442 CORRELATION BETWEEN SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILES AND BEHAVIOUR AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO SELL AND VALUE

revealed that the above-mentioned socio-demographic profiles have a significant effect on their wililngness to act positively. Similar to this, a study of Niringiye and

Omortor (2010) in Uganda showed that âge has an impact on their wiilingness to

contribute for improved solid waste management.

Table 7. Corrélation analysis of the respondents' socio-demographIc profiles

and wiilingness to act favorably for improved livestock waste management

Démographie Wiilingness to Pay (WTP)

Coopérative

Profiles Road Mobile Water Market Waste

Infra network pipe ^access facliity ^Membership

Member of a ^0.28" ^0.17 ^0.07 ^0.09 ^-0.27" ^0.26"

coopérative Désignation Age

Sex

Civil status

0.12 0.02

-0.07 0.14

-0.03 0.11

0.14 -0.03

-0.13 -0.17

0.19 0.04

-0.08 -0.33" -0.07 5.45" 0.17 -0.20

-0.33" -0.17 -0.11 -0.07 0.14 -0.14

Educational ^-0.12 ^-0.27" ^-0.20 ^-0.004 ^-0.12 ^-0.22 attainment

0.16 -0.06 0.15 0.25"

Household ^0.09 ^0.32"

size

**. Corrélation is significant at the 0.25 level.

442 CORRELATION BETWEEN SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILES

the respondents' coopérative/association membership to the above-mentioned

variables.

On the other hand, farm manager expressed greater willingness to produce

biogas than the farm owner.

Meanwhiie, âge does not have corrélations to respondents* behaviour, value, and willingness to sell. Conversely, sex is positively correlated to animal waste recycling value identification; findings revealed that more maie respondents believe that AWR is conducive to environmental protection, and agree that it is good for health.

Additionally, it is interesting to note that married respondents have a positive connotation of producing biogas, and that they consider AWR as a conducive

technology to environmental protection.

Educational attainment has a positive corrélation with the respondents*

value, behaviour and décisions. In the study, those who finished higher degrees

have a négative view on producing biogas but agreed that AWR is conducive to environmental protection and can augment household income.

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

Lastly, data suggest that household size have a négative corrélation with the respondents' value identification; lower number of household size believe that AWR is efficient in environmental protection and can be a source of household

income.

Table 8. Corrélation analysis

profiles, behavior, wlllingness to

of the respondents' socio-demographic sell, and value identification

Animal Wasle Recycling Animal Waste Recycling (AWR)

Value Identification Socio-

demographic

Profiles Produce

biogas

Other uses

(for sale)

Produce fertiiizer

Willingness to produce

biogas

AWR is conducive to environmental

protection

AWR is good for the

heaith

AWR is bénéficiai to increase

household income

Member of a _0.18 _0.04 _-0.05 _0.22 _-0.11 _-0.14 _0.03

coopérative

Désignation ^0.05 ^0.12 ^-0.04 ^0.34" ^-0.1 ⁰ ^0.02

Age ^0.06 ^-0.18 ^0.1 ^-0.03 ^-0.04 ^0.06 ^-0.1

Sex 0.03 -0.1 0.02 -0.02 0.28" 0.35" 0.12

Civil status 0.34" 0.01 -0.21 -0.18 -0.33" -0.19 -0.02

Educational

-0.28" ^0.09 ^0.23 ^-0.12 ^0.49" 0.37" 0.50"

allainment Household

0.21 -0.03 -0.08 -0.03 -0.21 -0.28" -0.25"

size

**. Corrélation is significant at the 0.25 level.

Déterminants of Livestock \A/aste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

Chapter V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND

RECOMMENDATION

This study was conducted in order to understand the current state of livestock waste management in selected barangays of Busuanga and Coron and evaluate the openness of the respondents in improving livestock waste

management in the area on the basis of wiliingness to accept (WTA) and

willingness to act favorably.

This présent research was carried out thru survey method, where a survey questionnaire was the main data gathering technique used to gain information on

socio-demographic profiles, farm characteristics as a fonction of the kind and number of animais tended/ raised, the existing livestock waste facilities, and obtain

insights on respondents' willingness to contribute and accept payment for improved livestock waste management. Further, corrélation of socio-demographic profiles with willingness to act for improved waste management as well as willingness to accept compensation were aiso analyzed.

There were (50) livestock farmer-participants in this study; 25 from

Busuanga and 25 from Coron. In Busuanga. Most respondents have âge range of 51-60, while 31-40 and 41-50 in Coron. Both towns are dominated by

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act

for improved Practices among Livestock Ralsers in Busuanga Island

owner/operator which are designated to manage the livestock farms, most are married maie and high school graduate, and have businesses.

Livestock raising is one among the livelihoods especially in the rural barangays of the island. The study revealed that animais such as carabao, goat, cattle, ducks, geese, turkeys, swine and chicken are being raised in order to

augment the income and support the protein requirement of households. From this, poultry (chicken) have the most numbers, some respondents are raising thousands

of chickens both for meat and eggs purposes.

Livestock waste management is still unregulated especially in the areas far from barangay center. Most respondents have no waste management facilities, less than half of the respondents from Busuanga and Coron have established

facilities for this purpose.

Corrélation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship of respondents' socio-demographic profiles in their willingness to pay, to accept payment, to get

involve and stay in an organization, and their values toward the animal waste recycling. The study showed that membership in a coopérative have positive corrélation on willingness to act for road infrastructure and further contribute for

inclusion in coopérative, sex of the respondents was surprisingly found to influence their willingness to act positively for improved market accessibility, household size

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers In Busuanga Island

significantly affects décisions on willingness to take action for improved mobile network services and coopérative membership. In contrast, other socio-

demographic profiles have négative corrélation on the livestock farmers' willingness to act; membership in a coopérative have négative effect on willingness

to participate for improved waste facilities, the respondents' willingness to

contribute for improved mobile network access are negatively affected by sex, civil status have négative connotation on improved road infrastructure, lastly, educational attainment negatively impacted their décision to pay for improved mobile network.

In addition, livestock farmers' socio-demographic profiles were correlated on their animal waste recycling (AWR) behavior and value identification, as well as evaluate its impact on their willingness to produce or sell waste for biogas. In

summary, hired manager expresses more willingness to produce biogas. Sex aiso has a significant effect on their values on AWR, maie respondents believed that

that AWR is conducive to environmental protection and good for the health.

Similarly, civil status has positive corrélation on the behaviour of the

respondents to produce biogas but negated the idea that AWR is conducive to

environmental protection. As to educational attainment, those who finish higher level of éducation have négative views on producing biogas while positive corrélation is recorded in their AWR values. Lastly, household size has négative

Déterminants of Livestock \A/aste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

corrélation on respondents' values about the AWR as being conducive to environmental protection and bénéficiai to household income.

In terms of the livestock farmers' accessibility to facilities intended for livestock raising and waste management, majority have access to road, water source, mobile network services, market access and waste management facilities, and that most of them are willing to act positively for improvement of these infrastructure and services.

With regards to the respondents' cognitive variables, ail of them have

knowledge on waste management, perceived good services from the environment, and positively expressed attitude toward the state of environment. However, most are only somewhat concerned on the environmental conditions.

Meanwhile, the higher number of the participants are members of an association/coopérative, and are willing to take necessary actions to stay as a member. Notably, ail of the respondents have positive relationship toward others,

have high regard on reciprocity and continue to trust institutions.

Animal waste recycling is perceived to be effective mechanism in addressing concern on these problems, and most of the respondents expressed their interest to produce fertilizer. Meanwhile, Busuanga recorded more

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

respondents who are willing to produce biogas which is contrary to the case of Coron wherein less of the respondents responded positively to the idea.

Lastly, majority of the respondents from both municipalities are in agreement that AWR is conducive to environmentai protection, good for the heaith,

and bénéficiai to increase household income.

Therefore, the study concludes that:

1. Some actions can be carried out among raisers to promote involvement

and belongingness in civil society organizations, which encourage participation among members to maintain their membership to the associations and when

necessary expend some amount for it;

2. Levei of éducation has a significant influence on the livestock raisers' values towards recycling (particularly AWR);

3. Livestock farmers have positive attitude manifested by their enthusiasm to act for improved services such as road, water, market access, waste

management facilities;

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

4. Livestock waste management practices has been strictly implemented in the areas nearby barangay centers only, which implies the need for concerted effort among the local government officiais and livestock raisers to put into action the same in ail areas particularly those distant farm areas;

5. Livestock farmers have knowledge on waste management but only few have established waste management facilities only imply that some factors contribute to the realization of establishment of these facilities. Apart from finding out the reasons for failure to establish a facility among raisers, the LGU officiais

must actively motivate them to follow and strictly implement the laws for effective

or sustainable livestock waste management.

It is clear that livestock waste management ruies and régulations in the

island are not well implemented especially in the far-flung farms, which poses threat to water tributaries. Given this situation, the status of the livestock waste management in the island can be safely said is still considerably behind if not in its

infancy stage.

Regardiess of this predicament, the livestock raisers have the desire and willingness to act positively towards changing their attitude and embrace sustainable practices for waste management in order to improve their socio- economic conditions and be champions to protect their immédiate environment.

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act

for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

Although promising results were observed in this présent study, the work has still some limitations that need to be addressed. This research should be deliberateiy generalized only for the study population in both municipaiities and

therefore may not represent the perspective of ai! or other group of the livestock farmers operating in both Busuanga and Coron towards livestock waste management. While this is only a preliminary study, it is recommended that further research may use the results of this study as a baseline data or a basis for formulating data-based recommandations on livestock waste management

particularly in Busuanga given that more livestock farmers must be involved to better represent each municipality and additional factors may aiso be considered

to have a better and more holistic understanding of livestock waste management.

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act

for Improved Practices among Livestock Kaisers in Busuanga Island

Bibliography

ABRENICA, M.; ILAGAN, G.; LlUAG, H.; NAPENAS, A.; TABION, R.; AND TAMINA, R. C. (2013). Municipality of Coron ECAN Resource Management

Plan 2017-2022, 228.

ADDAI KN, DANSO-ABBEAWI G (2014). Déterminants of Willingness to Py for Improved Solid Waste Management in Dunkwa-on-Offin, Ghana, Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 3(1):01- 09.

ASTILL, G. M., & SHUMWAY, 0. R. (2016). Profits from pollutants: Economie feasibility of integrated anaerobic digester and nutrient management Systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 353-362.

https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.012

ATINKUT, H. B., YAN, T., AREGA, Y., & RAZA, M. H. (2020). Farmers' willingness-to-pay for eco-friendiy agricultural waste management in Ethiopia:

A contingent valuation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121211.

hftpc;-//Hni,ora/10.1016/i.iclepro.2020.121211 Busuanga Palawan, Philippines, (n.d.), 829800.

CATELO, M. & DORADO, M. & AGBISIT, JR. (2001). Living with Livestock:

Dealing with Pig Waste in the Philippines. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), EEPSEA Policy Brief.

GERBA, 0. & PEPPER I. (2009). Chapter 24 - Wastewater Treatment and Biosolids Reuse. In Maier, R., Pepper, I., Gerba, 0. (Eds) Environmental

Microbiology (Second Edition), 503-530

HAGA, K. (1998). Animai waste problems and their solution from the

technological point of view in Japan. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 32(3), 203-210.

H AN, Z., ZENG, D., Ll, Q., CHENG, G., SHI, G., & MOU, Z. (2019). Public willingness to pay and participate in domestic waste management in rural areas of China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, f40(September 2018), 166-174. https://doi.orQ/10.1016/i.resconrec.2018.09.018

HE, K., ZHANG, J., ZENG, Y., & ZHANG, L. (2016). Households' willingness to ' accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling: Taking biogas

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

production from livestock manure waste in Hubei, P. R. China as an

example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 410-420.

inips:.. doi.org/10.1016. i .icleDro.2() 16.05.009

HE, K., ZHANG, J., ZENG, Y., & ZHANG, L. (2016). Households' willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling: Taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei, P. R. China as an example.

Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 410-420.

htrps://doi.ora/10.1016/i.iclepro.2016.05.009

IFEANYI PHD, O. & ODOEMELAWI, V. & OMEDE, A. & DURUNNA, G. &

EMENALOM, O. & UCHEGBU, M. & IFEANYI CHARLES, O. & ILOEJE, M.

(2012). Livestock waste and its impact on the environment. Scientific Journal

of Review. 1. 17-32.

LAUER, M., HANSEN, J. K., LAMERS, P., & THRÂN, D. (2018). Making money

from waste: The économie viability of producing biogas and biomethane in

the Idaho dairy industry. Applied Energy, 222(April), 621-636.

http<^-/ (ioi.org/10.1016/i.anenergv.201 K.04.()26

Li Q., WAGAN, S. A., & WANG, Y. (2021). An analysis on déterminants of farmers' willingness for resource utilization of livestock manure. Waste

Management, 120, 708-715. htiD.s:/7doi.org 10.1016/i.wasrnau.2020.10.036

LI, X., LIU, W., YAN, Y., FAN, G., & ZHAO, M. (2019). Rural households' willingness to accept compensation standards for controlling agricultural non- point source pollution: A case study of the Qinba water source area in

Northwest china. Water (Switzerland), 11(6), 1-15.

https://d0i.0rg/l 0.3390/w11061251

MANGA, VERONICA & NGWABIE, NGWA. (2019). Household perception and willingness to pay for improved waste management service in Mamfe, Cameroon. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 13.

354-364. 10.5897/AJEST2019.2681.

MARANAN, r. F. R., PARASO, M. G. V, ALCANTARA, A. J., ESPALDON, M.

V. O., ALAIRA, S. A, SEVILLA, G. G., & VALDEZ, G. A. (2008). Opérations aiid Waste Management of Slaughterhouses in the Province of Laguna.

Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 11(1), 32-41.

MATULIGH, s. g., GARMAN, h. F., & CARTER, H. O. (2014). Systems Analysis of Livestock Waste Systems Analysis Management : A Study of Large- Scale Dairying, 4(2), 33-42.

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Ralsers in Busuanga Island

MUGENDI, CHARLES N. (2005). An Econometric Analysis of Demand for

Improved Solid Waste Management in Nairobi. University of Nairobi Municipal Agricuiturist Office, Busuanga, Paiawan (2020)

Municipai Agricuiturist Office, Coron, Paiawan (2020)

NIRiNGlYE A, OMOTOR OG (2010). Déterminants of willingness to pay for solid

waste Management in Kampala city. Current Research Journal of Économie

Theory 2(3): 119-122.

OGiSHi, A., METCALFE, M., &ZiLBERMAN, D. (2001). Animal waste policy,

reforms to improve environmental quality. Choices, 15-18.

PARASO, M. G. V, ESPALDON, M. V. O., ALCANTARA, A. J., SEViLLA, C. C., ALAiRA, S. A, SOBREMiSANA, M. J., VALDEZ, C. A. (2010). A Survey of Waste Management Practices of Selected Swine and Poultry Farms in

Laguna, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management,

13(2), 44-52.

RAHJi, M. A. Y., & OLORUNTOBA, E. O. (2009). Déterminants of household's willingness-to-pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, Nigeria Waste Management and Research, 27(10), 961-965.

hHpQ-//Hni nra/10.1177/0734242X09103824

SiNGH, A., & RASHiD, M. (2017). Impact of animal waste on environment, its managemental stratégies and treatment protocols to reduce environmental contamination. Veterinary Science Research Journal, 8(1 and 2), 1-12.

i.frp^-//doi .orii/l 0.1574(.)/has/vsri/8.1 and2/1-12

SOYER, G., & YiLMAZ, E. (2020). Waste management in dairy cattle farms in Aydin Région. Potentiel of energy application. Sustainability (Switzerland),

12(4), 1—11. httDs://c]oi.oni/i().339(). su 12041614

TAO Jm & WANG, J. (2021). Farmers' willingness to accept compensation for l'ivestock and poultry waste resource utilization and its déterminants. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, May 2019.

httpc:'//rlni.ora/10.1016/i.cipre.2Q21.04.019

TOMELDAN, M. V. (1986). Tourism Structure Plan of Busuanga and Coron, Northern Paiawan: Comprehensive Development through Tourist'. MUHON:

A Journal of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and the Designed Environment, (3), 16-27.

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act

for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

VRIEZE, J. & COLICA, G. & PINTUCCI, C. & SARLI, J. & PEDIZZI, C. &

WILLEGHEMS, G. & BRAL, A. & VARGA, S. & PRAT, D. & PENG, L. &

SPILLER, M. & BUYSSE, J. & COLSEN, J. & BENITO, O. & CARBALLA, M. & VLAEMINCK, S. (2018). Resource recovery from pig manure via an integrated approach: A technical and économie assessment for full-scale applications. Bioresource Technology. 272.10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.024.

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and \A/illingness to Act for Improved Practices among Livestock Raisers in Busuanga Island

Appendices

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act

for Improved Practices among Livestock Kaisers in Busuanga Island

Appendix A

Coron Animal Population Survey 2019

Repiiblic of The Philippines Province of Polawan Munjcip<s[i(Y Coron

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL AGRICULTURiST ANIMAI. POl'l 1,AlION SI RVKV 201')

Animal Population

8ARANGAY ^Canle ^Carabao ^Goat ^Swinc ^Duck

Native Chicken

Broiler/

layer

Banuang Daan ¹⁰ ^S ²⁵⁷ ¹⁹⁸

Bintuan ¹³² ⁸³ ¹⁵⁰ ⁴⁸² ¹⁸⁶ ⁴³² ^1.000

Borac ¹⁴⁰ ¹⁷⁷ ²⁴⁵ ⁸²³ ¹⁹³ ⁵⁷⁸ 3,000

BuenavistD ³⁸ ³⁴ ⁵⁶ ¹⁷³ ³⁵ ²⁴⁸

Bulalacao ²⁰ ² ²⁶ ³⁵² ⁵ ²³¹

CabuRao 2 5 171 134

Decnbobo ⁹⁵ ⁴³ ²⁵ ⁷⁸⁸ ⁴⁷ ²⁴⁸

Decalacbao 1,945 203 136 476 116 543

Guadaiupe ¹²⁵ ⁷⁶ ¹⁵⁰ ⁴⁵² ⁸⁷ ⁴⁹⁸ 1,000

Laiaia ¹⁶⁷ ² ¹⁰ ⁴³ ²⁰⁹

Malawig ⁴¹ ¹⁵ ²¹ ¹⁹⁸ ¹³⁴

Marciila ⁴⁹ ¹⁴ ⁵⁵ ⁷⁹⁷ ²⁰ ²⁶⁵

San lose ¹²⁶ ⁴⁰ ⁷⁵ ³⁵⁹ ⁵⁴ ²³⁴

San Nicolas ⁹⁵⁰ ¹⁵⁵ ²³⁴ ⁸⁶⁸ ²³⁵ ⁵⁵⁴ ^7,000

TaBumpay 40 14 45 685 63 487

Tara 56 15 35 76 20 168

Turda ¹²⁷ ⁷⁵ ¹¹⁴ ⁵⁸³ ⁵⁸³ ⁵⁴⁹

Pobiacion 1 Pobiacion 2 Pobiacion 3 Pobiacion 4 Pobiacion 5

Pobiacion 6 ³² ¹⁵ ⁴³ ¹⁶⁵ ²⁰ ³⁸⁹

"■ TOTAL 1 4^ 1 9tS

Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Art for Improved Practices among Livestock Ralsers In Busuanga Island

Appendix B

Letterto Mayor Elizabeth Cervantes

ApriI21.2021

HON. ELÏZABETU M. CERVANTES

Municipal Mayor Municipality of Busuanga Salvacion, Busuanga, Palawan Thru: Mrs. Maria Theresa Rabe

Municipal Agriculturist

OFFICE Cf TU VUKPNl MAYOR

Dalam dokumen Déterminants of Livestock Waste Management and Willingness to Act (Halaman 76-92)