• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Review of Administrative Reform in Seoul

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Review of Administrative Reform in Seoul"

Copied!
14
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)2. 〔. 1. 2001. 3 (pp. 103~116) 103. 〕. Review of Administrative Reform in Seoul *. Ⅲ.. Ⅰ. Ⅱ.. Ⅰ.. , 「 ·. ·. 」 「. . (governance) .. 」 「. 」. ,. 1998. .. IMF ,. . ,. ,. 4 , .. . , . 「. 4 」,「. 4 」,「. 」,「. ,. 」. .. .. Ⅱ.. *. (2) 2. 104. 1. 2001. 3. ,. 1. 20% 1). ,. 2). 「. , 」. .. 「. 1998. 」. (BPR),. .. -. 1). ①. -. ,. , ②. , ·. .. , ③. ·. ,④ , ⑤ . .. , 6. (. ). 3). . -. . ①. , ,②. ·. -. ,. ,. ,③ , ④ ,⑤ .. .. , .. 1) . 2) 3). 470 1~4. ,. 2001. . 5~8. ,. ,. . ,. , ,. .. ,. (3) 105. .. .. ,. ,. ,. .. , ·. 2). . , ,. . ,. , 1998 34 20. .. 8. ,. ,. ,. 15. 10. ,. . 1999 ·. (. ),. 7. ,. ,. . 10 , 2000 .. ,. ,. -. :. -. :. 4 ·. .. 4). :. -. , :. -. , , ,. .. (. , 2001).. , 4) 1999. 2000. , 1. 7. 6 21. , 3. 3. ,. 7 2. 8 101. , 5. 9 8. 8. 9. ,. 5 1 .. ,. 3. 5. 7 2. , ,. 6. ,. (4) 2. 106. 1. 2001. 3. ·. , ·. ·. . ,. ·. 1998 ·. ·. ·. .. , .. 5). . , · ·. , 3. 43. ,. ,. 12. ,. (27.9%). , ,. ,. , ·. . 1999. 12. .. ,. , ,. PD,. .. ,. ,. 611. ,. .. 6). · ·. ·3. ,. ·. ·4 .. , ,. ,. , .. ,. .. 2.. 12. 7). 1- 2 1). 1. (Managemant By Objectives : MBO). 5). 3. 3 . ~. 6) ( ) 7). 3 5 ·. , ·. . ·. . ·. ·. .. ·. , ,. ·. ·. ·. ,. (5) 107. ,③. . ,. . ·. ,. ·. (±10). ·. ·. .. .. , ,. ,. ,. ,. .. ,. ,. ·. ,. , . .. 2001. ·. 2). ,. ·. (Performance). , ·. ·. ,. ,. (Output) .. .. 8). (. ). ·. ,. ,. 2001. , .. 9). . ①. 2002. ·. ·. ,② .. 8). (Output) ·. 9). ,. (Outcome). ,. ,. .. ,. ( ,. ) (. · ). ·. , ,. ·. , .. (6) 2. 108. 1. 2001. 3. 3). · ,. .. ,. 11). ,. , .. . · , , .. 12). .. 1~2. 10 ). ·. ·. ,. 1,114 462. .. ·. , 372. 20. 75% .. 1998. ,. .. , ,. ,. , ·. .. ,. ,. ,. · .. ,. ·. .. · · 10). .. 1 3 , 3 , 12 ~1999 1 1 , · , ,. 11) 1998 ,. ,. . , 15. 1 ,. 2 , ·. ,. ,. ,. ·. ,. 2. 4 ,. . ,. 5. ·. , 1999 39. 98. 2 ~3. 2 59. . 12) 1998 ,. 2000 30 ,. · 5 ,. ·. 172 ·. 115 , 89 ,. 57 24 ,. .. 5 19. .. (7) 109. ,. (operation process) 185 ,. 258. , ,. 82 .. ,. (One- stop). (Non- stop) ,. .. 2002 ,. 4). ,. ,. (Business Process Reengineering : BPR). . ,. 258. 1999. ,. , .. ,. ,. ,. 19. ,. , ·. , ①. ,. ,②' ?,. , ,. ,. ,. 1999 ·. 2000. ?'. . ,. ,③. (Zero-base). · ,. ④. (process). ·. ,. ·. ·. ,. .. .. . 1998. 3.. BPR 1). , 1999 , 2000. . 1998 (infrastructre process) 73. ,. ,. (8) 2. 110. 「. 1. 2001. 3. 」. .. .. 2). .. 13 ). 2 .. , 『 「. , .. ,. 「. 』. .. 」. ,. ,. .. 」 , .. ,. , FAX,. ,. ,. . ·. ,. ,. · .. 14 ). ,. ,. ·. ,. ,. ,. .. ,. · ·. ,. , ,. ,. , .. 4~6. 1. 15. .. 「 」. · ,. .. 15). 13) .. , ,. 14). . 1999. 6. 1999. 59.6. 2000. . 15) 1998 7 379,. 2000 12 488). 2 6 57.5%,. 1,509 477 (32.5%),. , 165 (10.9%) .. 867 ( .. 62.2. (9) 111. 24 .. One- Stop. Non- Stop. . .. 3). .. .. .. (BPR) , Plan. 2000. Action. 7 .. . 4) 16 ). (. :. www.cyber.seoul.kr). .. 375 ,. .. ,. 500. 875 .. .. , FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) 2000. .. . ①. 7. ), ②. ,. /. .. , ③. 16). ( , (. . ,. , ,. , ,. .. /. ,. ,. (10) 2. 112. 1. 2001. 3. , On- line. ). .. ,. ,. .. ,. .. ,. 17). , .. ,. .. .. .. .. 4. 1). ,. (Open System : Online .. Procedures. Enhancement. for. Civil. Applications). 5). .. 26. 1999. ,. 4. 15 , 2000. 28. 2 54. . . , , 17). 9 ,. . 14. ,4 .. ,. ·. ,. (11) 113. ,. .. , ,. , ,. ,. ,. , e- mail. 2). ,. .. ,. 18 ). · .. ,. 19 ). · .. . ·. ,. .. ,. ,. 3 .. .. ,. ,. 3. .. ,. ,. . . , · , . ,. 18). 19). , (www.metro.seoul.kr) .. ,. (open.metro.seoul.kr) .. (12) 2. 114. 1. 2001. 3. ,. ,. (. .. ,. ), 20. ,. ,. ,. ,. .. , ·. , . . ,. ,. 3. .. ,. 20 ). ,. . , ,. . . 4). 3). ·. 『. . 』 .. 1999. 21). , ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. .. 7. 25. ,. ,. .. 22). 20). 50 ,. ,. 5. ,. ,. ,. ·. ,. 1. ,. 10 ,. , ,. 2 ,. . 3 .. 21). ,. ,. . . 22) 4 957. .. 143. ,. 2 , 73. 1 , ,. 1 , 384. ,. 67 , ·. · 500. 68 ,. (13) 115. (BPR) ,. , 「. . 78%. ,. 」. ,. ,. ,. 59.1%,. , 68.1%. . 2000. ,「. .. 」. , ·. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. , .. . 21. ,. ,. . .. ,. 23). ,. Ⅲ.. . ,. , .. , 「. . 」. 6. ,. . , 「. . 」. . ·. ,. 21. ,. . (no- visit ,. 23). ( ①. ,. , ②. ,. government). . 2000 2. ) 7 , 140. 9 .. (14) 2. 116. 1. 2001. 3. 』. .. Hodge, G. A., 2000, Privatization-An International. .. Review of Performance- : Westview Press. Johnson, R. A. & Walzer, N. edt., 2000, Local. PC. Government Innovation, Quorum Books. Muzzio, D. & Ryzin, G. V., 2000, Satisfaction with. .. ,. ,. ,. ,. ·. ·. ,. New York City Services-Final Report- " The. ,. Council of the City of New York. Seoul Metropolitan. Cyber- City. .. ,. .. .. , ·. .. .. .. , 1998,『 』. .. , 2000, 『2000 』. , 2000, 『 5 , 1997, 『. ,『. 市政 改革白書』 』. . .. Government, 2000,『Reinventing. Seoul Metropolitan Government』.. (15)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The objectives of this final project report are to describe the varieties of media communication in Public Relations Division of Sukoharjo Local Government, to identify the

Bureaucracy Reform in Improving Integrated District Administrative Services RM Haryo Bharoto1, Yhonanda Harsono2, Aghnia Dian Lestari3, Shara Maharani4 Universitas Swadaya Gunung

Paper Number: PA031423 Paper Title: City and State Contracts to New York City Nonprofit Organizations: A Description and Preliminary Analysis of New Data Authors: Professor Nicole

Alper was originally sponsored by Reader's Digest for a one week residency in Alfred Because of a grant from the New York State Council on the Arts, a second week of residency "looks

The National Recreation and Play greatest factor in social reform lies Ground Association of America, 1 in the control of a peoples leisure j Madison Avenue, New York City, is an time,

PERSPEKTIF Available online http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/perspective Hipocracy in the Performance of State Civil Apparatus and Public Services in Mojokerto District/City: New

Allen has givenacomplete list of the Maximilian types of South Americanbirds in the Museum of Natural History, New York City,*the names of Maximilian's new actualorsupposed speciesbeing

317 MICRO SMALL BUSINESS LICENSE SERVICES COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN NORTH JAKARTA ADMINISTRATIVE CITY Dina Lesmana 1, Nia Sumiati 2 MICRO SMALL BUSINESS LICENSE SERVICES