nblib.library.kz - /elib/library.kz/jurnal/v_2006_3/

(1)

,

- ,

3- .

1. ( ),

2003–2012 : . :

. , 2003. . 23.

/ . . . ; :

Asia publishing, 1999. . 1. 110 .

[(S)-a- -

3- (1R,3R)- -3-(2,2- - )-

2,2- )] -

i , -

. -

,

3- i .

. . . ,

. 17.03.06 .

. .

,

- -

, ,

, -

,

, -

,

, -

. -

,

, - .

, , -

, -

,

, [1–3].

-

, -

, , ,

.

- , ,

.

-

. ,

,

- - .

- -

. ,

, -

. -

- .

,

, -

: ,

,

.

(2)

, - - .

-

, -

-

. ,

[4, 5]. -

, .

[5].

-

, -

, ,

.

ELISA, -

.

(ELISA) -

. - ,

.

( , , -

), -

,

. -

- ,

. – -

. -

- -

- .

,

. -

, , , , ,

, , , , -

[5].

[6].

( -

, , ) -

, ,

, -

.

, -

. ,

. -

, -

. -

, .

,

. -

- - .

- .

- [7].

-

. -

,

[1].

-

, -

[8].

K. Wilson [7] -

, gus A, -

GUS – ,

Rhizobia.

-

5- -4- -3 -D-

(X-glc A).

(3)

X-glc A ,

5,5’- -3,3’- -3,3’-

( . ).

luc AB -

, luc ,

. - . -

, -

, .

-

E coli -

.

- -

. -

. :

1. -

.

2. -

, .

3. -

.

4. -

[5].

- - [6],

- -

. -

, ,

, -

. [6]:

-

( , , -

, ),

. -

. ,

.

[9] E.coli

c

(4)

. [10]

,

Campilobacter.

, .

-

. -

[6].

-

, ,

.

[11] -

- SYTOX green,

Ps.aeruginosa .

, .

S.Chan et al. [12] -

. -

, -

- ,

.

-

« »,

, -

.

[6].

- - . .

P. E. Olsen et al. [13]

ELISA,

-

. -

– -

IgG, -

Sigma. -

, - .

1 -

.

Ch.Wang et al. [14] -

-

Ps.fluorescens .CS 85 -

-

(gus A) -

(lux B).

. E.coli WA803(pDB 30), Tn5-lux AB

.

. -

(KB-KS),

n- .

E.coli S17.1 -

pCAM III: TnSSgusA11,

. -

- - -

: 5- -4- -3 -D- -

.

- ,

KB-SK. 18-

n- -

,

, -

.

. ,

,

, ,

.

(5)

Rhizobium galegae Galega orientalis // . 2000.

1. . 44-49.

2. ., .,

., ., ., ., -

. -

-

// . . 4- -

-

» 3-6 2003 . ., 2003.

3. . -

-

: . . , 2005.

4. // . . . -

. .: , 2005. 608 .

5. ., . -

. . .: , 2002. 589 .

6.Deisingh F.K., Tompson M. Biosensors for the detection of bacteria // Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2004. V. 50.

P. 69-77.

7.Wilson K. Molecular techniques for the study ofRhizo- bial ecology in the field // Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1995.

V. 27, N5. P. 501-512.

8. . -

Chlamyd omonas reinhardtii

// . .

. . 2002. 2. . 90-93.

9.Ercole C., Del Gallo M., Pantalone M. et al. A biosensor forE.colibased on a potentoometric alternating biosensing transduser // Sens. Actuators. 2002. V. 83. P. 48-52.

for fast detection of pathogenic bacteria // Elecrtochem.

Commun. 2000. V. 2. P. 457-460.

11.Chang A.C., Gillespie J.B., Tabacco M.B. Enchanced detection of live bacteria using a dendrimer thin film in an optical biosensor // Anal. Chem. 2001. V. 73. P. 467-470.

12.Chan S., Horner S.R, Fauchet P.M., Miller B.L. Identi- fication of Gram negative bacteria using nanoscale silicon microcavities // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001. V. 123. P. 11797- 11798.

13.Olsen P.E., Sande E.S., Keyser H.H. et al. A very rapid enzyme immunoassay for confirmation of Rhizobial identity and estimation of cell numbers in fresh broth culture // Can.

J. Microbiol. 1998. V. 44. P. 380-385.

14. Wang Ch., Wang D., Zhou Qi. Colonization and persistence of a plant growth-promoting bacteriumPseudomo- nas fluorescens strain CS 85, on roots of cotton seedlings //

Can. J. Microbiol. 2004. V. 50. P. 475-481.

-

i i, i

i -

.

Summary

In the review general-theoretical bases and individual aspects of the problem of indication, activity and survival of the microorganisms introduced in the Soils are considered.