• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Indian Outward Foreign Direct Investment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Indian Outward Foreign Direct Investment"

Copied!
36
0
0

Teks penuh

The OFDI by ECMs significantly exceeded that of EIMs in the 1980s and their absolute gap has only increased over time (Table 2). There was a sectoral shift in OFDI through EIMs from manufacturing activities in the 1960s-1970s to service activities in the 1980s. The share of manufacturing and services in the total outward investments of EIMs was 52 percent and 43 percent respectively in the 1980s compared to 28 percent and 25.5 percent in OFDI flows from ECMs (Figure 1).

The comparative picture of OFDI undertaken by ECMs and EIMs underwent major changes in the 1990s. The developing regions concerned attracted more than 56 percent of OFDI through EIMs in the 1990s, compared to just 39 percent of OFDI from ECMs. EIMs began to seriously adopt overseas M&As in the 2000s—a favored strategy of OFDI by Chinese firms since the 1990s.

The developing regions' bias towards OFDI flows from ECMs in the 2000s appears to be a result of Chinese companies directing their large share of OFDI to offshore financial centers (OFCs). The story is the same for OFDI flows from EIMs, with four OFCs (Singapore, Mauritius, Channel Island and Cyprus) appearing in the list of top 10 host locations and accounting for almost 42 percent of India's OFDI flows in the 2000s names. In the current decade, ECMs are increasingly aggressive from the services sector, accounting for more than 65 percent of total Chinese OFDI flows (see Figure 5).

Overall, the role of all three economic sectors appears to have been more balanced in EIM FDI than ECM in the 2000s.

Table 2: Evolution of Chinese and Indian OFDI, 1980-2007 Period/OFDI (US$ billion)As % of world OFDI per capitaAs % of gross As % of GDP YearOFDI flows(US$)fixed capital formation ChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndia Cumulative OFDI Flows 198
Table 2: Evolution of Chinese and Indian OFDI, 1980-2007 Period/OFDI (US$ billion)As % of world OFDI per capitaAs % of gross As % of GDP YearOFDI flows(US$)fixed capital formation ChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndia Cumulative OFDI Flows 198

Locational Determinants of Indian and Chinese OFDI Flows

This study adds to the existing literature on FDI in emerging markets by analyzing the locational determinants of Chinese and Indian FDI in recent years. In light of the above theoretical understanding, a number of possible factors can be identified to explain the locational pattern of OFDI with ECM and EIM. Consistent with the gravity prediction, distance (DIST) may play a negative role in the geographic expansion of OFDI by emerging multinationals.

A large increase in the price level is likely to reduce the real earnings of foreign firms in local currency and may cause uncertainty in the overall investment environment of the host countries in question (Bajo-Rubia and Sosvilla-Rivero, 1994). As noted earlier, the share of non-FDI receiving countries in the total number of potential host countries is as high as 67 percent for Indian OFDI flows during 2001-2008 and 42 percent for Chinese OFDI flows during 2003 -2008. Given the higher levels of censoring in OFDI flows from India (more than 60 percent of the total number of countries do not receive FDI) and China (the average ratio is about 40 percent), the domestic distribution of OFDI in the CQR has focused on 75 percent in evaluation.

To the best of our knowledge, the application of three-step CQR to the location determinants of FDI has yet to receive attention in the literature. Among host country demand factors, POP is statistically significant with a predicted positive sign, while it explains FDI flows through EIMs and ECMs in the Tobit estimation. Although the same result holds for EIMs in the three-step CQR estimation, POP is found to have a negative and modestly significant effect on ECMs.

GDP per capita, PGDP, is found to have positive effects for EIMs and ECMs in the three-step CQR estimation, but only reaches statistical significance for EIMs. The natural resource endowments of the host countries represented by FUEL and ORE come with highly positive impacts for ECMs consistently across different estimations, but their effects become insignificant for EIMs in the three-step CQR estimation. Similarly, the skills variable, ERNL, appears to play a minor role in the location decision of EIMs and ECMs.

Its effects do not differ from zero for ECM and EIM in the three-level CQR assessment. Both BIT and DTT had a negative sign that was different from zero for ECM in the three-level CQR estimate. XR shows a negative coefficient that is statistically different from zero for EIM and ECM in the three-level CQR estimation.

Contrary to expectation, INF has a positive significant influence on OFDI from EIMs and ECMs in the three-stage CQR estimation. Therefore, the political stability factor has a small role to play in the location decision of EIMs and ECMs.

Figure 6: Proportion of FDI receiving Countries in the Total Number of  Host Countries for Indian and Chinese OFDI flows, 2001-2008
Figure 6: Proportion of FDI receiving Countries in the Total Number of Host Countries for Indian and Chinese OFDI flows, 2001-2008

Conclusion

The decade of the 1990s has seen a dramatic increase in OFDI from India starting from a low base but with striking changes in the nature of such investments. Indian OFDI profiles now registered a marked improvement in the share of the primary sector indicating growth in natural resource-seeking OFDI from India on a sustained basis. Against Chinese OFDI flowing more to developing regions in the 2000s, Indian OFDI went more to developed regions.

The quantitative analysis reveals that there are a number of similarities as well as differences in the location choices driving OFDI by ECM and EIM. In this study, developing economies are defined to include both developing and transition countries as classified by UNCTAD in the World Investment Report 2008. 2004) "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in European Transition Economies", Journal of Comparative Economics Firm-Specific Assets and the Link Between Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment”, American Economic Review.

The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment”, Journal of International Business Studies Three-Step Censored Quantile Regression and Extramarital Affairs”, Journal of American Statistical Association The Empirics of China's Outward Direct Investment”, mimeo, Universiteit van Kalifornië, Santa Cruz, VSA . 2009) "While Global FDI Falls, China's Outward FDI Doubles", Columbia FDI Perspectives, No. 5, Vale Columbia Centre on Sustainable International Investment, Columbia University. A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions”, Journal of International Business Studies Wisselkoerse en Foreign Direct Investment: An Imperfect Capital Markets Approach”, Quarterly Journal of Economics Emerging Multinationals: Outward FDI from the BRICS Countries”, International Journal of Technology and Globalization Multinasionale maatskappye uit opkomende ekonomieë:. 2002) "Firm-spesifieke bates en die verband tussen wisselkoerse en Japannese direkte buitelandse belegging in die Verenigde State: 'n Herondersoek", Japanese Economic Review.

1987) “Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies Determinants of Direct Investment and Its Connection to Trade”, UNCTAD Review, pp. 2007) “De motieven van Chinese buitenlandse investeringen in de Baltic Sea Region”, PEI Electronic Publications, nr. 1994) “The Real Exchange Rate and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Relative Wealth vs. 2009) “What bepaalt Chinese Outward FDI?”, CMI Working Paper, nr. 1983) (red.). OESO (2008) “China's Outward Direct Investment”, OECD Investment Policy Reviews: China 2008, pp. 1992) “The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey of Empirical Evidence”, United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, New York: Verenigde Naties.

Changing Trends and Patterns”, International Journal of Technology and Globalization b) “Emergence of Indian Outward FDI: What Implications for Host Developing Countries?”, Revista Economía: teoría y práctica c) “India's Emerging Multinationals in Developed region ”, MPRA Paper, no. 12361, University of Munich Library, Germany. Perspectives on Indian Outward Foreign Direct Investment, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. eds) (2009) The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties and Investment Flows, Oxford: Oxford University Press. eds) (2008) The Rise of Transnational Corporations from Emerging Markets, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 1999) “A Monte Carlo Investigation of the Sampling Behavior of Conditional Moment Tests in Tobit and Probit Models”, Journal of Econometrics Chinese Outward Investment in Hong Kong: Trends, Prospects and Policy Implications”, OECD-DC Working Paper, No. 1999) “Foreign Direct Investment Flows to and from China”, PASCN Discussion Paper, no.

Gambar

Table 1: OFDI Flows from Emerging Economies, 1991−2007 OFDI Flows M&A Purchase Annual Average Annual Compound  Annual Average Annual Compound  Region/Country(US$ billion)Growth Rate (%)(US$ billion)Growth Rate (%) 1991-992000-071991-992000-071991-99200
Table 2: Evolution of Chinese and Indian OFDI, 1980-2007 Period/OFDI (US$ billion)As % of world OFDI per capitaAs % of gross As % of GDP YearOFDI flows(US$)fixed capital formation ChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndiaChinaIndia Cumulative OFDI Flows 198
Figure 1: Chinese and Indian OFDI in 1980s, by Sector
Table 3: Regional Distribution of OFDI Flows from China and India, 2000-2009 Chinese OFDI Flows (US$ million)Indian OFDI Flows (US$ million) Region2003-2007Per centNo
+4

Referensi

Garis besar

Dokumen terkait

• Q2: Are there statistically significant differences in attitudes towards plagiarism among students enrolled in chemistry and biology departments due to demographic variables such as

These findings show that changes to Chinese domestic policy and level of control by the Chinese central government can have a profound influence on Chinese firms’ views towards