CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
5.3 Further Study
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game : What happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Baycan-Levent, T., Gülümser Akgün, A. A., & Kundak, S. (2010). Success conditions for urban networks: Eurocities and sister cities. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1187-1206.
Biggs, P. C. (2003). Managing cultural differences in alliances. Retrieved from www.alliancestrategy.com
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Oumer, A. (2016). Town twinning and German city growth. Regional Studies, 50(8), 1420-1432.
Chamniprasart, P. (2018). Ministry of interior's sister city policy for regional development. Retrieved from http://www.fad.moi.go.th/images/Sister- City_report.pdf
Chandarasorn, V. (2005). An integrated theory of public policy implementation.
Bangkok: TURA.
Cremer, R. D., De Bruin, A., & Dupuis, A. (2001). International sister‐cities: Bridging the global‐local divide. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60(1), 377-401.
De Villiers, J. C. (2005). Strategic alliances between communities, with special emphasis on the twinning of South African cities and towns with international partners (Doctoral dissertation). University of Stellenbosch Business School, Bellville.
De Villiers, J. C. (2009). Success factors and the city-to-city partnership management process–from strategy to alliance capability. Habitat International, 33(2), 149- 156.
De Villiers, J. C., De Coning, T. J., & Smit, E. (2007). Towards an understanding of the success factors in international twinning and sister-city relationships. South African Journal of Business Management, 38(1), 1-10.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (2009). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues.
Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313-321.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of
174
Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
Gibbs, M., Gooding, A., Woods, R., Pillora, S., & Smith, R. (2015). Sister cities and international alliances. Ultimo NSW: UTSeScholarship, UTS Library.
Gray, B. (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: Multiple conceptions and multiple methods. Cooperative strategy: Economic, Business, and
Organizational Issues, 243-260.
Habitat, U. N. (2001). City-to-city cooperation: Issues arising from experience. Nairobi:
UN Habitat.
Harbison, J. R., & Pekar, P. P. (1993). A practical guide to alliances: Leapfrogging the learning curve: a perspective for US Companies. Booz: Allen & Hamilton.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Indriyati, N., Sanyoto, S., Yuliantiningsih, A., Mardianto, A., & Wismaningsih, W.
(2016). Model of sister city cooperation in order to improve regional
development in Banyumas Regency. Journal Dinamika Hukum, 16(2), 156-164.
Khan, A. R. (2016). Policy implementation: Some aspects and issues. Journal of Community Positive Practices (3), 3-12.
Koontz, T., & Newig, J. (2014). From Planning to Implementation: Top-down and bottom up approaches for collborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42, 416-425.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Kurniawan, T. A., de Oliveira, J. P., Premakumara, D. G. J., & Nagaishi, M. (2013).
City-to-city level cooperation for generating urban co-benefits: the case of technological cooperation in the waste sector between Surabaya (Indonesia) and Kitakyushu (Japan). Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 43-50.
Lendrum, T. (2003). The strategic partnering handbook: The practitioners' guide to partnerships and alliances. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Maas, G. J. P., & Fox, W. (1997). Entrepreneurship and public management. Kenwyn:
Juta and Co.
Maksamphan, C. (2018). Global areana and foreign affairs policy for regional
175
development. Retrieved from http://www.fad.moi.go.th/images/Sister- City_report.pdf
Mascitelli, B., & Chung, M. (2008). Using sister city relationships to access the Chinese market. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 7(2), 203-215.
Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity- conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145-174.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy.
Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
Mockler, R. J. (1999). CBI series in practical strategy, Multinational Strategic alliances. New York: Wiley.
Nikolaos, B., & Vassilios, Z. (2016). Tourism policy and residents' well-being in Cyprus: Opportunities and challenges for developing an inside-out destination management approach. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 5(1), 44-54.
O'Toole, K. (2001). Kokusaika and internationalisation: Australian and Japanese sister city type relationships. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 55(3), 403- 419.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2018). The twelfth national economic and social development plan. Bangkok: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.
Ossenbrink, J., Finnsson, S., Bening, C. R., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2018). Delineating policy mixes: Contrasting top-down and bottom-up approaches to the case of energy-storage policy in California. Research Policy, 48(10), 103582.
Pramudwinai, D. (2015). Vice Minister of Ministry of Foreign Affairs Conduct Press Release on the implementation result of Foreign Affairs Policy [Press release].
Retrieved from http://www.mfa.go.th/main/th/media-center/14/55579-รัฐมนตรีช่วยว่า การกระทรวงการต่างประเทศแถลงผลงานกลุ.html
Prasad, B. D. (2008). Content Analysis. A method of Social Science Research. Research Methods for Social Work, 5, 1-20.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in
176
Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation (Vol. 708). California: Univ of California Press.
Ramasamy, B., & Cremer, R. D. (1998). Cities, commerce and culture: The economic role of international sister‐city relationships between New Zealand and Asia.
Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 3(3), 446-461.
Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21-48.
Sabatier, P. (2005). From policy implementation to policy change: A personal odyssey.
Reform and Change in Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, 8, 17- 34.
Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 481-504.
Segil, L. (1996). Intelligent business alliances: How to profit using today's most important strategic tool. New York: Times Business.
Sistercities.org. (n.d.). What Is a Sister City?. Retrieved from https://sistercities.org/about-us/what-is-a-sister-city-3/
Smith, T. B. (1973). The policy implementation process. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 197-209.
Stemler, S. (2000). An Overview of Content Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7, 17.
Stewart Jr, J., Hedge, D. M., & Lester, J. P. (2007). Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Princeton, N.J.: Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic.
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box.
Public Administration Review, 66, 20-32.
Tjandradewi, B. I., Marcotullio, P. J., & Kidokoro, T. (2006). Evaluating city-to-city cooperation: a case study of the Penang and Yokohama experience. Habitat International, 30(3), 357-376.
UNDP. (2009). Community security and social cohesion: Towards a UNDP approach.
New York: UNDP.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A
177
conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488.
Zelinsky, W. (1991). The twinning of the world: sister cities in geographic and historical perspective. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(1), 1-31.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Sister City Relationship by Province
No. Partner City Type of Partnership Year Status Chiang Mai Provincial Government
1 San Rafael City, California, USA
Sister City/Friendship City
1990 Inactive
2 Kangwon City, Gangwon Province, Republic of Korea
Sister City/Friendship City
1992 Inactive
3 Honjo Municipality, Saitama, Japan
Sister City/Friendship City
1992 Inactive
4 Toronto City, Ontario Province, Canada
Sister City/Friendship City
1997 Inactive
5 Shanghai Municipality, Jiangsu Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
2000 Active
6 Yokatta Province, Indonesia Sister City/Friendship City
2007 Active
7 Qingdao Sub-provincial City, Shangdong Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
2008 Active
8 Chongqing Municipality, Sichuan Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
2008 Active
9 Bursa Metropolitan Municipality, Turkey
Sister City/Friendship City
2013 Active
10 Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan Sister City/Friendship City
2013 Active
11 Kengtung Town, Myanmar Sister City/Friendship City
2014 Active
12 Chengdu Sub-Provincial City, Sichuan Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
2015 Active
No. Partner City Type of Partnership Year Status 13 Assam State, India Sister City/Friendship
City
- On Process
14 Yangzhou Prefecture-level city, Jiangsu Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
- On Process
15 Hainan Province, China Sister City/Friendship City
- On Process
16 Xishuangbanna
Autonomous Region of Tai Ethnic Groups Yunan
Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
- On Process
17 Genoa City, Italy Sister City/Friendship City
- On Process
Chiang Mai City-Municipality 18. Toyama City, Japan Sister City/Friendship
City
1989 N/A
19. Saitama City, Saitama, Jaoan
Sister City/Friendship City
1992 N/A
20. Kunming Prefecture-level city, Yunan Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
1999 Active
21. Harbin Sub-Provincial City, Heilongjiang Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
2008 Active
22. Yiwu Sub-prefectural City, Zhejiang Province, China
Sister City/Friendship City
2018 Active
Khonkean Province
Khonkean Provincial Government 1 Fujian, China Sister City/Friendship
City
2002 Active
2 Danang, Vietnam Sister City/Friendship 2015 Active
No. Partner City Type of Partnership Year Status City
Khonkean City-Municipality 3 Nanning, China Sister City/Friendship
City
1992 Active
5 Dong Hei, Vietnam Sister City/Friendship City
2005 Active
Rayong Province
Rayong Provincial Government 1 Jeollanm-do, Korean Sister City/Friendship
City
1999 Active
2 Liu Zhou, China Sister City/Friendship City
2011 Active
Rayong City-Municipality 3 Hechi, China Sister City/Friendship
City
2013 Inactive
APPENDIX B
Letter of Intent and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
to Establish [Twin Cities/Sister Cities/Friendship Cities/Partnership Cities/etc.]
between
(name of Thai province) and
………...
Based on the principles of mutual benefit and equality and with a view to further enhancing and consolidating friendly relations between name of Thai province) and……….., [the two cities/both cities/ the two sides/both sides] have reached the following intentions:
1. [The two cities/Both cities/The two sides/Both sides] will strengthen and further improve the existing cooperation on/in (specify fields of cooperation).
2. [The two cities/Both cities/The two sides/Both sides] will seek the opportunities for mutual cooperation on/in (specify fields of cooperation).
3. [The two cities/Both cities/The two sides/Both sides] will encourage their agencies concerned to maintain regular contacts and consultations with each other for the cooperation under this Letter of Intent, as well as to encourage exchange of visits between their officials.
4. [The two cities/Both cities/The two sides/Both sides] [aim to/will] formally establish a [Twin Cities/Sister Cities/Friendship Cities/Partnership Cities/etc.] relationship in the future.
Signed in duplicate at (Place) on (date) in the Thai, (other city’s language), and English languages, all texts having equal validity. In case of divergence, the English text will be used.
This Letter of Intent does not intend to create rights or obligations under international law.
For (Thai province) For
………. ………..
……...…(Name)……….. ………...…(Name)………..
……….(Position)………. ………….(Position)……….
(Draft)
[Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement/Memorandum of Agreement/etc.]
on the Establishment of [Twin Cities/Sister Cities/Friendship Cities/Partnership Cities/etc.]
between
……(name of Thai province)……
and
………
……….and……….. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the [“Participants/two Sides”]);
Guided by mutual aspiration toward the strengthening of understanding and goodwill between…(name of Thai province)...and……..…...…; and
Taking into consideration the existing contacts between them;
[Have reached the common understandings as follows/Have reached the following understanding]:
1. The [Participants/two Sides] will, within their authority and to the extent permitted by the laws and regulations in force in their respective countries, cooperate with each other to promote mutual prosperity and development on the basis of equality and mutual benefits.
2. The [Participants/two Sides] will cooperate with each other in various fields [or specify the fields of interest] compatible with their respective government’s policies, domestic laws, and international obligations.
3. The [Participants/two Sides] will encourage their concerned agencies to maintain direct contact with each other for cooperation under this [Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement/Memorandum of Agreement/etc.]. The [Participants/two Sides] will also encourage the exchange of visits between their officials.
4. The [Participants/two Sides] will consult each other regarding the modalities and programs of cooperation in implementing this [Memorandum of Understanding/ Agreement/Memorandum of Agreement/etc.] by convening annual meetings, or other meetings when necessary, to monitor and evaluate the achievement of joint projects as well as to ensure concrete results and mutual benefits.
5. This [Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement/Memorandum of Agreement/etc.] will come into effect on the date of its signature and…
Option 2: …will remain in effect for a (time e.g. five-year) period. The renewal/extension of the [Twin Cities/Sister Cities/Friendship Cities/Partnership Cities/etc.] relationship will depend on mutual decision by the [Participants/two Sides.]
Signed in duplicate at (place) on (date) in the Thai, (the other Party/Participant/Side’s language) and English language. In case of divergence of interpretation, the English text will be used.
For (Name of the Thai Province) For………
……… ……….
…………(Name)………
………(Name)………..
……….(Position)……….. ………….(Position)………
APPENDIX C
Interview Questions