We systematically analyze the AIC dynamics and the properties of the resulting GW signal. For the SFC method, we assume that the WD is cold and has a constant Ye. According to their results, the shear rate in the core remains close to the threshold value for the onset of the DSI.
We use these Ye(ρ) data for the Ye evolution of the low-density part (ρ < ρc,i) of the WD during collapse. This aspect will prove to be important for the understanding of the collapse dynamics in rapidly rotating models. We recall that fpi is the fraction of the central density where the angular velocity has a global maximum.
6 for all models the initial values (βi) of the parameterβ as a function of their central angular velocity Ωc,i before collapse. The robustness does not affect the collapse and post-bounce dynamics of the inner core. We implement this by taking advantage of the fact that Ye(ρ) is a good approximation of a linear function of log(ρ) (see Figure 1).
The rejection and re-expansion of the inner core is also evident in the time evolution of ρc shown in Fig. Moreover, the mass and size of the inner core are rather insensitive to the initial value of ρc. Note that such a measure of the inner core is only valid at the time of rejection.
Conservation of the angular momentum leads to an increase of the angular velocity Ω ∝ ̟−2 and of the centrifugal acceleration acent= Ω2̟ ∝̟−3. Shown are the results of the high-T model sequence (the low-T models exhibit identical systematics). 8, where we plot the time to core jump as a function of the initial central angular velocity Ωc,i.
9 we plot the maximum density ρmax,b at bounce as a function of the inner core parameter βic,b. III, shows that the masses and geometry of the discs produced in the AIC are sensitive to the angular momentum distribution in the precollapse WDs.
GRAVITATIONAL WAVE EMISSION In Fig. 15, we present the time evolution of the GW
Hdisk is the thickness and Re is the equatorial radius of the disk, while Mdisk is its mass. The total mass of the disk and its equatorial radius (the disk thickness Hdisk) grows with increasing rotation (see Tab. III). Thus, when considering two WDs of sets A and D with the same total angular momentum, the mass and equatorial extent of the disc in the D model will be smaller by a factor of ∼1.5−2.
This is reflected in the GW signal by an overall lower frequency emission and a significant broadening of the bounce peak of the waveform (see for example models AD9, AD10). In some models of this subtype, the negative peak may be similar to or slightly larger than that of the first positive peak in the waveform. To demonstrate the dependence of |h|max on the overall rotation of the inner core during bouncing, we plot in Figure 1.
18, we plot the peak frequencies fmax of the GW energy spectrum as a function of the inner core parameter βic,b for high-T AIC models (the low-T and higher-Ye . models show the same overall systematics). The interesting details of the mode structure of the inner cores of AIC and iron core collapse will be further explored in a subsequent publication. 19, we provide time–frequency analyzes of the GW signals from the same representative models shown in Figs.
Nevertheless, there is still considerable energy released from higher frequency components of the dynamics during bounce and post-bounce times. 20 we present this comparison and plot the GW signals of the high-T AIC models DU2 (slow rotation, type IIIa), AU5 (moderately fast rotation, type IIIb), and AD10 (very fast rotation, type IIIc) . In the same order, we superimpose the GW signals from the Dimmelmeier et al.
Note that the width of the waveform peaks associated with core reflection is very similar, indicating very similar emission frequencies. This peak is due to re-contraction of the inner core of the ICC after the first strong post-rebound expansion. At rebound, the ICC model's more massive inner core leads to a larger and broader negative peak in the waveform, and its downstream signal exhibits larger amplitudes than the opposite AIC model.
PROSPECTS FOR NONAXISYMMETRIC ROTATIONAL INSTABILITIES
Due to the different central densities and rotation profiles of the pre-collapse WD models, there is no one-to-one correspondence between βic,b and βi. Therefore, we do not expect the high β instability to occur immediately after the rebound in most AIC events. On the other hand, the matter around the PNS experiences rapid neutrino cooling (which is not modeled by our approach) and the PNS shrinks significantly already at an early stage after the rebound.
Using the VUL-CAN/2D code, Ott [60] obtained the post-shock evolution of the PNS rotation of the Dessart et al. We expect that a similar increase of the parameter βic,pb should also occur for the rapidly rotating AIC models considered here. They are therefore unlikely to become subject to the high-β dynamical non-axisymmetric instability, but can contract and twist up to β ≥βsec ≃14 % at which they can, in principle, have a secular non-axisymmetric instability in the late post-shock phase experience.
However, other processes, e.g. MHD dynamo and instabilities (see, e.g., limit and/or reduce the rotation of the PNS on the long time scale required for the growth of the secular instability. In addition to the possibility of a high-β instability, the situation seems favorable for a low-β instability as well. Considering, that the lowest-order unstable modes of the sample velocity have characteristic Keplerian angular velocities O(Ωchar) [56], we can easily verify that such a criterion is always satisfied by our models.
We note that even precollapse models with uniform rotation have strong differential rotation in the aftershock region outside the inner core. Reliable estimates can only be made by performing 3D numerical simulations that adequately treat deleptonization and post-bounce contraction of the PNS and that investigate the dependence of the instability on βic,pb, on the differential rotation rate, and on the thermodynamic and MHD properties of the PNS. Finally, these calculations will also determine what the effective long-term deformation dynamics of the strip mode is.
It is still unclear whether this behavior will also be preserved in the AIC scenario, where infalling material with high specific angular momentum can lead to significant changes.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In this paper we have presented the first general-
Test calculations motivated by possible systematic biases of the AICYe (ρ) trajectories obtained from [28] (see sections II A 2 and II C 3) with the inner core values of Ye increased by ~10% and ~20 % yielded values Microphone, larger by ∼11% and ∼25%. We find that the parameterβic,b= (Erot/|W|)ic, of the jumping inner core provides a unique mapping between the rotation of the inner core and the late-time collapse and jump dynamics, but the mapping between the precollapse configurations and βic, b. This type of signal is mainly due to the small inner masses of the bouncing core obtained in these models.
Rotation remains subdominant in the type IIIa and type IIIb models and we find that there is a monotonic and near-linear relationship between the maximum GW amplitude and the rotation of the inner core which is best described by the power law|hmax| ∝10−21βic,b0.74. This finding suggests that the GW emission in these models is driven by the fundamental quadrupole (2f) mode of the inner core. Due to the degenerate dependence of the initial model parameters βic,bon, this can only place loose constraints on the structure and spin configuration of the progenitor WD.
By studying the configurations of the protonneutron stars formed in our AIC models, we find that none of them is likely to experience the high- β non-axisymmetric bar-mode instability at very early postbounce times. We conclude that the emergence of non-axisymmetric dynamics driven by either low-β or high-β instabilities and the resulting large enhancement of the GW signature may be a generic aspect of AIC and needs to be investigated in 3D models. The comparison of the GW signals from our axisymmetric AIC models with the gravitational waveforms of.
It seems unlikely that AIC and iron core collapse could be distinguished on the basis of the axisymmetric parts of their GW signals alone, unless detailed knowledge of the signal time series as well as of source orientation and distance is available to break observation. degenerations. As a point of caution, we note that the generic type III GW signal morphology observed in our AIC models is due to the small inner-core values of Ye and consequently small inner-core masses predicted by the Ye(ρ) parameterization obtained from the approximate Newtonian radiation-hydrodynamic simulations by [28]. Tests with artificially reduced deptonization show that the signal shape becomes a mixture of type III found in our study and type I observed in rotating iron core collapse [49] if Ye in the inner core is larger by ~20%.
In a follow-up study, we will use Ye(ρ) data from improved general relativistic radiation-hydrodynamics simulations [102] to better constrain the current uncertainties of the AIC inner-core electron fraction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The results of our AIC simulations presented in this article and the conclusions we draw based on them demonstrate the complex and in many cases degenerate dependence of AIC results and observational signatures on initial conditions. Observation of GWs from an AIC event can provide important information on the rotation dynamics of the AIC. We also neglected nuclear burning, used only a single nuclear EOS with limited temperature, and were forced to impose ad-hoc initial temperature and electron fraction distributions in our spin-equilibrium precollapse WD models.
Importantly, extensive future 3D radiative hydrodynamic simulations are needed to address the range of possible, in many cases likely non-axisymmetric, post-bounce evolutions of AIC and to make detailed predictions of their signatures in GWs, neutrinos and in the electromagnetic spectrum. Stellar iron core collapse in 3+1 general relativity and the gravitational wave signature of core-collapse supernovae.
