Philippine Management Review2022, Vol. 29, 1-24.
Destination brand gestalt and its effects on brand attachment and brand loyalty
ǤȗǡǤȗȗƬȗȗȗ
a UNKLAB Business, School, Universitas Klabat, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia
b University of the Philippines, Cesar E.A. Virata School of Business, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
ǡ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋǤǤǡǡ ǡ ǡȌǤ
ǦͺͶ
ǡǤ ǡ
ȋ ǡ ǡ ȌǤ
̵
Ǥ
–ǡ ǡ Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧ ǡ
Ǥ
Keywordsǣǡǡ ǡǡ
1 Introduction
ȋǡ ʹͲͲͷȌǤ ǡǡ ǡ
ǡ Ǥ ǡ
ǡ
Ǧȋ ǡʹͲͲͷȌǤǡ
ȋǡǡƬ ǡʹͲͲͷȌǤ
ȋǡ ʹͲͳͶȌǤ ǡ
ȋ ǡǡƬǡʹͲͳʹȌǤ
ȋǡʹͲͲͻǢǡǡǡƬ
ǡ ʹͲͲʹǡ Ǥ ͺͺͲȌǤ ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡǡȋǤǤǡƬǡʹͲͳʹǢǡǡǡƬǡʹͲͳȌǡ
ȋǤǤǡǡ ǡƬǡʹͲͳȌǡȋƬ ǡʹͲͳǢƬǡ ʹͲͳʹȌǤ
Ǥǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡȋǤǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ǡ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ȗ ǣ̷Ǥ Ǥ
ȗȗ ǣ ̷ǤǤ
ȗȗȗ ǣ̷Ǥ Ǥ
ʹ Destination brand gestalt and its effects on brand attachment and brand loyalty
of brand gestalt enables one to capture the brand’s complexity and the dynamic synergy among its Ǥ“Wonderful Indonesia” is an example of a destination brand that encompasses a diverse
Ǥ
ǡ ǡ ǡǡ
natural beauty, vibrant culture, fascinating experience, and exhilarating adventures. Likewise, “It’s more fun in the Philippines” is a destination brand that promises something beyond travel experience,
ǡǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧǡ
Ǥ ǡʹͲͳͺǡ
ͳͲΨ ȋȌǡǤͷΨ
ǡ ͶǤ͵Ψ ǡ ͵ͳͻ Ǥ
ǡ
ȋƬǡʹͲͲͶȌǤ
ȋ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͲͶȌǤ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
In today’s highly competitive tourism environment, brand loyalty has emerged as a critical driving
ȋ×ǡ ǡ Ƭ Ǧ Àǡ ʹͲͳͶǢ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͲͷȌǤ ǡ
ȋǡͳͻͻǢ ƬǡʹͲͳʹǢƬǡʹͲͳͶǢƬǡʹͲͲͳǢ
ǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳͳȌǤ ǡ
branding issue in today’s competitive tourist market (Veasna, Wu, & Huang, 2013, p. 511). A
ǦǦ
ȋǡʹͲͲͲȌǤǡ ǡ
Ǥ
Despite the significance of brand gestalt, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no empirical work
ǡ
ȋǤǤǡ Ƭ ǡ ͳͻͻͺǢ Ƭ ʹͲͳͳǢ ǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳȌǤ ǡ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋǤǤǡǡ ǡ ǡȌǤ
brand as perceived in the visitors’ minds.
ǡ ǡǤ
ȋʹͲʹͲȌǡ
ȋ ͳȌǤ
Ǧ
Ǥ
Figure 1. Total Number of Tourist Visiting North Sulawesi, 2016-2019
ǣǡʹͲʹͲ -
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
2016 2017 2018 2019
Number of tourist (in million)
Year
1.53 1.7 2.09
22.1
Deske W. Mandagi, Dave DG. Centeno & Indrajit ͵
2 Literature Review
2.1 Brand Gestalt
ȋ ǤǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍ ǡ
ȋǤǤǡǡǡȌǤ
ǤǤȋʹͲͲͻȌ
ǡǤ
Ǧterm branding success because of its ability to capture a brand’s ǡ ȋǡǡ ƬǡʹͲʹͳȌǤǡ
ǡ Ǥ
Ǥ ȋʹͲͲͻȌǡ
ǡ ȋǤǤǡ Ȍǡ
ȋǤǤǡǡǡȌǤ
Ǥ ȋʹͲʹͳȌ
–ǡ ǡ ǡǤ
ǡ ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍ
– ǡ ǡ –
Ǥ ǡ ò Ǥ ȋʹͲͲǡ Ǥ ͳ Ƭ ͶȌ
–ǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ ȋʹͲʹͳȌǡ
–ǡǡ ǡǤ
͵ǡǤ
2.2 Brand Attachment
Ǧ ǡ
ȋ ǡͳͻͻͺȌǤ
ǡ
Ǥ ǡ Ǧ
r’s knowledge and experiences that determines one’s future intention or
ȋƬǡͳͻͻͻȌǤǡ
ȋǤǡʹͲͳͲȌǤ
ȋǤǤǡƬǡ 2013; Kim, Sung, & Kang, 2014; Tuškej, Golob, & Podnar, 2013).
ȋǡ ʹͲͲͲȌǤ
ǡ ǡ ǡȋǡ ǡǡ ǡƬ
ǡ ʹͲͳͲǡ Ǥ ʹȌǤ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ
ȋǡʹͲͲǢ ƬǡʹͲͲ͵ȌǤ
ǡ ǡ
ǡ ǡȋǡ ǡ ƬǡʹͲͳͶȌǤ ǡ
ȋƬǡʹͲͳǢǡǡǡƬǡʹͲͳǢǤǡ ʹͲͳͲǢǡǡƬǡʹͲͳ͵ȌǤ
ǦǤ ǡ
key predictor of tourists’ satisfaction (Prayag & Ryan, 2011; Veasna et al., 2013) and loyalty behavior ȋƬǡʹͲͳ͵ǢǦ×ǡǦǡǦǡƬ Ǧ ǡʹͲͳͻǢǡǡƬ
Ͷ Destination brand gestalt and its effects on brand attachment and brand loyalty
ǡ ʹͲͳǢ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳͳȌǤ ǡ
ȋǤǡʹͲͳ͵ȌǤ
2.3 Brand Loyalty
ȋÚǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ǡ ȋ
ǡʹͲͳǢǡǡ ǡƬǡʹͲͲͺȌǤ ȋͳͻ͵ǡǤʹȌǡǡ
Ǥ
between the consumers’ attitudes towards a brand and their repurchase intention for thaȋ
& Basu, 1994). Brand loyalty is defined as “a deeply held commitment to rebuy or patronize a preferred
Ȁ ǡ Ǧ ǡ
ng having the potential to cause switching behavior” (Oliver, ͳͻͻͻǡǤ͵ͶȌǤ
ǡȋ Ƭ
ͳͻ͵ǢǡͳͻͻͻȌǤ ǡ
involves “a degree of dispositional commitment in terms of some unique value associated with the brand” (Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2001 p. 82). Brand loyalty can b ǡ
ȋǡ ǡƬǡʹͲͳͷȌǡ
satisfaction (Fullerton, 2005; Kasiri, Cheng, Sambasivan, & Sidin, 2017; Sivadas & Baker‐Prewitt, ʹͲͲͲȌǡ ȋ Ƭ òǡ ʹͲͲͺǢ ǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳͷȌǡ
ȋǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳͶȌǤ ǡ
ȋǤǤǡȌ ǡ
Ǥ
Existing literature in the field of tourism recognizes the significance of brand loyalty in today’s
ȋǤǤǡ×ǤǡʹͲͳͶǢƬǡʹͲͳ͵ǢǦǤǡ ʹͲͳͻǢǡǡƬ ǡʹͲͳǢƬǡʹͲͳͳǢ ƬǡʹͲͲͷȌǤ
ǡ
ǡ ȋ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳͲȌǤ ǡ
ǡ ȋǦǡ
ǡƬǡʹͲͳͷȌǤǡ
ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ
3 Hypotheses Development and Research Model
3.1 The Relationship Between Brand Gestalt and Brand Attachment
ǡ ǡ
ǡ ȋǤǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
Ǥ
̵ ǤȋͳͻͻͻȌ
ǡ Ǧ ̵ ǡ Ǧ
Ǥǡ ’
ȋǤǤǡ Ȍ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ
ǡ Ǥǡ
ǣ
H1ǣ ǡ ̵
ǡǦ Ǥ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲͻǢǤǡʹͲʹͳȌǡ
– ǡ ǡ ǡ
Ǥ
ȋǡʹͲͳͲȌǤ ǡ
Deske W. Mandagi, Dave DG. Centeno & Indrajit ͷ
Ǥ Ǧ ȋʹͲͲͳȌǡǡǡ
Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ȋ Ƭ
ǡʹͲͳʹȌǤǡ ǡǡ ǡ ȋʹͲͳͲȌ
ǡ ǡ
fictional, such as the brand’s heritage, founder, highlights, crises, and core values.
’ Ǥ
Ǧ ȋ ǤǡʹͲͳͲȌǡ ǡǡǡ
Ǥ ǡ
ǡ ǡ ǡǡǡ
ǡ Ǥ
ǡ ǡǡ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲȌǤ ǡ
’ Ǧ
ǤǡǡƬ ȋʹͲͳͻȌ Ǧ
Ǥ Ǧ
Ǥǡ
Ǧ ȋǡʹͲͳͲǢǤǡ ʹͲͳͻȌǤǡǣ
H1aǣ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ
Ǥǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ ǡ
ǡǡǡǡ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥattachment theory’s prediction, a
Ǥ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲȌǤ
ȋǡ ʹͲͲǢ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͲ͵ȌǤ Ǥ
ǤȋʹͲͳͲȌǡ
ȋǤǤǡ ȌǤ ǡ
ǦȋǤǤǡƬ ǡʹͲͳǢƬǡʹͲͳͶȌǤ
ǡ ǡǣ H1bǣ ǡ ̵
Ǧ Ǥ
ȋ
Ȍȋ ƬǡʹͲͲͲǢǤǡʹͲͲȌǤǡ
ǡ
ȋǤǡʹͲͳͲǡǤʹͶȌǤ
ȋǡͳͻͻʹȌǤ ǡ
Ǥ
ȋǡǡǡ Ƭ ǡʹͲͲͶȌǡ ̵
ȋǡǡƬǡʹͲͳͶȌǤǡ
ǡ
Ǥ ǡ
’ Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥǡ
ǣ
H1cǣ ǡ
Ǧ Ǥ
Destination brand gestalt and its effects on brand attachment and brand loyalty
ǡ Ǧ
attachment. These destinations’ stakeholders consist of various groups, which include localǡ
ǡǡǡǤǡǡ
ȋʹͲͳͺȌ
ǤȋǤǤǡ Ȍ
ǡ ǡ ǡǡ
Ǥǡǣ
H1dǣ ǡ
a higher degree of tourists’ perceived similarity between themselves and the other
Ǧ Ǥ
3.2 The Relationship Between Brand Gestalt and Brand Loyalty
ǡ
ȋ ƬͳͻͻͶǢǡͳͻͻͻȌǡ
ǡ ǡ ǡ
ȋǡ ͳͻͻͻȌǤ ǡ ȋͳͻͻͻȌ
consumer’s judgment of the brand’s performance is a criticalǦ Ǥ
’ǡ
Ǥǡ
ǣ
H2ǣect on brand loyalty, such that the higher the tourist’s perception
ǡǤ
ȋǡʹͲͳͲȌǤ
ȋʹͲͳͷȌ ǡ
Ǥ ǡ
’ ǡ Ǥ
ǡǣ
H2aǣ ǡ
ǦǤ
efined as the “subjective, internal consumer responses ȋǡǡ ǡȌǡǦ
are part of a brand’s design and identity, packaging, communications, and environments” (Brakus, ǡƬǡʹͲͲͻǡǤͷ͵ȌǤ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲͻǢƬ̵ǡʹͲͳͲǢƬǡʹͲͳͷǢ
ƬǡʹͲͳͶȌǤǡ
ǡ ǦǦ ȋǡǡƬÞǡʹͲͳͶǢ
ǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳǢ Ǧ Ǥǡ ʹͲͳͷȌǤ ǡ
ǣ
H2bǣ ǡ
ǦǤ
Ǥ
ȋǡͳͻͻʹȌǤǤ ȋʹͲͲͻȌǡȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍ Ǥ
role of the physical environment on consumers’ Ǥ ǡȋͳͻͻʹȌ
Ǥ
ǡ ȋʹͲͲʹȌ
Ǥ ǡ
ǡ
Ǥǡǣ H2cǣ ǡ
Ǥ
Deske W. Mandagi, Dave DG. Centeno & Indrajit
Ǥ ò ǤȋʹͲͲǡǤͶȌǡ
Ǧ
ǡȋǤǤǡ Ȍǡ ǡ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋǤǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ǡ Ǧ ȋǡǡƬǡʹͲͲ͵ȌǤ
Ǧ
ȋǤǤǡ Ƭ ǡ ͳͻͻ͵Ǣ Ƭ ǡ ʹͲͳǢ Óǡ ʹͲͲͳǢ ǡ ʹͲͳȌǤ
Ǧ
ȋǤǤǡ ǡ ʹͲͳȌǤ ǡ
stakeholders’ involvement in destination brand creation can influence visitors’ loyalty to the
Ǥ ǡ
Ȁ Ǥǡǣ
H2dǣ ǡ
ǦǤ
3.3 The Relationship Between Brand Attachment and Brand Loyalty
Ǥ
ȋǤǤǡǤǡʹͲͳǢƬǡʹͲͳǢ
ǤǡʹͲͳͲǢǤǡʹͲͳ͵ȌǤ ȋǤǤǡǡ ǡȌ ǡ
Ǥ Ǥ
to develop an attachment to a destination because they assess the destination’s ability to fulfill their
ǡȋǤǡʹͲͳͲǡǤʹͶȌǤ
destination attachment on tourist’s loyalty behavior is well explored in the
ȋǤǤǡƬǡʹͲͳ͵ǢǡǡƬ ǡʹͲͳͺǢǡǡƬǡ ʹͲͳǢƬǢʹͲͳͳǢǤǡʹͲͳ͵ǢǡǡƬǡʹͲͳͲȌǤǡ
ǣ
H3ǣ ǡ
Ǥ
ʹ͵Ǥͳ ǡ while model 2 displays the effect of brand gestalt’s dimension on brand attachment and brand loyalty.
Figure 2. Proposed Conceptual Model 1: The Influence of the Aggregate Brand Gestalt
ͺ Destination brand gestalt and its effects on brand attachment and brand loyalty
Figure 3. Proposed Conceptual Model 2: On the Influence of the Dimensions of Brand Gestalt
4 Method
4.1 Data Collection and Sample
ǡǤ
’Ǧȋ ͳȌǤǦ
ͳʹͺ Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǥ
ȋ ȌǡȋȌǡ
ȋ ȌǤ
Ǥ ͺͲͲ ǡ ͵ͲͲ ȋ͵ͺΨȌ
ʹͷͲ ȋ͵ͳΨȌǤ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ ǡ ǡ
ȋÚǡʹͲͲǡǤͻͺǦͻͻȌǤ
Ǥ
4.2 Measurement
Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ Ǥ
ǦǦ
ȋͳȌǡ ǡ ȋȌ Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ʹ͵Ǥ
ǤǡǤȋʹͲʹͳȌǡ
ȋǤǤǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ȌǤ
Ǧ ȋ Ǥǡ ʹͲͳͲǢ
ǡǡƬǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
ȋƬǡʹͲͲͳǢǡǡǡƬǡʹͲͳͳȌǤ
ǡ Ǥ
Deske W. Mandagi, Dave DG. Centeno & Indrajit ͻ
4.3 Pilot Study
Ǧ ͳʹͲ
Ǥ
ǡǡ Ǥ ǡǦ
Ǧ ͺͲ Ǥ
Ǥ
4.4 Data Analysis
ȋȌǤ
ȋǡǡƬǡʹͲͳͳȌǡ
Ǥ
ȋ Ȍ
ȋǡǡǡƬǡʹͲͳʹǡǤͶͳͶǦͶͳͷȌǤ ǡ
ȋ Ƭ ǡ ͳͻͺͳȌǤ ǡ ̵
Ǥ
ʹǤͲʹͷǤͲǤ
ǡ ȋǦ
Ȍǡ ǡ ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
5 Results
5.1 Demographic
ǡͺͲͲʹͲͳͻ
ʹͲʹͲǤͺͶͻΨǤ ͺͶ ǡ͵ͺͲȋͷͷǤΨȌǤ ʹͲʹͻ
ǡͺͷΨǦǡͷͺΨ ȋ
ͳȌǤ
Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Characteristic Category Sample
N Percentage
͵ͺͲ ͷͷǤ
͵ͲͶ ͶͶǤͶ
ʹͲ ʹͳ ͵ͳǤ
ʹͲ–ʹͻ ʹ͵ ͵ͺǤͷ
͵Ͳ–͵ͻ ͵ͺ ͷǤ
ͶͲ–Ͷͻ ͺͷ ͳʹǤͶ
ͷͲ ͺͳ ͳͳǤͺ
ͷͻ ͺͶǤ
ͳͲͷ ͳͷǤͶ
͵ͻͻ ͷͺǤ͵
ʹͺͷ ͶͳǤ
5.2 Analysis of Variance
ǡ
MANOVA test was performed. The analysis was conducted by comparing the destinations’ mean score
ǤTable 2, each dimension’s brand gestalt
͵ǤͺͲͶǤͶǤ ǡ
sites’ mean scores were within a small range (4.20 to 4.28). The Tomohon Extreme Market had the
ͳͲ Destination brand gestalt and its effects on brand attachment and brand loyalty
ǡǤ
ȋͶǤ͵ͲȌ
ȋͶǤͲͳȌǤǡ
ȋͶǤͶȌȋͶǤ͵ʹȌǤ
Table 2. One-factor MANOVA Test of Visitors' Perception of Brand Gestalt in the Three Data Collection Sites
Variables Group* Descriptive Statistic MANOVA Test
Mean St. Dev F Statistic p
ͳ ͶǤ͵Ͳͳ ͲǤͷ ͲǤͳͺ͵ ͲǤͺ͵͵
ʹ ͶǤʹͶ ͲǤʹͲ
͵ ͶǤʹͲ ͲǤͳͳ
ͳ ͶǤͲͳͲ ͳǤͲͶʹ ʹǤͺͲ ͲǤͲͷͺ
ʹ ͵ǤͺͲʹ ͳǤͲͻ
͵ ͵Ǥͺʹ ͲǤͻͺͶ
ͳ ͶǤͷͳ ͲǤͺͻ ʹǤ͵ ͲǤͲ͵
ʹ ͶǤͷ ͲǤͻͳ
͵ ͶǤ͵ͻ ͲǤͺʹ
ͳ ͶǤʹͷ͵ ͳǤͲͺ͵ ͲǤͻʹͷ ͲǤ͵ͻ
ʹ ͶǤͳͷ ͳǤͲ
͵ ͶǤ͵ͳ ͳǤͳͳͷ
ͳ ͶǤʹͺͳ ͲǤͷͺͻ ͳǤͲͳ ͲǤʹͲʹ
ʹ ͶǤʹͲʹ ͲǤͲͷ
͵ ͶǤʹͺͺ ͲǤͷͲ͵
ȗǣͳαǡʹαǡ͵α
Ǧ
Ǥʹ
Ǥ ǡ
ȋǡ ǡǡƬǡʹͲͲͻȌǤ
5.3 Reliability and Validity
variable’s reliability, Cronbach's alpha (CA) and composite reliability (CR) were estimated,
ǦͲǤȋ Ƭ ǡͳͻͺͳȌǤ͵
ͲǤǡ Ǥ Table 3. Reliability and Validity Results
Variables/Constructs CA CR AVE
ͲǤͻʹ ͲǤͻʹ ͲǤ͵
ͲǤͻ͵ ͲǤͻͶ ͲǤ
ͲǤͻͶ ͲǤͻͶ ͲǤ
ͲǤͻͷ ͲǤͻͷ ͲǤͺͳ
ͲǤͻ͵ ͲǤͻ͵ ͲǤͺ
ͲǤͻͷ ͲǤͻͷ ͲǤ
ͲǤͻͶ ͲǤͻͶ ͲǤͺ
Ǧ
ȋ ȌǤ ȋȌ
Ǥ
ͲǤͷȋǤǡʹͲͲͻȌͲǤͷȋ Ƭ ǡͳͻͺͳȌǤ
͵Ͷǡ
Ǥ
Deske W. Mandagi, Dave DG. Centeno & Indrajit ͳͳ
Table 4. Measurement Items Factor Loading
Scale items Factor loading
Story
Ǥ ͲǤͻͲ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͶ
Ǥ ͲǤͺʹ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͷ
Ǥ ͲǤͻ͵
Sensescape
Ǥ ͲǤͺ
Ǥ ͲǤͺ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͻ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͶ
Ǥ ͲǤͻͳ
Servicescape
Ǥ ͲǤͻͲ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͲ
Ǥ ͲǤͻͳ
Ǥ ͲǤͻ͵
Ǥ ͲǤͻͷ
Stakeholder
Ǥ ͲǤͻ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͺ
Ǥ ͲǤͺ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͳ Brand attachment
Ǥ ͲǤͻͷ
Ǥ ͲǤͻͲ
Ǥ ͲǤͻʹ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͺ
Brand loyalty
Ǥ ͲǤͺͻ
Ǥ ͲǤ͵
Ǥ ͲǤͻ
Ǥ ͲǤͺͺ
Ǥ ͲǤͺ͵
Ǥ ͲǤͺͳ
Ǥ ͲǤͻͲ
Ǥ ͲǤ
ǡ
Ǥ ȋͳͻͺͳȌǡ
Ǧ
Ǥͷ
Ǧ ǡ
Ǥ