eS. Now we claim that for each n

N,eS

+

p

clβSd

(

tFn

(−

t

+

A

))

, so letn

Nand letq

eS. To show that

tFn

(−

t

+

A

) ∈

q

+

p, we show that

Un

S

y

S:

y

+

tFn

(−

t

+

A

) ∈

p

.

So let y

Un

S. ThenC

({

y

},

Un

) ∈

pand C

{

y

},

Un

⊆ −

y

+

tFn

(−

t

+

A

).

Now pick r

∈ (

eS

+

p

) ∩

K (sinceeS

+

p is a left ideal ofeS). Givenn

N,

tFn

(−

t

+

A

) ∈

r so picktn

Fn such that

tn

+

A

r. Now eachtn

Fn

Unso limn→∞tn

=

ehence pickq

eS

clβSd

{

tn: n

N

}

. Thenq

+

r

K and

{

tn: n

N

} ⊆ {

t

S:

t

+

A

r

}

thus A

q

+

r. ✷

We characterize those sets that are members of minimal idempotents in

(

eS

, +)

. By[9, Theorem 2.1], there exists a relatively complicated characterization of those subsets

A

of

P(

S

)

which extend to a member of the smallest ideal of

β

S.

This characterization was called “collection wise piecewise syndetic” in[10]and used there to characterize central sets, that is members of idempotents in the smallest ideal of

β

S.

Definition 3.9.LetS be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

ande

E

(

T

)

. Let

τ

e

(

S

) = {

U

S: U

∈ τ

e

}

. (a) A set A

Sis central neareif and only if there is some idempotent p

K withA

p.

(b) A family

A ⊆ P(

S

)

is topological collectionwise piecewise syndetic neareif and only if there exist functions F

: P

f

( A ) →

U∈τe

P

f

(

U

S

)

and

δ : P

f

( A ) →

U∈τe

P (

U

) ∩ τ

e

such that for everyO

∈ τ

e, everyG

∈ P

f

(

S

)

, and every

H ∈ P

f

(A)

, there is somet

S

O such that for everyU

∈ τ

e and every

F ∈ P

f

(H)

,

G

∩ δ( F )

U

+

t

xF(F)U

x

+ F

.

(c) Let

B = {

Un

}

n=1 has theFproperty at the pointe. A family

A ⊆ P(

S

)

is collectionwise syndetic nearewith countable base if and only if there exist functions

F

: P

f

( A ) →

n=1

P

f

(

Un

S

)

and

δ : P

f

( A ) →

n=1

P (

Un

) ∩ τ

e

(

S

)

such that for everyU

∈ τ

e, everyG

∈ P

f

(

S

)

, and every

H ∈ P

f

(A)

, there is somet

S

U such that for everyn

N and every

F ∈ P

f

(H)

,

G

∩ δ( F )

n

+

t

xF(F)n

x

+ F

.

(7)

Theorem 3.10.Let S be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

, e

E

(

T

)

, and

B = {

Un

}

n=1have theFproperty at the point e. There exists p

K such that

A ⊆

p if and only if

A

is collectionwise piecewise syndetic near e with countable base.

Proof. Necessity. Let B

(F) = {

x

S:

x

+

F ∈

p

}

, for each

F ∈ P

f

(A)

. Then by Theorem 3.4, B

(F )

is syndetic near e with countable base, so for eachn

N, pick F

(F)

n

∈ P

f

(

Un

S

)

and

δ(F)

n

∈ P(

Un

) ∩ τ

e

(

S

)

such that

S

∩ δ( F )

n

xF(F)n

x

+

B

( F ) .

We have thus defined F

: P

f

( A ) →

n=1

P

f

(

Un

S

)

and

δ : P

f

( A ) →

n=1

P (

Un

) ∩ τ

e

(

S

) .

To see that these functions are as required, letU

∈ τ

e,G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

, and

H ∈ P

f

(A)

be given.

Pick m

N such that max

{

n

N: Un

G

= ∅} <

m. For each

(

y

,

n

, F)

such that n

∈ {

1

,

2

, . . . ,

m

}

,

F ∈ P

f

(H)

, and y

∈ δ(F)

n

G, pickx

(

y

,

n

, F) ∈

F

(F)

nsuch thatx

(

y

,

n

, F ) +

y

B

(F)

, that is

−(

x

(

y

,

n

, F) +

y

) + F ∈

p. Let

C =

x

(

y

,

n

, F ) +

y

+

F

:n

∈ {

1

,

2

, . . . ,

m

}, F ∈ P

f

( H ),

andy

∈ δ( F )

n

G

.

If

C = ∅

, the conclusion is trivial, so we may assume

C = ∅

and hence

C ∈ P

f

(

p

)

. Pickt

C ∩

U. Letn

Nand

F ∈ P

f

(H)

be given. If G

∩ δ(F)

n

= ∅

the conclusion holds, so assumeG

∩ δ(F)

n

= ∅

and let y

G

∩ δ(F)

n. Then y

∈ δ(F)

n andy

G son

<

m. Thust

∈ −(

x

(

y

,

n

, F) +

y

) +

F

so y

+

t

∈ −

x

(

y

,

n

, F ) +

F ⊆

xF(F)n

x

+ F

.

Sufficiency. Pick functions F and

δ

as guaranteed by the assumption that

A

is collectionwise piecewise syndetic near e with countable base. Given U

∈ τ

e,G

∈ P

f

(

S

)

, and

H ∈ P

f

(A)

, pick t

(H,

G

,

U

) ∈

U

S such that for every n

Nand

F ∈ P

f

(H)

,

G

∩ δ( F )

n

+

t

( H ,

G

,

U

) ⊆

xF(F)n

x

+ F

.

For each

F ∈ P

f

(A)

and every y

S, let D

( F ,

y

) =

t

( H ,

G

,

U

)

:

H ∈ P

f

( A ),

G

∈ P

f

(

S

),

y

G

, F ⊆ H ,

andU

∈ τ

e

.

Then D

= {

D

(F,

y

)

:

F ∈ P

f

(A)

andy

S

} ∪ {

U

S: U

∈ τ

e

}

has the finite intersection property. Indeed, given

F

1

, F

2

, . . . ,F

n, y1

,

y2

, . . . ,

yn andU1

,

U2

, . . . ,

Un

∈ τ

e, let

H =

n

i=1

F

i

,

G

= {

y1

,

y2

, . . . ,

yn

},

and U

=

n

k=1

Uk

.

Thent

(H,

G

,

U

) ∈

n

i=1

(

D

(F

i

,

yi

) ∩

Ui

)

. So picku

eS such that

{

D

(F,

y

)

:

F ∈ P

f

(A)

andy

S

} ⊆

u. Now we claim that for each

F ∈ P

f

(A)

and eachn

N,

eS

+

u

xF(F)n clβSd

x

+ F

.

So pickq

eS and let A

=

xF(F)n

(−

x

+

F)

. We claim that

δ(F)

n

⊆ {

y

S:

y

+

A

u

}

, so that since

δ(F)

n

q, we have A

q

+

u. Let y

∈ δ(F)

n. It suffices to show that D

(F,

y

) ⊆ −

y

+

A. So let

H ∈ P

f

(A)

with

F ⊆ H

, let G

∈ P

f

(A)

with y

G, and letU

∈ τ

e be given. Then y

G

∩ δ(F)

nso y

+

t

(H,

G

,

U

) ∈

A as required. Pick a minimal left idealLofeS withL

eS

+

q. Then

L

F∈Pf(A)

n=1

xF(F)n clβSd

x

+ F

.

(8)

Pickr

L. For each

F ∈ P

f

(A)

and eachn

N, pickx

(F,

n

) ∈

F

(F)

n such that

x

(F ,

n

) + F ∈

r. For each

F ∈ P

f

(A)

, let

E ( F ) =

x

( H ,

n

)

:

H ∈ P

f

( A ), F ⊆ H ,

andn

∈ N .

We claim that

{E(F)

:

F ∈ P

f

(A)} ∪ τ

e

(

S

)

has the finite intersection property. Indeed, given

F

1

, F

2

, . . . , F

n and V1

,

V2

, . . . ,

Vn

∈ τ

e

(

S

)

, pick n

N such that Un

m

k=1Vk and let

H =

m

i=1

F

i. Then we have x

(H,

n

) ∈

m

i=1

E(F

i

) ∩

m

i=1Vi. So pickw

eS such that

{E (F)

:

F ∈ P

f

(A)} ⊆

w. Let p

=

w

+

r. Then p

L

K. To see that

A ⊆

p, let A

∈ A

. We show that

E({

A

}) ⊆ {

x

S:

x

+

A

r

}

. Let

F ∈ P

f

(A)

with A

∈ F

and let n

N. Then

x

(F,

n

) +

F ∈

r and therefore

x

(F,

n

) +

F ⊆ −

x

(F,

n

) +

A. ✷

Conjecture.Let S be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

and e

E

(

T

)

. Let

A ⊆ P(

S

)

. Then there exists p

K such that

A ⊆

p if and only if

A

is topological collectionwise piecewise syndetic near e.

We formalize the notion of “tree” below. We write

ω = {

0

,

1

,

2

,

3

, . . .}

, the first infinite ordinal and recall that each ordinal is the set of its predecessors. (So 3

= {

0

,

1

,

2

}

and 0

= ∅

and, if f is the function

(

0

,

3

), (

1

,

5

), (

2

,

9

), (

3

,

7

), (

4

,

5

)

then f

|

3

= {(

0

,

3

), (

1

,

5

), (

2

,

9

)}

.)

Definition 3.11.Tris a tree in Aif and only ifTris a set of functions and for each f

Tr, domain

(

f

) ∈ ω

and range

(

f

) ⊂

A and if domain

(

f

) =

n

>

0, then f

|

n1

Tr.Tris a tree if and only if for some A,Tris a tree in A.

Definition 3.12.

(a) Let f be a function with domain

(

f

) =

n

∈ ω

and letxbe given. Then fx

=

f

∪ {(

n

,

x

)}

. (b) Given a treeTrand f

Tr,Bf

=

Bf

(

Tr

) = {

x: fx

Tr

}

.

(c) Let

(

S

, +)

be a semigroup and let A

S. ThenTris a

-tree in A if and only ifTris a tree in A and all f

Trand all x

Bf,Bfx

⊆ −

x

+

Bf.

(d) Let

(

S

, +)

be a semigroup and let A

S. ThenTris anFS-tree in Aif and only ifTris a tree in Aand for all f

Tr, Bf

=

tF

g

(

t

)

: g

Tr

,

f

g

,

and

∅ =

F

domain

(

g

) \

domain

(

f

)

.

Lemma 3.13.Let

(

S

, +)

be a discrete semigroup and let p be an idempotent in

β

Sd. If A

p, then there is an FS-tree Tr in A such that for each f

Tr, Bf

p.

Proof. This is[10, Lemma 3.6]. ✷ Lemma 3.14.Any FS-tree is a

-tree.

Proof. This is[8, Lemma 4.6]. ✷

When we say that

CF

FI is a “downward directed family” we mean thatIis a directed set and wheneverF

,

G

Iwith FG, one hasCG

CF.

Theorem 3.15.Let S be a dense subsemigroup of

(

T

, +)

, e

E

(

T

)

, and A

S. Let

B = {

Un

}

n=1has theFproperty at the point e.

Statements

(

1

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

3

)

, and

(

4

)

are equivalent and are implied by statement

(

5

)

. If S is countable, all five statements are equivalent.

(1) A is central near e.

(2) There is an FS-tree Tr in A that

{

Bf: f

Tr

}

is collectionwise near e with countable base.

(3) There is a

-tree Tr in A such that

{

Bf: f

Tr

}

is collectionwise near e with countable base.

(4) There is a downward directed family

CF

FIof subsets of A such that

(i) for all F

I and all x

CF, there exists some G

I with CG

⊆ −

x

+

CF, and (ii)

{

CF: F

I

}

is collectionwise piecewise syndetic near e with countable base.

(5) There is a decreasing sequence

Cn

n=1of subsets of A such that

(i) for all n

Nand all x

Cn, there is some m

Nwith Cm

⊆ −

x

+

Cn, and (ii)

{

Cn:n

N

}

is collectionwise piecewise syndetic near e with countable base.

Proof. See Theorem 4.7 in[8]. ✷

(9)

4. Central sets neareand applications

In this section suppose that T is a commutative semigroup.

Definition 4.1.Let

(

T

, +)

be a semitopological semigroup and Sbe a dense subsemigroup of T. Let

B = {

Un

}

n=1 has theF property at the pointe

E

(

T

)

.

(a)

Φ = {

f

:

N

N: for alln

N

,

f

(

n

)

n

}

.

(b)

Y = {

yi,t

t=1

i=1: for eachi

N,

yi,t

t=1is a sequence in S and∞

t=1yi,t converges

}.

(c) Given Y

=

yi,t

t=1

i=1 in

Y

and A

S, A is a JY-set near e if and only if for all n

N there exist a

Un and H

∈ P

f

(

N

)

such that minHnand for eachi

∈ {

1

,

2

, . . . ,

n

}

,a

+

tH yi,t

A.

(d) GivenY

∈ Y

, JY

= {

p

eS: for all A

p

,

Ais a JY-set neare

}.

(e) J

=

Y∈Y JY.

Lemma 4.2.Let

(

T

, +)

be a commutative semitopological semigroup and S be a dense subsemigroup of T . Let

B = {

Un

}

n=1has theF property at the point e

E

(

T

)

. Let Y

∈ Y

. Then K

JY.

Proof.Let Y

=

yi,t

t=1

i=1 and let p

K. To see that p

JY, let A

p. To see that A is a JY-set near e, let n

N be given. Fork

Nlet

Ik

=

a

+

tH

y1,t

,

a

+

tH

y2,t

, . . . ,

a

+

tH

yn,t

: a

Un

S

,

H

∈ P

f

( N ),

minH

k

,

i

∈ {

1

,

2

, . . . ,

n

},

a

+

tH

yi,t

Uk

and let

Ek

=

Ik

(

a

,

a

, . . . ,

a

)

:a

Uk

S

.

Let W

=

n

i=1eS and let Z

=

n

i=1

β

Sd. Let E

=

k=1clZEk and letI

=

k=1clZIk. Observe that

∅ =

I

E. We claim that E is a s

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In this paper we discuss the microstrip antenna, types of microstrip antenna, feeding techniques and application of microstrip patch antenna with their advantage and

prisoner’s dilemma as a typical 2 × 2 game for a network wherein an individual extracts the number of other individuals who adopt a strategy s j , depending on some sampling rate,

We also prove an auxiliary result about minimal maps to products of surfaces andR-trees that do not minimize their energy functionals over Teichmüller space Theorem 7B1.. The idea is

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol.104,No 4 2015 599--619.Scopus 32.Ould Ahmed Mahmoud Sid Ahmed,The single valued extension property and Bishop s property

46, 577 [11] Kylychbekov S et al2020 Reconstruction of plasma density profiles by measuring spectra of radiation emitted from oscillating plasma dipolesPlasma Sources Sci..

We determined 18S rRNA gene sequences ofAmoebophryastrains infecting the thecate dinoflagellatesAlexandrium affine andGonyaulax polygrammafrom Korean coastal waters and compared those

2:00 – 3:00 Kazuma Morita Kyoto p-adic Hodge Theory in the imperfect residue field case Abstract : In this talk, we state some results on Galois representations of local field with

12 June Tuesday 9:30 – 10:30 Takeshi Kajiwara Yokohama National, Chikara Nakayama Tokyo IT “Log abelian varieties” joint work with Kazuya Kato Abstract : We discuss the notions log