nblib.library.kz - /elib/library.kz/jurnal/v_2006_5/

(1)

57

18. ., ., .,

. : // . 1997.

2. .88-94.

19. Thompson C.D. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease //Science, 1995, V.267. P.1456-1462.

Summary

In article are resulted given cytopathic actions dsRNA by way electrophoresis analysis DNA of cells - targets (for detection markers of apoptosis – internucleosomal damage of DNA) various strains of influenza viruses and in conditions in vitro on chorionallantoic environment of chicken embryos. The electrophoresis analysis DNA of cells on chorionallantoic environment of chicken embryos infected with viruses of influenza has shown, that apoptosis degradation of DNA chorionallantoic cells is induced by all testing strains depending

on an infectious doze and from time of incubation in a different degree of expressiveness. Ability of isolate /Almaty/5/98 to cause in limiting cultivations internucleosomal damage of DNA, in our opinion, it is probably connected from it persistent by the form.

i i -

in vitro

( ) -

( ) i i

. -

i

i.

/5/98 i -

-

i .

578:23 578.1/2 578.08

2.03.2006 .

i

i), i -

.

i i

( ) -

. -

, ,

. :

. ,

, i -

-

[1, 33-34]. i

.

1. -

. i -

,

: , , ,

, . , -

, , , , -

– – .

, , , ,

, , , , -

, . – , -

.

i -

: ,

, , , ,

, , , , , -

, , , , ,

, , ,

, , , -

, , , , ,

, , , , -

, , , ,

, , ,

.

, , , , -

, i , ,

, , , ,

, , ),

),

), . , -

- .

, -

, , , , -

, , , ,

i .

2. -

(2)

58

2006. 5

. : i -

), ),

i i ), ), -

( i ),

), ( i ), .

3. -

. , , ,

, , , , ,

, , , ,

, ,

i), ),

, ), i),

i i ), ), -

) .

, ,

i-

i: – . -

. “

” -

[2, 105]. – 1) .

, . 2)

[3, 24], ( i), -

( ( ) -

, i i , i),

( i),

) ( i ).

.

4. i .

,

, i i

i , ,

.

”, “ ” -

. -

30- .

( . ;

“ ”, “ ” i,

, );

( , ), ( -

; ;

; . –

, – ); -

( . i, ); (

, ), (

, i + ( ), -

( . , + ( ),

i , ) +

), (

, “ ” ),

( . -

, ), ( ), -

( i+ ), ( i

, ), (

, i).

– . i i.

(“ ”) +

. ,

, , , -

i.

”, “ ” i -

: – , –

) , – . i

i

i , “ ”, “ -

” [4,

22]. i ,

- .

– ; , , -

, , i

, i

i. . -

, “ , , , , -

,

”, – i i i,

[5, 144].

– ,

, [6, 409].

– ,

i – [7, 84].

“ ”

, – , , ,

, – , ,

(2- , 29- .; 3- , 239, 256- ). -

, i –

: . i i

i, : i i

– ,

– i . i i -

– i.

i i – i

i ) i. –

i “ ” . -

, “ ”

i. “ i” + “ ” +

” .

– i -

, , . -

.

(3)

59 i

( ) ,

i .

– i (

) . –

, i “ ” -

[8, 668]. i

“ ”, “ ” -

i .

i.

- i [9, 94].

i -

, i. – -

- - i.

5.

. “ ” -

, , ,

, , , -

i, -

, ( ), ,

, , ,

, -

, , , -

, , , , -

-

, , , -

), , ( ), -

( ), , -

, ), ( -

), ( i ,

), ( i

), , , -

i -

. i i -

, ( i ), -

( ), ( ) i

i.

i ,

. i -

i. ,

, , , , ,

.

– .

i , ,

i .

,

. -

. ,

, i ,

. :

. , i

, 1963, 8- .).

25- :

, ,

i ,

i

.

i:

“ -

” (“ i ”

– .)

”.

, -

. -

,

.

, , ,

. i. –

[6, 469]

–

[10, 71]. i

– ( )

i i

, .

i -

, i -

, ,

. i -

, . , -

; i -

, , .

[11, 73].

i

“ ” -

. – i, i, -

i .

[12, 173].

i i

, , -

, i

.

(4)

60

2006. 5

.

”

- ,

i.

i , –

. –

, ,

. i -

i- i i

. i i

, “ ”, “i ” “

” i .

-

i ,

: .

i: “ i -

-

” ( . i, 1971, 45- .).

” .

, .

i.

– .

i.

i i i

: 1) ; 2) , [3,

108].

i. i

, ,

. , -

“ ” i .

,

, i i .

” i

.

, i

“ ”, “ ”, “ ”

, , -

.

1. . -

. -

: , 1996. 168 .

2. i. 2- . -

: , 1999. 240 .

3. i. 1- . -

: , 1996. 200 .

4. . i

i. : , 1985. 160 .

5. . i // . 1971.

6.

6. . ., 1959.

7. . ,

// .

1982. 1.

8. . . ., 1953.

9. . . -

, 1956.

10. .

. , 1977.

11. . -

. ., 1903.

12. . // -

. ., 1954.

- .

. ,

. 2.06.2006 .