Bakan's study of the private corporation begins with the recognition that it emerged in the mid-19th century as a legal entity with "personality." Now, the corporate paradigm has a history based on the development of the Western Industrial Revolution, which came hand in hand with the realization that science must have a balance between theory and practice.
Modelling the Human Activity System
The idea of the social mind can be elaborated by recognizing that an enduring group with a dominant culture has the capacity for collective cognitive processes (Clark, 2008; Clark & Chalmers, 1998; Theiner, Allen & Goldston, 2010), which constitute a prerequisite conceptualization for the existence of a collective mind. In the operative domain, the operative system of the collective involves structure, which constrains and facilitates or reinforces behavior.
The Intelligences
Operational intelligence is responsible for the representation and manipulation of the transformative aspects of reality. Figurative and operational intelligence7 was originally applied to the developing child's psyche by Piaget (1950), but later it was also applied to the developing human activity group (Yolles, 2008).
The Collective Mind as a set of Personality Traits
The personality operating system that houses the operational information and personality structures that facilitate decision-making behavior and that provides the cognitive self-organization of the normative personality and its self-regulatory capacity. The operating system of the personality is modeled to match the operating structures of the collective as a whole: this is where the decision-making structures and the operating structures match - in other words, where the structure of an organization is related to both the decision-making and the operational manifestation. behavior. In this case, the self-organization of the regulatory capacity of a collective also coincides with its structural nature.
In this approach, there is the ability to explore the organization as a normative individual within a complex plural environment, norms that emerge from the body of the social collective. Cultural, figurative, operational, and social intelligence are also explicit parts of the collective mind, while emotional intelligence is a more implicit component of figurative and operational intelligence. Lines listed in intelligence and their positive or negative adaptive feedback indicate pathologies that may develop.
Within the more detailed context of the collective mind in Figure 1, figurative and operational intelligence have a better interpretation than for the higher-level model in Figure 2. Limiting intelligence to the connection between traits can result in inefficiencies in the design of information between systems of the supersystem. They must become: aware of: (i) the nature of the social pathologies they cause through this; (ii) the social impact of the ideology and ethics they support actively or passively and directly or indirectly; and (iii) social and technical factors affecting society.
The Paradigm
Nature of the Paradigm and it modes of Possible Existence
These norms can be represented in terms of a cultural system that a group maintains with its values, beliefs and belief potentials, which are ultimately responsible for collective states of mind that reflect acceptable emotional and attitudinal attitudes through the use of language. The nature of the group can be usefully understood from the social-cognitive agency approach adopted by Bandura (2010). It produces the laws that govern it (Schwarz, 1997), and it does so because it is logically closed, a condition which, according to Parsons (1937), occurs when: all its propositions are interdependent, each having consequences for the others, and each of these implications finds its statement in another proposition of the same system.
This occurs where the identity of the group is greater than the group itself, e.g. where a company centers on a single product that gives it an identity and an ideology, and when the product fails, so does the identity and the company. Since the paradigm is a reflection of the collective group and its operative actions, understanding the processes of corporate paradigm change has become a particular interest in the literature (e.g. Gladstone &, Reynolds, 1999; Factor, 2001; Govan, 2005 ), especially under chaos. While the normal mode of a paradigm can be described as the place for its equilibrium development, it is also the relatively simple narrative mode created by epistemic imperatives, which drives stories like songs that rise and fall to the academic niche music of the spheres8.
The function of an ideology is to direct policy initiatives and orient the structures of the group that both constrain and facilitate types of behavior. As the crisis deepens, the bearers of the paradigm are subjected to the pressures of change and commit themselves to a concrete proposal for reconstruction to a new framework. Where different frameworks exist, communication fails and semantic content is lost as polarization develops (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006) and members of the different camps are constrained by the boundaries of their own paradigm.
The Nature of Paradigm Change
In this way, two types of conceptualization can be developed in the paradigm: (a) lateral, which makes it possible to identify phenomena that have not been previously known; and (b) transitive, where a higher level of theory (called a meta-theory) emerges than those previously known, which can be attached to a whole group of lower-level theories without significantly changing any. New types of structures can therefore arise spontaneously as a dominant paradigm moves from organizational chaos to greater order, and the paradigm is seen as viable. The dominant paradigm is existential only through the cultural system and patterns of knowledge that emerge through the group of people who sustain them, and the demise of a group that uniquely supports it is consistent with the demise of the paradigm itself.
The paradigm exists with a stable belief system and logical base, although during normal development the base may change its form (morphogenesis). Where there are too many distinct narratives with competing stories, the dominance of the paradigm and thus the equilibrium is lost. Fluctuation The tensions after the tropical drift that moved the paradigm away from its stable narrative position lead it to structural criticism.
This will likely be accompanied by debates about the utility of the epistemological basis for the paradigm. Bifurcations When bifurcations occur, a paradigm can take different possible paths in its pragmatic behavior. It is a relational process that develops in a paradigm with positive and negative feedback and integration as the new cognitive basis manifests itself figuratively and pragmatically.
Reflections
In type 7.0, decay represents a process of disorganization, regression, or extinction of the paradigm, ultimately leading to the possible loss of group member carriers. In type 7.1, the process of change begins with "more of the same" small changes that maintain its current state but do not solve problems. Complexification of the logical basis and modes of practice can occur during a process of iteration.
Many who subscribe to the cultural values of individualism have believed that one of the panaceas for correcting poor performance in public organization has been privatization. A number of forms of intelligence have been considered, including operative, figurative, emotional social and cultural, all of which are part of the core nature of collective agency and its information processing capacity. This also points to the possibility of anticipating the development of crises given that tell-tale signs appear, perhaps in relation to the stability of the properties.
Thus for example Guo, Yolles & Iles (2011) used a cultural model development to explore the coherence and pathology of a number of Chinese commercial banks, developing empirical mechanisms to generate statistical estimates. Manmuang (2011) undertook a study of the conflict in southern Thailand, where Islamist insurgents were practicing acts of terrorism against the local population and the military and police. By adopting a form of the paradigm cycle in Figure 4, he was able to develop detailed explanations for the changing stability and nature of conflict.
Breaking the corporate paradigm in the military: Using an innovative military approach to improve enterprise behavior within the services. Wild organizations: causes, processes and consequences of organizational misconduct", Annals Academy of Management. The Conflict Cycle with Special Reference to the Insurgency in the Three Southern Border Provinces of Thailand, Doctoral Dissertation.
Mythos and logos in Carl Jung's thought: The theory of the collective unconscious in scientific perspective. Where are the new theories of organization. http://Apps.Aomonline.Org/Calls/Cfp/Paper_Info.Asp?User_Lname=&User_Id=. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. A Unified Pen Systems Model for Explaining Organizational Change. http://epress.anu.edu.au/info_systems/mobile_devices/ch11.html.
Cognitive Integration of Social and Environmental Beliefs, Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. 3Following Hoffman (1947), in the early 18th century the corpuscular paradigm of light emerged from Newton's research, in which light was seen to consist of particles emitted in all directions from a source, could be discerned in the early 18th century. In the late 19th century, Young discovered from his experiments that light seemed to have properties exclusive to waves, for which Fresnel developed a mathematical structure, and for which Maxwell then formulated his theory.
Published in the Journal Nature as the paper 'The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory' in 1928, the paper first introduced and defined the concept of 'complementarity' and outlined the basic points of what would become known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Bohr's position was eventually supported by Heisenburg's uncertainty theory, which implied that it was fundamentally impossible to simultaneously measure the position and the momentum of a physical object with an arbitrarily high precision.
