rii",e
/
..;isiii:!"
Cffr. r_t Bg.l"illiii
$tuiiSilLLISAAII
PERSONALITY TRAIT DYNAMIC FACTORS RELATED
SBX PROMISCUITY OF SELECTBD FEMALES OF ANGELES CITY: PROSPECTS FOR SOCIAL
IIVIERVEIVITON
I r* t-od
1.e
Ce"/"$-[.
DissertationPresented to
the
Facultyof the
Graduate School Centro Escolar UniversityIn Partial Fulfillment
of the
Requirementsfor the
Degree Doctorof
EducationDoetor
of
Philosophyby
Ri-cardo
V,
Flores MyrnaF. Iral
March Ig?5
Republic of the Philippines Department of Education and Culture
BUREA,U OF HIGSER EDUCATION
DTSSERTATION REVTEW AND REPORT
Title: TTPERSONALITY TRAIT DYNAMIC FACTORS RELATED fO SEX PRO}4:ISCUITY OF SELECTED FEMALES IN ANGELES CITY:
PROSPECT FOR SOCTAL II{TERVENTIONII
Authors: RICARDO V. FLORES MYRNA FLORES IRAL Degree: Doctor of Education Doctor of Philosophy School: Centro Escolar University
No. of Pages - 565
fhis study is divided into two parts. The first part is an eff,ort to gain insight into the prychological dimensions
in predisposition to femal-e sex promiscuity particularly that of being a prostituter and the second part aims to find some
prospects for social intervention.
Purpose
The purpose of the study are: (f) to discover the
self-perception patterns of individual-s who have been identified
as sexually promiscuous for monetary consideration; '(Z) to con- pare the personality patterns of the prostitutes and non-prostitutes
2-
3) to deternine the attitude of the Citizen Leaders in the
community towards these subjects, and (4) to propose a theoretical
model for a. multiple-approach progran of social intervention whish
could be experimented upon to effect positive socialization and
thus avoid susceptibility to prostitution as well as tackle the
rehabil,itation of those who are already in this profession.
Problem
Two rnai-n problems vrere considered in this study:
Part I asks: What personality dimensions, as measured by MAT,
SV, AAI and SCT differentiate prostitutes and non-prostitutes?
Part II asks: What does the comnunity leadership of .A,ngeJ,es City do or plan to do about this problem?
1.O Are there significant differences in the assessment
of the prostitutes and nep-prostitutes on each of the following scales of the instrument used in this study:
1.1 Association Adjustment Inventory: Total Scoring, Psychotic Responses, Hysteric-l{on Hysteric, Passnoid-Naive, Schicophrenic-Objective, Anxious-Relaxr Juvenility, Depressed-
Optimisticr !ilithdrawal Sociable, Regid-!-lexibl-e, Impulsive-Restrained, Sociopathic-Empathetic and Psyshosomapathic-PhysicaI Cont entment.
L.2 Scale of Vsluss; Socia1 Acceptancel Family Solidarity, Economic-security, social Mobility. Moral Responsibility, Hupan
3.-
Personality, Respect for Excellence, Moral Equalityr Brotherhood, Devotion to Truth, Pursuit of Happiness and Spiritual Enrichment.
I.3 Motivational Analysis Test: Career Sentinentl Home Parental Sentiment, Caution-Safety Erg, Narcism-iomfort Erg, Superego Sentiment, Sweetheaytr-spouse Sentinent, Self-Sentiment,
and Pugnacity-Sadisn Ergr Mating Erg and Assertiveness Erg.
L.4 Sentence Completion Test: Attitude towards l{otherr Attitude towards Father, nttitude towards Fanily, Attitude towards Men, Heterosexual Relationsl Self l'{orthl Fear and Reaction to Fearl Guilt and Shame, Attitu.de torvards Pastr Religiosity, Social
Acceptancel Attitude towards the Futurel Goals, Level of Aspiration Attitude towards Occupation and Values attached to Vrlork?
2.O Are there significayrt differences in the profiles of those prostitutes when grouped according to3
2.1 Present Age (eighteen & below) and ninteen & above)
2.2 G6ographic Origin (urban/sub-urban and rural) 2.3 Marital Btatus (rnamied and single)?
3.O Based upon the subjectst attitude towards their present occupation and outlook of the futurel as gleaned fron the
PDS and SCTr are there indieations of their willingness to be rehabilitated? If so1 what occupation would they be wiLling to get into?
Specific Questions for Part II
4.0 How much do the Citizen Leaders know about the prosti tut es?
5.O If the Citizens Leaders were asked to work together
with other organizations in setting up an integrated multiple-approach progran to protect the community from the adverse affects of the pre-
eence of prostitutes, which among the following organization would they prefer to work with?
5.1 Religious organizations 5.2 Government officials 5.7 Civic organizations 5.4 Student leaders
5.5 School administrators 5.6 Ameri-can Resiclenta
5.O Are there significant differences in the character descriptions given to the prostitutes by the six different organ- izations?
7.O Are there significant differences in the perception of the Citizen teaders relative to the following areas:
7,I Allowing the presence of the prostitutes in the communityl
?.2 Advantages due to the presence of prostitutes in the community;
?.7 Disadvantages riue to the presence of prostitutes in the communityl and
?.4 Problems encountered in the community related to the presence of prostituf,es?
l
i:
t., Li
It"
t-
t
l:.
tr!T ril
vr.
E
, B.O What are the preventive rneasures proposed by the Citizen leaders against the adverse effect of prostitutions for;
B.L the youxh . 8.2 the community?
9.0 Wbat is a desirable integrated program for social intervention which can be put up by the community towards this end?
1O.O What is currently being done in the community as far
as prostitution is concerned?
Eypotheses
The hypotheses are:
Part I:
1.O fhere are no signifieant differences between the mean
6cores of the prostitutes and the non-prostitutes in the following
scales of the instrunents used: llATr SVr AAIr and SCT.
2.O There are no sigr.ificant difference in the mean scores of the prostitutes on each of the variables mentioned in hypothesis 1 above when the subjects are grouped according. to:
2.L Present age (eighteen & below) and nineteen and above)