Since the aim of this study is to establish the relationships between local residents' perceptions of housing development procedures, the most appropriate research tool is a quantitative approach using a self-administered questionnaire survey. As a result, the main objective of this study was to provide essential input to the Malaysian Government and the Secretary of the Government of Selangor (Housing Division) to provide more quality public local housing to low-income people who cannot afford it to buy a house. real estate on the free market.
- Research Background
- Problem Statement
- Research Question
- Research Objectives
- Scope of Research Study
- Significance of Study
- Outline of Research
Local opposition to new housing development is a common phenomenon due to spatial proximity over the housing development's effect on the characteristics of the neighbourhood, and the characteristics and behavior of local community residents. Study background of this research is to identify the behavior and reasons of the local opposition parties towards housing development on the case study of a housing development project in Jalan.
- Introduction
- Overview of Property Development Practise in Malaysia
- Not in My Back Yard (NIMBY) & Yes in My Back Yard (YIMBY)
- Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs)
- Local Opposition
- Theoretical Framework
- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)
- Social Exchange Theory
- Social Representations Theory
- Research framework
- Attitude
- Subjective Norm
- Perceived Behavioural Control
- Dealing with Developers
- Information
- Trust on Authority
- Conceptual Framework
- Summary
According to researcher Mond and Alias (2011), the accommodation advancement process consists of three main stages: the connection starts with the pre-planning process, followed by the development stage and the last is the post-development stage. Due to the detailed evaluation of different departments, the connection can be tedious (Yaakup et al., 2003).
- Research Framework
- Hypotheses & Propositions Development
- Attitude affects the local opposition towards housing development
- Subjective norm affect the local opposition towards housing development
- Perceived Behaviour Control influence the local opposition towards housing development. 34
- Information influence the local opposition towards housing development
- Trust on authority influence the local opposition towards housing development
- Research Design
- Research Strategies
- Measurement of Variables and Instrumentation
- Data Collection
- Sampling
- Data Collection Procedures
- Descriptive Statistic
- Analysis Method
- Summary
Most of the time, it is determined by the availability of resources, such as economic cost, effort and time that consumers believe they should devote to the purchase process. The particular classification of land-use struggle, according to Coppens, is portrayed as ". . . patterns of social communication that arise when a group of people recognizes that a regulated land-use change is not in accordance with their inclinations, qualities, or needs Theirs". Land use conflicts, as shown by Coppens, occur in four stages. It is completed to find and report specific relationships between different parts of the features being examined.
With the availability of the Internet, questionnaire surveys can be easily distributed via email to companies. Target audiences were asked to rate their identification with each of the sentences on the various factors that caused local opposition to housing development. The importance of the study that determines with the questionnaire that the researcher develops was based on the connection with the research administered by the researcher, which is based on the reading of related topics and the questionnaire about the factors Attitudes, Effect of Subject Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control, which have deal with the developer. , Trust the authority of the local opposition to the housing development and to test whether he can oppose the housing development.
Accordingly, to Saunders et al. 2012), in the quantitative description of the data in terms of the central tendency was measured in mode, median and mean. According to Hair et al. 2014), range refers to the extreme values in a set of data while standard deviation is a measure of the spread, to obtain an index of the spread of a distribution.
- Response Rates in Summary
- Demographic
- Demographic of Gender
- Demographic of Age Group
- Demographic of Household Size
- Demographic of Aged Below 16
- Demographic of Monthly Income
- Descriptive Analysis
- Attitude
- Subjective Norm
- Perceived Behaviour Control
- Dealing with the developer
- Information
- Trust on Local Authority
- Housing Development
- Normality Assessment
- Reliability Assessment
- Pearson Correlation
- Hypothesis Testing
Attitude question #2 is 'as a general rule, I believe that the new housing development is useful for nearby communities' recorded the most notable mean value of 4.08 with a standard deviation of . Question No. 3, which is 'as a general rule, do I generally think the new housing development is a good idea'' appeared to have the smallest mean value of 3.82 with a standard deviation of 1.207. Subjective norm question #5 is “Generally, I intend to support the objection to the new housing development project” recorded the most notable mean value of 4.26 with standard deviation of 0.931.
But question #1 reads, "My family members supported my decision to oppose the new housing project." seemed to have the most reduced mean value of 3.86 with a standard deviation of 1.347. Perceived Behavior Control Question No. 5 reads, "I received adequate information about the development project before it was approved" recorded the most notable mean value at 4.00 with a standard deviation of 1.1.39. However, question #1, which is 'I feel powerless to object to the new housing project', was found to have the most reduced mean value of 3.83 with a standard deviation of 1.335.
Dealing with developer question #4 is 'Will this new housing development contribute to the overdevelopment scenario in this vicinity' recorded the most significant mean value at 4.08 with a standard deviation of 1.051. However, question #2 'The developer used bullying tactics.' appeared to have the lowest mean value of 3.95 with a standard deviation of 1.319. Faith in question no. 2 of the neighborhood authority 'The local authority listens to and protects the interests of the local community.' is 'recorded the most significant mean value at 4.07 with a standard deviation of 1.140.
Housing development question No. 5 'The new housing project will cause a decrease in the rental value of my property' is 'recorded the highest average value of 3.96 with a standard deviation of 1.260.
Introduction
Summary of Findings
Results of Discussions
- Attitudes and Housing development
- Subjective Norm and Housing development
- Perceived Behaviour Control and Housing development
- Dealing with Developers and Housing Development
- Information and Housing Development
- Trust in Local Authority and Housing Development
The first outcome of the hypothesis explains that Attitudes take a significant and positive relationship with housing development, it obviously indicates that and improves in the standard of Attitudes of residents in Petaling Jaya. In other ways, the findings from this study have generalized to the situation and context that local residents actually feel the importance of housing development, which will significantly influence their attitudes. The second hypothesis outcome explained and demonstrated that subjective norm is positively associated with housing development.
Their findings show that subjective norms significantly increased the variance in intentions (contributing an additional 5% to the main theory of planned behavior predictors), leading the authors to conclude that the well-established association between subjective norms and housing construction suggests that these variables may have predictive power, implying a strong motivation for further research. It is often assumed that the ineffectiveness of the housing planning and control process exacerbates housing problems. As a result, this article aims to examine key stakeholders' perceptions of the effectiveness of housing planning and control, as well as their responsibilities in making urban housing development decisions.
The purpose of this study is to describe key stakeholders' perspectives on housing planning challenges related to development plan implementation and planning control. Finally, the last hypothesis outcome explained and demonstrated that Trust in local authority and Housing Development.
Implication of Research
Aaltonen (2017) observed six project management practices: business case, contracting, control, governance, decision making, and capacity and competence building. Project management failure is caused by a lack of engagement in project design, selection and decision-making, as well as poor stakeholder engagement (Shiferaw, Klakegg, & Haavaldsen, 2012). By and large, the evaluation in the three-arranging aspect for this review has exhibited a few perspectives in estimating the local resident's perception of housing development.
To make the voice of the local neighbors better heard, a local forum can be set up. This is a great platform to start a dialogue with the locals. It can deliver or convey the right message to the local community. In addition, local media sources are also one of the most important to keep the updates with the local community. Residents of the local community have different opinions, so we must remain calm towards their support, as the opposition exercise will affect the communication path.
The Public Relations team is required who can bring priority to the issues, experts have experience in the property sector is that they not only understand the background of the planning position, they can also be familiar with the whole process before, so the relations they are good with the public. in the treatment of local residents along with communication through the media. Meanwhile, because it has a direct connection with the local community, it can also have a better connection of knowledge that can be taken into consideration during the planning processes, it can serve as a good channel to help increase the opportunities for obtain permission for the development of the project which can benefit the local community and also the perspective of the developer.
Limitation of Study
Among the issues are compliance with minimal expenditure accommodation strategy, thickness, plot ratio and additionally problems identified with planning and publication time for the improvement plans. By merging accommodation arrangements, methods and arrangement methodology, it not only incentives strengthen the accommodation arrangement process, but it will additionally expand the work of arranging accommodation to provide suitable accommodation, empower supportive accommodation advancements and guarantee skills in the accommodation transfer framework (Rameli, 2009). According to Dear (2007), the complaints of the neighborhood can result in a valuable improvement of a proposed project; such vocal, client-led opposition may also cause the positive adaptation of human service providers' program plans.
To get a more essential and effective result, it must have regular updates that are convenient to navigate to receive feedback from the communities. Such a platform can also involve the developer, and the developer should have endeavored to answer all the questions in a timely manner and keep the communities informed without hesitation to appease the anger of the opposition. Another limitation of the development will be that such local opposition data available for opposition construction in Malaysia is rare, this has also limited this study of research.
Recommendation and Conclusion
The relationship between place attachment, the theory of planned behavior and residents' response to place change. The effects of gender and age on the implementation of new technology in a developing country: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). An investigation of green hotel customers' decision making: Development of an extended model of the theory of planned behavior.
Intention to pay conventional hotel prices in a green hotel - a modification of the theory of planned behavior. Homo Economicus in a Big Society: Understanding Middle-Class Activism and NIMBYism Towards New Housing Developments.” Housing, Theory and Society. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK.
Land use planning and the housing market: A comparative review of the UK and the USA. 3 In general, I think that the new housing development is a good idea. In general, I think the new housing development should be.
