• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Incentives FOR PROCESS CONTROL

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Incentives FOR PROCESS CONTROL"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Incentives FOR PROCESS CONTROL Ojectives of a Process

Raw materials desired product

This is achieved using certain arrangement of reactors, heat exchangers, pumps, distillation columns, absorbers, evaporators, tanks,…..etc.

The arrangements must satisfy the following requirement:

1- Sefty (of people). Therefore, T, P, C (specially poisoneous or explosive components) should be within allowable range.

2- Product specification. Concentration of products must be maintained at certain level (by means of control).

3- Invironmental Regulation. Regulation requires that T, C and flow rate of certain chemical species be under some limits.

4- Operational constraint. Examples are: net positive suction head, level in the tank, flodding in distillation column, T in reactor of certain material, T and the catalysis for endothermal reactor.

5- Economics: Costs involve raw material, energy, capital and human labor.

Minimum operational cost maximum profit Can be summarized as follows:

- Suppressing the influence of external disturbance - Insuring stability of the process

- Optimization of the performance

Suppressing the influence of external disturbance :

Most common, because it is out of reach of the operator.

Proper controller mechanism makes the suitable changes on the process to cancel out the negative impact on the process.

(2)

Example

Fi, Ti

h T

F, T Fst condensate

Objectives:

1- Keep T = Td

2- Keep h = hd Changes: Fi, Ti

1- Because of process requirement. After Td and hd are reached then no need for control.

2- Because of disturbances. Control is needed all times.

Feedback Control

(3)

Feed forward meaqsur Ti and close or open the steam valve accordingly.

It does noot wait until the effect is felt by the system (it anticipate the effect)

- Insuring stability of the process Stable process

Y

Return to its initial value

t=t0 t

The process is stable or (self regulating). No need for the controller for stabilization.

(4)

Unstable process

Unstable process requires external control for stabilization.

- Optimizing the Performance of a Chemical Process Principal Objective: 1- Safety

2- Product specification

Making the operation of the plant more profitable.

Conditions which effect the operation of the plant (T, P, Concentration, F) should be changed in such away so that profit is maximum. This is done automatically by the controller and operator.

Example:

A 1 B 2 C Endothermic reaction Heat is supplied by steam B is the desired product.

Objective is to maximize the profit (Ф) over the period.

(5)

The only variable that we can change in the opartion is steam flow rate (Q) (Q effect T which effect ri which effect distribution ratio).

How Q can be changed with time to maximize Ф.

Q Qmax

Qmin

time

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The concept of control structure between the integration of bilateral manipulator, vision-based force compliance controller and the vision-based disturbance observer is

A systematic method for assessing the disturbance rejection performance of different control structures for the ALSTOM gasifier using GRDG is presented in this

greatly improved the stability and control accuracy of the Temperature Alert System. The performance of a control generally specified in terms of stability,

In conclusion, designing an adaptive controller through stability approach can ensure a stable closed loop system whereby the gradient approach does not take any consideration on

13-045, (2013); Matthias Dischinger, Bodo Knoll and Nadine Riedel, “The Role of Headquarters in Multinational Profit Shifting Strategies”, International Tax and Public

The research contributions of this study can be summarized as follows: • A comprehensive evaluation of four different sampling methods to address the imbalanced data issue in fraud

H∞ Controller design for FJR Since the required objectives of robust stability, fast and suitable tracking response and disturbance attenuation despite the limited control effort, are

Conclusions The conclusion can be summarized as follows: 1 To obtain the value of the specific wear rate in the hip joint prostheses, modifications of the femoral head holder,