• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Conclusions and Recommendation

Dalam dokumen Rice-Based Biosystems Journal 2020 (August) (Halaman 62-65)

Generally, there were higher TPC in the leaves of both TKM6 and TN1 than in their stems (Tables 3 and 4). These same results were also observed in stemborer-infested resistant and susceptible maize varieties (Praveen et al., 2013) and in another study looking at the TPC in the leaves and stems of Monsonia burkeana (Mamphiswana et al., 2010). Surprisingly, TPC of the susceptible TN1 was generally higher than that of the resistant TKM6, both for the infested leaves and stems. It is hypothesized that the resistant genotypes have higher TPC than the susceptible. In contrast, the results obtained in the current study is different from the results of Praveen et al. (2013) on maize varieties and Punithavalli et al. (2013) on rice genotypes against leaf folder. With lower TPC than the susceptible, TKM6 showed promising significant phenolics-induced defense mechanism.

This mechanism may hint on the possible biochemical mechanism of resistance of TKM6 amidst biological enemy such as YSB larvae, which can be explored in succeeding studies. In contrast, TN1 had high TPC even before larvae introduction; thus, the slight increase in TPC may not be necessarily attributable to YSB infestation but to other biological stress, which the plant detected during the experiment.

LC Conditioning and Adjustments for Identification of Peaks and Compounds

Different mobile phase system and column temperatures were tested to determine the optimal chromatographic conditions to separate analytes. The peak of serotonin standard tends to elute very early while the peaks of trans-cinnamic acid tend to elute very late, and often does not appear using other elution conditions. Some peaks also tend to co-elute, which is probably due to the same retention properties, such as in the case of vanillic acid and syringic acid. Peak of trans-cinnamic acid was observed, and peaks of vanillic acid and syringic acid were slightly separated at 254 nm wavelength using the optimized mobile phase system used (Table 5).

Table 5. Optimized mobile phase system.

Minutes % Absorbance % Concentration

0 95 5

5 85 15

10 85 15

20 75 25

30 75 25

35 60 40

45 75 25

50 95 5

55 95 5

Identification of Peaks in Standards and Leaf Extracts

In RP-HPLC, polarity of phenolic compounds determines the elution order with the most polar one eluting first followed by the less polar ones (Zhang et al., 2013). Most polar compounds eluting first were serotonin (5.35 min), followed by tryptamine (9.53 min), 4 hydroxybenzoic acid (10.79 min), vanillic acid (12.25 min), syringic cid (12.74 min), p-coumaric acid (17.87 min), and lastly, trans-cinnamic acid (36.34 min) (Figure 3).

Vanillic acid (12.113 min) and p-coumaric acid (18.266 min) were detected at 254 nm wavelength in the diluted TKM6 extract (Figure 4). It is plausible that these phenolics found in TKM6 may be among the biochemical natures for its resistance against YSB.

Both vanillic and p-coumaric acid are well-studied phenolics in relation to plant resistance and insect herbivory. In a study conducted on castor plant by Usha Rani and Jyothsna (2014), vanillic acids delayed the egg laying of Achaea janata L. and Spodoptera litura F. On the other hand, a decrease in A. janata and S. litura larval body weights was evident in coumaric acid treatments confirming the antifeedant effects of the phenolics tested. In maize, the amount of free p-coumaric acid was correlated with the resistance level. Higher quantities of p-coumaric in the pith could contribute to general resistance to stemborer attack. Jointly with ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid could provide resistance mechanisms through cell wall fortification and lignification. The vanillic acid showed a decreased tendency after silking, when maize is most attractive for Sesamia nonagrioides, suggesting this acid could act as a chemoattractant for S. nonagrioides larvae or adults (Santiago et al., 2005).

The dietary exposure to vanillic acid led to enhanced activities of detoxifying enzymes, 𝛽-glucosidase, carboxyl esterase, glutathione S-transferase, and glutathione reductase in the midgut tissues of all the larval instars of Spodoptera litura, indicating the toxic nature of these compounds in Capsicum annum.

RICE-BASED BIOSYSTEMS JOURNAL (2020) 7: 49-58 57

YSB varied in terms of released phenolic compound.

The resistant genotypes exhibited multiple defense mechanism in terms of higher expression of phenolic compound particularly when plants perceived threat following YSB infestation. Moreover, the optimized biochemical screening method from this study, in addition to existing breeding methods, can aid in the selection of materials to be used in the development of lines/variety that are resistant to stemborer in particular. However, correlation of results with the parallel studies on morphological (trichome density, orientation, and distribution) and physiological factors (lignin thickness and content) is necessary to explain the ways rice cope and to provide a complete picture plants protecting themselves from insect pest infestation such as stemborer.

Acknowledgment

This research is a component of the project

“Mechanisms of rice insect pest and disease resistance in traditional rice varieties and development of genetic stocks with novel sources of resistant genes”

funded by the Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Agricultural Research (DA-BAR).

The Authors are grateful to GSRillon, GDCSantiago, GFEstoy, BMTabudlong, PSTorrena, ABEstoy, NLManigbas, and NVDesamero for the comments, suggestions, and assistance in the experimental set up and design. The authors also grateful to JM Manalo IV for editing/proofreading the drafts of the paper.

Literature Cited

Amsagowri V, Muthiah C, Muthukrishnan N, Mini MI (2018) Biochemical changes in rice yellow stem borer infested rice accessions. Ind J Entom. 80(3): 926-934

Ane NUI, Hussain M (2016) Diversity of insect pest in major rice growing areas of the world. JEZS 4(1): 36-41

Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (2017) Rice Production Worldwide. Springer International Publishing AG:

Switzerland

Chen H, Stout MJ, Qian Q, Chen F (2012) Genetic, molecular and genomic basis of rice defense against insects. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 31: 74-9

Chieng CY (1985) Stem borer infestation on hybrid rice. Int Rice Res Newslett. 10(5): 21

Cohen MB, Romena AM, Gould F (2000) Dispersal by larvae of the stem borers Scirpophaga incertulas (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae) and Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in plats of transplanted rice.

Envi Entom. 29(5): 958-971

Devasena N, Soundararajan RP, Reuolin SJ, Jeyaprakash P, Robin S (2018) Evaluation of rice genotypes for resistance to yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas walker through artificial screening methods. J Ent Zool Stud. 6(1):

874-878

Fßrstenberg-Hägg J, Zagrobelny M, Bak S (2013) Plant defense against insect herbivores. Int J Mol Sci. 14: 10242-10297 Gowda JH, Palo R (2003) Age-related changes in defensive traits

of Acacia tortilis Hayne. Afr J Ecol. 41: 218-223 Hartmann T (1996) Diversity and variability of plant secondary

metabolism: a mechanistic view. Entomo Exp Appli. 80(1):

177-188

Heinrichs EA (1986) Prospectives and directions for the continued development of insect-resistant rice varieties. Agri Eco Envi. 18(1): 9-36

IBM Corp. Released (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp

Ishihara A, Hashimoto Y, Miyagawa H, Wakasa K (2008) Induction of serotonin accumulation by feeding of rice striped stem borer in rice leaves. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 3(9): 714-716

Kogan M, Paxton J (1983) Natural inducers of plant resistance to insects. In Hedin PA, editor. Plant Resistance to Insects.

AC Symposium Series. American Chemical Society:

Washington DC. 208: 153-171

Kumar L, Mahatma MK, Kalariya KA, Bishi SK, Mann A (2014) Plant Phenolics: Important Bio-Weapon Against Pathogens and insect herbivores. Popular Kheti 2(3): 149- 152

Lattanzio V, Cardinali A (2006) Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects.

Phytochemistry: Adv Res. 23-67

Litsinger JA, Alviola, Dela Cruz CG, Canapi BL, Batay-An EH, Barrion AT (2006) Rice white stemborer Scirpophaga innotata Walker in southern Mindanao, Philippines. I.

Supplantation of yellow stemborer S. incertulas Walker and pest status. Int J Pest Mgmt, 52(1): 11-21

Litsinger JA, Canapi B, Barrion AT (2011) Philippine Rice Stemborers: A Review schipophaga spp are the most prevalent rice stemborers in the Philippines regardless of location and ecosystem. Phil Ent 25(1): 1-47

Mamphiswana ND, Mashela PW, Mdee LK (2010) Distribution of total phenolics and antioxidant activity in fruit, leaf, stem and root of Monsonia burkeana. Afr J Agric Res.

5(18): 2570-2575

Muralidharan K, Pasalu IC (2006) Assessments of crop losses in rice ecosystems due to stem borer damage (Lepidopter:

Pyralidae). Crop Prot. 25: 409-417

Nayak A, Baig MJ, Mohapatra PK, Behera KS (2019) Effect of insect feeding on biochemical changes in rice plant. J Entom Zool Stud. 7(6): 138-142

Pathak MD, Dale D (1982) The Biochemical Basis of Resistance in Host Plants to Insect Pests. In Shemilt LW (Ed.).

Chemistry and World Food Supplies: The New Frontiers.

CHEMRAWN II. Canada: Pergamon Press.

Pathak MD, Andres F, Galacgac N, Raros R (1971) Resistance of rice varieties to striped rice borers. Philippines:

International Rice Research Institute

Pathak MD, Khan ZR (1994) Insect Pests of Rice. Philippines:

International Rice Research Institute

Praveen HD, Ugalat J, Signh H (2013) Biochemical changes during crop growth period of resistance and susceptible varieties of maize against stem borer. Environment and Ecology 31(4): 1621-1626

Punithavalli M, Muthukrishnan NM, Balagi Rajkuma M (2013) Defensive Responses of Rice Genotypes for Resistance Against Rice Leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Rice Science, 2013, 20(5): 363370

Sanchez F, Coronado RS, Carlos HB, Canongo CV (2018) Shilimic acid pathway in biosynthesis of phenolic compounds. In Hernandez MS, Mateos RG, Tenago MP (Eds.). Plant physiological aspect of phenolic compounds.

United Kingdom: Intechopen

Santiago R, Malvar RA, Baamonde MD, Revilla P, Souto X (2005) Free phenols in maize pith and their relationship with resistance to Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera:

Noctuidae) attack. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98(4):1349-1356

Saxena RC (1986) Biochemical bases of insect resistance in rice varieties. In Green, M. B. and P.A. Hedin (Eds.). Natural Resistance of Plants to Pests. AC Symposium Series 296:142-159. DOI: 10.1021/bk-1986-0296

Sebastian LS, Alviola PA, Francisco SR (2000) In bridging the rice yield gap in the Philippines. In Papademetriou MK, Dent FJ, Herath EM (Eds.). Bridging bridging the rice yield gap in the Asia-Pacific Region. http://www.fao.org/3/

x6905e/x6905e0b.htm#TopOfPage

Schaller A (2008) Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory. Germany:

Springer

Shahjahan M (1992) Influence of plant nutrients and some biochemical plant characteristics on varietal resistance to yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (walker) of rice.

Trop Agric Res. 4: 180-195

Singh DP, Tiwari T (2019) Assessment of extent of damage and yield loss caused by stem borer in rice. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8(2): 21122-2115 Singleton Vl, Orthofer R, Lamuela-RaventĂłs RM (1998)

Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent.

Methods Enzymology, 299c (1): 152-178

Spiteller D (2008) Plant defense strategies. In Encyclopedia of Ecology. Elsevier. (pp 2798-2811)

Usha Rani P, Jyothsna Y (2010) Biochemical and enzymatic changes in rice plants as a mechanism of defense. Acta Physiol Plant. 32: 695–701

Usha Rani P, Pratyushas (2014) Role of castor plant phenolics on performance of its two herbivores and their impact on egg parasitoid behavior. BioControl 59: 513-524

War AR, Paulraj MG, War MY, Ignacimuthu S (2011) Jasmonic acid-mediated induced resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Plant Growth Regul; 30: 512- 23

War AR, Paulraj MG, War MY, Ignacimuthu S (2011b) Herbivore- and elicitor-induced resistance in groundnut to Asian armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera:

Noctuidae). Plant Signal Behav; 6:1769-1777

War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, Buhroo AA, Hussain B, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma HC (2012) Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 7(10): 1306-1320

Zhang A, Wan L, Wu C, Fang Y, Han G, Li H, Zhang Z, Wang H (2013) Simultaneous determination of 14 phenolic compounds in grape canes by HPLC-DAD-UV using wavelength switching detection. Molecules. 18: 14241- 14257

RICE-BASED BIOSYSTEMS JOURNAL (2020) 7: 59-68 59

ROOT DEVELOPMENT AND YIELD RESPONSES

Dalam dokumen Rice-Based Biosystems Journal 2020 (August) (Halaman 62-65)