DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

According to the quality management system (QMS) of the college of engineering, one of the tasks of the quality and development committee in the program. Follow up the course specifications periodically according to the model of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Evaluation and follow up on their upgrading. Prepare Program Specifications according to the model of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Evaluation.

Follow up on the periodic preparation of the course report and review of the annual program report according to the model of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Evaluation. Prepare the annual program report following the model of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Evaluation. Oversee the progress of the tutoring process according to the approved mechanisms in the program.

Organizing a regular meeting with the advisory coordinators to follow up on developments in the program guidance process. Periodically (every mid-semester) submit a report that includes the committee's work and levels of students to the program and faculty administration.

Community Services Committee

Alumni Committee

Measuring business owner attitudes towards program graduates, and seeking to open up the job market to graduates. Establishment of an annual day for graduates, institutions and companies to recruit for program graduates. Considering what the program management and the deanship of the College refer to the topics and handling the related matters.

E-Learning Committee

Study Plan Committee

Carry out an examination of the compatibility between the demands of the labor market and the specializations within the education. Ensure that the course specifications are accessible and that they comply with both the academic plans of the department and the standards of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Evaluation. Follow up with faculty members in the program and ensure they distribute short course specifications to students at the beginning of each semester.

To inform faculty members in the program of any updates and developments in the study plans and course specifications. To study the compatibility of the course content, teaching methods, course objectives and the expected learning outcomes and preparation of the relevant reports. List of books and references required by faculty members in the program and coordinate with the Central University Library to provide them in accordance with departmental requirements.

Keep and save all committee documentation and forward a copy to the department head and the faculty dean. Consideration of items referred to the committee by the head of department and completion of related actions.

Graduation Project Committee

Liaise with the University Dean's Office for Academic Affairs at the end of each semester to coordinate and review the latest developments regarding study plans and specifications and distribute them to faculty members in the program. Prepare studies of program requirements for laboratories and support equipment and software. Developing a general perception of the plants and their arrangement and their relationship to each other and the appropriate areas for each laboratory and the spaces required.

Ensuring that the specifications of the equipment to be supplied to the laboratories are in place prior to the completion of the procurement process. Ensuring periodic maintenance of laboratories and replacement of damaged ones especially at the end of each semester. Keeping all documents related to the committee's work and forwarding a copy of them to the head of the department and the dean of the College.

Taking into account what the Head of Department and Dean of the College refers to the subjects and the settlement of the related issues.

Scientific Research & Graduate Studies Committee

Studying the needs of laboratories for engineers, technicians and assistants necessary for the organization and processing of laboratories.

Summer Training Committee

Academic affairs Committee

Program Quality Monitoring Procedures

Quality Cycle

1-Plan

3-Monitor

4-Improve

Evaluation of Program Quality matrix

Program Key Performance Indicator

Internal and External Audit Forms

Course Identification and General Information B. Course Delivery

Resources and Facilities E. Administrative Issues

11 Question type is mandatory and optional 12 Question type is optional NA only. 14 Detailed question marks are mentioned 15 Question marks are appropriate for the type 16 The examination paper is clear and readable. 3 The questions do not suggest an answer 4 The questions are written in clear language 5 The questions measure the ability to memorize 6 The questions measure the ability to.

Notes

The auditor checks that the grades obtained by the students match the model answers for random samples of the student's exams and assignments. The auditor checks whether the marks on the exam paper match the one shown on the cover. The auditor ensures that there is an assessment method for assessing student learning outcomes.

The auditor ensures that rubrics are available to evaluate learning outcomes that are not measured by exams.

Internal reviewer report’ form

College: Engineering

Reviewer name

Email

Mobile

Telephone

Assessment

Please comment on the suitability of the activities, assessment and correction tasks to the educational objectives and outcomes, the course structure and its content, and whether the evaluation standards, the table of specifications and sample answers were prepared at the

Quality of students' work

Please comment on the perception of the quality of students' work and progress, and whether the quality of their work reflects the level of qualification, objectives and learning outcomes of the course

Consistency of assessment methods and learning outcomes

Strength points

Please indicate best practice in the course assessment and mention strengths

Weaknesses

Please identify weaknesses in the course assessment from your point of view, if any

What are the improvement proposals from your point of view?

Recommendations

Reviewer Name

Signatures

Date

A report is prepared for each course

Not mentioning the names of students or faculty members in the report

Program title: Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering College of: Engineering Jouf University

Program benchmark (Not Applicable to Engineering Course) - The program adopted the standards of the

If yes

First: Reviewing of the program specification (according to NCAAA template, 2020) : Cover

Program Identification and General Information
Mission, Goals, and Learning Outcomes Item

Program Mission
Program Goals
Relationship between Program Mission and Goals and the Mission and Goals of the Institution/College
Graduate Attributes

Curriculum
Student Admission and Support
Teaching and Administrative Staff
Learning Resources, Facilities, and Equipment
Program Management and Regulations
Program Quality Assurance

Specification Approval Data

The relationship between the mission and goals of the program and the mission and goals of the institution/college. The evaluation plan for the program's learning outcomes (PLOs), and the mechanisms of using its results in the development processes.

Requirements

Third: Reviewing of the program courses specification (according to NCAAA template, 2020)

Vare/evaluating Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Vare/evaluating Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 1.

Final opinion

The course specification was revised in the 2020 edition of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Assessment.

Cover

Course Identification

Credit hours
Course type
Level/year at which this course is offered

Course Objectives and Learning Outcomes

Course Description 2. Course Main Objective

Course Content
Teaching and Assessment

Alignment of Course Learning Outcomes with Teaching Strategies and Assessment Methods

Student Academic Counseling and Support
Learning Resources and Facilities
Course Quality Evaluation
Field Experience Identification

Level/year at which this course is offered
Dates and times allocation of field experience activities
Pre-requisites to join field experience (if any)

Learning Outcomes, and Training and Assessment Methods

Field Experience Learning Outcomes 2. Alignment of Learning Outcomes with

Field Experience Administration

Field Experience Locations
Responsibilities
Field Experience Implementation a. Supervision and Follow-up Mechanism

Training Quality Evaluation*

Alignment of Course Learning Outcomes with Teaching Strategies and Assessment Methods Teaching Strategies and Assessment Methods 2. Field Experience Course Specification reviewed in the 2019 edition of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Assessment. Course Report reviewed in the National Center for Academic Accreditation accreditation and assessment from 2020.

College

Department

Program

Academic year

Name course and code: Mandatory / elective

Course Delivery

Course Contact Hours (per semester) 2. Topics not Covered
Teaching Strategies
Recommendations

Student Results

Distribution of Grades 2. Comment on Student Results

Course Learning Outcomes

Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Results
Recommendations

Course Quality Evaluation

Students Evaluation of the Quality of the Course
Other Evaluations 3.Recommendations

Difficulties and Challenges
Course Improvement Plan

Course Improvement Actions 2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year

The Course Report was reviewed at the 2019 edition of the National Center for Academic Accreditation and Assessment.

Credit hours: Coordinator: Teaching staff

Field Experience Course Identification and General Information
Field Experience Modifications or Adaptations from Planned Field Experience Specifications
Results

Number of students starting field experience/completing
Distribution of Grades 3. Analyze special factors

Administrative Issues

Organizational or administrative difficulties encountered
Consequences of any difficulties experienced for student learning in the
Proposed process to overcome these difficulties

Evaluation of Field Experience Activity

Describe the evaluation process and list recommendations for improvement of field experience activities
Student evaluation of the field experience (Attach summary of survey results)

Planning for Improvement

Progress on actions proposed
List what other actions have been taken to improve the field experience
Action Plan for Next Semester/Year

Consequences of any difficulties encountered for student learning in the experienced for student learning in the field experience. List what other actions were taken to improve the field experience improve the field experience.

Approval Data

Program title: Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering College of: Engineering Jouf University College of: Engineering Jouf University.

General Information

Statistical Information
Program Context
Course Reports Information Summary
Program Management and Administration
Summary Program Evaluation
Program Course Evaluation

Action Plan Progress Report

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (Overall Rating: ****)
TEACHING AND LEARNING (Overall Rating: ***)
STUDENTS (Overall Rating: ****)
TEACHING STAFF (Overall Rating: ****)

Independent Evaluations
Conclusion
Actions Recommended
Attachments

Significant changes outside the institution affecting the program (if any) in the last year. Analyze completion rates, score. distributions and trends to determine priorities and recommendations for improvement. List all subjects that were planned but not taken this academic year and state the reason and what will be done if any alternative action is required.

Complete only if untaught items were of sufficient importance to require some compensatory action). Indicate for each course whether student evaluations and/or other evaluations of the quality of education have taken place. List the courses taught by this program this year and for this program that appear in other programs.

An independent opinion on the quality of the program (eg head of another similar department/program offering commentary on evidence received and conclusions reached, department/program offering commentary on evidence received and conclusions reached).