• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Completion of a Metric Space

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Completion of a Metric Space"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Completion of a Metric Space

Definition. Acompletionof a metric space (X, d) is a pair consisting of a complete metric space (X, d) and an isometryϕ:X→X such that ϕ[X] is dense inX. Theorem 1. Every metric space has a completion.

Proof. Let (X, d) be a metric space. Denote by C[X] the collection of all Cauchy sequences inX. Define a relation∼ onC[X] by

(xn)∼(yn) ⇐⇒ lim

n→∞d(xn, yn) = 0.

It is easy to see that this is an equivalence relation on C[X]. LetX be the set of all equivalence classes for∼:

X = {[(xn)] : (xn)∈ C[X]}.

Define d:X×X →[0,∞) by

d([(xn)],[(yn)]) = lim

n→∞d(xn, yn),

where [(xn)], [(yn)]∈X. To show that d is well-defined, let (x0n) and (yn0) be two Cauchy sequences inX such that (xn)∼(x0n) and (yn)∼(yn0). Then

n→∞lim d(xn, x0n) = lim

n→∞d(yn, yn0) = 0.

By the triangle inequality,

d(xn, yn) ≤ d(xn, x0n) +d(x0n, yn0) +d(yn0, yn) and d(x0n, y0n) ≤ d(x0n, xn) +d(xn, yn) +d(yn, y0n).

Hence,

|d(xn, yn)−d(x0n, yn0)| ≤ d(xn, x0n) +d(yn, y0n) −→ 0.

Since both (d(xn, yn)) and (d(x0n, y0n)) are convergent, this shows that

n→∞lim d(xn, yn) = lim

n→∞d(x0n, yn0).

Thusd is well-defined.

Next, we show that d is a metric on X. Let [(xn)], [(yn)], [(zn)]∈X. Then d([(xn)],[(yn)]) = 0⇔ lim

n→∞d(xn, yn) = 0⇔(xn)∼(yn)⇔[(xn)] = [(yn)].

Also,

d([(xn)],[(yn)]) = lim

n→∞d(xn, yn) = lim

n→∞d(yn, xn) =d([(yn)],[(xn)]).

1

(2)

Since d(xn, zn)≤d(xn, yn) +d(yn, zn),

n→∞lim d(xn, zn) ≤ lim

n→∞d(xn, yn) + lim

n→∞d(yn, zn).

Thus

d([(xn)],[(zn)]) ≤ d([(xn)],[(yn)]) +d([(yn)],[(zn)]).

Hence d is a metric onX.

For eachx∈X, let ˆx= [(x, x, . . .)]∈X, the equivalence classes of the constant sequence (x, x, . . .). Define ϕ:X→X by ϕ(x) = ˆx. Then for anyx,y∈X,

d(ϕ(x), ϕ(y)) =d(ˆx,y) = limˆ

n→∞d(x, y) =d(x, y).

Hence ϕ is an isometry from X into X. To show that ϕ[X] is dense in X, let x = [(xn)]∈ X and let ε > 0. Since (xn) is a Cauchy sequence, there exists an N ∈N such that for any m, n ≥N, d(xm, xn) < ε

2. Let z =xN. Then ˆz ∈ϕ[X]

and

d(x,z) = limˆ

n→∞d(xn, z) = lim

n→∞d(xn, xN) ≤ ε 2 < ε.

Thus ˆz∈Bd(x, ε)∩ϕ[X]. Hence, ϕ[X] is dense inX.

Finally we show that (X, d) is complete. To establish this, we apply the following lemma of which proof is left as an exercise:

Lemma. Let(X, d) be a metric space andA a dense subset such that every Cauchy sequence in A converges in X. Prove thatX is complete.

Hence, it suffices to show that every Cauchy sequence in the dense subspace ϕ[X] converges in X. Let (zbk) be a Cauchy sequence in ϕ[X], where each bzk is represented by the Cauchy sequence (zk, zk, . . .). Since ϕis an isometry,

d(zn, zm) = d(zbn,bzm) for each m,n.

Hence, (z1, z2, z3, . . .) is a Cauchy sequence in X. Let z = [(z1, z2, z3, . . .)]∈ X. To show that (bzk) converges to z, let ε > 0. Then there is an N ∈ N such that d(zk, zn)< ε

2 for any k,n≥N. Hence, for each k≥N, d(bzk, z) = lim

n→∞d(zk, zn) ≤ ε 2 < ε.

This shows that (zbk) converges to a point z inX and that X is complete.

2

(3)

Theorem 2. A completion of a metric space is unique up to isometry. More pre- cisely, if {ϕ1,(X1, d1)}and {ϕ2,(X2, d2)}are two completions of(X, d), then there is a unique isometry f from X1 onto X2 such thatf ◦ϕ12.

Proof. Since ϕ1 is an isometry, ϕ1 is 1-1. Thus ϕ−111[X] → X is an isometry from ϕ−11 [X] onto X. Since ϕ2 is an isometry from X onto ϕ2[X]⊆X2, it follows thatϕ2◦ϕ−111[X]→ϕ2[X] is a surjective isometry. Leth=ϕ2◦ϕ−11 . Then

h◦ϕ1 = (ϕ2◦ϕ−11 )◦ϕ12◦(ϕ−11 ◦ϕ1) =ϕ2◦iX2.

Hence there exists a unique isometryf fromX1 intoX2 which is an extension ofh.

For eachx∈X,

f◦ϕ1(x) =f(ϕ1(x)) =h(ϕ1(x)) =h◦ϕ1(x) =ϕ2(x).

Thusf◦ϕ12. Similarly, there exists a unique isometryg fromX2 intoX1 such thatg◦ϕ21. Therefore

g◦f◦ϕ1 =g◦ϕ21 and f◦g◦ϕ2=f◦ϕ12.

Hence g◦f = iϕ1[X] and f ◦g = iϕ2[X]. Since ϕ1[X] is dense in X1, we have g◦f =iX

1. Similarly, f ◦g= iX

2. Thus f =g−1. Hence, f is a unique isometry from X1 onto X2 such that f◦ϕ12.

3

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Ichijy¯ o, who showed that every tangent space to a Rizza manifold is a complex Banach space and that Rizza condition does not necessarily reduce the Finsler metric to a Riemannian

In the design development there is some analysis, namely the concept and development of ideas, development of space that consisting of the space area and

Although it is acceptable to create explicit measures with 4 – 6 items ( Hinkin, 1998 ), this number is too few for word fragment completion tasks because respondents may not generate

ON GENERALIZED HYPERCONNECTED SPACES Definition 4.1 Let is called g- hyperconnected, if every nonempty g- open subset U of X is g- dense g- hyper connected, if every nonempty g -

Indeed, from Corollary 1.4 we see that a metric space X is isometric to an additive subgroup of a Banach space if and only if there is a group structure onXwhich makes the metric

LetA be a subset in a metric space M, d andB ⊆M is open relative toA.. Prove that A\B is closed relative to

A space X is Scl-Scl connected if and only if it is not possible to express X as union of two non-empty and disjoint semi clopen sets.. Firstly, assume that X be Scl-Scl

LetX,dbe a complete metric space and T:X→X be an almostZ-contraction with respect to a functionζ∈ Z.Then, T has a unique fixed point, and, for every initial point x0∈ X, the Picard