University of the Philippines Los Baños University of the Philippines Los Baños
University Knowledge Digital University Knowledge Digital Repository
Repository
Graduate Student's Output Theses and Dissertations
10-2000
The effects of interest rate liberalization on the supply of and The effects of interest rate liberalization on the supply of and demand for agricultural credit in the Philippines
demand for agricultural credit in the Philippines
Irene B. Binohlan
University of the Philippines Los Baños
Follow this and additional works at: https://www.ukdr.uplb.edu.ph/etd-grad Part of the Agriculture Commons
Recommended Citation Recommended Citation
Binohlan, Irene B., "The effects of interest rate liberalization on the supply of and demand for agricultural credit in the Philippines" (2000). Graduate Student's Output. 703.
https://www.ukdr.uplb.edu.ph/etd-grad/703
IRENE B. BINOHLAN
THE EFFECTS OF INTEREST RATE LIBERALIZATION ON THE SUPPLY OF DEMAND FOR AGRICULTURAL CREDIT IN THE PHILIPPINES
SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES AT LOS BANOS
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE
DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE (Agricultural Economics)
October 2000
13- 6VIA-1-A DO B. CARADA The thesis hereto attached entitled, "THE EFFECTS OF INTEREST RATE LIBERALIZATION ON THE SUPPLY OF AND DEMAND FOR AGRICULTURAL CREDIT IN THE PHILIPPINES", prepared and submitted by IRENE B. BINOHLAN, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Agricultural Economics) is hereby accepted.
6
ISABELITA M. PABU ON WIL
Member, Guidance Committee
& )-tit
Date Signed
Member, Guidance Committee ep 2-111.1
Date Signed
_ ).
--e---- COKA(LON T. ARAGON Chair, Guidance Committee✓- 6( ?--z—Lro Date Signed
Accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Agricultural Economics).
/1440.44,
ceir EUE20 P. MARIANOChair
Department of Agricultural Economics
67 "Joy fkve.
Date Signed
• "72
RITA P. LAUDE Dean, Graduate School
University of the Philippines Los Bafios IVelt
Date Signed
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Background and Statement of the Problem 1
Significance of the Study 5
Objectives of the Study 7
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Empirical Studies that Support Financial Liberalization 8 Empirical Studies that Do Not Support Financial Liberalization 16 Empirical Studies on the Cost and Returns of Agricultural Lending 21 Under a Regulated and a Liberalized Financial Policy
III. THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY
Theoretical Framework 29
Conceptual Framework 34
Hypotheses of the Study 37
IV. METHODOLOGY
Types of Data and Methods of Data Collection 38
Analytical Procedure 39
Limitations of the Study 43
PAGE
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Monetary and Credit Policies during the Pre-liberalization and
Liberalization Period 45
Average Agricultural Loan Portfolio 52
Ratio of Agricultural Loans Granted by Formal Financial 58 Institutions
Average Interest Rate 59
Average Rediscount and Required Reserve 61
Average Volume of Unsubsidized Loans Granted to the
Agriculture Sector and Sub-sectors 62
The Effects of Interest Rate Liberalization Policy on the
Agricultural Credit supply 64
The Effects of Interest Rate Liberalization Policy on the Demand for Agricultural Credit
Agriculture Sector 69
Food Crops Sub-sector 71
Export and Commercial Crops Sub-sector 73
Livestock and Poultry Sub-sector 75
Fishery Sub-sector 78
Forestry Sub-sector 80
Perception of Bankers on the Effects of Financial Liberalization In the Philippines
Sectors that Benefited from the Financial Liberalization 82
vi
PAGE
Effects of Financial Liberalization on the Lending
Operation of Banks 86
Effects of Financial Liberalization on the Deposit
Generation of Banks 88
Problems Encountered in Adopting the Liberalized
Interest Rates 89
VI. SUMMARY , CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary and Conclusion 92
Recommendations 100
LITERATURE CITED 103
APPENDICES 105
vii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1 Average annual volume of potential agricultural loan portfolio, interest rates, rediscount rate, and required reserve during the
pre-liberalization and liberalization periods, Philippines,1973-1996. 53 2 Average annual volume of deposits, capital accounts, fixed assets,
number of financial institutions, and inflation rate during the
pre-liberalization and liberalization periods, Philippines, 1973-1996. 54 3 Average annual volume of unsubsidized loans granted to the agriculture
sector, average volume of loans granted to the sub-sectors, and the average nominal lending rate during the pre-liberalization and
liberalization periods, Philippines, 1977-1993. 56 4 Average annual growth rate and percent contribution Gross National
product of the agriculture, industry, and service sectors during the pre-
liberalization and the liberalization period, Philippines, 1973-1996. 57 5 Regression results showing the effects of interest rate liberalization
policy, rediscount rate, and reserve requirement on the potential
agricultural loan portfolio of banks in the Philippines,1973-1996. 65 6 Regression results showing the effects of interest rate liberalization
on the demand for loans by the agriculture sector, Philippines,
1977-1993. 70
7 Regression results showing the effects of interest rate liberalization on the demand for loans by the food crops sub-sector, Philippines,
1977-1993. 72
8 Regression results showing the effects of interest rate liberalization on the demand for loan by the export and commercial crops sub-sector,
Philippines, 1977-1993. 74
viii
TABLE PAGE
9 Regression results showing the effects of interest rate liberalization policy, nominal lending rate, and volume of livestock and poultry production on the demand for loans by the livestock and poultry sub-sector,
Philippines, 1977-1993. 76
10 Regression results showing the effects of the interest rate liberalization policy, nominal lending rate, volume of production of fishery products, and volume of exports of fishery products on the demand for loans by
the fishery sub-sector, Philippines, 1977-1993. 79
11 Regression results showing the effects of the interest rate liberalization policy, nominal lending rate, and volume of production of forestry products on the demand for loans by the forestry sub-sector, Philippines, 1977-1993. 81 12 Response of 13 sample bankers with regard to the sector that benefited
most from the interest rate liberalization. 84
13 Response of 13 sample bankers with regard to the benefits from the
interest rate liberalization policy deposit generation. 85 14 Response of 13 sample bankers on the effects of interest rate
liberalization on lending operation. 87
15 Response of 13 sample bankers on the effects of interest rate
liberalization on deposit generation. 90
16 Response of 13 sample bankers on the problems encountered during
the interest rate liberalization period. 91
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Graph showing the movements of the supply of and demand for agricultural credit during the liberalization
period. 33
2 Diagram showing the factors that affect the volume of
agricultural credit supply and demand. 36
x
LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES
APPENDIX TABLE PAGE
1 Classification of commercial banks based on total assets,
Philippines, as of December 24, 1998. 105
2 Potential agricultural loan portfolio of banks (million pesos),
Philippines, 1973-1996. 106
3 Ratio of agricultural loans granted, by institution, Philippines,
1977-1993. 107
4 Total liabilities and net worth of formal financial institutions,
Philippines, 1973-1996. 108
5 Investment in bonds and securities by commercial and rural
banks (million pesos), Philippines, 1973-1996. 109 6 Average exchange rates in pesos per US dollar and balance
of payments, Philippines, 1976-1996. 110
7 Foreign interest rates (percent per annum), Philippines,
1976-1996. 111
8 Inflation rate on all items, Philippines, 1973-1997. 112 9 Number of firms registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Philippines, 1977-1996. 113
10 Average land area and volume of agricultural production and exports,
Philippines, 1977-1996. 114
11 Correlation matrix of variables used in determining
multicollinearity of variables. 115
12 Annual growth rate of required reserve and rediscount rate,
Philippines, 1974-1996. 116
xi
APPENDIX TABLE PAGE
13 Total volume of exports (metric tons), Philippines, 1977-1996. 117 14 Interest rate, rediscount rate, and required reserve (percent),
Philippines, 1973-1996. 118
15 Volume of agricultural loans granted, by institution
(million pesos), Philippines, 1977-1993. 119
16 Volume of agricultural loans granted, by sub-sector (million pesos),
Philippines, 1997-1993. 120
17 Total agricultural production, Philippines, 1977-1993. 121 18 Total deposit liabilities of banks (million pesos), Philippines,
1977-1993. 122
19 Total borrowings and other liabilities of banks (million pesos),
Philippines, 1973-1996. 123
20 Total capital accounts of banks and gross loanable funds,
(million pesos), Philippines, 1973-1996. 124
21 Total fixed and other assets of banks (million pesos), Philippines,
1973-1996. 125
22 Number of financial institutions, Philippines, 1976-1997. 126 23 Volume of unsubsidized and subsidized agricultural loans granted
(million pesos), Philippines,1977-1993. 127
xii
ABSTRACT
BINOHLAN, IRENE. University of the Philippines at Los Banos, October 2000. The Effects of Interest Rate Liberalization on the Supply of and Demand for Agricultural Credit in the Philippines.
Major Adviser: Dr. Corazon T. Aragon
The study sought to analyze the effects of the interest rate liberalization policy, and the other monetary policies , e.g., nominal lending rate, rediscount rate, and required reserve on the agricultural credit supply in the Philippines. On the demand side, it aimed to analyze the effects of the interest rate liberalization policy and the other factors such as the nominal lending rate and volume of production and exports on the demand for loans by the agriculture sector and its sub-sectors. The study used time series secondary data and primary data and employed two analytical procedures, namely: test of means and regression analysis.
The results of the study showed that the average agricultural loan portfolio of banks increased and was statistically significant when the interest rate liberalization policy was in place. However, the average ratio of the agricultural loans granted to total loans granted by the commercial and rural banks declined during the interest rate liberalization period. On the other hand, the regression coefficient showed an inverse and significant relationship between the agricultural credit supply and the required reserve.
Conversely, the rediscount rate did not have a significant influence on the volume of agricultural credit supply and had an illogical sign. On the demand side of agricultural
credit, the results of the study showed a weak inverse relationship between the interest rate liberalization policy and the volume of loans availed of by the agriculture sector as a whole, being statistically non-significant at ten percent probability level. However, the sub-sectors indicated varied response to the interest rate liberalization policy. Among the sub-sectors that had a significant increase in the average volume of demand for credit during the interest rate liberalization policy were the food crops, livestock and poultry, and fishery sub-sectors. On the other hand, the export and commercial crops and forestry sub-sectors experienced a significant decline in the average demand for credit during the interest rate liberalization period. This shows an illogical relationship with the interest rate policy dummy. However, the decrease might be explained by the significant drop in the average volume of exports for both sub-sectors.
The perception of bankers on the effects of interest rate liberalization policy suggested a positive view on the liberalization policy, especially the commercial banks.
However, the rural banks disclosed that the liberalization policy posed adverse effects on banks that were not ready to install innovations so as to effectively withstand the stiff competition brought by the market-determined interest rate.
With these findings, the following are the recommendations: 1) increase government appropriation for rural infrastructures; 2) support the creation of an apex organization of rural banks for fund mobilization, research, and review of financial policies that affect them; and 3) the Central Bank to provide incentives to rural banks through more favorable rediscounting scheme.
xiv